Hello. I have been following Rossi and the posts since the beginning and
am very fascinated.
Rather than a fraud, I believe Rossi is on to something incrementally
better than those that came before. He has more success starting the
reaction, however I think he has little control over it once
From: Jeff Sutton jsutton.sudb...@gmail.com
Hello. I have been following Rossi and the posts since the beginning and am
very fascinated.
Rather than a fraud, I believe Rossi is on to something incrementally better
than those that came before. He has more success starting the reaction,
The self sustaining mode as demonstrated basically is just a
quasi exponentially damped energy source that cools down at its internally
determined rate. It must be reheated to operational temperature. He once
talked of using a duty cycle of power input followed by zero power input
to keep it
On 11-11-09 11:21 AM, Jeff Sutton wrote:
Hello. I have been following Rossi and the posts since the beginning
and am very fascinated.
Rather than a fraud, I believe Rossi is on to something incrementally
better than those that came before. He has more success starting the
reaction, however
*The Rossi reactor has evolved over time and these changes inform how Rossi
controls his reactor.*
* *
*Initially, Rossi had an internal heater whose function it was to produce
exotic forms of hydrogen.*
* *
*It is these little known hydrogen assemblages that make the Rossi reactor
work.*
* *
Good points. But then what is the control mechanism that does this?
Surely not the water flow rate as that is typically constant, nor the
heating element (especially with self-sustaining mode). Were there any
other control boxes or wires that were never specified? Some mysterious
frequency
Jeff Sutton jsutton.sudb...@gmail.com wrote:
He has shown it in self-sustaining mode but always shuts it down after a
few hours with some excuse. Why does he do that when the blockbuster note
would be the ecat just keeps on going. I suggest this must mean that the
ecat cannot just keep on
You make some good points and we know that there are neat and as yet
unknown processes at play.
wrt
*In detail, the area around and very close to the internal heater produces
hydrogen plasma. *
Great but why doesn't the heat produced by the reaction itself form more
plasma? You are treating one
Agreed regarding self-sustaining time and there is something in the
reactor that needs to be reset. I suggest however, that simply adding
heat again cannot be it as that is saying one type of heat is different
from the other.
Is the heater a DC device or AC with some important frequency?
On
*Great but why doesn't the heat produced by the reaction itself form more
plasma? You are treating one heat different from the other, unless there
is some geometry involved?*
* *
*Geometry is involved.*
* *
*I have always assumed that there is a space between the powder and the
heater where
*If memory serves, someone on vortex saw that the internal heater was
pulsed from looking at a movie of a scope either in the first or a very
early demo.*
* *
*I would think that an alternating plasma would increase the production of
Rydberg matter since RM condenses out of the plasma as the
of the Black Light powders and be done.
Fran
From: Jeff Sutton [mailto:jsutton.sudb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 1:54 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Control Mechanism
Agreed regarding self-sustaining time and there is something in the reactor
that needs
Heat a secondary effect ?
Could the heater be a coil fed with sawtooth pulses to create collapsing
magnetic fields
that somehow promote the reactions ?
QM wonderland ;)
Non physicist speculation here...
JG Moreau
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:29:56 -0500
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Control
Rossi has said that each of the 107 E-Cat reactor boxes in the 1 MW demo
had a individual control system. Running in self sustain mode, with the
heater not being activated, the only other wires going into the reactor
box are those called RF as per the attachment. One would then assume
these
Thank you and nice thoughts regarding control/gain. I had missed the RF
wires.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
Rossi has said that each of the 107 E-Cat reactor boxes in the 1 MW demo
had a individual control system. Running in self sustain
15 matches
Mail list logo
