Re: Patch to make link.sh output a bit less scary.

2010-05-18 Fir de Conversatie Tony Mechelynck
On 18/05/10 11:24, Jeff Horelick wrote: Hey, i've noticed some people saying on IRC and randomly throughout the web in places that the whole: link.sh: We don't need libXt! link.sh: Removing libXt! thing is a bit scary if you're new to compiling vim or compiling stuff on linux in general

Re: Patch to make link.sh output a bit less scary.

2010-05-18 Fir de Conversatie Matt Wozniski
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Cesar Romani wrote: On 18/05/2010 04:24 a.m., Jeff Horelick wrote: Hey, i've noticed some people saying on IRC and randomly throughout the web in places that the whole: link.sh: We don't need libXt! link.sh: Removing libXt! thing is a bit scary if you're

Re: Patch to make link.sh output a bit less scary.

2010-05-18 Fir de Conversatie Dominique Pellé
Cesar Romani wrote: On 18/05/2010 04:24 a.m., Jeff Horelick wrote: Hey, i've noticed some people saying on IRC and randomly throughout the web in places that the whole: link.sh: We don't need libXt! link.sh: Removing libXt! thing is a bit scary if you're new to compiling vim or compiling

Re: Patch to make link.sh output a bit less scary.

2010-05-18 Fir de Conversatie Gary Johnson
On 2010-05-18, Matt Wozniski wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Cesar Romani wrote: On 18/05/2010 04:24 a.m., Jeff Horelick wrote: Hey, i've noticed some people saying on IRC and randomly throughout the web in places that the whole: link.sh: We don't need libXt! link.sh:

Re: Patch to make link.sh output a bit less scary.

2010-05-18 Fir de Conversatie Charles Campbell
Gary Johnson wrote: On 2010-05-18, Matt Wozniski wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Cesar Romani wrote: On 18/05/2010 04:24 a.m., Jeff Horelick wrote: Hey, i've noticed some people saying on IRC and randomly throughout the web in places that the whole: link.sh: We don't

Re: Patch to make link.sh output a bit less scary.

2010-05-18 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Jeff Horelick wrote: Hey, i've noticed some people saying on IRC and randomly throughout the web in places that the whole: link.sh: We don't need libXt! link.sh: Removing libXt! thing is a bit scary if you're new to compiling vim or compiling stuff on linux in general because you might

Re: Patch to make link.sh output a bit less scary.

2010-05-18 Fir de Conversatie JD
On May 18, 4:29 pm, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote: Jeff Horelick wrote: Hey, i've noticed some people saying on IRC and randomly throughout the web in places that the whole: link.sh: We don't need libXt! link.sh: Removing libXt! thing is a bit scary if you're new to

Re: Patch to make link.sh output a bit less scary.

2010-05-18 Fir de Conversatie Tony Mechelynck
On 18/05/10 22:42, JD wrote: [...] They're also likely the type of people who own the Brooklyn Bridge (does that joke work outside the US?). I'm Belgian, and I've met it before, so maybe it does. Omit sounds quite good to me. I used delinking because I was sort of under the impression that