I am just arguing that a point charge is not logically prone to blow up.
Whether or not a point charge is an adequate model of an electron is
another question.
Harry
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:33 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I am not yet convinced that an electron can be reduced
*You can pack a zillion protons into a tiny space.*
No, protons need to pair with neutrons to get close; that is how they form
nuclei.
Hydrogen will form metal hybrid chemically. But then they are not mobile
anymore.
All the above does not apply to neutrons. Neutrons cannot be packed by the
Let’s get started on the math
In quantum mechanics, a group of particles known as fermions (for example,
electrons, protons and neutrons) obey the Pauli exclusion principle. This
states that two fermions cannot occupy the same (one-particle) quantum
state. The states are labeled by a set of
By the way, the Fermi energy prohibits ultra-low energy neutrons from
surviving because the neutron energy must meet or exceed the Fermi
temperature of the lattice.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Let’s get started on the math
In quantum mechanics, a group
Check out neutron star densities.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Mar 27, 2013 2:37 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Low Energy Neutrons and Local Temperature
You can pack a zillion protons into a tiny space.
No, protons
Check out neutron star temperatures.
Cheers: Axil
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:09 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Check out neutron star densities.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Mar 27, 2013
Interesting question Axil. Are neutron stars capable of radiating energy into
space until they eventually approach zero? Is this not a feature of nature?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Mar 27, 2013 11:13 am
We can use logic as a sensitive probe of LENR.
Let’s explore the proposition; LENR+ is not self- destructive, since it
functions for a long time.
A LENR theory that does not explain how the reaction is not
self-destructive is a false one.
Most successful LENR experiments produce heat for a
non destructive is one hypothesis.
regenerative is another.
craters have been observed, transmutation too... maybe the destruction
regenerate the production instead of killing it.
Maybe is a kind of controlled chaos/imperfection the source of LENR, like
it is for some kind of superconduction,
In LENR, there is direct experimental evidence for the existence of such
hot spots in before-and-after scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of
the surfaces of experimental LENR devices, some of which have lithium in or
around them. In post-experiment SEM images
By the way, if Widom and Larsen use these LENR experimental proofs, this
invalidates WL as a LENR+ theory.
Cheers: Axil
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
In LENR, there is direct experimental evidence for the existence of such
hot spots in before-and-after
I don't know.
harry
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:37 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Is there a time frame associated with these activities? How many
femtoseconds does it take for the neutron to go through the nucleus or
interact with it? I am having a tough time getting a handle
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:07:59 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
For those who want to play with numbers, run a calculation that determines
the maximum density of protons or neutron that are allowed by the PEP into
the NAE and then determine the number of NAE that are required to
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 27 Mar 2013 02:37:04 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
All the above does not apply to neutrons. Neutrons cannot be packed by the
zillions into a tiny space.
Enough can be packed into a tiny space in a fission bomb to release a Megaton of
energy in a fraction of a second.
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:23:03 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
As this positive charge is reduced, the attraction between protons and
neutrons are decreased.
Why?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Since we know that proton charge can be screened and therefore variable,
the coulomb coefficient is reduced relative to the Asymmetry term as a
result of screening.
See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-empirical_mass_formula
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:03 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
This is a false comparison, an emotional one, and one that damages LENR. If
the common man compares LENR to nuclear fission or fusion, progress on the
PR front for LENR will go backward.
A bomb uses more than 8 kilograms of material in a “pit” where the reaction
occurs throughout the entire bulk
Thanks for the inspiration.
It has just occurred to me that the use of Ni64 which has an abundant
neutrons will be most susceptible to fission due to an imbalance of
nuclear forces; more specifically the coulomb force relative to the
Asymmetry force.
Now it makes sense that Rossi uses a
I have current interesting evidence for unparticles.
I can generate something that I and most people can feel, and yet is only
very weakly interactive with matter.
It is easy to try if anyone want to give it a shot.
John
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
DGT has found that “Ni58, Ni60, Ni62 and Ni64 stable isotopes where
“willing” to participate in a LENR reaction, whilst Ni61 was not. So there
was no need for any costly enrichment method.”
The number of nucleons (Z) is a known parameter in the fission of heavy
metal isotopes U233, U235, Pu239,
Replace
In explanation, the binding energy of the nucleus is when there are pairs
of protons and neutrons.
with
In explanation, the binding energy of the nucleus is *greater* when there
are pairs of protons and neutrons.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
21 matches
Mail list logo
