François Wautier wrote:
Hi,
Duly noting the near absolute lack of interest in my previous email (Only
Devendra Singh responded indicating he had the same problem), I decided to
go and figure out things my way.
Good job. I use CDB, and don't know enough about using MySQL with
vpopmail to find
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
My squirrelmail previously can change password without any problem.
But today, when one of my user wants to change its password, there is error:
- --> server error 500. Password not changed.
What is causing this?
The version is:
vqadmin 2.3.2
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
My squirrelmail previously can change password without any problem.
But today, when one of my user wants to change its password, there is error:
- --> server error 500. Password not changed.
What is causing this?
The versio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 June 2004 03:42 pm, Patrick Donker wrote:
> Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >Hi all,
> >My squirrelmail previously can change password without any problem.
> >But today, when one of my user w
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 June 2004 03:42 pm, Patrick Donker wrote:
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
My squirrelmail previously can change password without any proble
Hi,
I am running vpopmail 5.3.30 with qmail 1.03 and qmailadmin 1.0.29
I already set the .qmailadmin-limits to a particular domain with the
setting below but I still can send email via the mail server, why?
disable_external_relay
disable_smtp
And, I had configure vpopmail with --enable-roaming-us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 June 2004 03:53 pm, Patrick Donker wrote:
The easiest way to rule that out is to undo your latest changes. If that
> is undoable for whatever reason, you should revise if there is a rights
> problem
I didn't know what happen, but when I
Rick,
> François Wautier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Duly noting the near absolute lack of interest in my previous email (Only
> > Devendra Singh responded indicating he had the same problem), I decided
> > to go and figure out things my way.
>
> Good job. I use CDB, and don't know enough about usin
Hi,
I am using Erwin Hoffmann's qmail-smtpd-auth-0.4.2.
I have noticed that once authenticated a user can use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(where server.com is a domain listed in rcpthosts) in the FROM header. Is
there any remedy.
__
Devendra Singh
IndiaM
On Monday 07 June 2004 08:08 am, Devendra Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Erwin Hoffmann's qmail-smtpd-auth-0.4.2.
>
> I have noticed that once authenticated a user can use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (where server.com is a domain listed in rcpthosts) in the FROM header.
even an unauthenticated user can
Hi,
I tried to upgrade the Vpopmail software but something is not work
correctly. We used the MySQL AUTH Module.
If I read from the UPGRADE documentation, I read:
--- Upgrading to 5.4 from 5.3.x or 5.2.x is straight forward.
We dont have enabled many-domain, so we have a problem.
By default
Jeremy:
Your answers are always very helpful. I had almost given up using mysql
backend on a master server. Now I am going to try again. I will keep posted.
Thanks again.
Kirti
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 11:36 PM
To: [EM
At 07/06/04 20:05 (), you wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2004 08:08 am, Devendra Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Erwin Hoffmann's qmail-smtpd-auth-0.4.2.
>
> I have noticed that once authenticated a user can use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (where server.com is a domain listed in rcpthosts) in the FROM header.
I have qmail + vpopmail installed in my server and i want to block a mail from
an external domain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) only for the user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How can i do this ?
TUNET
www.tunet.tn
On Monday 07 June 2004 10:17 am, Devendra Singh wrote:
>
> Sorry Jeremy,
>
> Perhaps I was unable to explain the problem properly.
>
> Suppose a Server is hosting the following domains:
>
> abc.com
> xyz.com
> test.com
>
>
ok.
> Now, the user [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been enabled for SMTP
On Monday 07 June 2004 10:13 am, Martin Leduc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to upgrade the Vpopmail software but something is not work
> correctly. We used the MySQL AUTH Module.
>
> If I read from the UPGRADE documentation, I read:
>
> --- Upgrading to 5.4 from 5.3.x or 5.2.x is straight forward.
On Monday 07 June 2004 10:37 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have qmail + vpopmail installed in my server and i want to block a mail
> from an external domain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) only for the user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> How can i do this ?
cat < `~vpopmail/bin/vuserinfo -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]/.qmail
Thank you, thats working :)
Now I need to make a pre-production test.
I would like to copy my vpopmail/domains dir and my Database to my DEVEL
server.
Did I need other files? Like in the Qmail config?
Martin
From: Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Monday 07 June 2004 11:33 am, Martin Leduc wrote:
> Thank you, thats working :)
great.
> Now I need to make a pre-production test.
ok.
> I would like to copy my vpopmail/domains dir and my Database to my DEVEL
> server.
ok.
> Did I need other files? Like in the Qmail config?
the users/ a
On Monday 07 June 2004 4:24 am, ro0ot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running vpopmail 5.3.30 with qmail 1.03 and qmailadmin 1.0.29
>
> I already set the .qmailadmin-limits to a particular domain with the
> setting below but I still can send email via the mail server, why?
>
> disable_external_relay
> disabl
On Jun 7, 2004, at 10:30 AM, Ken Jones wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2004 4:24 am, ro0ot wrote:
I am running vpopmail 5.3.30 with qmail 1.03 and qmailadmin 1.0.29
I already set the .qmailadmin-limits to a particular domain with the
setting below but I still can send email via the mail server, why?
You m
Can you tel me quickly what is the difference between enabled-many-domain=y
and =n?
it's only the one "table per domain" when "no" is enabled ?
Best Regards
Martin
From: Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Upgrading from 5.2.1
On Monday 07 June 2004 01:39 pm, Martin Leduc wrote:
> Can you tel me quickly what is the difference between enabled-many-domain=y
> and =n?
as far as I know it only affects sql (mysql only?) backends, as with
--enable-many-domains=y (default) it uses one table with all of the
information, and w
On Monday 07 June 2004 2:01 pm, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> On Monday 07 June 2004 01:39 pm, Martin Leduc wrote:
> > Can you tel me quickly what is the difference between
> > enabled-many-domain=y and =n?
>
> as far as I know it only affects sql (mysql only?) backends, as with
> --enable-many-domains=y
On Monday 07 June 2004 02:20 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
> On Monday 07 June 2004 2:01 pm, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> > On Monday 07 June 2004 01:39 pm, Martin Leduc wrote:
> > > Can you tel me quickly what is the difference between
> > > enabled-many-domain=y and =n?
> >
> > as far as I know it only affects
On Monday 07 June 2004 02:22 pm, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> > As an ex-database admin, I wrote the many-domains=no option as
> > an optimization to the database schema to save disk space.
> >
> > Consider hosting one domain with 1 million email accounts.
> > The pw_domain(64 char) field is redundant (
The unified qmail patches include a patch to verify the FROM address with
authenticated user. The patch is located at
http://night.rdslink.ro/dudu/qmail/. Check README for 2004_05_02.
Hope it helps.
Shouguan Lin
-Original Message-
From: Devendra Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: M
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2004 02:22 pm, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
As an ex-database admin, I wrote the many-domains=no option as
an optimization to the database schema to save disk space.
Consider hosting one domain with 1 million email accounts.
The pw_domain(64 char) field is redundan
On Monday 07 June 2004 03:08 pm, Rick Widmer wrote:
> Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> > On Monday 07 June 2004 02:22 pm, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> >>>As an ex-database admin, I wrote the many-domains=no option as
> >>>an optimization to the database schema to save disk space.
> >>>
> >>>Consider hosting one
On Monday 07 June 2004 3:08 pm, Rick Widmer wrote:
> Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> > On Monday 07 June 2004 02:22 pm, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> >>>As an ex-database admin, I wrote the many-domains=no option as
> >>>an optimization to the database schema to save disk space.
> >>>
> >>>Consider hosting one d
On Monday 07 June 2004 03:34 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
> > p.s. It does bring up a real question - does anyone actually use
> > separate tables for each domain anymore? It would be nice if we could
> > remove the option some day. (It causes a number of four state ifdef
> > structures that are kind of
At 07/06/04 21:27 (), you wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2004 10:17 am, Devendra Singh wrote:
>
> Sorry Jeremy,
>
> Perhaps I was unable to explain the problem properly.
>
> Suppose a Server is hosting the following domains:
>
> abc.com
> xyz.com
> test.com
>
>
ok.
> Now, the user [EMAIL PROTEC
On Jun 7, 2004, at 9:28 PM, Devendra Singh wrote:
I would like to re-frame my Subject: "SMTP Authenticated user is able
to impersonate anyone in rcpthosts".
You could re-frame it even more. Authenticated SMTP users can use any
FROM address and submit mail for any host.
Some clients may have mul
33 matches
Mail list logo
