> -Original Message-
> From: Davide Giunchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:56 AM
> To: Rhett Hermer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Qmailadmin feature request
>
>
> Il 09:13, venerdì 7 febbraio 2003, Rhett Herme
Il 09:13, venerdì 7 febbraio 2003, Rhett Hermer ha scritto:
> If djb doesn't want to improve qmail with all of those patches et al, then
> what's stopping us to write new MTA based on qmail design? Is there any
> restriction that I am not aware of?
I don't think that anybody here want to write yet
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Qmailadmin feature request
> > Just out of genuine curiosity, were you actually seeing problems that
> > required each of those patches? I've been running a
> > qm
This has been an ongoing argument on the qmail list. Some 'purists' believe
that there is no need for any patch apart from QMAILQUEUE which dan has
indicated he will probably include in the next version.
While I was initially sceptical about this I can see some logic in what they
are saying. Ta
> I just use vpopmail and tcpserver here. Was that insufficient for your
> needs or does the method you describe offer something more/different? I
> have quite a few concurrent pop3 users (maybe 50-70, not 100 [yet]) and
> maybe half of that in IMAP sessions but haven't run into any problems with
> - smtp-auth-relaying: useful for big lan with some external users
> - smtp-after-pop: vpopmail feature that do this is good for small traffic
> network, but when you have 100 or more concurrent connection to the pop3
> you cannot use binary file but you must use a database.
I just use vpopmail a
> Just out of genuine curiosity, were you actually seeing problems that
> required each of those patches? I've been running a
> qmail/vpopmail/sqwebmail/qmailadmin setup for the past year now and have
> yet to actually find need for a patch.
There's a lot of needs that plain qmail doesn't suite o
> Just out of genuine curiosity, were you actually seeing problems that
> required each of those patches? I've been running a
> qmail/vpopmail/sqwebmail/qmailadmin setup for the past year now and have
> yet to actually find need for a patch.
Not problems per se, but rather features I would like t
> yes, patch upon patches... the same thing that other's qmail administrator
> has done. For this reaseon i've proposed the project described in my
> previous mail about this thread.
Exactly. I'm saying I've _got_ a master patch that does this, and none of the
patches in the master list are esot
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Qmailadmin feature request
>
>
> > > I believe you're using the wr
> qmail-0.0.0.0
> qmail-1.03-qmtpc
> qmail-bouncecontrol
> qmail-1.03-tls
> netscape-progress
> qmail-send.mimeheaders
> qmail-pop3d+vpomail
>
yes, patch upon patches... the same thing that other's qmail administrator has
done. For this reaseon i've proposed the project described in my previous
> > I believe you're using the wrong MTA if you don't like patches. :-)
> > Qmail is the "a patchy mail server" of mail servers.
> I keep hoping that will change sometime soon. :) I guess no-one has
> released a patch that everyone just can't do without though.
I've put together a monster patch
I think that is time to create a "qmail GPL project" , "qmail megapatch
project" or something similiar a big patch developed in gpl'd like
project.
The problem is that patching a qmail mail server is very common, and when you
have to apply a lot of patch to the same source you can't do it a
On Thursday 06 February 2003 11:04, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > And secondly, I don't like patches.
>
> I believe you're using the wrong MTA if you don't like patches. :-)
> Qmail is the "a patchy mail server" of mail servers.
I keep hoping that will change sometime soon. :) I guess no-one has
re
> And secondly, I don't like patches.
I believe you're using the wrong MTA if you don't like patches. :-)
Qmail is the "a patchy mail server" of mail servers.
Regards,
Andrew
> > Hey, one of my clients bought a domain which was previously held by
> > someone else. This of course meant that lots and lots of spammers were
> > sending mails to a couple addresses on that domain, and he'd like to be
> > able to mark certain explicit addresses for bouncing, while retaining t
On Thursday 06 February 2003 01:49, Ken Jones wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 February 2003 18:22, you wrote:
> It would be great if you knew of any C programmers with a few
> hours to spare. then we could hook vpopmail into qmail-smtpd
> and block the email right at the front door.
I know C, and I oc
17 matches
Mail list logo
