http://phys.org/news/2014-07-physicists-nature-high-temperature-superconductivity.html
Physicists unlock nature of high-temperature superconductivity
It's magnetism that eliminates the coulomb barrier that allows electrons to
stick together and form cooper pairs found in superconductivity.
This
I wrote:
spectroscopy at Harvard CfA showed evidence (and several possible
> artifacts) of continuum radiation in the 10-30 nm range from low-energy ...
>
There is a further lack of clarity as to the employer of the spectropists.
Were they GEN3 subcontractors with no affiliation to Harvard CfA w
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Mike Carrell wrote:
That light was observed at BLP and confirmed at the Harvard-Smithsonian
> Center for Astrophysics.
I've always been a little uncomfortable with the way the testing done on
behalf of BLP at Harvard-Smithsonian CfA is characterized. After hea
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Mike Carrell wrote:
Arc welders commonly flood t ears wit argon, a cheap inert gas, to avoid
> oxidation of the metal before it cools. Ionized argon has served as a
> catalyst in earlier gas phase experiments, but it plays no part in the
> SunCell.
>
Sounds a lo
BTW, let me just say this and this will be the last I will say on this subject.
Many people are late bloomers. I know someone who was failing his classes in
one semester then went on to become the first honor student the next. And no,
he did not cheat. His teachers were so amazed. His mom co
Jojo Iznart wrote:
Whatever you say my friend.
>
No, it is not whatever I say. It is what every history book and
authoritative source says. This is not about me.
> I'm not inclined to start an argument with you.
>
You are not inclined to do your homework, or to look up readily available
f
Whatever you say my friend. I'm not inclined to start an argument with you.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is the SunCell a titanium burner?
I did not notice this.
Jojo Izn
I did not notice this.
Jojo Iznart wrote:
But didn't Edison have an incredibly lousy history before he perfected his
> lightbulb?
>
> Didn'tt Einstein fail high school algebra before he created the
> beautifully elegant language of Relativity mathematics?
>
No, he did not fail high school alge
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 5:54 AM, Jojo Iznart wrote:
> But didn't Edison have an incredibly lousy history before he perfected
> his lightbulb?
>
***Not at all. He had several successful inventions under his belt by that
time.
>
> Didn'tt Einstein fail high school algebra before he created the
>From Jed:
...
> I judge the demo useless, as far as I could tell. I could barely hear
> what the people in the video said. Maybe if I could have heard it I
> would have found it more convincing. Slides would have helped, too.
Mills heard similar complaints from other observers, and t
I believe the validators have already done that and have concluded that the
energy output can not be explain chemically or any other way other than the
hydrino. They have come out very strongly for Mills.
Though I do not have a horse in this race, I still find GUTCP and the hydrino
concept mor
http://youtu.be/P5VdbabPbvU
I love these videos...
On Monday, July 28, 2014, Jojo Iznart wrote:
> yea, there's oxygen from H20, but isn't the real question be "how much?"
>
> Maybe you can do the math and compute the amount of oxygen and then
> estimate the amount of titanium and then add 2 an
To find where the Sun Cell power is coming from, experimental procedure as
follows:
Test the power of the electric arch only,
Then, add the TiCl2 and measure the power output.
Then add water is small steps and measure the associated power output
increase.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Joj
yea, there's oxygen from H20, but isn't the real question be "how much?"
Maybe you can do the math and compute the amount of oxygen and then estimate
the amount of titanium and then add 2 and 2 together and figure out if there is
enough chemical energy to explain the huge explosion.
For that ma
*Mills remarked that there is no oxygen available.*
In the 20,000C plasma blast, the water will decompose into h2 and O. SO
there is oxygen.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Mike Carrell wrote:
>
> Optical instruments to quantitatively measure the radiant energy are
>> s
For the simple reason that even if you assumed that the titanium powder was
oxidized chemically, it would still not account for the energy. It was clear
that titanium was not being oxidized; else you are left with the conundrum on
why it is not being consumed or why it would oxidize so readily
Mike Carrell wrote:
Jed resumes his traditional role as a skeptic, as he has been these many
> years.
>
No, I was only critiquing this as a demonstration. I think it failed in
that role. It failed for the general public. For insiders it might have
been optimum. I cannot judge.
The composition
Jed resumes his traditional role as a skeptic, as he has been these many years.
The composition of the fuel powder is stated openly in papers on the website.
One just has to read carefully and in the context of all Mills’ has written
about GUTCP, which unfortunately is not CMNS or LENR [try usin
Mike Carrell wrote:
Optical instruments to quantitatively measure the radiant energy are
> standard lab equipment and can be calibrated to NIST standards.
>
This is a bomb calorimeter. I do not think it incorporates optical
instruments. (A schematic of the calorimeter would have helped.) Plus, e
1. I agree, 5J input should be completely charaterized and documented. Mills
talked about IGBT power supplies in the upcoming prototype. These advanced
power supplies should help answer this question.
2. I don't agree with your analysis of the Bomb Calorimetry. Larger
conductors if any s
Ken,
Sounds like an improvement upon the former since the spongelike geometry
syphons water toward the surface but since the graphite is “floating” I assume
it turns to steam before the liquid water has a chance to conduct too much
heat down below the surface and stop the steam production. It
Speculation about titanium is a distraction, for it is not involved in the
chemistry of the SunCell.
How So? Can you expand on this point?
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Mike Carrell wrote:
> Optical instruments to quantitatively measure the radiant energy are
> standard lab equipment and c
Optical instruments to quantitatively measure the radiant energy are standard
lab equipment and can be calibrated to NIST standards. Speculation about
titanium is a distraction, for it is not involved in the chemistry of the
SunCell.
Mike Carrell
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail
I wonder is this the same phenonomena as that described by Halas's group at
Rice Univ a couple years back?. They simply focused sunlight onto carbon
black in water and saw water boiling directly off at apparently low temp.
I briefly reproduced her experiment by a fresnel lens focused on a little
Another thing that would have helped would be to trigger a chemical
explosion with a known amount of explosive, to calibrate.
- Jed
Jojo Iznart wrote:
I blamed Mills for revealing too much in his demos, now you are asking him
> to reveal more secrets. I don't think that's wise.
>
Well, if he cannot reveal the chemical contents of the explosion, there is
no point to doing it. It cannot be convincing without that information
I hope you're right. It is in my interest to see the Suncell fail.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 12:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is the SunCell a titanium burner?
Jojo,
A lot depends upon how accuratel
After the arc discharge, the TiC2 will be completely vaporized. But in
microseconds, titanium nanoparticles will condense out of the plasma when
the plasma temperature falls below the boiling point of titanium.
There will be a timeframe when titanium will be a solid and chlorine will
be a gas at a
From: Bob Higgins
Their calorimetry appears to be flawed. They have apparently modified the
calorimeter to bring in huge current carrying conductors, and everyone knows
that what carries current well also transports heat well…
Good point Bob, and good post. There is almost no real
A huge amount of RF radiation should be produced by the NMR active isotopes
of chlorine. Chlorine has only non zero nuclear magnetic monuments in its
two isotopes.
Mills could capture a large amount of electric power by converting RF to
electricity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectenna
Like al
Jojo,
A lot depends upon how accurately the input energy can be determined. It would
surprise me to find that the welder has precise control upon the current and
voltage waveforms at that level and time frame. These types of devices are not
instrument quality and control of the leakage fields
LENR will always occur in a nanoparticle environment when pumped by an
electric discharge. This is witnessed by many experiments involving
exploding foils comprised of various types of metals.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
> First, the fact that the same output could be o
First, the fact that the same output could be obtained with a 5J input is
completely undocumented - it is just thrown out there and without presented
demonstration or experimental data - the comment is worthless.
Their calorimetry appears to be flawed. They have apparently modified the
calorimete
The Sun Cell has all the indicators of a LENR system: arc discharge,
nanoparticles, and EMF output. Rather than infrared output as seen in the
NiH system, the output is at high frequencies in the blue/green color
spectrum.
Argon is a puzzle to me. The NiH system should work with argon as a gas but
I blamed Mills for revealing too much in his demos, now you are asking him to
reveal more secrets. I don't think that's wise. If he will have any
commercial success at all, he must learn how to keep his secrets a little
better.
We as outside observers will have to be content with what Mills r
If I remember correctly, it is about 2/3 to 3/4 of the way on video 1. A guy
named Jim??? did the bomb calorimetry and he showed the output graph of the
temp rise which he calculated to be around 623+ J. Randy then explain that the
input power was around 200+ J because the fuel was enclosed in
>Mills should have spent 5 or 10 minutes introducing the experiment and
listing all of the materials and the potential chemical energy from various
ways of reacting them. That is what McKubre did in his first book about
cold >fusion, as I described here on p. 12:
He does have validators saying tha
I wrote:
> What do you mean failure? Commercial failures? No, his inventions nearly
> always made money. If you mean he went through several potential designs
> for the lightbulb . . .
>
He also had some epic demonstration failures in 1878 and '79, when
investors visited his house to see the lig
Jojo Iznart wrote:
Point is, he had a long string of failures before his successes. But feel
> free to disagree with me. I won't hold it against you.
>
What do you mean failure? Commercial failures? No, his inventions nearly
always made money. If you mean he went through several potential des
Jojo Iznart wrote:
> Well, the input is 5v x 10,000A or 5J for the short duration.
>
> Why is there a question that the explosion can achieve a high COP. In
> this case, it appears to be >100.
>
> I am not sure where the controversy is. COP appears to be clearly
> overunity.
>
Most explosions
Point is, he had a long string of failures before his successes. But feel free
to disagree with me. I won't hold it against you.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is the SunCell a t
Jojo Iznart wrote:
But didn't Edison have an incredibly lousy history before he perfected his
> lightbulb?
>
No, he had a fabulous history. He was one of the successful and celebrated
inventors in history by 1879, with breakthroughs in telegraphy, the
phonograph and electricity. He often infuri
Where, in the most recent demo video, is the calorimetry?
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Jojo Iznart wrote:
> But didn't Edison have an incredibly lousy history before he perfected
> his lightbulb?
>
> Didn'tt Einstein fail high school algebra before he created the
> beautifully elegant lang
But didn't Edison have an incredibly lousy history before he perfected his
lightbulb?
Didn'tt Einstein fail high school algebra before he created the beautifully
elegant language of Relativity mathematics?
PERIOD.
Don't get me wrong, I want Mills to fail. That would give my wave-powered
po
I get it that there is plenty doubt about Mills' current claims due to his
prior track record. Personally, I find Mills often coming off as arrogant,
particularly in his terse responses to posts in the yahoo
[SocietyforClassicalPhysics] group. He is no friend of LENR research either,
that is b
Kevin
The remark you placed is not fair against R.Mills
(If you place your bet on Miills, you put it on someone with an incredibly
lousy history. Period).
Please read my argumentation:
>From the beginning R.Mills knew that fractional quantum states of hydrogen
>were possible.
His theory
You forgot pulse repetition factor and pulse duration in the case where you
want to transmit high power levels and induce strong, quickly changing
electromagnetic fields, but not cook people or maybe melt your powder
(immediately)
On Sunday, July 27, 2014, Axil Axil wrote:
> Let's get right down
47 matches
Mail list logo
