Hi Jones, Terry,
I just saw the subject's message
(http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg66408.html)
yesterday, while searching the vortex-l archives. I unsubscribed from
vortex-l months ago, because I was unable to keep up, mostly because of
the amount of Rossi related stuff.
Mark Jurich wrote:
FYI: arXiv of this paper:
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1106/1106.0847.pdf
Interesting paper, thanks.
I found it odd that nobody mentions the *positions* of the planets
(Jupiter, mainly), during solar max. Maybe to try to avoid the
association with astrology, the
On 09/30/2013 08:53 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
...
Assuming that the event took place at the beginning of AD 774, we obtain
(1870.6-774)/5.539 = 197.978, which is in excellent agreement. And
assuming the end of 774, we get (1870.6-774.9)/5.539 = 197.815, which is
still in good agreement.
Needless
Hi Mauro,
Thanks for bringing this point up again. Being in the Southern hemisphere,
EC is probably harder for you to forget :)
Periodically we delve in-and-out of cosmological ramblings on Vortex,
looking for the possible LENR connection (or rather an external stimulus to
LENR) and to be
I believe we will find that this whole universe orbits based upon
energetic, quantum gravity fields of dark/vacuum energy between bodies.
Earth's magnetic field protects us from a lot of the energetic stuff, but
what gets through creates our weather disturbances and ionizes the
atmosphere.
When
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
**
I found it odd that nobody mentions the *positions* of the planets
(Jupiter, mainly), during solar max. Maybe to try to avoid the association
with astrology, the constellations, and related pseudo-scientific stuff?
Could
Eric,
I believe YES. If you look at the Sunspots, they harbor the elliptical,
magnetic flux tubes(strings of vacuum energy in my model) that generate
solar flares and CME's and stream energetic particles. I believe these
energetic particles are collapsed/dark vacuum energy (branes from M
*http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2009/097874.pdf*
* *
* *
*The results of transmutation from the proton 21 experiments have been
replicated by Sandia National Laboratories*
* *
* *
* *
*See*
* *
* *
*4. CONCLUSIONS*
* *
*The Proton-21 Laboratory in the Ukraine has
On 09/30/2013 11:47 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
mailto:ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
I found it odd that nobody mentions the *positions* of the planets
(Jupiter, mainly), during solar max. Maybe to try to avoid the
association
Are these the same guys that missed the mass/energy of the universe by
1900% (95/5)...:)
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
**
On 09/30/2013 11:47 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
I found it
On 09/30/2013 12:20 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote:
Are these the same guys that missed the mass/energy of the universe by
1900% (95/5)...:)
The point being, in any case, that the effect of the planets on the Sun
can't be explained by a *conventional* tidal effect, that is, the ones
depending on
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
*The results of transmutation from the proton 21 experiments have been
replicated by Sandia National Laboratories*
Yes, but they determined the results have a prosaic cause: contamination.
Not transmutation.
*I would think that Sandia labs would have
H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Does it necessarily follow that every mass-energy conversion must have a
nuclear _origin_? The answer is no
because if the principle of mass-energy equivalency is applied rigorously
to chemical reactions, some mass-energy conversion will occur although it
Actually Jed, the mass change can be measured. Of course this is not
done using a laboratory scales. However, if the mass and energy of the
individual particles resulting from the nuclear reaction are measured,
the numbers add up correctly.
Ed
On Sep 30, 2013, at 12:19 PM, Jed Rothwell
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Actually Jed, the mass change can be measured. Of course this is not done
using a laboratory scales. However, if the mass and energy of the
individual particles resulting from the nuclear reaction are measured, the
numbers add up correctly.
Sure. I
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Malinovskyi said that Proton-21 scientists presented these results at a
seminar in Bonn, Germany, in 2004; and he stated that, since then, they
have had collaborations with many European laboratories, which rechecked
their experiments, measured the
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 29 Sep 2013 23:48:46 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
For example, titanium hydride has long been used as a heat based hydrogen
source/sink.
It was always obvious that some form of metal hydride was intended. I was just
pointing out the typo in the patent.
On Sun, Sep
In reply to Mauro Lacy's message of Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:32:02 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
I found it odd that nobody mentions the *positions* of the planets
(Jupiter, mainly), during solar max. Maybe to try to avoid the
association with astrology, the constellations, and related
pseudo-scientific stuff?
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:47:26 -0700:
Hi,
Could the eleven year solar cycle be the reason that the largest planet in the
solar system formed at a distance where the orbital period matched the solar
cycle? (roughly).
[snip]
Could there be some kind of effect from
I have read of a model of the sun which tend to demonstrate the magnetic
effects (sun spots) based upon magnetic field lines captured within the
conductive plasma. The lines get twisted as the sun rotates according to the
model. Perhaps the whole concern about an 11 year cycle affected by
David,
They don't just twist, they break off and go thru magnetic reconnection
expelling billions of tons of energetic particles into space as CMEs and
also flares. At 1-5 per day over a few billion years that is a lot of
energetic stuff, where is all that stuff?
Stewart
A *coronal mass
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 4:06 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Dark energy, matter and gravitational effects are likely not involved to
any major degree.
I like Robin's approach -- perhaps there's an intrinsic process driving the
sun's 11 year cycle, and it has influenced where the
One further (far-out :-) thought on this 11- year cycle… and it is that we are
seeing what is basically a holdover resonance from the “previous system”.
Our sun is a second or third generation star – meaning that it has gone through
more than one iteration of collapse and rebirth. Where was
I sorta think most of these stars are multi-dimensional branes at their
core that decay to hydrogen and eject/leak branes further out as the
universe expands, ie. maybe our solar system is just a bunch of galactic
mass ejections like comets caught in quantum orbit with each other and the
gas
I have the same opinion as you Eric. It is difficult to believe in dark matter
in particular since it can not be detected except through the behavior of
gravitation. I find it easier to suspect that there is a phenomena occurring
in the behavior of gravity that we have not yet discovered.
That is an interesting idea Jones. I was thinking of another possibility that
we might want to consider.
Much of my career has been associated with radios and consequently oscillators.
I have designed numerous types of these including VCO's and crystal versions
so I have a tendency to see
I had an interesting thought that I wanted to share with the gang. What would
happen if you ring a bell that is totally engulfed within a vacuum? Since
there is no way for the energy to escape the bell by being radiated through air
one would think that the sound waves contained within the
27 matches
Mail list logo
