These might be pretty similar to Rossi's setup. (Google Superthal smu)
Superthal heating modules
Prefabricated heating modules consisting of vacuum-formed ceramic fibre
with an integral Kanthal Super molybdenum-disilicide (MoSi2) heating
element for up to 1750°C (3180°F) element temperature.
it.
John
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 5:26 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:00 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
There are two rays of hope here:
1) That the high rate of infection in Africa will allow evolution toward
greater ambulatory transmission
Additionally some people get it but are apparently symptom-less beyond a
light touch of the flu.
This could very well be a nutrition issue, such that those with
insufficient nutrition fail.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 5:16 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to David Roberson's message of Wed,
It seems that Mega doses of Vitamin C are very promising:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/ebolagate/2014/09/combating-ebola-how-to-fight-ebola-with-vitamin-c-ascorbic-acid.html
Vitamin C is needed to make collagen that keeps your blood on the inside.
Ebola causes Vitamin C to drop to Zero until the
You want conspiracy???
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/breaking_news/2014/08/for-ebola-they-built-drive-through-gas-chambers.html
Basically the PCR test is 100% effective at registering positive when
tested on someone who has Ebola.
It has never been tested on someone without Ebola.
So does it
No, it means he is important! Too important to waste his energy pressing
the shift button.
2014-09-01 2:07 GMT+12:00 Alexander Hollins alexander.holl...@gmail.com:
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1673957641/free-energy?ref=category_popular
all caps means he's REALLY serious.
Not just that update:
http://www.infoworld.com/t/microsoft-windows/microsoft-yanks-botched-black-tuesday-patches-kb-2982791-kb-2970228-kb-2975719-and-kb-2975331-248582
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
298 . . . my lysdexic friend.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014
Alain, where did you read that the blank/dummy control drive also worked?
From what I read it seemed to indicate that it passed (got negative result)
on that drive.
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
few bad point for the test are :
1- the thrust is
contained internal physical
modifications that were designed to produce
thrust, while the other did not (with the latter being referred to as the
“null” test article).
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 9:16 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Alain, where did you read that the blank/dummy control
However, apparently a dummy load produced zero thrust...
And I think the other designs need to be better understood, should they
really be null?
http://i.imgur.com/daNmDty.png
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:09 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like I can answer my own question
Different, but this made me think of Borbas Miklos, a simple ion free
anomalous thrust experiment:
http://web.archive.org/web/20090902150248/http://bmiklos2000.freeweb.hu/unipolar.htm
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:16 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
However, apparently a dummy load
More on the null test...
http://www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/2c8xah/nasa_validates_impossible_space_drive_wired_uk/cjdg3bh
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 11:21 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Different, but this made me think of Borbas Miklos, a simple ion free
anomalous thrust
I was not aware of Poher, but given that shouldn't Morton be considered a
further and earlier verification of this effect?
Sure it might be harder to directly replicate his results, but the same
force from an asymmetrical spark discharge was noted.
It might also be worth noting Piggot:
Surely it would make a steam punk fans day.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Can this system support supercritical steam generation. How hot are the
hot spots?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercritical_steam_generator
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 2:29 PM,
Excuse my ignorance, because my interest in Rossi is small maybe I have not
been paying enough attention...
But has this report still not come out and not a peep from them?
Just checking...
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
Different folks different
And is it more light, or more ionization that can be understood by the
apparent light and light sources?
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Rest easy Harry
The article itself is confused. Whoever wrote the article had its premise
backward.
On Sat,
The description of Cravens reminds me of Muon catalyzed fusion.
I have not read up on Craven's work, did it involve Muons?
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Axil Axil
One of the most amazing LENR systems of them all
Though not LENR related, the Rosemary Ainslie circuit has has a resistive
electromagnet that is pulsed.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Hi John,
Yes it is a mistake to read too much into this amp-turn detail. It is more
of a curiosity
assuming they are round.
John
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
If you have seen the famous image of the Rossi HT HotCat showing the
resistance wiring, then you probably realize that the electrical input,
even
though it is used for heating, and even
With IndieGoGo, you can get partial funding unlike kickstarter.
So even if it doesn't reach their goal they very likely get to do what they
can with what they got.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
the crowd-funding effort on IndieGoGo
quarters
down to 7.09%. Those are not good odds.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/06/24/probability-rossi-is-real-is-now-28/
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:44 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
wrote
, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:51 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Kevin, I think you failed to account for CME and sunspot activity being
very low.
Elevated sunspot activity is related to aberrant behavior
Easy enough to take 2 salt water aquariums, fill both with sea stars etc...
Expose one to a water softening device, and the other as the control.
Second test, take some hard water and measure it's hardness somehow? And
then expose to Radar.
Tell Marine Biologists about your discovery.
Should
vapor does not imply that a
Lamborghini can be designed to use that principle or that the car will sell
in the marketplace. Designing the car requires far more science and
engineering fields than demonstrating gasoline detonation.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:53 AM, John Berry berry.joh
Axil, I think you need to add ether or aether to your spell check
dictionary.
Either or both, but not neither or you end up with 'either' ;)
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
“*John, I agree this is an etheric effect and has the same difficulties
MM
IS real, or he is NOT real..
There is no such thing as probability in reality.
I see..
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:12 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze's ego is astounding, thinking that he has things so well worked out
that his ramblings about probability have meaning.
Even
Blaze, a fine verbal joust.
But you must admit it is not even close to reality.
Now you are engaging in a factious argument, Rossi and his eCat are not
wave functions yet to be collapsed.
Good comedy, but if I were to take you at your word, I would consider you
needing to be picked up by some
it work even in I know I faked it!
Imagine my confusion when you show me you can do it to in person, and I
know I used a trick and this shouldn't be possible.
Perhaps I am taking you too seriously.
Perhaps you were in jest about an eCat wave function waiting to be
collapsed.
I sure hope so.
John
then to be cemented as
reality for the universe, or at least earth.
It already either IS, or IS NOT regardless of what people think, or what
odds it would be running at with a bookie.
John
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi has either found a real
that is at odds with a con man.
But my opinion of Rossi is meaningless.
As is the randomness of quantum probabilities on the fact that probability
has nothing to do with Rossi having anything real or not.
John
there are enough of these low level
'promises/threats' to bring it up to a level of relevance.
John
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm constrained to decrease my ASSessment of an ASSurance
that Blaze will pull his head out of his ASinine hind quarters down
.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 8:12 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze's ego is astounding, thinking that he has things so well worked out
that his ramblings about probability have meaning.
Even if he were that good at working out probability, a few facts remain
that make it worthless
Oh, and you are more likely to die from an infection caught in hospital
than die from all forms of accident combined.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:39 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Put a gun to my head with 10,000,000 chambers and a bullet in only one of
them selected at random
So, it could be a good way to remove nickel pollution...
OR if it is doing some biological transmutation maybe it is making nickle...
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:29 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
A new plant species with an unusual lifestyle – it eats nickel for a
living – has
Looks like Wikipedia are fairly rigid. See their entry for ee cummings
Rusty
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 May 2014 18:05
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ever-vigilant Wikipedia editors
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com mailto:jabow...@gmail.com
Dear Friends at Vortex
I have suddenly lost contact with you. Don't know why or how, but I have
not received emails for what seems like about 10 days. I enjoy well over
half the posts, and find that I'm missing it all. Please reconnect me!
John Newman
I did not think quarks were meant to exist in such separation?
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
More:
It looks like the magnetic field drives the quark in the same direction as
its spin. This makes sense because two magnets will attract or repel each
.pdf
http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0009/0009076.pdf
note: The author claims that it cannot be used for transmitting information
backwards in time, however this is easily shown to be false if SR take on
reality were assumed to be true.
John
I should also note the possibly obvious, near-fields are not necessarily
near.
They can can be extremely distant if the frequency is low or infinite if
essentially zero.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:49 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
In researching my near field electromagnetic
-field around a
dipole transmits instantaneously within the quarter wave length.
I can find it if anyone is interested.
John
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 7:51 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.netwrote:
I don't know if your EM inertia is the same thing, but I mentioned
previously that the concept
anyone see any problems, improvements, suggestions where to go from
here?
John
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
John--
Three points for clarification:
How is the solenoid move, along the axis, perpendicular to the axis or
rotate around the axis?
In the case of increasing inertia, there is one solenoid and if you saw it
as an O
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
John--
I would say that they do.
I assume you mean propagate instantaneously?
At least there is still the booby prize of disprovng SR.
If they didn't, it seems the magnetic fields coming from the Sun to the
earth
Then my idea is bust.
But so is Special Relativity.
There is no way for my idea to be wrong and Special Relativity to survive.
John
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
John--
Yes--I meant that I would say they propagate instantaneously. I think
to SR.
John
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:24 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:28 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, but you will have fun trying to visualize this with SR.
SR assumes that each sees the other as length contracted, as clock
Here is a snippet from the Navy:
Quote:
In principle, the critics of GPS in the relativity debate have not been
completely wrong. The neglected 7 factor could hurt us. The OCS software
should be reformulated. Nevertheless, in practice, neglect of relativity
does not now contribute measurably to
leads to a net force opposing the acceleration.
This would seem identical to inertia, but could also be seen as a
hysteresis against space effect.
John
, the
inertial mass would seem to turn negative, it would not resist acceleration.
John
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:43 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
I was discussing elsewhere if a photon has mass, there are many reasons to
argue that it does, it imparts a force as it is emitted
BTW the DOE are working on a variation of this concept for NASA...
http://science.howstuffworks.com/electromagnetic-propulsion1.htm
Though their version is switched, much like a patent for a similar idea I
have seen.
John
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:05 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
not being constant outside of
completely perfect inertial frames that do not exist in reality.
John
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:32 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
John,
Forget these videos.
I just realized they are not a fair critique of special relativity because
they don't factor
that the speed of sound is not relative
to the air.
John
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:58 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
John,
Einstein's conception of simultaneity follows a procedure. The first step
in this procedure is to establish clock synchronization in one frame of
reference
...
John
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
At this moment there are 8,699 customers without power in Georgia.
http://outagemap.georgiapower.com/external/default.html
*Active Outages:* 186 *Affected Customers:* 8,699
Since the great 1 blizzard I have
not seem
to be supported fully by fusion.
I bet there are other anomalies, but my knowledge and interest in CF/LENR
is rather low.
IMO the key to all of this is in the anomalies, things not acting in the
normal way.
John
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote
http://www.neoclassicalrelativity.org/
There are 6 simple videos showing arguments against various parts of
Special Relativity.
http://www.youtube.com/user/NeoclassicRelativity
, and if they control the experiment,
the data provided from it, and provide the only 'accepted' theory
No wonder it looks like it fits.
But the Doppler effect is way more than enough to explain the result.
John
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:43 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
After
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:32 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
John, this device is real.
No doubt, so is the Doppler effect, which *will* be present.
Read the article carefully and you will understand how the frequency is
accurately explained by Lorentz contraction. Do you
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:25 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
John, like before, you are dead set against special relativity and even a
simple example such as this does not convince you.
Correct.
It would convince me at least to a point if I could check over everything,
or as i
that each photon has
a lowest frequency which is when the observer inhabits the frame it was
created in, which is fine, but then the photon has a preferred
(discoverable) frame!
John
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 5:43 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
There has been a continuous
Some of the arguments are weak, but the one with the electrons in the
closed tube is pretty solid and clear.
The same issue occurs with any rotated disk.
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Another opposing view:
into the dime-box saloon!! The place could
use some female energy...
J
-mark
*From:* Kevin O'Malley [mailto:kevmol...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 05, 2014 4:28 PM
*To:* vortex-l
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Disproofs of Relativity
John:
Do you have a citation for all these many
Special Relativity has a real problem with instantaneous communication,
even when it must be possible as in this case.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 8:54 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Both frames are in sliding contact so it takes no time for the sprayer to
leave behind a mark.
I
, it is not disallowed.
John
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:24 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
If you want to believe it is settled science as many do, you are welcome
to do so.
But I question it because no one
, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
John:
Do you have a citation for all these many findings? I'm debating
someone elsewhere and she is not only unconvinced, she's far smarter and
better educated than I am.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:24 PM, John Berry
, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:40 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
The Sagnac effect is a very good example.
Then there are various interferometry drift experiments, and most have
shown some degree of drift, just far less that a static aether the earth
moves through, positive results are more
some female energy...
J
-mark
*From:* Kevin O'Malley [mailto:kevmol...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 05, 2014 4:28 PM
*To:* vortex-l
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Disproofs of Relativity
John:
Do you have a citation for all these many findings? I'm debating
someone elsewhere and she
Oh, and one somehow got left out of my list... If NASA doesn't think the
speed of light is insurmountable...
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/05/28/nasa-admits-they-are-working-to-travel-faster-than-the-speed-of-light/
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 8:48 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
well on.
John
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:35 AM, D R Lunsford antimatter3...@gmail.comwrote:
No one will ever take cold fusion seriously if they come here and read
nonsense about how relativity is wrong.
You
differences!
The speed of light being C is actually not indicated by most experiments to
measure the speed of light as C under all conditions, rather confirmation
bias and stilted interpretations of results are used to keep the theory
alive.
John
in that
portion.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:34 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
The Sagnac effect is where light is sent both ways around a loop (fibre
optic cable loop/coil or an arrangement of mirrors) and the time it takes
light to complete the loop is increased in one direction
fluorescence?
What about thermal insulative properties, if some change faster after a
temperature drop an IR camera will pick it yp.
John
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Yes I think Peter said something about the first week in February
Bob
- Original
I think the better argument is the length contraction of the circumference
of a quickly rotating circular disk, if you put a measuring tape around it,
you will get a result that the disk insists can't be as it sees the
measuring tape as connected.
John
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:23 AM, David
of instantaneous walkie talkies in the classic twin
paradox.
John
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:23 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
That would be true if the problem of simultaneity across frames reference
were present, but the thought experiment is crafted to avoid that
possibility.
Harry
, such as the time dilation changing from zero
to huge based on subtle changes in motion (almost linear to perfectly
linear to).
John
to come to but I recommend not trying to
imagine this as it will do your head in :)
John
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:28 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On second thought, I am not so sure about the linear example.
I will need to see it illustrated to be sure.
harry
On Fri, Feb 28
they aren't receding at high speed so we cam observe the
time dilation that is meant to be happening in real time so to speak.
John
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:33 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
If you increase the size of the disk in the non-linear example until it is
almost linear
in
Since the mirrors are biased to their frame (whatever that is) then um
well, er..
Well how can you describe reality with a theory of unreality.
John
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:58 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Reading the wiki page, essentially wiki and I are saying
have a real impact on the actual experiment, requiring higher
linear velocity and greater distances to pick the results up without
improving the clock, but as a thought experiment is got a bit simpler.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:20 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Here you go: http
. So does the thought experiment designed to test SR.
You should illustrate that as well.
harry
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:20 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
Here you go: http://imageshack.com/a/img198/4812/j2s2.png
BTW if acceleration doesn't cause time dilation, even though
Relativity.
John
. In addition, it's an accelerating
acceleration vector.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:57 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
If you are in an accelerating space elevator, and you throw a clock
upwards and then it falls down, the clock looks to be accelerating, but it
is in a constant
Leaking, I guess you are implying the equivalence principle is not meant to
apply to dropped objects?
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:19 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Leaking, this does not apply to the elevator example though.
And the equivalence principle states that G-force
that you're too inept to
figure out a way to differentiate between them, but instead that there is *no
possible local experiment you can perform to tell the difference, no matter
how clever you are*.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:17 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Leaking, I guess you
believe me but you can't explain it.
But please this time, don't ignore me.
John
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:43 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
If I am wrong about this and this is an expected difference, then
the equivalence principle is often wrongly stated to be far more
could tell did not relate to what I am
proposing.
John
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:38 PM, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I am missing something at this point as well. Isn't dilation an
effect of VELOCITY and not acceleration?
Both!
General Relativity states that time dilation occurs in gravity fields and
with acceleration (G-Force)
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:01 PM, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
YOU said falls down. That assumes a mass and direction. Your statement
of the experiment assumes a massive body being accelerated away from. if
we are talking about in free space, then that is different.
In the
that the physical phenomena are in any way alike, since
one effects time and one doesn't, which is a huge difference.
John
dilation/contraction
2014-02-27 0:40 GMT+01:00 John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:12 PM, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
Not at all, however, if you are accelerating at a rate away from the
body that the clock is falling towards,
No offence to you, but I
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:54 PM, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=237212
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:44 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
But reading this thread:
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=237212
to the train.
How can both measure C for the light?
Or what if you replace it with an electron at near .999 C, what would be
expected?
Obviously assume a vacuum is present.
Thanks for taking a look,
John
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:37 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
The spatial relationships
Special Relativity
Sorry. I should have probably included the full version at least once.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
John--
What does SR stand for or mean?
Bob
*From:* John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Friday, February 21, 2014 3
end, except for when
it isn't!
John
For brevity, I will explain it in sentence. and the possible results in a
few more, But the longer form solves questions and objections:
Take 2 light sensors separated at an appropriate distance, the censors are
shaped like CD and are transparent, designated A and B, rotate them at high
enough
, and one week from now is 04.03.2014 (dd/mm/) for me, but many
reading will think I meant a month and a week away.
John
David?
I really am anxiously waiting for evidence.
Not trying to rush you, but just don't forget ok?
Assuming you are still talking to me.
Yeah, patience isn't my strong suit.
John
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 7:51 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM
an entrained aether.
So while I can wait if you have other things right now, I am very
interested in such evidence, even if you just tell me what to Google.
Thank you,
John
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:21 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
John, I am pursuing other goals at the moment
exist no matter what your motion is relative to that wire.
John
Because the
, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:32 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
Here we go again...
I have strongly argued that according to SR, magnetic fields occur due to
relative motion between electric charges, maybe also electric fields and an
observer with a relative motion to the charge/fields
be
unaffected!
John
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 8:05 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:25 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Imagine two friends with synchronized watches. One friend
a ridiculous
paradox as you say.
So this seems to be evidence for an aether, to be added to the big pile of
evidence for the establishment to ignore.
John
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 8:34 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:10 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote
201 - 300 of 1582 matches
Mail list logo
