Re: [vdr] small patch for vdr.c: continue even with read-only video directory

2013-03-10 Thread fnu
and it's important for me, that vdr cannot write anything to the video directory. Since this is important for you personaly, you want to change VDR for all users, are you serious? From my personal point of view a read only video directory with an video disk recorder doesn't make much sense. But

Re: [vdr] small patch for vdr.c: continue even with read-only video directory

2013-03-10 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 09.03.2013 21:24, Peter Münster wrote: Hi Klaus, Could you please delete line 577 from vdr.c or do something similar to let vdr continue even with read-only video directory? vdr runs fine with this patch on my system, and it's important for me, that vdr cannot write anything to the video

Re: [vdr] read-only video directory

2013-03-10 Thread Udo Richter
Am 08.03.2013 19:35, schrieb Stephan Loescher: When you use the suggested solution with unionfs, then the client uses the servers setup/timers/epg/etc. because it sees them in its /video-directory. Only until the first write, after that the client will continue with its local writable copy.

[vdr] ANNOUNCE vdr-ttxtsubs 0.3.0

2013-03-10 Thread Tobi
It has been far too long since the last ttxtsubs release, so I thought it's time for a new one. A million thanks to all contributors: Ville Skyttä, Jussi Tepponen, Matti Horila, Dimitri Petrovski (Please let me know, if I missed someone here..) The changes: * Removed obsolete (unused since

[vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.40

2013-03-10 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
VDR developer version 1.7.40 is now available at ftp://ftp.tvdr.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-1.7.40.tar.bz2 A 'diff' against the previous version is available at ftp://ftp.tvdr.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-1.7.39-1.7.40.diff MD5 checksums: f59a7ac199248a870e157c66a6ffc24d vdr-1.7.40.tar.bz2

[vdr] Final call for translations for VDR version 2.0.0

2013-03-10 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
The release of VDR version 2.0.0 is imminent, but there are still several untranslated internationalized texts. This is the final call for translations for version 2.0.0. Please don't rely on the original translators to complete these files, some of them may not have time or are no longer

Re: [vdr] Final call for translations for VDR version 2.0.0

2013-03-10 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 10.03.2013 16:05, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: The release of VDR version 2.0.0 is imminent, but there are still several untranslated internationalized texts. This is the final call for translations for version 2.0.0. ... hu_HU.po: 1 I just received the missing Hungarian translation. Thanks to

Re: [vdr] Final call for translations for VDR version 2.0.0

2013-03-10 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 10.03.2013 16:05, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: The release of VDR version 2.0.0 is imminent, but there are still several untranslated internationalized texts. This is the final call for translations for version 2.0.0. ... ru_RU.po: 1 I just received the missing Russian translation. Thanks to

[vdr] Femon plugin build failed against vdr-1.7.40

2013-03-10 Thread YUP
Hi, I tried to build femon 1.7.18 against vdr 1.7.40 and got the following log: == Starting build()... g++ -g -O3 -Wall -Werror=overloaded-virtual -Wno-parentheses -fPIC -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -c -DPLUGIN_NAME_I18N='femon' -o femonosd.o

Re: [vdr] Femon plugin build failed against vdr-1.7.40

2013-03-10 Thread Lars Hanisch
Am 10.03.2013 18:01, schrieb YUP: Hi, I tried to build femon 1.7.18 against vdr 1.7.40 and got the following log: == Starting build()... g++ -g -O3 -Wall -Werror=overloaded-virtual -Wno-parentheses -fPIC -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -c

Re: [vdr] Femon plugin build failed against vdr-1.7.40

2013-03-10 Thread Gianni Jan
Hi, I solved it this way --- /home/VDR/vdr-1.7.39/PLUGINS/src/femon/femonosd.c2013-02-10 03:20:00.0 +0100 +++ /home/VDR/vdr-1.7.40/PLUGINS/src/femon/femonosd.c2013-03-10 17:01:00.754613217 +0100 @@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ offset += OSDROWHEIGHT;

Re: [vdr] Femon plugin build failed against vdr-1.7.40

2013-03-10 Thread YUP
Thanks, Gianni, it works! Regards, Yarema 2013/3/10 Gianni Jan 23jan...@gmail.com Hi, I solved it this way --- /home/VDR/vdr-1.7.39/PLUGINS/src/femon/femonosd.c2013-02-10 03:20:00.0 +0100 +++ /home/VDR/vdr-1.7.40/PLUGINS/src/femon/femonosd.c2013-03-10 17:01:00.754613217

Re: [vdr] small patch for vdr.c: continue even with read-only video directory

2013-03-10 Thread Peter Münster
On Sun, Mar 10 2013, fnu wrote: Since this is important for you personaly, you want to change VDR for all users, are you serious? Yes, where is the problem? But to change it in a global way like this is IMHO not a way to go. Did you understand my suggestion? Here again: not writable:

Re: [vdr] small patch for vdr.c: continue even with read-only video directory

2013-03-10 Thread Peter Münster
On Sun, Mar 10 2013, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: I'm afraid we're too close to releasing version 2.0.0 to make such changes now. No problem. I would just like to know, if you agree with such a patch (or something more elaborated). Besides, why don't you just use a writeable video directory and

Re: [vdr] small patch for vdr.c: continue even with read-only video directory

2013-03-10 Thread Matthias Schniedermeyer
On 10.03.2013 20:40, Peter Münster wrote: On Sun, Mar 10 2013, fnu wrote: But to change it in a global way like this is IMHO not a way to go. Did you understand my suggestion? Here again: not writable: warning, not readable: exit. Is that a problem for real-life systems? For most people

Re: [vdr] small patch for vdr.c: continue even with read-only video directory

2013-03-10 Thread Peter Münster
On Sun, Mar 10 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: Read-only CAN for e.g. happen after an error when the filesystem is mounted with error=read-only Sorry, didn't know about such a configuration option. Therefore I agree with a somewhat more elaborated solution as mentioned by fnu. Or please

Re: [vdr] small patch for vdr.c: continue even with read-only video directory

2013-03-10 Thread VDR User
not writable: warning, not readable: exit. Is that a problem for real-life systems? A lot of people, myself included, don't like VDR exiting on its' own unless it's completely unavoidable (such as a crash). I'd much rather miss some recordings but have live tv available for everyone to use