On 1/27/07, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im not sure Id agree that a sense of victimization or righteous anger
are the primary driving forces behind such things, but they are in the
mix somewhere when it comes to reactions of music etc industry.
When somebody makes the argument that
On 1/28/07, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the reasonable
person can find a fair course through the complex. I think we're
doing that -- as Roxanne suggests -- by having these discussions
here.
So here's the fair course that I see -- there should be clear and
unambiguous agreements
http://blip.tv/file/139457/
...let's continue this conversation with moving pictures.
On 1/28/07, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there is a big difference from playing a ditty at a wedding
and selling CDs by the truckload. They are not like at all. Of course
they were wrong to argue that.
Under the law there is no difference between playing a ditty
at a wedding and selling
On 1/28/07, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see how we're asking for expansive rights by not allowing
corporations to take our work in its entirety, display it and profit
from it with no attribution or direct linkage. I don't see how
seeking permission and or compensation for usage
On 1/27/07, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even accepting reality for what it is, however, there are
many good reasons to continue to push for our rights as creators to
be sacrosanct.
The problem is that videobloggers are going down the same hopelessly
unrealistic and ultimately disastrous
Hey folks,
I have this idea to make a mashup with this YouTube video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=901D-ZyP9Nk
My idea is to play along on guitar, shoot video of myself playing
along, and then make a composite video with the original next to the
new thing. The camera would be the little
Hey Markus --
On 1/26/07, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi lucas
there are firefox plugins that will grab the flv easily
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/2390/
i just tried using iSquint
Ok, so let's say I get the FLV. I think that I'd need to convert it
to Quicktime to be able
On 1/26/07, Philip Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are two websites that come in handy if you want to mashup
videos from YouTube ~
[snip]
On 1/26/07, John Cardenas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or just simply...after you have watched the video in youtube...right click
the internet
Wow! That's a fascinating decision, Peter. Much respect to you --
it's typical of your understated and serious way of doing things.
-Lucas
On 1/4/07, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Referer header is unreliable.
Faking the Referer header *would* be a cause worth litigating, but
they're not doing that.
On 1/4/07, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's correct. The problem is that we do want to be picky. We want to
allow people to use VPIP to play back videos hosted on blip, but we
don't want to allow them to use the MyHeavy player on MyHeavy.com
(unless it's the content creator
On 1/4/07, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to mention that Referer and User Agent headers are arbitrary and it
would be less than trivial for a myheavy.com site to identify itself as
blip.tv or vPIP respectively. If it wanted to.
But then it would be doing fraud or
On 1/3/07, sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maybe someone linked to your feed in the forums for testing xspf/rss
playlists.
For what it's worth, I object to the phrase xspf/rss playlists. RSS
is a feed, XSPF is a playlist. They have different strengths,
weaknesses, architectures, and, most of
On 1/3/07, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been thinking about redirecting all requests for blip videos from
myheavy to a video about blip. If the problem isn't fixed tomorrow we will do
just that.
My impression from Ryanne's comment that they're superimposing their
logo is that
On 1/3/07, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i sent a message from their site contact form and selected business
inquiry as the category
got a quick reply back (surprise!)
as usual, they expect me to identify the vids
i asked them to remove any vid that was in their database and on my
Their service is a Flash app which plays an arbitrary FLV file on any server.
For example I can patch this URL of theirs for viewing Steve Garfield
stuff on blip:
On 1/3/07, J. Rhett Aultman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah? That's not going to help me. They scraped me from Google Video.
Then ask Google Video to do the same, and don't use them if that is
something you need.
On 1/3/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im using this great article from wethemedia during the Veoh incident:
http://wearethemedia.com/2006/04/08/whats-going-on-with-veoh/
There is, incidentally, a protocol for Web-based aggregation of video
content.
Here are two other protocols for
this not happen. Or to put on notice for a suit. The person
whose material is being violated should not be considered guilty.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Their service is a Flash app which plays an arbitrary FLV file on
any server
On 1/3/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is a link being fetched on the client side, not a copy on the
server side, so it's not a copyright issue.
The videos MyHeavy.com transcoded from blip.tv on their site
On 1/3/07, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not sure i get you lucas.
i asked them to license or take down
seems like a reasonable request to me
no DMCA needed yet
i just sent a polite request
we'll see what they do
somehow i doubt they will want to license my vids for commercial use
On 1/3/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is a link being fetched on the client side, not a copy on the
server side, so it's not a copyright issue.
I see what you mean. They're pulling to the FLV file from
On 1/3/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, yes they are references my flv video on blip.tv. But do they have
a right to play the media through their flash player when the
copyright prohibits commercial performance of it?
Internet Explorer is clearly commercial. Does it have a right to
On 1/3/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A custom flash player
written by online video company MyHeavy.com that overlays their logo,
display ads on top prior to rolling and such is clearly different to
any observer and the consumer from a browser.
Not to the web it isn't. Flash is just
Right. Which means you concede that it makes no difference whether
their Flash FLV player is commercial.
On 1/3/07, rudy.jahchan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is a retarded question. Possibly the stupidest I have heard.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 1/3/07, rudy.jahchan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its not the linking or the copying that is the issue, Lucas. It is the
fact that they are really profitting from it, and without any
consultation on our parts.
You can address that with a rewrite rule. Just use copyright to force
third parties
On 5/11/06, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
more ...
unfortunately, upon testing with win2k/ie6, the object's onclick did
*not* fire
microsoft's doc says it should handle the onclick with object and so i
wonder if the flash movie is consuming the event in this caseInteresting!
On 5/12/06, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting! It is is the flash movie, then a WMP embed/object should let
the onclick pass through.
I tried this out in both IE 6 and FF, but no luck:
object classid="">
id=EXAMPLE_OBJECT_ID height=286 width=320 >
captured i
So, not to wander or digress or anything, I swear, but what's the
chance an onclick on an html object/embed element will work?
SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant
Individual
Note XSPF support, meaning that a lot more can be done with video playlists.
SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant
Individual
Use
On 5/8/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking we'd have to wait for SMIL support (for video playlist support)... but XSPF is a much quicker route. (And probably easier for more people to understand.)
Another thing for video playlist support is
On 4/10/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, should their be an opposing rel=no_enclosure so services like feedburner
and blog engines etc can easily skip that media excluding it from the RSS
channel?
In my own scraper, if I find any rel=enclosure then I assume that all
enclosures
Kudos go to Marcus Sandy and Zadi Diaz.On 4/10/06, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Chuck Silverman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]just a quick thank you to you and your two friends at the Grove Apple
Store. I don't the names of the two who did most of the explaining.
when you talk with them
On 2/11/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quotes are nice (i certainly like
media in smaller chunks), but actually making the quotes requires a
high level of investment for the user
The situation where it's too much work for the average user to do
something is a pretty common pattern
Given that I just moved to the fine city of Los Angeles, I'm wondering
about local events for audio/video hackers. Anybody know of such a
meetup? If not, anybody interested in an evening at Barney's Beanery?
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
I use Godaddy for domains but not for hosting. I use them for domains because they're not jerks and the prices and features are fine. I've had them for a couple years now, and my long term experience has been good. For hosting something about them doesn't turn me on, though that's just a vibe
You can check it using http://www.smoothouse.com/podcast/validator.php
or http://feedvalidator.org
On 12/29/05, Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I made it to iTunes specs but it doesn't work. Here is the code:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
rss
I summarized this conversation and contacted Carr for a comment:
http://gonze.com/weblog/story/12-20-5
His response:
wrote imprecisely and you are right to call me on it. I should
have clearly stated that there is abundant free programming to be
had -- much of it glorious -- but that if I
On 12/2/05, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont know if anyone has been following this story, but now it's a
top ranked story on Technorati search:
http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench/news/2818
This is an entry in Dave Winer's project to be considered the creator
of
On 12/1/05, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yup, I just experienced this on this web site: http://www.bravia-advert.com/commercial/braviaextcommhigh.html
That page works for me with FF 1.5 and QT 7.3.Are you using the same version of Quicktime?
SPONSORED LINKS
Software conflicts of this kind are inevitable from time to time.
What isn't inevitable is that there should only be one piece of
software (Quicktime) capable of rendering your videoblog.
The workaround for now is to post vlogs in more than one format, which
is a good idea anyway.
There are three issues --
That Peaches number is definitely unauthorized.
The sexual content is going to piss some people off.
Barbie is a fiercely protected trademark.
The Peaches issue is a good enough reason to bounce it, add in the
other two issues and it's an obvious choice.
On 11/28/05, jonny goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for a free FTP program for Win XP for my students to
upload their vids to a server. Thanks for any help!
Filezilla is great: http://filezilla.sourceforge.net/
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
On 11/26/05, chrlshogan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blogdigger came to the rescue with a site search that we're still
optimizing to ensure that all the content on Ourmedia is properly
indexed. We're still working on that with the Blogdigger team, as well
as planning to roll out enhanced search
On 11/26/05, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On mefeedia directory, for several months you see the same vlogs first and
that is not likely to change since, afterall, they always appear first which
increases exposure every time.
I spent almost a year beating this problem in the Webjay
On 11/26/05, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are wrong!!! See my next post about hidden diamonds. Did you see them
before?? NO!!!
All my work over the past few years has been under the same
assumptions as Deirdre has, and so far this has gone fine. The only
problem I face is
On 11/23/05, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think we may be comparing apples and oranges
it's not really the video vs. text
the distinction if really between the 'visual' and the 'abstract'.
how the information is delivered does not seem change that
There's some word from
On 11/23/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably not what you're thinking of since it's not linguistics, but
semiotics talk about three types of signs: icon, index and symbol. Written
language belonging to the last group (arbitrary signs given value by
convention).
On 11/21/05, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then there is the role of text in this affair. I think that after
nearly a year of farting around and not achieving anything, I might
finally decide what project to dedicate myself to, and that will be
more video-based communication systems.
On 11/22/05, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i keep thinking of my (unborn)kids who will go online and SEE and HEAR
the world through their computers. Its a real sharing of
consciousness.
Seeing and hearing is a lot closer to the way we think about things.
It's easier to absorb what
On 11/22/05, daniel liss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a brief response:
http://pouringdown.blogspot.com/2005/11/war-on-text-brief-response.html
If anybody does more vlogs, audioblogs, photoblogs, doodleblogs, etc
on this send me a pointer and I'll include it at
On 11/16/05, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you see Ronen's new videoblog?
http://cinemalog.net/tags/video/cinemalog/
he does a good job embedding the videos in the page. i usually dont like it.
Amen. That's a really nice job.
I'm surprised that I like it so much -- the normal approach
On 11/8/05, Michael Shipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Flash gets mentioned because the penetration rate is somewhere around
97% of all web browsers. Most likely, any web-based aggregators will go
with Flash for video.
On the other hand, Java's penatration rate within browsers is unknown
and
On 11/4/05, Ted Tagami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If a site relies on traffic to it's pages for revenue, then this could be shown to be criminal.
They also have it backwards. We should not have to opt out of their
aggregation, but rather opt in to it. I don't like it either. Their
opt-out
On 11/4/05, Lynn Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice that blogtelevision.net is taking all of the videos that I
put up and placing them on their site.
Are you under the impression that they're making copies, Lynn?
These guys are about the same as the old i638 (or whatever they were)
people,
its house in order on this.
here's what happens in Win Xp with Firefox:
application/xml+rss: ok, iTunes opens up.
application/xml: FF shows XML file
no special header: FF shows it as an html page.
What should I do?
Peter
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED
:15 +0100, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 10/30/05, petertheman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Lucas!
But if I don't use that application/xml+rss, it doesn't work.
Curious and curiouser. It works for me with application/octets as
long as the extension is .pcast. WTF
On 10/30/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clarification... not sure what the mime-type is supposed to be for .pcast
files.
But, for RSS, its as stated below.
-Josh
On 10/30/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to use application/rss+xml
not
On 10/26/05, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wondered if the problem was just me ... because if its not just me,
other folks who have a one-click button on their site may be using a system
that doesnt work for lots of people.
Apple blew off the one-click spec for RSS w/
Question for video gurus -- is there any way to get video into Flash
without packaging it up as either a FLV file or embedding it within an
SWF file? What I'm wondering is whether it's possible to have Flash
launch a movie in some other, more generic/ open format.
thanks in advance.
- Lucas
On 10/24/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's documentation from Macromedia... you may have already seen this:
http://www.macromedia.com/support/flash/images_video/flash_video/
http://www.macromedia.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=tn_14041
Question: what's the
Are there still podcatchers which don't handle redirects? That seems insane.
On 10/18/05, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, for those of you who use wordpress and want to use it's automatic
enclosure feature, but have found you cannot because your hosting service
issues a redirect to
On 10/8/05, B Yen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose I use archive.org to upload a digitzed video of something off
a major network. Is this allowable under Fair Use Doctrine?
There isn't enough information here to say yes or no. As a general
rule, being kind to archive.org by not getting them
On 10/7/05, Justin Chapweske [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any advantage between ASX and WPL? I noticed that WPL seems to
be a SMIL format...
They're really different, not necessarily better or worse.
WPL is parseable XML. ASX has a bunch of peculiarities which will
defeat XML parsers.
On 10/7/05, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we just need a XSPF video player!! :-)
maybe videolan+xspf
The videolan people are on the ball, and with XSPF a sister project to
ogg I think they'll be predisposed to do it. If you or somebody
happened to file a feature request with
On 10/5/05, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah, i could do that very easily...
but are you saying their is now a xspf video player??
Yahoo Media Engine and Winamp with the Plext XSPF plugin will both do video.
Also, we can easily transform XSPF into proprietary formats like
On 10/6/05, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what up, Lucas.
yo gangsta.
I cant find the winamp plugin. got a link?
Cleverly hidden:
http://plext.blogspot.com/
Packaging and chrome could use a wee bit of modernization but the code
works great.
the yahoo thing... i might download
On 10/3/05, Adrian Miles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in QT you can:
1. add a href parameter to the embed tag inside embed just include
href=url of video or page target=myself (to load video in same
location - if targetting a page target=_blank,
target=quicktimeplayer loads what href points to
Has anybody pushed the limits of Quicktime files in iTunes? I know
that simple movies will open, but I'm wondering how much scripting is
likely to work.
Thanks in advance.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click
One thing -- Epitonic is not necessarily podsafe. They work out deals
with labels on a one-to-one basis where epitonic.com is the only host
permitted. It's very likely that a label which does a deal with
Epitonic is happy to have a similar deal with vloggers, but that's the
extent of it, so
Can you point me to the enclosure code, Pete? It's pretty
straightforward to implement recursion as long as the PHP architecture
is reentrant.
You're a Wordpress demon, right? If you're hesitant to do it
yourself, that's a flag that it's not so easy...
On 8/1/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL
I love this list just as it is. The flames and chaos just contribute
to the cookin' flavor, and the theory, art, and socializing make for
an incredibly creative community.
SPONSORED LINKS
Individual
On 7/22/05, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And a possible 8th: Vlogger-reviews: People post commentary about the
vlogs they're watching, or reviews of vlogs, just as long as it
doesn't become a critique group or a recurring OMG, Verdi is teh
bestest!!! (i.e., re-reviewing the
On 7/22/05, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if
nothing else what a great video Mel made that resulted from all the
commotion ... I strongly recommend it, if you haven't seen it ... it's
a classic ...
http://melslife.org/archives/2005/07/20/dr-phil-can-you-please-help/
.. this video,
On 7/22/05, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: good points
Eric Rice has posted an interesting video related to this
http://blog.ericrice.com/blog/_archives/2005/7/21/1060030.html
i think he's also speaking to all of us quite clearly
Watching this, I was conscious of how much Eric's
On 7/22/05, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you have energetic outgoing passionate Jonny O telling you of some off
the wall rhetoric conspriacy theory bullshit he will be held up and feet
kissed.
Hm. Good point. Steve Garfield's stuff jumps out of the monitor in a
way that
77 matches
Mail list logo
