Yes youtube now has some auto-adaption so long as people use the right code to
embed youtube videos.
Cheers
Steve
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joly MacFie j...@... wrote:
It uses iframe to do the html5, like this plug in.. but doesn't youtube also
auto-adapt to client?
Michael Sullivan wrote:
this is all repairable. but in order to succeed, it has to be done without
the noise of monetization and ideally without the dependency on a company's
product that directly requires monetization in order to sustain. for
example, i added a comment to Clintus' post and
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog.tv wrote:
Thanks for taking the time to reply, Dave.
I won't ask you to wade back through my overlong posts - I was
obviously unclear, since you're arguing with points I wasn't making.
I was talking about a specific *type* of
I think the technological focus was often far too much on the making and
publishing and not enough on the watching and caring and finding.
That's not to criticise anyone's focus particularly - it was important
to work on the production side of it. But when there were tens of
videobloggers it
Hello Phillip,
my experience is that blog site are text based and don't handle video
well; video storage sites don't handle discussions and social networking
very well.
* * *
Many people use a combination of both...
vimeo is $60 a year for pro accounts... store as much as you want.
many free blogs
I also experimented, using Blogger, with channel networks and show players
http://videoactiv.blogspot.com/
while making much use of Vodpod.
The point being that you can bend Blogger templates by hacking them every
which way.
But as to what constitutes the best design for a videoblog -- I
thanks for all your input folks.
since our summer youth group is pretty small, only 4 students or fellows, i'm
going to buy just one pkt cam to experiment with (we already have a sturdy sony
pd150, still working fine in the sd).
looks like i'm going to go with the zi8 but given that many
I have a JVC Hard Drive Camcorder and you can reformat. It is in the menu
system. I have to dig my camcorder to confirm out but if I recall correctly:
you select the reformat option,
a menu comes up asking are you sure,
you select yes
and it will do the deed for you.
It may not solve the
See you guys at 6pm tonight at the Bushwick Starr.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Adam Quirk qu...@wreckandsalvage.comwrote:
There's a Facebook page for Vloggercue if anyone is interested in that sort
of thing:
http://www.facebook.com/#!/event.php?eid=117946824885160
Trying to get a rough
I can;t post here except with safari, 3 other browsers nothing but problems on
this thing
OK, I will try the medium for tubemogul, I tried large, that was too big,
then did 2 medium which I haven't tried yet to upload, as Ryan went even
smaller, if I remember correctly, so was waiting
Have fun. Very sad not to be there. When it was announced, I planned
to save money and buy a ticket. But it was my parent's 50th wedding
anniversary party today anyway, so I couldn't make it regardless of
parlous finances and carbon guilt. Send my love to everyone. Post
vids like it's
What Rupert said!
Bummed that I couldn't make it, but many of you know why. I'll be around for
the next one, hopefully!
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog.tv wrote:
Have fun. Very sad not to be there. When it was announced, I planned
to save money and buy a
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 7:03 AM, cheryl.ben...@ymail.com
cheryl.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
can you send me the link pls mike, I am searching on ebay and can't find it,
it may be gone already, I would prefer the HD 2020 ($700 plus tax of course
and way out of my range but would love to have it
I was a PC guy a few years ago and bought a Mac Mini to get into Apple and
video production.
There's no looking back.
Although I have an iMac now, the Mac Mini did me proud.
iMovie (free with OS X) can work for your basic videos, but Final Cut Pro (or
Express) is the real powerhouse.
Ratbag
can you send me the link pls mike, I am searching on ebay and can't find it, it
may be gone already, I would prefer the HD 2020 ($700 plus tax of course and
way out of my range but would love to have it if light enough), but was looking
at the HD 1010, which is still expensive for$550, that
can you send me the link pls mike, I am searching on ebay and can't find it, it
may be gone already, I would prefer the HD 2020 ($700 plus tax of course and
way out of my range but would love to have it if light enough), but was looking
at the HD 1010, which is still expensive for$550, that
can you send me the link pls mike, I am searching on ebay and can't find it, it
may be gone already, I would prefer the HD 2020 ($700 plus tax of course and
way out of my range but would love to have it if light enough), but was looking
at the HD 1010, which is still expensive for$550, that
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, mgmoon mgm...@... wrote:
Ratbag ... once you go Mac, you'll never go back.
That's what i was afraid of...
Hmmm, wonder what happened to my post I made yesterday? Anyhow... here's the
info.
Anyhow --- HD1010 new on eBay for $262 from a Canadian Photo Store.
Today, Dell.ca has the Kodak ZX3 (Sportplay) for $129 Candadian and includes
4gb card and case.
If you need links, send me a msg.
Mike
p.s.
Hi Mike,
Thanx for the input. Decided to go with the CG10 from amazon at a good
price. Based final decision after viewing many vids at youtube. Convincing.
Glad you got your domain name.
Tom Dolan
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:47 PM, mgmoon mgm...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hmmm, wonder what happened to
I can't resist a virtual shopping expedition for camcorders. So if I understand
the needs and the budget these are some of the candidates. At this price point
2 out of 3 ain't bad or you can't always get what you want at under $130. This
is what I found:
At TigerDirect:
Creative Vado 2nd
Have you looked at http://posterous.com? According to the web site:
We will transcode your video so that you can see it in a flash player right
there in your browser. It will even play on an iPhone without flash.
We take almost all video files you can think of, and we'll host the file too,
so
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Jones david.jo...@...
wrote:
...
If you host your videos on Youtube (and probably others) then there is
no penalty for moving to HD, you won't lose anyone.
Youtube default to displaying the low res 360p version of the video
for everyone. So it's HD
Don't think about it, do it. I'm constantly looking for accessible resources I
can share with people.
The technology is changing faster than I anticipated. There is going to be a
split between web based produced video and mobile produced video because of the
iMovie for iPhone4.
There will
JD Lasica: ...these articles may be of interest...
Nice call, JD, thanks!
Although perhaps I should point out (just so all remain on the same page)
the issues discussed in this thread were specific to the Graber matter, as
shooting on public lands pose other elements as well.
Maybe in the
Hi Dave,
Thanks for sharing your story.
I wrote a book that has step by step guides in it on shoting, lighting, sound ,
editing, hosting, live video, etc.
Get Seen
http://stevegarfield.com/getseen
It's also got a lot of interviews in it with details like yours on how
successful people are
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Marguerita
marguerita.mcma...@gmail.com wrote:
On thing that has held me back a bit has been my fear of losing my dial-up
viewers, esp. if I make HD vids, but I just checked my analytics and see that
only 4% of my viewers come at my blog on dial-up. Last time
Coming to this late, but these articles may be of interest:
The rules around capturing public performances
http://www.socialbrite.org/2009/08/16/the-rules-around-capturing-public-performances/
What is off-limits to a documentary filmmaker?
Great story David. Thanks for sharing.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Jones david.jo...@... wrote:
Ok, I'll lead by example as I normally do, here is my video blogging story:
Hi, I'm Dave Jones from Sydney Australia. I started a niche
electronics engineering video blog in April
The Sprint HTC Evo looks like it's also 720p, two camera, and duel flash too.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-20004833-94.html
Any word on a Verizon competitor in the vlogphone category this summer?
I know I may sound old, but the pace of smart phone innovation is staggeringly
fast right now
You're welcome :)
I hope it encourages other people to share their story.
I'm actually thinking about doing a whole series of video blog
tutorials and how to get started, what are the best low cost tools to
use, how to get audio and lighting right, editing, posting etc. As
there doesn't really
Hi Dave,
I just don't have the words to thank you enough for this post!
I am just starting out (well, 18 months into using video) and still desperately
trying to figure things out and learn.
Your details and timeline are great! I am just now thinking about a better
camera and better sound
Gena: You certainly do not want police officers interpreting their own
understanding of the law.
Which is precisely why I brought this to the groups' attention, considering
our collective interest (video, often shot in public places). When folks are
aware of their prevailing rights, there is
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Mark Villaseñor
videoblogyahoogr...@tailtrex.tv wrote:
Gena: You certainly do not want police officers interpreting their own
understanding of the law.
Which is precisely why I brought this to the groups' attention, considering
our collective interest (video,
I didn't see this thread before I posed mine...
Couldn't one use a blue tooth headset as a wireless lapel mic for interviews???
I notice the iPhone 4 also has two mics, i wonder if that will help audio
capture for the video?
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert Howe rup...@... wrote:
Thanks for the insights and feedback, everyone!
jd lasica
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, C Hastings chris3...@... wrote:
Avid is also working a cloud based tool. They talked it up @ NAB and recently
did a demo at a LA Editors lounge. see link:
This is not unexpected when you consider the number of times citizen have
recorded police officers using excessive force. Those same videos that will
wind up on YouTube to dispute the official findings.
It depends on the local laws and where you are doing at the moment.
If this is correct for
not sure why a conversation between an officer of the state and a citizen
would be deemed private. But hey, I'm on the other side of the planet
an appropriate closing
Adrian Miles
School of Media and Communication
Program Director B.Comm Honours
vogmae.net.au
On 9 June 2010 13:50, compumavengal
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, pageflex2001 innom...@... wrote:
As time goes by, more and more I realize that coming up with the idea first
isn't as important as executing it when the time is right.
They say being one step ahead of the curve you are a genius, being two steps
ahead
Great discussion. I've been asked to present at the Orange County Multimedia
Web Video SIG next week on this subject and this post has been an invaluable
resource. Thanks to everyone for sharing links and opinions.
Its interesting and exciting to see progress made with these tools, but I still
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:31 PM, adammerc...@att.net adammerc...@att.net wrote:
Lets face it, without Flash, there would be no web video as we know it today.
There would be no Vimeo, or Blip.
and no Youtube!
Only 2 billion or so videos served a day.
Dave.
started in 1969 and is still going today
Corporations fold or merge ever 5 years
tom_a_sparks
--- On Mon, 7/6/10, adammerc...@att.net adammerc...@att.net wrote:
From: adammerc...@att.net adammerc...@att.net
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: WebM Project
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Received
hi all
I've kept out of this, but comments below, sorry Tom, Linux is open source
(it was written, quite recently in the history of unix, because there was
*no* open source unix), but unix is not open source, never has been.
Proprietary all the way as far as I know:
--- On Mon, 7/6/10, Adrian Miles adrian.mi...@rmit.edu.au wrote:
From: Adrian Miles adrian.mi...@rmit.edu.au
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: WebM Project
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Received: Monday, 7 June, 2010, 9:13 PM
hi all
I've kept out
Adam M: Its interesting and exciting to see progress made with these tools,
but I still dont quite get the whole open source movement. Why is it such a
big deal, especially in regards to web video? Or any content for that
matter?
Adam/All:
I am in the same boat; with similar sentiment. Though
Very good!
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:31 AM, adammerc...@att.net adammerc...@att.net wrote:
They say being one step ahead of the curve you are a genius, being two steps
ahead you are a martyr
--
---
Joly MacFie 218 565 9365
Thats still a great lineup. I would like to attend a few of those sessions
today (like not literally today, you know, currently, these days...)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman jay.ded...@... wrote:
It's working now (thanks Ryanne!) - http://www.vloggercon.com
I was just
Just as a side note - and me being the documentary guy in the group - if you
want to know more about the Unix/Linux open source OS history - there'a a
great 2001 doc called Revolution OS - which you can conveniently watch in
entirety online here
Flattening, in the QuickTime context, means baking all the data into one files,
as opposed to referencing outside files. QuickTime has the ability to create
very small reference movies, basically containers for external content - audio,
video, sprite, text - packaged yp into one file. When
Regarding flash:
It certainly got round the nightmares with OS differences, install this plugin,
etc etc, and played a massive role in videoblogging and other video on the web
going mainstream in a big way. Its kinda hard to imagine vlogging taking off to
the extent it did without flash, but
Thanks Julian!
I think it was Bill Gates who first envisioned the idea of web-connected TV,
writing about it in his book The Road Ahead. He predicted that people will be
able to chat with TV show hosts through their connected TV's. Microsoft went
ahead and implemented WebTV back in 1998 or so.
- Original Message -
From: Marguerita
Thank you Richard and Mark for your answers - you both had great
approaches and tips! I also found this clip by Bill Myers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1VkY6v3Ll4 that may help me.
I am going to give it a whirl this weekend!
Good luck.
When I first started on Vegas it took me ages to discover that 'S' for
split clip allowed one to cut between separate tracks! I was stuck!
After that I've never looked back.
The latest Vegas Pros allow combining multiple video tracks into one
track that one can run through switching live.
Thank you Richard and Mark for your answers - you both had great approaches and
tips! I also found this clip by Bill Myers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1VkY6v3Ll4 that may help me.
I am going to give it a whirl this weekend!
Thank you, Marguerita
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com,
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Mark Villaseñor
videoblogyahoogr...@tailtrex.tv wrote:
David Jones: Yes, Youtube seems to fit my niche market very well.
Hi Dave:
...I wasn't aiming to convince you otherwise. If YT is working for you under
the model you've described, particular to your
David Jones: ...it doesn't matter, because I do it for fun, not profit. If
it tuns into something I can do full time to pay the bills then that would
be fantastic, but I have no illusions that will actually happen. I like to
think I'm ultimately working toward it with everything I do though.
I see vloggercon here:
http://vloggercon.blogspot.com/
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz schl...@... wrote:
All that archived information is now gone... What a great snapshot into a
certain time in online video, with vids of some of the best creators and
innovators at
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Mark Villaseñor
videoblogyahoogr...@tailtrex.tv wrote:
Hey Dave:
Foremost please know I'm not aiming to be adversarial when discussing this
topic, just informative as I can through frankness. That said; your
sentiment above is a common one and somewhat
David Jones: Yes, Youtube seems to fit my niche market very well.
Hi Dave:
...I wasn't aiming to convince you otherwise. If YT is working for you under
the model you've described, particular to your market, then perhaps it is
the best fit for the content you offer.
David Jones: IMO Youtube is
It sounds like Youtube may be best for you. Everyone has had different
experiences. But I can tell you that advertising revenue for many producers is
higher with Blip. And it's important not to underestimate the quality of the
ads. Blip has done deals for my productions that not only paid well,
More importantly, I should have reiterated what Steve pointed out: Blip
distributes to YouTube, so it can't hurt to use them, even if you don't put
their player on your home page. They will expose you to many other markets that
you might never reach otherwise, without giving up your Youtube
David Jones: Numbers are everything. About half of my audience find and
watch me via Youtube, they don't care about my blog website at all!
Hey Dave:
Quite true, numbers are everything. Yet if those numbers depend on issues
outside one's immediate and long-term control, they ultimately mean
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Robert Millis
mil...@hudsonstreetmedia.com wrote:
More importantly, I should have reiterated what Steve pointed out: Blip
distributes to YouTube, so it can't hurt to use them, even if you don't put
their player on your home page. They will expose you to many
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Mark Villaseñor
videoblogyahoogr...@tailtrex.tv wrote:
David Jones: Numbers are everything. About half of my audience find and
watch me via Youtube, they don't care about my blog website at all!
Hey Dave:
Quite true, numbers are everything. Yet if those
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:50 AM, David Jones david.jo...@altium.com wrote:
Blip also didn't offer (at the time, it might have changed) direct
deposit of ad revenue into a bank account, let alone into a bank
account in Australia. Yet Adsense does, I get a fat deposit into my
account every month
Hi Simon,
Sounds like you are making a series.
blip.tv can help.
1. by default, show the youtube version of a video
Upload once to blip.tv and have blip.tv post a version to youtube for you.
Embed that on your blog.
2. create an itunes-friendly rss feed so people can find and
subscribe to
Steve is dead on with this, the only thing I would add is that the
Blip player (and many others) may look better on your home page than a
YouTube player, so consider which is more important -- your brand
appearance or numbers seen by YouTube viewers.
I'd give the Blip player a try before
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Robert Millis
mil...@hudsonstreetmedia.com wrote:
Steve is dead on with this, the only thing I would add is that the
Blip player (and many others) may look better on your home page than a
YouTube player, so consider which is more important -- your brand
thanks steve, now i don't have to buy your book. or maybe i should, since i
still don't have any experience with an RSS feed.
we went pro with blip a year ago, ad revenues quadupled that $90. so fear not.
the main reason i can afford to have produced a series is i live in such a
remote -
Just catching up after week away, reading the various breakdowns
speculations.
So WebM only matches h.264 baseline profile for quality, and is
bulkier and slower and uses more power? But surely the point is that
this is just the beginning of an open development process?
And isn't the
Re full page video: Odd how few cool tools have been made with HTML5
video so far. It'll be interesting to see what the HTML5 version of
Navigaya.com looks like, which they say is coming soon. Recently
launched as Flash only - nice full page video/web TV, social media
browsing interface -
Not familiar with navigaya.com.
Dont see info on site and requires login to go deeper but no signup.
Care to elaborate?
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog.tv wrote:
Just catching up after week away, reading the various breakdowns
speculations.
So WebM only
If you can get past the presenter's weird boob jiggling, this demo
video shows it off quite well:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lp8aMhluDs
It's a closed, walled-garden Flash deal. More like a set top box
interface. But pretty and full of features - more on the way. Will
be interesting
Ta for the info, I see the ipad issue is shown on their issues list so
hopefully they will fix it soon.
( http://code.google.com/p/projekktor-zwei/issues/list )
I gave it a go with some old videos on my worpress site and it seemed to work
well, although I could not get the playlist feature to
Yeah I shall give it a year to see hwo it does before reaching any conclusions.
At this stage by biggest problem is how much CPU it uses to playback, quality
seems ok to me but CPU use is not. Hope that can be improved substantially and
the hardware (eg GPU) decoding stuff happens quite
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:15 PM, elbowsofdeath st...@dvmachine.com wrote:
Meanwhile apparently someone that knows a bit about the tech of video codecs
had an initial look at VP8 and was quite concerned about some similarities in
certain functions to h.264. This leaves the door open for
Oh and I forgot to post the link to the WebM discussion group:
https://groups.google.com/a/webmproject.org/group/webm-discuss/topics
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Michael Verdi mich...@michaelverdi.com wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:15 PM, elbowsofdeath st...@dvmachine.com wrote:
Here is an article about the developer who has looked at VP8 and found
various problems. Hopefully the reality is not as bad as the article
suggests, but in the rush to something free and open it would be all to easy
to overlook or dismiss these issues, and then maybe suffer pain later:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman jay.ded...@... wrote:
.
If anyone is doing any video experiments with html5 (and VP8)...please post!
I'd love to oblige and do some encoding in VP8 and play back in HTML5. I'll
share. But how do I get a VP8 encoder for the Mac? I
It always takes some time for developers to work their magic and create stuff
that end-users can use. I expect there to be a good mix of free low-price
encoders, along with integration into many existing tools.
Its very early days, and the lack of encoders isnt much of a problem at this
Yes, there are apparently big time issues with not just functions but out
and out code shared with h.264, and with some inefficiencies in the current
implementation. But it's early.
I'm actually not all that happy about this announcement. If I had any
confidence that VP8 would be quickly,
Here is an article about the developer who has looked at VP8 and found various
problems. Hopefully the reality is not as bad as the article suggests, but in
the rush to something free and open it would be all to easy to overlook or
dismiss these issues, and then maybe suffer pain later:
And here is the developers original post:
http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=377
There is a lot of very technical info in there, which is too much for me, but
Im certainly concerned about some of the issues he highlights.
yay for open. Boo for the messy possibly premature launch spec,the waste
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brook Hinton bhin...@... wrote:
Yes, there are apparently big time issues with not just functions but out
and out code shared with h.264, and with some inefficiencies in the current
implementation. But it's early.
I'm actually not all that happy about
I don't know too much about this, but I've been following html5 developments
as much as my brain will allow me. It seems that for browsing on desktops
and laptops, this bodes well for the immediate future as far as
interactivity. But as for other video playback devices, h264 is going to
hold on
Here is the project website:
http://www.webmproject.org/
I hope it does well and they can make the encoding and decoding efficient quite
quickly, and that lots of tools sprout up quickly.
Its almost still to early even to do some initial testing, but I shall give it
a go in the coming days.
Here is the project website:
http://www.webmproject.org/
I hope it does well and they can make the encoding and decoding efficient
quite quickly, and that lots of tools sprout up quickly.
It is indeed good news. Think of how this discussion has unfolded the
past year. Ogg/Theora went from a
You can go see WebM in action:
Get a Firefox nightly at http://bit.ly/d2xhKm opt in to the YouTube
HTML5 beta at http://bit.ly/NkgJd watch WebM video at
http://bit.ly/cG7zlU
- Verdi
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Jay dedman jay.ded...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the project website:
Thank you Mark for a thorough advice! And thanks Steve on the recommendation on
camera.
Will look into everything.
Loreta
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Loreta_Vaidas loretabir...@... wrote:
Hello,
Ok..so I have a question (again! :) ). I'm working with a lady in her company
and
So...just exactly what kind of performance are you expecting out of a $150
camera?
I hope nothing professional. It's a low caliber camera. Pretty much you'll
get something between crap and amateur results.
Nothing professional. Just no hissing.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com,
is there a gain button on the camera?
If you mean the little mic-icon menu, then yes, I think so. I tried pushing the
levels all the way on the + side, abd there was louder sound, but also louder
hissing...
I dont know what you're using to edit your videos with however in Final Cut
Pro, you can play with the audio using the Parametric Equalizer audio filter.
That may help with the hissing.
David
http://www.youtube.com/davidhowellca
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, MyFirstMemoryDotOrg
MyFirstMemoryDotOrg: Nothing professional. Just no hissing.
Yet you're not going to achieve anything but poor audio quality (in
comparison to more robust units), from systems DESIGNED to be substandard in
quality. This, me thinks, is what David was alluding to -- and I tend to
agree.
The
i tested the Zi8 with the senn ew100 lav mics. (this mic has an adjustable
output level and it took a couple of tries to get the sound right.) in the end
had good levels with no high pitched sounds. has anyone else tried mics that
have adjustable levels? maybe that's the key?
i mainly bought
btw, got a PM about upgrading the firmware, and the camera came with 1.06, the
latest one.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, MyFirstMemoryDotOrg
myfirstmemory@... wrote:
I recently bought this combination, and the results are disappointing.
Can anyone give their opinion on the
The first set with mic off I heard a high pitched sound in the background but
the audio was clear.
In the second set there was something muting the sound or there was some kind
of distance. Was the mic held at the same distance and position each time?
Just my 2 cents,
Gena
In the second set there was something muting the sound or there was some kind
of distance. Was the mic held at the same distance and position each time?
Yes, pretty much. The 2nd room was much bigger, but the camera should perform,
no? This is just basic test videos in a quiet environment. If
So...just exactly what kind of performance are you expecting out of a $150
camera?
I hope nothing professional. It's a low caliber camera. Pretty much you'll get
something between crap and amateur results.
David
http://www.youtube.com/davidhowellca
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com,
what kind of performance are you expecting out of a $150 camera?
I hope nothing professional. It's a low caliber camera. Pretty much you'll
get something between crap and amateur results.
David has a point. Inexpensive cameras offer amazing convenience but
limited quality. I use my iPhone to
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath heathpa...@... wrote:
I didn't think OSNews story was hysterical, I thought it brought up some
valid points and after reading the Endgaget article there are still very
valid concerns.
To repeat the point: as an end user, you'll never have to
1 - 100 of 20532 matches
Mail list logo
