John Simpson a écrit :
what if there happens to be a mailbox with the name "mailfilter"? (yes,
it's a rather contrived example, but you see some really weird stuff
when you run an ISP... as an example, we had one user who ran one of the
local post offices and wanted "postmaster" as his user
On Oct 25, 2006, at 8:52 AM, Jérôme MOLLIER-PIERRET wrote:
You'll find our patch below, if it can help someone ...
I'll put it in my personal patch queue for inclusion in a future release
of vpopmail, but since I don't use maildrop, I may not include it unless
others tell me it's worth add
Sorry for the off topic.
Does anyone know about good clones/substitutes of tcpserver and rblsmtpd?
I'ld like they to have a more open licensing, so developing and
deployment of new integrated features could be more easy.
Thanks,
Tonino
On 2006-10-25, at 1756, Howard Jones wrote:
I've just started using qpsmtpd to do SMTP AUTH against my vpopmail
users with vchkpw, to avoid running a patched qmail-smtpd[1]...
[1] actually, it's to avoid having to reconcile SMTP AUTH patches with
chkuser, which I already use, and couldn't live
On 2006-10-26, at 0359, Jérôme MOLLIER-PIERRET wrote:
John Simpson a écrit :
also, what if a user (i.e. the owner of one specific mailbox)
wants to create their own .mailfilter file, either directly or
using some kind of web interface which gives them a set of options
and writes a .mailfi
John Simpson wrote:
> you are aware that there are other patches out there which do the same
> thing that "chkuser" does, which do work with AUTH, TLS, and SSL, and
> which don't rely specifically on vpopmail (i.e. when you upgrade
> vpopmail you don't have to re-compile qmail)?
>
> i mention this
On 2006-10-26, at 0441, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Does anyone know about good clones/substitutes of tcpserver and
rblsmtpd?
I'ld like they to have a more open licensing, so developing and
deployment of new integrated features could be more easy.
(sorry for going even further off topic)
John Simpson wrote:
>
> you may have other reasons for wanting to stick with chkuser, but you
> should at least look at other options (if you haven't already done so.)
I haven't bothered before now, but now that's two (different?) patchsets
to try out for TLS+AUTH+chkuser+etc+etc :-) The last tim
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 12:39 -0400, John Simpson wrote:
> On 2006-10-26, at 0359, Jérôme MOLLIER-PIERRET wrote:
> > John Simpson a écrit :
> >>
> >> also, what if a user (i.e. the owner of one specific mailbox)
> >> wants to create their own .mailfilter file, either directly or
> >> using some k
John Simpson wrote:
i've heard it said that all of djb's other software is essentially
public domain, but now i'm curious and would like know for sure. has
anybody heard or seen any kind of statement from djb about this, and
if so where can i find a copy of it?
Most of his software is not publi
On 2006-10-26, at 1454, David Chaplin-Loebell wrote:
John Simpson wrote:
i've heard it said that all of djb's other software is essentially
public domain, but now i'm curious and would like know for sure.
has anybody heard or seen any kind of statement from djb about
this, and if so where
On 2006-10-26, at 1251, Rick Romero wrote:
I don't know what everyone else is doing, but my .qmail-default looks
like this:
|maildrop /home/vpopmail/domains/havokmon.com/mailfilter
| /usr/home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail
'' /usr/home/vpopmail/domains/havokmon.com/rick
And my mailfiler is essenti
John Simpson wrote:
i don't really mind either way, but i'd like to know what his policy
is, just to be sure. before you pointed out this page this i was not
aware of 2007-01-01 having any significance (other than "new years
day", obviously.)
He periodically updates those dates. I think the po
On 2006-10-26, at 1737, David Chaplin-Loebell wrote:
John Simpson wrote:
i don't really mind either way, but i'd like to know what his
policy is, just to be sure. before you pointed out this page this
i was not aware of 2007-01-01 having any significance (other than
"new years day", obvious
that's what i was thinking- at some point in the future, somebody (maybe
myself, if i ever get some free time) (yeah, right) will want to write a
web interface which gives individual mailbox owners the ability to
either edit their own .mailfilter file, or choose from a list of options
which w
15 matches
Mail list logo
