DGT and Rossi are honest in that they both have little or no idea of what
is going on in LENR. BLP has their science all worked out, and all that is
required is more money for engineering. I say that BLP has even less of a
feel for what they are doing than the rest of their competitors.
I all
I don't think that Blacklight is the best victim of those wikithruthers,
anyway since 2004-2005 I have observed that wikipedia, toward consensus or
toward some popular ideology lobby, is controlled by unilateral group of
opinion.
I hope that when cold fusion fiasco will be unavoidable some people
From Axil
DGT and Rossi are honest in that they both have little or no idea
of what is going on in LENR. BLP has their science all worked out,
and all that is required is more money for engineering. I say that
BLP has even less of a feel for what they are doing than the rest
of their
* BLP is feeling embolden by the recent June and July SunCell
demonstrations. While many skeptics continue to express a number
of legitimate doubts... apparently BLP has none.
I respect your optimism, Steven. But I draw a diametrically opposite
conclusion from this action. It's one that to
Dear Friends
I have just published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/08/fundamental-causation-mechanisms-of-lenr.html
It would be very risky saying that AXIL is an open-minded and anti-dogmatic
physicist (he really is!) because - I tell it from experience- all
physicists claim(ed) to be so-
Jack,
You may wish to do a little more research on Mills' technique and this
welder before buying. I recall (but cannot find the reference at the
moment) that Mills claimed that at least 4.5V was needed to split the water
into monatomic H ions. The spec for this spot welder is 2.5V, but I don't
Is Axil a Physicist? I thought he claimed to be a systems engineer.
And since we don't even know if he is truly a systems engineer, how do we
evaluate what he is saying? A lot of things he says goes over my head; and I'm
an engineer (a real degreed, bonafide, practicing Electrical
Thanks for your insights Bob. I will study it further. It seems like it
might be an interesting project to attempt.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jack,
You may wish to do a little more research on Mills' technique and this
welder before
Jesus told me it doesn't matter.
2014-08-15 11:52 GMT-03:00 Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com:
Is Axil a Physicist? I thought he claimed to be a systems engineer.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
In the diagram in the TechCrunch article, they talk about fusing deuterium
and helium. A deuterium-deuterium fusion would produce copious neutrons
and is highly undesirable. They want charged particles to enable direct
conversion to electrical. The Wikipedia page says they have published
My friend, why do you have to begin a new round of insults with this comment?
Why do you feel the need to mock the God I love, with rhetoric that are sure to
elicit a strong response from me? Can I mock your wife whom you love and not
expect a strong reaction from you?
Jojo
-
I will give you the other cheek and I pray for you, if you are my enemy.
Remember, Jesus told me he is a carpenter but he knew more that the
priests. That's the same with Axil.
2014-08-15 12:06 GMT-03:00 Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com:
My friend, why do you have to begin a new round of
Axil is Lixa spelled backwards. That might help...
On Friday, August 15, 2014, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
I will give you the other cheek and I pray for you, if you are my enemy.
Remember, Jesus told me he is a carpenter but he knew more that the
priests. That's the same with
Actually, to be serious, his email, janap implies he is probably an x
military systems engineer.
JANAP Joint Army Navy Acquisition Policy
He is was one of the guys with the military microwave pulsed radars
electrocuting and/or dissolving fish, reefs, dolphins, etc...
He should remain anonymous,
AXIL is my friend, I admire him for what he knows; he is able to
write very good analyses and syntheses (this a rare quality)
I alone decide what I publish on my personal blog.
Peter
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 6:17 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, to be serious, his email,
This will be my last response on this subject lest I get too hyped up and bring
the quick judgement of the mob here again. But let me just point out a few
things.
1. Exactly what cheek are you giving? I never insulted you, you insulted me
first. How can you turn the other cheek when no one
You have a point there Stewie. But at the least we should know what his
educational background is.
As Captain Piccard once said I need to understand the messenger before I can
understand the message. I wonder why not many people hold to this policy. I
think this is just prudent.
Jojo
As a fundamentalist, you should be interested in how nuclear decay rates
may vary and what makes them vary. The fundamentalist church as dumped a
ton of money into variable nuclear decay rate research.
This branch of religious belief want to overture the radioactive dating
proofs offered by
Mark says he was the carpenter, others the carpenter's son. I don't know
why this should be questioned. It was part of the Gospels writer's narrative
about his outward ordinariness. The Greek word can refer to a contractor, more
than just furniture.
Whatever the faults of Christianity and
I am asking you to give the other cheek and pray for me.
But let's say what the scriptures tells us:
Yachchaapi sarvabhootaanaam beejam tadahamarjuna;
Na tadasti vinaa yatsyaanmayaa bhootam charaacharam
Naanto’sti mama divyaanaam vibhooteenaam parantapa;
Esha tooddeshatah prokto
Ed Storms and all the rest do not address what stabilizes the reaction
products of fusion to helium. I am convince that this is at the heart of
LENR.
When Ed was evaluating the ash results that LeClair gave him. He saw now
radioactive isotopes. But he said that what LeClair produces was hot
My friend, herein lies the problem. Your first comment betrays a stereotype
that you would do well to shed. Your implication is that a religious person
like me is never interested in true science and discovery. Let me just remind
you, that true science is never incompatible with a belief in
Isaac Newton did not believe in the Trinity. You have to emulate this guy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
My friend, I believe you are incorrect. The passage you are referring to is
found in Mark 6:3 with a parallel passage in Mat 13:55. In both instances, the
passage in question was a question; an allegation made by other people that was
recorded by Mark and Matthew. Mark and Matthew never
I am turning the other cheek by not reciprocating with an insult.
As for your other point, I am not sure what you want to prove to me. Are these
passages from the Mahabharata?
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Rocha
To: John Milstone
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014
*PS. Exactly which fundamentalist church dumped or is dumping money into
variable nuclear decay rate research. Pray tell.*
http://sensuouscurmudgeon.wordpress.com/2010/09/04/creationism-and-variable-radioactive-decay-rates/
Snip
Okay. That’s interesting indeed. But even more interesting is
Yes, specifically the Bhagava Gita. This a small text about Jesus, in his
previous incarnation, talking to Arjuna.
It's very likely that Jesus was carpenter. He had a family to feed. Or do
you think he stared at a wall until he started preaching?
2014-08-15 13:26 GMT-03:00 Jojo Iznart
You seem to be illustrating my point quite well my friend.
How do you know the LeClair reaction was cold fusion?, and not Hot fusion as Ed
claims? Is it because of the lack of long term radioactive isotopes? First of
all, correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the LeClair reaction never
If the world is only 6000 years old, the sum of all Egyptian dynasties go
up to 5000 years. No, there was no biblical flood, at least.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
I really don't see any difference from cold fusion to hot fusion. Just see
my paper with Akito.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
*And didn't LeClair get sick with radiation, hence there may have been some
radioactive nasties, which would put Ed's explanation right on.*
There are two quite different effects here that are independent of each
other. This goes back to the BEC explanation. No BEC means gamma radiation.
No
The difference is the production of neutrons.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
wrote:
I really don't see any difference from cold fusion to hot fusion. Just see
my paper with Akito.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Not all nuclear reactions produce neutrons! Some of them are indeed
harmless, like the decay of Tritium to He3.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Axil,
You present a credible theory that connects the dots nicely with supporting
citations. Your statements may have been a little to mater of fact for some of
your audience who would have you state everything unproven as only your opinion
but your arguments were clear and persuasive..
or we would have LENR occurring everywhere around us where ever we have
large magnetic fields
I think we do have LENR occuring around us. Strong magnetic fields occur
before/during earthquakes, after CMEs/geomagnetic storms, during severe
weather, etc.
We just call it different things because
Far Out! Hemp Could Power Better Super-Batteries
http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/innovation/far-out-hemp-could-power-better-super-batteries-n178741
Industrial hemp, the non-psychoactive cousin of marijuana, can play a role
in manufacturing super-powerful supercapacitors for energy storage at a
cost
although I would suggest a little more illumination on the contribution of
the NAE WRT virtual photons / relativistic frames or we would have LENR
occurring everywhere around us where ever we have large magnetic fields.
It takes a very special type of magnetic field. It takes an anapole
magnetic
Terry--
Thanks for that link--The paper is very interesting. The effect of magnetic
fields on the reaction is not spelled out to well. Jones seems to think that
there are improvements to the ideas since 1993. I agree with him.
Bob
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Terry Blanton
On 16/08/2014 12:11 AM, Jojo Iznart wrote:
...It is the inherent unreliability and irreproducibility of the
methods themselves that is causing a lot of controversy.
I don't know why you think radio-nucleotide dating is unreliable (unless
you only listen to the YECs!). Take a look at figure 1
I've had numerous wiki run-ins with the Grump on Cold Fusion / eCat.
(but I haven't edited BLP)
Apart from his anti-fringe-science posture, he's a stickler on
reliable sources. (ie none of the sites covering the ecat are
reliable, so there's nothing to report).
BLP's complaint about
Where's the promised TIP2 report
***Rossi has no control over those 7 feckless (or perhaps even corrupt)
professors. They are more concerned with their own reputations than the
advancement of science.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would you
We see an emperor with no clothes but are afraid to admit it.
***Axil aint no emperor. Go ahead and keep challenging him. I challenged
Ed Storms when he was on this list and got very similar treatment as Axil
is supposedly giving you.
So, how can we know that you're a bonafide EE? How are your
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
You have a point there Stewie. But at the least we should know what his
educational background is.
***I think he posted it sometime before. Physics degree, working as a
systems engineer. You don't trust that? How
Here's a place to start on radionuclide dating. But my eyes glaze over
(MEGO) relatively quickly
http://answersinscience.org/RadiometricDating-Woolf.htm
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:30 PM, jwin...@cyllene.uwa.edu.au wrote:
On 16/08/2014 12:11 AM, Jojo Iznart wrote:
...It is the inherent
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Fri, 15 Aug 2014 08:59:47 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
What I don't understand is what will
PREVENT D-D fusion if the conditions are present for D-3He fusion. In
fact, if they intend to breed 3He, then it seems there will be other
reactions going on that probably will
- Original Message -
From: Kevin O'Malley
To: vortex-l
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 5:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
You have a point there Stewie. But at the
Why would I show you anything if that was your last response or
correspondence with me?
If you aren't going to show YOUR bonafides, why do you ask them of anyone
else? Hypocrisy, thy name is jojo.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original
Thanks for your comments.
Radionucleotide dating, whatever radionucleotides are being used is inherently
based on assumptions. If any of the assumptions do not hold up, the method is
totally useless.
Assumption #1: That the ratio of the 2 isotopes is the same in the past as it
is in the
My friend, there is more evidence (physical, scientific, literary, historical,
etc) to establish a young Earth than there are evidences for the existence of
Egyptian dynasties, let alone their supposed age.
We don't know for sure they go up to 5000 years. But even it they did, it
would not
I am not familiar with the Bhagava Gita so I will not comment on this. But I
only have one question. How do you know it was Jesus? Does the text
specifically mention the name Jesus?
Regarding Jesus as a Carpenter ... Don't get me wrong. I am not arguing that
Jesus was not a carpenter. It
Would you rather base your world view on one or two outlier points, or on
the overwhelming trend of millions of data points that all fit and are
consistent with each other?
***Excellent point. There are so many who simply do not examine the wide
range of evidence. As a ferinstance, Jojo points
You need to evaluate what the man believed based on his commentaries not based
on some wikipedia entry.
But even if he did not, he was still a man of faith and believed in God before
he was a man of science. That was my point.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Rocha
My friend, my original question stands: Which fundamentalist church?
ICR is NOT a fundamentalist church. It is a research think tank supported by
many people including non-Christians. Heck, some of their more senior
researchers are non-Christians. They are just honest, open-minded
I am ceasing my communication with you because you have a history of insulting
people, not just me. So, lest the mob here kick me out again, I will refrain
from futile discussions and piss fights with immature kids like you.
Have a nice life.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From:
So... then... that wasn't your last correspondence with me.
I see you've begun insulting a ton of others around here, so I'm happy to
be left off your target list.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
I am ceasing my communication with you because you
Jesus never said he was a carpenter.
***Now I see that you're saying that Jesus could have been a carpenter.
You're pretty disingenuous.
Nor did any of the gospel writers claim that he was a carpenter.
***Mark 6:3. New International Version http://biblehub.com/niv/mark/6.htm
Isn't this the
I feel like Vortex would not be Vortex without the occasional religious
digression.
Eric
I am ceasing my communication with you because you have a history of
insulting people, not just me.
***Ahhh shucks, I was hoping Vorts would appreciate a good, creative,
well-placed insult. Second of all, where is my history of insulting you?
And third of all, my insults have been good, creative,
58 matches
Mail list logo
