> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davide Giunchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:56 AM
> To: Rhett Hermer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Qmailadmin feature request
>
>
> Il 09:13, venerdý 7 febbraio 2003, Rhett Hermer ha scritto:
> > If djb doesn't want to improve qmail with all of those
> patches et al, then
> > what's stopping us to write new MTA based on qmail design?
> Is there any
> > restriction that I am not aware of?
>
> I don't think that anybody here want to write
> yet_another_mta, probably if
> somebody is unhappy with qmail it will pass to postfix.
>
> Regards.
>
> --
> Davide Giunchi.
> Membro del FoLUG (ForlÝ Linux User Group) - http://folug.linux.it
> GPG Key available on http://www.keyserver.net
> Fingerprint: 4BFF 2682 6A58 ECFE 071B  A1A4 F2A3 9EFA 6494 81FD
>
>

Not to mention there are those of us that don't want 300 patches
integrated into qmail.  Patches should be used on an as-needed basis,
not simply because they exist.  And even then, it's highly recommended
that one look for an add-on app that will supply the requested feature
instead of patching the qmail source.

Regards,

Robert Kropiewnicki


Reply via email to