> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davide Giunchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:56 AM
> To: Rhett Hermer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Qmailadmin feature request
> Il 09:13, venerdý 7 febbraio 2003, Rhett Hermer ha scritto:
> > If djb doesn't want to improve qmail with all of those
> patches et al, then
> > what's stopping us to write new MTA based on qmail design?
> Is there any
> > restriction that I am not aware of?
> I don't think that anybody here want to write
> yet_another_mta, probably if
> somebody is unhappy with qmail it will pass to postfix.
> Regards.
> --
> Davide Giunchi.
> Membro del FoLUG (ForlÝ Linux User Group) - http://folug.linux.it
> GPG Key available on http://www.keyserver.net
> Fingerprint: 4BFF 2682 6A58 ECFE 071B  A1A4 F2A3 9EFA 6494 81FD

Not to mention there are those of us that don't want 300 patches
integrated into qmail.  Patches should be used on an as-needed basis,
not simply because they exist.  And even then, it's highly recommended
that one look for an add-on app that will supply the requested feature
instead of patching the qmail source.


Robert Kropiewnicki

Reply via email to