On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> You have missed something indeed. Don't assume poor implementation
> without checking the facts or even read all of them. There are different
> type of users, usages, requirements out there then you might think. This
> is going from 300Mhz
On 21.04.2009 21:27, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> So better suggestion for the distri maintainers would be to use the \mnt
>> tree for mounting any partitions.
>
> I disagree, /mnt is system admin area, not something distros should touch.
> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#MNTMOUNTPOINTFORATE
Ville Skyttä schrieb:
> On Tuesday 21 April 2009, Peter Dittmann wrote:
>
>
>> So better suggestion for the distri maintainers would be to use the \mnt
>> tree for mounting any partitions.
>>
>
> I disagree, /mnt is system admin area, not something distros should touch.
> http://www.pathna
On Tuesday 21 April 2009, Peter Dittmann wrote:
> So better suggestion for the distri maintainers would be to use the \mnt
> tree for mounting any partitions.
I disagree, /mnt is system admin area, not something distros should touch.
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#MNTMOUNTPOINTFORA
VDR User schrieb:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Steffen Barszus wrote:
>
>> the content therein is pretty vdr specific. So the suggested (and
>> sensible) recommendations are in fact not that obvious. This also shows
>> that there is a solution/recommendation to create some .do_not_touch
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> the content therein is pretty vdr specific. So the suggested (and
> sensible) recommendations are in fact not that obvious. This also shows
> that there is a solution/recommendation to create some .do_not_touch
> files in possible empty di
Peter Dittmann schrieb:
>> I can't see any evidence for this symlinks, and I don't know a reason
>> for this.
>> The vdr gets told via the option '-v /var/lib/video.00' where the
>> video dir is located.
>>
>
> But you see what I'm pointing to.
> The distries are usually mounting the partiti
> Quoting Peter Dittmann :
> > E.g. ctvdr/debian uses (I think ...) /var/vdr/videoX directly to mount
the
> > partition.
>
> The directories are named /var/lib/video.XX and this are not necessary
> partitions, but could be of course.
>
> > Strange as it finally uses symlinks to create the /vide
Quoting Peter Dittmann :
> E.g. ctvdr/debian uses (I think ...) /var/vdr/videoX directly to mount the
> partition.
The directories are named /var/lib/video.XX and this are not necessary
partitions, but could be of course.
> Strange as it finally uses symlinks to create the /videoX. So change wo
> On 20.04.2009 10:56, Peter Dittmann wrote:
> > A simple use case:
> > * standalone settop box with VDR and DVD recording capability
> > * OS gets a seperate small partition
> > * /videoX get the big rest
>
> To add some more variations to the same solution the others already
> mentioned:
>
> -
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Udo Richter wrote:
> To add some more variations to the same solution the others already
> mentioned:
>
> - Mount your big disk to /mnt/data
> - Put video to /mnt/data/video
> - either:
> - pass /mnt/data/video directly to VDR
> - put a symlink from /video to
On 20.04.2009 10:56, Peter Dittmann wrote:
> A simple use case:
> * standalone settop box with VDR and DVD recording capability
> * OS gets a seperate small partition
> * /videoX get the big rest
To add some more variations to the same solution the others already
mentioned:
- Mount your big disk
On Montag, 20. April 2009, Peter Dittmann wrote:
> vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org schrieb am 15.04.2009 08:41:02:
> > > vdr is not deleting files it does not know. Its only deleting empty
> > > directories in its video directories.
> >
> > From the VDR/INSTALL file:
> >
> > Note that you should not copy
On 04/20/09 10:56, Peter Dittmann wrote:
> vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org schrieb am 15.04.2009 08:41:02:
>
>>> vdr is not deleting files it does not know. Its only deleting empty
>>> directories in its video directories.
>> From the VDR/INSTALL file:
>>
>> Note that you should not copy any non-VDR fi
vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org schrieb am 15.04.2009 08:41:02:
> > vdr is not deleting files it does not know. Its only deleting empty
> > directories in its video directories.
>
> From the VDR/INSTALL file:
>
> Note that you should not copy any non-VDR files into the /videoX
> directories,
> sin
Matthias Schwarzott schrieb:
> I thought bind mount does work on even older kernels, still shouldn't
> a symlink work too?
Need to re-check - guess i mix something here. Some bind mount features
only start working properly at 2.6.26+ (bind mount ro, move etc). Bind
mounting readonly some directo
On Mittwoch, 15. April 2009, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> Matthias Schwarzott schrieb:
> > On Montag, 13. April 2009, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> >> Hi all!
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> >> is there any way to let vdr ignore any directories which do not belong
> >> to it ?
> >>
> >> What i have seen is that vdr is re
On 04/15/09 08:57, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> Klaus Schmidinger schrieb:
>> On 15.04.2009 08:24, Steffen Barszus wrote:
>>
>>> ...On the other hand i think what vdr does is a bad idea
>>> and unnecessary. period.
>>>
Still I support the opinion that vdr should not silently delete files i
Klaus Schmidinger schrieb:
> On 15.04.2009 08:24, Steffen Barszus wrote:
>
>> ...On the other hand i think what vdr does is a bad idea
>> and unnecessary. period.
>>
>>> Still I support the opinion that vdr should not silently delete files it
>>> does
>>> not know.
>>>
>>>
>> vd
On 15.04.2009 08:24, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> ...On the other hand i think what vdr does is a bad idea
> and unnecessary. period.
>> Still I support the opinion that vdr should not silently delete files it
>> does
>> not know.
>>
>
> vdr is not deleting files it does not know. Its only deleti
20 matches
Mail list logo
