On 2005-11-07, at 2354, Tom Collins wrote:
One problem is that some programs (including qmailadmin) actually
make use of information in the header files to conditionally
compile its code. To truly move to a dynamic lib, we need to have
any program that links to libvpopmail do so without u
>Thanks for pointing that out to me. I always love the friendly and
>helpful advice I get from maillists. I certainly appreciate the people
>who never address me in a condescending or derogatory manner. Thanks so
>much for simply correcting my misinformation instead of lowering
>yourself to becomi
Nicholas Harring wrote:
Please, please, please don't spread FUD by even implicitly blaming the
vpopmail developers for this. ;-)
I've seen *one* patch for this and, IIRC, it didn't apply cleanly to
the current version of vpopmail. I worked on it a bit, and liked the
results, but delaying pushi
>> Please, please, please don't spread FUD by even implicitly blaming the
>> vpopmail developers for this. ;-)
>>
>> I've seen *one* patch for this and, IIRC, it didn't apply cleanly to
>> the current version of vpopmail. I worked on it a bit, and liked the
>> results, but delaying pushing it int
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
At 05.54 08/11/2005, you wrote:
On Nov 7, 2005, at 8:15 AM, Nicholas Harring wrote:
Please, please, please don't spread FUD by even implicitly blaming
chkuser for this. There's no way to implement chkuser in even a vaguely
efficient manner without linking against v
At 05.54 08/11/2005, you wrote:
On Nov 7, 2005, at 8:15 AM, Nicholas Harring wrote:
Please, please, please don't spread FUD by even implicitly blaming
chkuser for this. There's no way to implement chkuser in even a vaguely
efficient manner without linking against vpopmail. Vpopmail needs to
begi
On Nov 7, 2005, at 8:15 AM, Nicholas Harring wrote:
Please, please, please don't spread FUD by even implicitly blaming
chkuser for this. There's no way to implement chkuser in even a vaguely
efficient manner without linking against vpopmail. Vpopmail needs to
begin building a shared library, then
On 2005-11-07, at 1015, Nicholas Harring wrote:
Please, please, please don't spread FUD by even implicitly blaming
chkuser for this.
i wasn't trying to cast blame anywhere, and if it sounded like i was
then i apologize.
There's no way to implement chkuser in even a vaguely
efficient manner
> of course, if libvpopmail were a shared library and you had linked
> courier-authlib to the shared library, then as long as the API hadn't
> changed you would be okay.
>
> but since it does statically link, i would say to re-compile
> everything that uses libvpopmail. note that if you're using t
On 2005-11-06, at 2143, Szeki - Inc wrote:
Question is:
I have to recompile, if I only change some function in vpopmail ? The
version remains the same, only for example, logging change from p
to v.
I really have to recompile courier-atuthlib if I change vpopmail
option
enable-sql-logging ?
10 matches
Mail list logo
