I see you can /text to search, and do * to find the next
occurrence of the word under the cursor, but how do you paste
text that you've just yank'd, into the search line after you
press / without using the mouse?
You can use control+R followed by / to insert the text of the
last search.
I would dearly like to be able to replace ex by a more
comfortable older version
eg
not wiping image of recent changes on screen
on exit.
I'm not 100% sure how to do this one. This is likely a terminal
thing. Perhaps you can monkey with the settings as described in
Can you please expand on what :open does and what it's useful for?
:help :open tells me nothing at all :-(
Open-mode is a quasi-Ex and quasi-Vi mode, or could also be
described as Vi mode on a glass/printing TTY. It doesn't
redraw the screen. I found it useful when I had to use a printer
Is :help undo where we can get information on Vim7's undo? I
remember reading about how it was all awesome and stuff, but I
haven't gotten a chance to actually try to use it yet.
It's all contained in
:help undo.txt
The powerful additions to Vim7 are found at
:help
I'm trying to find/create a command that acts somewhat like zO/zR
for within an existing fold.
If I use zR, it opens all the folds in the whole document.
If I use zO, it opens all the folds under the cursor.
The behavior I'm looking for is that if I'm within an existing
fold, it recursively
Is there a better (faster?) way to edit the output of an
external prog in a new tab or window, than to filter the new
buffer through it?
:tabnew|%!svn diff
Faster? Not so much.
Better? for certain definitions of Better :)
:tabnew | 0r! svn diff
It doesn't involve funneling
I'm trying to find/create a command that acts somewhat like zO/zR
for within an existing fold.
The behavior I'm looking for is that if I'm within an existing
fold, it recursively opens all the folds within the current fold:
Try zczO
Works like a charm. Andy's solution worked as well,
Speaking of which, is there any quicker way to visually select the
entire file, analogous to ^A in other systems? I have to essentially do
1GVGctl-del
to stick everything into the scratchpad/clipboard/whatever to dump it
back into the item from whence it originally came, and that's
In the old gvim, doing a search (/something) highlights all
something in red. In gvim 7, it doesn't highlight all occurrences.
Is there a way to turn this back on?
It sounds like in the process, a vimrc (system-wide?) was
changed. You don't mention your distro/OS, so it's hard to help
there.
Been a long long time vi user but bizarrely never made the
jump to vim until quite recently.
Welcome!
I'm editing a lot of complex html/cake-php thtml templates at
the moment and despite useful color highlighting I'm finding
it quite difficult to see the wood for the trees due to the
Any suggestions on keys/key combos that are good candidates
for custom mappings etc?
[snip]
I think Bram mentioned he's found prefixing with _ works
well..
I believe that the backslash (\) is the only stand-alone
lower-ASCII character available for mappings, and thus is the
default
Is there a way to retain the undo levels, even when the buffer is not
loaded in any windows/tabs? Right now, whenever I open another file in
a window, the previous file loses it's undo levels, even though it is
still inside the buffer list.
Just to make sure I understand, you're talking about
Just stumbled across this link:
http://gpl.internetconnection.net/vi/
for a basic implementation of Vi, authored in JavaScript. Sick,
sick, sick. So just in case you're on a foreign computer that
doesn't have vi/vim installed, and you need a fix, you can get it
via the web. :)
-tim
I'm looking for a quick and easy way to compare two pieces of
code inside a single file. I find it to be quite a common use
case to compare two functions or code block to see if they are
similar enough to be refactored out to a single function.
I've done this occasionally, and use the following
It seems that top-posters and bottom-posters belongs to
different party and no one can convice another.
Follow to difficult conversation the makes questions the reading
before answers the reading.
Responding with the answers interlinearly makes the conversation
easier to follow for people who
/+,/ENDTEXT/-j
to every line after STARTTEXT through every line before
ENDTEXT. If the text to join is embedded in your HTML/JS
files, this might help isolate the contents so you're only
joining germane lines.
-tim
On 5/26/07, Tim Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been trying to figure out
I'd like to use a defined syntax group as a range; eg.
{cComment}s/me/you/g
to substitute every me by you in C-comments.
I found SrchRplcHiGrp (http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=848)
but that does only search/replace ...
Doesn't this plugin answer your need stated
echo first file first.txt
echo second file second.txt
gvim first.txt second.txt
Suppose in first.txt I edit `first` to become `1st` using Vim editing
commands:
cw1stEscape
Now I perform a search-and-replace to change `second` to `2nd`:
:argdo
That brings me to my question. I have noticed that when
editing large files (millions of lines), deleting a large
number of lines (say, hundreds of thousands to millions) takes
an unbelieveably long time in VIM--at least on my systems.
The issue of editing large files comes up occasionally. A
Do you have syntax highlighting enabled? That can really slow vim
down.
Well, I don't mean to. :set says this:
It can be toggled via
:syntax on
and
:syntax off
To see what flavor of syntax highlighting you currently have, you
can query the 'syntax' setting:
I am trying to write a simple function, which searches through
the whole buffer to fund a certain pattern and stops searching
when found the first match. I also want the function to
return a matched/not matched return code and given the caller
the line/column of the match if found.
Let's say I do multi-file replace like 'argdo %s/foo/bar/g',
and I 'autowrite' and 'nohidden' options are set.
So the argdo will replace and write files, because of 'autowrite' is on.
My question is, is there any trick to do 'undo' after that that
would undo all changed files in this situation ?
In a script, how do I get the value of ~ -- the last used
replace-to string, as used in s//~/ ?
While I've wondered this in the past, and don't have an answer at
the moment, I found a small bug in the help text (or in the :help
command) while hunting.
In Vim7, if I type
:help ~
and
Is there a way I can rebind alt+something keys for Windows gVim. Normally
alt+b is for opening the buffers menu, alt + w is for opening the
windows menu, etc. Is the only solution rebuilding Vim without those
shortcuts, or is there a easier/quicker way to do it?
Well, if you don't use the
I'm trying to work out if it's possible to refer to 'the previous
line' in a regex.
e.g. if the first 8 characters of a line are blank,
^\s{8}
replace them with the 8 characters at the start of the previous line.
Ideally it would handle a line a time, thus multiple blank line
starts
:g/^\s\{8}/-s/^\(.\{8}\).*\n\zs\s\{8}/\1
I don't understand that regex completely - but it deletes
lines of data :-)
Looks like it globably matches the 'blank start' lines, then
searches in that for the pattern - thus deleting the third
line...
That's really odd...the \zs *should* be forcing
I am running gvim version 7.0.235 on FC6. I have a slight problem
where everytime I open a gvim session, the gvim window is placed behind
all of my terminals. Would anyone have an idea why this is happening and
how I may correct it?
While I don't know enough about your setup to give
I've never used \=, but I see it only works at the
beginning of the substitute string and makes the entire
replacement an expression. Is there a way to put it in the
middle.
For example, I was thinking if the CSV file had other
numbers, and only one field should be 0 padded, ex:
Blah,
I'm not a list-admin, but did you try sending a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From the account with which you subscribed? (just to make sure)
It should be the same one with which you posted to the list, as
the list shouldn't let you post if you're not subscribed.
-tim
Is it possible to define a regular expression so that it remembered
(.vimrc?) and i can just refer to the name of the regexp rather than
type the whole thing, eg. something like:
define myregexp = '^ *[1-9][0-9]\{3}-[A-Z0-9\-]*\. *$'
and then in command line i just do:
let @x = '^ \+[1-9][0-9]\{3}-[-A-Z0-9]*. \+$'
You don't even need to load it explicitly in the vimrc,
registers are remembered by the viminfo (see :help viminfo).
...as long as your copy of vim is
1) compiled with +viminfo
2) set to use viminfo (non-empty 'viminfo') and
3) the 'viminfo' set
Selecting a block (Ctrl-V), then pressing I (shift-i) and
entering text which then gets inserted into all rows of the
block at the same
column.
I've tried to that some time ago, because i though that should
work the way you described it. But it didn't and still
doesn't work on my vim,
I'm very sorry to bother the list with this problem but I've been
searching in the web the couples hours to find an answer and still
haven't find any.
It's a common sed problem and in the FAQ
http://sed.sourceforge.net/sed1line.txt
(scan for the emulates grep bit)
Fortunately, the vim
grep 'rs10946498' chr6.txt | grep -v 'rs10946498.*rs10946498'
out.txt
Sed might allow it in one pass with something like
sed -e '/rs10946398/!d' -e '/rs10946398.*rs10946398/d'
chr6.txt out.txt
Still try to migrate from Windows to linux, but hopefully will done it
someday!
Since
What is your favorite little-known Vim feature?
One person's little-known feature is another person's
life-blood. :)
There are dark corners and abuses of Ex commands that I exercise
on a regular basis without thinking--when I mention them in an
answer on the list, I occasionally get a wow, I
Well, could one not do something like the following?
:vnoremap down downodowno
No, I did not mean move the corners of the selection.
I meants move the contents.
I meant erase the contents at the old place and put the contents
at the new place. Imagine moving text frames in the
I 'set ve=all' and selected a rectangle with Ctrl-V.
How can I move this rectangle up/down left/right with arrows ?
I assume you're asking how you can move the other sides of a visual
block. When you're using visual block you usually have control of only
one corner (southwest for me most of
There's one file (.htm) that I edit, and every time I write it to-disk,
it'll say [converted], much the way you'd see on reading a file the
status message that lists any non-native format or other quirks of the
file, eg, [unix], [noeol], etc. (At least that's what I recall;
the file's at home
I am curious whether this kind of meta-regexp is
possible with vim:
I want to match a certain kind of pattern and want to
do something with it.
The kind of pattern does not describe a group of chars
but their relation to each other.
Example:
I want to search for a number
Five identical characters would be: /\[a-z,A-Z]\{4}/ I believe...
This would be any 4 characters in your set [a-z,A-Z] (including
the comma), it would match any of the following:
A,b,
,A,Z
Numbers would be: /\d\d\{2}\d/
This also would match things like
1221
How to delete all comment line in one command line(C/C++)?
Before:
//
/*comment1*/
//
int Fun()
{
int a = 5; // number 1;
int b = 10;// number 2;
return a+b;// number 1 + number 2;
}
After:
int Fun()
{
int a = 5;
int b = 10;
return a+b;
On some of the other mailing lists to which I subscribe, I have
the ability to set an option that sniffs the headers and doesn't
send a duplicte copy to me if I'm already in the TO:/CC: headers.
Most of these use the majordomo software, IIUC.
Is there a way to do the same thing with the Vim
When the cursor is in the middle of a word you wish to delete
diw has a distinct advantage over bdw
But what is it?
I think it's the mental model.
diw is two mental steps: {action}{object} where {action} is
delete and {object} is iw even though that {object} is two
characters.
bdw,
Is is possible to change background for range of lines without
suppressing the other syntax highlighting in the range ?
(I tried something simpler and less useful - match by range of
lines (:match Search /\%123l\_.*\%999l/ which suppresses
highlighting in the region) but even this did not
I'm running vim in a console using gnome-terminal. I put these
mappings in my .vimrc file:
map c-q :mksession! ~/.vim/.session cr
map c-s :source ~/.vim/.session cr
Pressing those buttons (CTRL+Q or CTRL+S) doesn't work. When I map as
below instead:
map F9 :mksession! ~/.vim/.session
I expected :g/^\d/fold to create a fold of all lines
matching ^\d, but nothing happens, except that the search
string is higlighted. My 'foldmethod' is 'manual'. What
am I missing?
:fold expects a |range|. You don't supply one. What the
above does is put the cursor on every line starting
find . -name pom.xml | awk '{print bad $1 /dev/stderr}' | vi -
then issuing ls to no avail
iff I issue
find . -name pom.xml | awk '{print bad $1 /dev/stderr}' 2
session ; vi -S session
[cut]
I think I'm missing a point somewhere, can you think of anyway to skip
the intermediary session
The following is the result of doing
i1.1CRESC.
1.1
1¬1
that is inserting 1.1 and a newline, and then repeating. For some
strange reason the . isn't repeated as it should be.
I'm running the text version of vim in a gnome terminal on fedora core
6 using utf-8.
I don't get the behavior you
I use vim7 on Win32 and every time I save a file, vim adds a
new blank (CR+LF) line at the end of the file although it is
not visible when in vim. Is there an option to disable this
behaviour?
yes, there is a way to break expectations :)
The problem is that if you don't have a terminal newline
cd's to the directory that contains the file I'm editing. Does anyone
know what's causing that or how I can turn if off?
In more detail, what happens is this. I type something like:
vi /some/other/dir/filename
at the command line, and then when I'm in gvim, if I type:
:pwd
I get:
Is it possible to do the following, or maybe some plugin
already exist. If not, how would I script it. Let's say I have
some long identifier EXPECTED_GCONFIG scattered around the
file. I put cursor after _ and change it to EXPECTED_CONTENTS
somehow, maybe char-by-char, not necessarily in one
I use both Linux and Windows machines at work with one
keyboard, mouse and dual-monitor display. Windows is OK for
some things, but using it extensively drives me batty.
Especially when working with several programs running in
various windows, KDE is much easier to use.
As a means to
I did th3 follwing: With a program, which generates random numbers in
different formats, I created a file, which consists of _one_ line of
2097152 characters (0-9,A-F).
To split the line into lines of 72 characters each, I started vim and
let it read the file.
I postioned the cursor
I would like to map F12 to execute the following code within the
shell. This si what I have so far:
map F12 :!cleartool co -c . filenameCR
You might try
nnoremap f12 :!cleartool co -c . %cr
The percent is expanded to be the current file name.
:help :_%
has more details
I have this in my _vimrc file:
function! CHANGE_CURR_DIR()
let _dir = expand(%:p:h)
let _filename = expand(%)//I added this line
exec cd . _dir
unlet _dir
endfunction
autocmd BufEnter * call CHANGE_CURR_DIR()
You may also want to investigate the
I wanted to sort the first field numerically of a text applying the
functions of Dr. Chip but all I can achieve is the following:
-
977 ./gnuwin/coreutils-5.3.0-dep
9784 ./RESKIT
98./gnuwin/coreutils-5.3.0-9/usr/share/locale/af
987 ./Unison/Orchestral
Recently gvim has had the annoying habit of inserting messages in the
text of the document being edited, such as
:confirm wqa
Sometimes they are longer.
I don't see anything glaringly obvious in your supplied vimrc
files that would trigger such behavior. However, there's a
possiblity
-does this happen in one particular type of file but not in
others (such as in *.tex or *.xyz but not in others)
Most of the files I edit are *.tex files so that is not much of a
distinguishing mark.
Ah well...perhaps a tex-filetype mapping?
-does it only happen in one mode? (only in
With that knowledge, I'd go spelunking in the $VIMRUNTIME/
folders for the tex-related plugins/syntax/filetype files to see
if there are map commands that should be nnoremap commands.
Or perhaps you have some of your own additions under $HOME/.vim/
that might be bunging matters.
-tim
And what
i have a html-file with footnotes converted to plain text and
like to replace the footnotes in the text with the
footnotetext many pages later, eg. the occurrence of [12] with
the later definition (many pages later) like [12] bla bla
bla. Does anybody has an idea, how to achieve this?
Without
Otherwise, do a '0' and ride the 'j' key a the way down a
file. If the cursor doesn't budge, how would you be able to
tell if it was a space or multiple spaces there, or a tab
character?
Well, if that information is truely useful and what you want to
know, you can always
:set
Well, if that information is truely useful and what you want to
know, you can always
:set list
Displays ^I just fine, but trashes actual indentation, at least for me
(dunno if there's any magical 'vim' setting, like :set keepindent or
something). Iow, I wanna be able to see
Is there any option in vim which reconfigures the behavior of
up/down buttons so that they move cursor on wrapped virtual
lines like on real lines?
While I don't believe there's an option per-se, it's very easy to use
:nnoremap up gk
:nnoremap down gj
:vnoremap up gk
i am using visual mode and shift to indent a block of code.
the problem i am having is that once i do this, the visual mode is
gone. So, i have to re-select everything and do it again. Is there a
command to repeat the last shift ?
or better yet, is there a better way to shift code right and
Swt. Lotta things I didn't know about, should come in handy, tnx!
Especially the } thing. Man, can't tell you how many times I just
eyeball code and do things like
10
whups, make that
15
bah, too many...
14
Ah, better.
Glad it
Eg, when deleting whole blocks of the same repetitive code
(eg, consolidating multiple tables into just one big-ass
table, and just need to delete the end-table from table N, and
the begin-table for table N+1), I'll visually select the text
to be deleted, note the status line that says
For some reason autoindent go turned on again with Vim 7.0.
In earlier versions, I disabled it via set textwidth=0 at the bottom
of my .vimrc, however, now, somehow this setting is being overwritten
somewhere, and textwidth is being set to something else (i.e 78 last
I checked).
Well,
One other candidate might be the underscore, though it's a
shifted key which makes it a little more difficult, it is
usually in a pretty predictable place (unlike the
backslash/pipe key which I find all over the keyboard
depending on whose machine I'm using...makes typing DOS
file-paths a pain).
I can set the font in gvim using:
Set guifont=
But how do I do the same with console vim?
It relies on the font your console uses. Thus, if you're using a
xterm/rxvt/konsole/whatver, you can set your display font for the
terminal application and vim uses it. If you're an an SSH
session
How can I add some char before a block? Just like C++
comment.
Use V to select the block you want, then type :s/^/\/\//
You can make this a little easier/shorter to type by using
:s!^!//
The alternative delimiters (you can use a variety of characters,
though I tend to choose !, @,
Vowels are a problem. Unless you have an escape in your name, a, i
and o are boring letters. I know someone named Veerle and her name
is actually quite destructive, overwriting an entire line with l.
What's the most interesting name anyone can find, and also the most
damaging?
I think my friend
Scanning tags.
E15: Invalid expression:
substitute(v:fname,'s$','','g')substitute(v:fname,'s$','','g')
i get this error only in gvim. vim7 and vim6.3 work fine.
I suspect your gvimrc loads something that causes the problem.
It seems odd that the problem would only occur in gvim, but not
be
Scanning tags.
E15: Invalid expression:
substitute(v:fname,'s$','','g')substitute(v:fname,'s$','','g')
i get this error only in gvim. vim7 and vim6.3 work fine.
I suspect your gvimrc loads something that causes the problem.
It seems odd that the problem would only occur in gvim, but not
be
Scanning tags.
E15: Invalid expression:
substitute(v:fname,'s$','','g')substitute(v:fname,'s$','','g')
i get this error only in gvim. vim7 and vim6.3 work fine.
I suspect your gvimrc loads something that causes the problem.
It seems odd that the problem would only occur in gvim, but not
be
Scanning tags.
E15: Invalid expression:
substitute(v:fname,'s$','','g')substitute(v:fname,'s$','','g')
i get this error only in gvim. vim7 and vim6.3 work fine.
I suspect your gvimrc loads something that causes the problem.
It seems odd that the problem would only occur in gvim, but not
be
Scanning tags.
E15: Invalid expression:
substitute(v:fname,'s$','','g')substitute(v:fname,'s$','','g')
i get this error only in gvim. vim7 and vim6.3 work fine.
I suspect your gvimrc loads something that causes the problem.
It seems odd that the problem would only occur in gvim, but not
be
Scanning tags.
E15: Invalid expression:
substitute(v:fname,'s$','','g')substitute(v:fname,'s$','','g')
i get this error only in gvim. vim7 and vim6.3 work fine.
I suspect your gvimrc loads something that causes the problem.
It seems odd that the problem would only occur in gvim, but not
be
Sorry for the duplicate emails...my mailserver was giving me fits
telling me that it hadn't sent, yet was apparently not so truthful.
-tim
i would like to do some contribution in vim development, i
have used vim more than one year in programming and text edit,
but when i want to start to code for vim, i even do not know
what language is used for vim development, could you give me
some information and steps how to do?
Vim is
Can I use variable in pattern of substitute() in script?
let row = getline(j) 'trallala'
let rownext = getline(j+1) 'bimbam'
let row = substitute(row, ^\\\(.*\\\)$, \\1 rownext, g)
'trallala bimbam'
yes is the short answer, though you have to
1) concat it (if there's something to which it
In general, the safest keys to use for the {lhs} (left-hand
side) of mappings are the F keys. Almost everything else
already has a function in Vim. Among
Worth knowing. Thanks. What about when using a leader such as
, or / ?
The comma does a reverse-search of the last thing you searched
for
how can I identify a single line no longer than e.g. 60 characters
preceded and followed by a blank line via regexs. This way I want to
identify section headings. What I did was mark every blank line with
%s/^$// and than chomp the CR %s/\n//g and if the text
between the 's isn't longer than 60
i have a file ( actually a group of them ) and i need to
delete the quotation marks in each file, i am sure that vim
has a tool for this.
For a single file, you want to use
:%s///g
For multiple files, you might want:
:set hidden
:argdo %s///g
(review your changes)
When I delete rows using dd the deleted text is put in the
default buffer, using dd again will put it in 1 and so on.
But if I use another kind of deletion like dw, I couldnt fetch
it from the buffers 1-9, only from the first unnamed buffer.
For future reference, these are registers rather
i want to set some words in the text file in italic format, but not the
whole file, i use gvim and when i set font from the edit menu, and choose
italic, it will set all words in that file to be italic, but that is not
what i want, how to use command to implement? and i think there is also
I did th3 follwing: With a program, which generates random
numbers in different formats, I created a file, which consists
of _one_ line of 2097152 characters (0-9,A-F).
To split the line into lines of 72 characters each, I started
vim and let it read the file.
I postioned the cursor at position
The problem I have with my kind of splitting a line is not that it
does not work -- it is the deadly side effect it caused.
My opinion is, that it should not be possible to kill a system
(...too big words, I know, but...) by simply submitting
a sub-optimal command to a text editor.
As you
Just out of curiosity, why are you trying to
edit a 1 GB file with any text editor? I'm
assuming that these files are flat file
databases.
I need to do that quite often. They are usually
log files from a long running program in debug
mode.
I find that pre-processing with grep/sed/awk
:map ,bb cCRCRESCkpIspanESCA/spanESCkJJ
Any thoughts on why this only works sometimes? I can't isolate
what conditions bring it about.
What are the results when it doesn't work?
It looks like you're actually rejoining the lines, so it's odd to
add the CRs just to remove them.
Other items
I have a buffer consisting of many
create view ...
...
go
blocks.
How can I write these blocks somehow efficient to different files?
This presumes a little stability in your source (that there's
consistent spacing/indenting, that case is consistent, that the
view-name immediatedly follows
I'm experiencing a problem when folding visual blocks - if I
have a section folded directly above another section that I
want to fold, they end up merging once I fold the second
section, sometimes they even add unfolded text to the fold -
am I doing something wrong?
It sounds like your folds
if match(getline(1,20),^ \{0,1}\(=\{2,6}\)[^=]\+\1 *$) = 0
The pattern used in the match() call is the same as in the
syntax highlighting script.
My guess is that it's something like an escaping problem. You're
using double-quotes which are a little more finicky about
i know with i can move a selection to the right by one
indent, how can i move a selection just one space ?
Well, if you want to move by one indent, you can
:set sw=1 ts=1 et
which will then make and indent by one space (not one
tab) or, you can
:set sw=1 ts=1 noet
and
:sp on a new buffer causes a raise of 4-8K.
:q on a split causes a raise of 4-8K.
Switching to/from gvim causes a small increase, typically 4-8K for a few
switches.
Searching (with *) for a word in a .c file (with syntax highlighting) causes
it to increase. If you hold down * then you
I have used vim for a while, and though no expert I am fairly
comfortable with the common commands. Recently I ran into a situation
where I just couldn't find a way to do a search and replace. I was
hoping some of you experts could help me out.
Starting text:
nameTable[pattern with
Reading over my original question, I realize that it was
awfully obtuse and confusing. The 'nohlsearch' line is the
one that is already in my .vimrc and works. I yanked/put it
to the next line down to use it as a template, modifing it to:
map F3 :set nobackup return
that's the one that
Can you tell me how I have to do to delete those lines beginning by
numbers or MPRINT from my file ?
Though I'm not sure I followed your examples, if this is all you
want, the following should do what your above-summary describes:
:g/^\(\d\|MPRINT\)/d
That breaks down as
:g/.../ on
I have a vim script which I want to use to search replace a
part out of a given line. The fields in the line are based on
field length and the field I want to change starts at position
33 and ends after 4 charachter.
A regex search is not appropriet, as the string I am looking
for may
first, is there a way i can scroll text under the cursor ( so that the
cursor stays on the same place in the terminal, but the text scrolls
anyway )
i just think that would be really cool.
If you want the cursor to stay in the middle of the screen, you
can set your 'scrolloff' setting to some
In VHDL I many times need to change the following code:
component AAA
port (
i1 : in std_ulogic;
i2 : in std_ulogic;
o1 : out std_ulogic;
o2 : out std_ulogic);
end component AAA;
into:
inst_AAA : AAA
port map (
i1 = in ,
i1 = in ,
o1
1 - 100 of 409 matches
Mail list logo
