Re: [VoiceOps] Recommendations for high-cps SS7 OC-X gear?

I would be concerned about the IP infringement lawsuit they lost to Genband. My experience hasn't been good with them when using other application servers. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 22, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Brandon Buckner wrote: > > Just curious: Is there a reason to

Re: [VoiceOps] Recommendations for high-cps SS7 OC-X gear?

I've used in the past. Good success with them. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 22, 2016, at 1:26 PM, Calvin Ellison wrote: > > Anyone using TelcoBridges gear? > > > > Regards, > > Calvin Ellison > Voice Operations Engineer > calvin.elli...@voxox.com > +1 (213)

Re: [VoiceOps] Recommendations for high-cps SS7 OC-X gear?

I agree. A distributed Architecture, geographically dispersed, is the best design for what is being asked of. The only issue I would see with the Sonus deployment is they are very expensive. MetaSwitch would be able to handle this load, as far as I know. Probably not as expensive as Sonus

Re: [VoiceOps] Recommendations for high-cps SS7 OC-X gear?

Anyone using TelcoBridges gear? Regards, *Calvin Ellison* Voice Operations Engineer calvin.elli...@voxox.com +1 (213) 285-0555 --- *voxox.com * 5825 Oberlin Drive, Suite 5 San Diego, CA 92121 [image: Voxox] On Fri, Apr 22,

Re: [VoiceOps] Recommendations for high-cps SS7 OC-X gear?

t: [VoiceOps] Recommendations for high-cps SS7 OC-X gear? Looking for suggestions for NEBS compliant gear that can support SS7, handle OC-3 or higher levels of channels, and can support (in aggregate) up to around 500 cps through a *good* (key word) SIP interface. I'm willing to entertain the idea of a s

Re: [VoiceOps] Recommendations for high-cps SS7 OC-X gear?

ect) > Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ > > Sent from my BlackBerry. > Original Message > From: Paul Timmins > Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 23:36 > To: Brooks Bridges > Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org

Re: [VoiceOps] Recommendations for high-cps SS7 OC-X gear?

Avoid Meta at all cost. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:35 PM, Paul Timmins wrote: > > You're going to handle 500CPS of legacy sonet based TDM and question dropping > 7 figures on the solution? *cringes* > > This is literally what platforms like metaswitch,

Re: [VoiceOps] Recommendations for high-cps SS7 OC-X gear?

‎That is a fun fact, indeed. This I did not know! -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700 Atlanta, GA 30309 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ Sent 

Re: [VoiceOps] Recommendations for high-cps SS7 OC-X gear?

: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Recommendations for high-cps SS7 OC-X gear? ___ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops ___ VoiceOps mailing lis

Re: [VoiceOps] Recommendations for high-cps SS7 OC-X gear?

@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Recommendations for high-cps SS7 OC-X gear? ___ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Re: [VoiceOps] Recommendations for high-cps SS7 OC-X gear?

You're going to handle 500CPS of legacy sonet based TDM and question dropping 7 figures on the solution? *cringes* This is literally what platforms like metaswitch, sonus and many others are made for. If you're looking for low cost, Taqua's solution is decent, and if you need to take that

[VoiceOps] Recommendations for high-cps SS7 OC-X gear?

Looking for suggestions for NEBS compliant gear that can support SS7, handle OC-3 or higher levels of channels, and can support (in aggregate) up to around 500 cps through a *good* (key word) SIP interface. I'm willing to entertain the idea of a single larger device that can take a full OC-48