svan...@bahnhof.se wrote:
Yes, it has limitations but given the low power consumption it's still
impressive. The ION runs fine with advanced deinterlacer for 576i and
temporal for 1080i. A 9500GT can do advanced on 1080i but for me it's not
worth the extra heat and space. I have the computer on
: [vdr] HD clients for vdr
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Timothy D. Lenztl...@vorgon.com wrote:
I've had a problem with seeminly under powered video card using a 8400gs
(g98) and little by little am finding out what settings
are
needed:
# vdpau: Try to recreate progressive frames from
Some stations do 1080i others do 720p. The 1080i seem to be worse but then I
turn of deint for progressive video which should free
up some of the video card.
- Original Message -
From: Goga777 goga...@bk.ru
To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: [vdr] HD
Yes, it has limitations but given the low power consumption it's still
impressive. The ION runs fine with advanced deinterlacer for 576i and
temporal for 1080i. A 9500GT can do advanced on 1080i but for me it's not
worth the extra heat and space. I have the computer on the back of my TV.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 08:31:43AM +1000, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
In my experience, you just have to do deinterlacing in vdpau with
interlaced content, even when displaying on an interlaced display. If
you try to output interlaced material directly, you get ghosting since
the weaved frames are
the main reason why nvidia chooses to deinterlace always even if you use an
interlaced video timing is not the scaling problem you mention. This could
be eventually solved (albeit not perfectly) by scaling both fields
independently.
The main reason is: even with VDPAU there still exists no
Is it AMD (ATI) have the same problem?
Vladimir
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 13:12 +0400, Goga777 wrote:
the main reason why nvidia chooses to deinterlace always even if you
use an interlaced video timing is not the scaling problem you
mention. This could be eventually solved (albeit not
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 01:12:43PM +0400, Goga777 wrote:
is it possible to solve radically this problem with vdpau ? did you discuss
with nvidia developpers about this
issue ?
I don't know if nvidia hardware is capable of such things at all.
This issue (among others) once has been discussed
Приветствую, Vladimir
Is it AMD (ATI) have the same problem?
yes.
but for ati and intel there's solution from Thomas - see
http://www.forum.free-x.de/wbb/index.php?page=ThreadpostID=2576#post2576
http://lowbyte.de/vga-sync-fields/vga-sync-fields/
Goga
2009/8/22 Thomas Hilber v...@toh.cx:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 08:31:43AM +1000, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
In my experience, you just have to do deinterlacing in vdpau with
interlaced content, even when displaying on an interlaced display. If
you try to output interlaced material directly, you get
On 19/08/2009, Magnus Hörlin mag...@alefors.se wrote:
Hi Goga. No, it's not available in xbmc. For some reason xineliboutput has
never worked as well for HD as xbmc does.
/Magnus
So how do you set timers or lookup EPG etc in XBMC is there a plugin
on XBMC to make it appear like VDR
On 19/08/2009, Magnus Hörlin mag...@alefors.se wrote:
Well, my ION board with 9400m does temporal deinterlacing of 1080i HDTV
just fine in xbmc. The question was about the best silent solution and a
computer with just an Atom and a 9400 requires a lot less cooling than
something with a
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org] För Theunis
Potgieter
Skickat: den 20 augusti 2009 10:00
Till: VDR Mailing List
Ämne: Re: [vdr] HD clients for vdr
On 19/08/2009, Magnus Hörlin mag...@alefors.se wrote:
Well, my ION board
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org] För Theunis
Potgieter
Skickat: den 20 augusti 2009 09:28
Till: VDR Mailing List
Ämne: Re: [vdr] HD clients for vdr
On 19/08/2009, Magnus Hörlin mag...@alefors.se wrote:
Hi Goga. No, it's
2009/8/20 Magnus Hörlin mag...@alefors.se:
Yes, it has limitations but given the low power consumption it's still
impressive. The ION runs fine with advanced deinterlacer for 576i and
temporal for 1080i. A 9500GT can do advanced on 1080i but for me it's not
worth the extra heat and space. I
On 18/08/2009, Anssi Hannula anssi.hann...@gmail.com wrote:
Magnus Hörlin wrote:
Hi. My opinion is that nvidia's ION platform with vdpau and XBMC gives the
best result. The atom's cpu load is 10% playing 1080p h264 so forget the
3GHz core2 unless you want to play Flash HD movies or
2009/8/19 Theunis Potgieter theunis.potgie...@gmail.com:
On 18/08/2009, Anssi Hannula anssi.hann...@gmail.com wrote:
Magnus Hörlin wrote:
Hi. My opinion is that nvidia's ION platform with vdpau and XBMC gives
the best result. The atom's cpu load is 10% playing 1080p h264 so forget
the
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org] För Theunis
Potgieter
Skickat: den 19 augusti 2009 09:52
Till: VDR Mailing List
Ämne: Re: [vdr] HD clients for vdr
On 18/08/2009, Anssi Hannula anssi.hann...@gmail.com wrote:
Magnus Hörlin
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Torgeir Veimotorg...@pobox.com wrote:
Ideally you would like to have the 9400/9500 type GPU that can do both
h264 and VC1.
Initially you might think you do, since you'd like to playback bluray
material in the future. But in fact, most of the time you'd be
Well, my ION board with 9400m does temporal deinterlacing of 1080i HDTV
just fine in xbmc.
did you try the temporal_spatial with 1080i ?
Goga
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Goga777 wrote:
Well, my ION board with 9400m does temporal deinterlacing of 1080i HDTV
just fine in xbmc.
did you try the temporal_spatial with 1080i ?
Goga
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
Well, my ION board with 9400m does temporal deinterlacing of 1080i HDTV
just fine in xbmc.
did you try the temporal_spatial with 1080i ?
Hi Goga. No, it's not available in xbmc.
do you know - why so limited ?
For some reason xineliboutput
has never worked as well for
2009/8/20 VDR User user@gmail.com:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Torgeir Veimotorg...@pobox.com wrote:
For a more thorough answer, have a look at the mythtv mailing lists.
That's all and well but you should be slapped for that last sentence.
Ah, yes :), here's a couple of non mythtv
I recently saw the popcornhour and the HD demo on the popcorn wasn't
what I expected. It felt like the early adopters of the first DVD
players that came out. It was more jittery than a Blu-Ray disk on a
PS3. So now I am wondering, what is the best silent/cheap client out
there? That actually does
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org] För Theunis
Potgieter
Skickat: den 18 augusti 2009 15:00
Till: VDR Mailing List
Ämne: [vdr] HD clients for vdr
I recently saw the popcornhour and the HD demo on the popcorn wasn't
what I
Magnus Hörlin wrote:
Hi. My opinion is that nvidia's ION platform with vdpau and XBMC gives the
best result. The atom's cpu load is 10% playing 1080p h264 so forget the
3GHz core2 unless you want to play Flash HD movies or other non-vdpau formats.
Isn't Flash HD content usually encoded in
Anssi Hannula wrote:
Magnus Hörlin wrote:
Hi. My opinion is that nvidia's ION platform with vdpau and XBMC gives the best
result. The atom's cpu load is 10% playing 1080p h264 so forget the 3GHz core2
unless you want to play Flash HD movies or other non-vdpau formats.
Isn't Flash HD content
27 matches
Mail list logo
