The reason for a low position of electrons in Holmlid theory is
superconductivity in the hydrogen molecule. The Meissner effect pushes all
electrons out of the positively charges core of the molecule and a shell of
electrons forms a cloud of negative charge close to the positive nucleus of
the
Hi,
Another consequence of shrunken D molecules is that a neutron may hop from one D
nucleus to the other within the molecule. This produces T + p, and explains the
Tritium results previously detected. BTW, this is also Mills' original CAF
reaction.
T is produced in preference to He3 because it
New paper from Holmlid on ultra dense hydrogen as dark matter:
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aadda1/meta
Holmlid is a very brave scientist for putting this idea forward.
The finding that Strange radiation as a symbiont of ultra dense matter can
absorb up to 10^6 GeV of
In reply to Andrew Meulenberg's message of Thu, 18 Oct 2018 06:28:11 -0400:
Hi Andrew,
Actually I was thinking about Mills, &/or my variation thereof. See my web page
for the latter. However I think that any theory that provides for shrunken
atoms/molecules is a viable possibility.
>Robin,
>
This seems more plausible than D-D -> He-4 directly without gammas.
From: Andrew Meulenberg
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 6:28 AM
To: VORTEX; Andrew Meulenberg
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hopping, low-mo, and variable decay neutrons - more than one
type
Robin,
A post from Alan Smith that describes the way Russ's LENR reactor produces
heat and/or gamma raditaion as follows:
The 'why are there no dead graduate students' meme to justify not believing
on cold fusion goes back a long way. Actually it should not be confused
with hot fusion at all, which as
?
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 3:19 PM
To: Jones Beene
Cc: VORTEX
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hopping, low-mo, and variable decay neutrons - more than one
type
Hi Jones,
Consider the possibilities resulting from the existence of a shrunken molecule:-
Deuterium
Robin,
I'm sorry that I don't have time to monitor this site regularly, so I may
have missed the earlier references. However, when you mention shrunken
molecules, do you mean those with deep-orbit electrons, such as modeled in
A. Meulenberg and J. L. Paillet, “Basis for femto-molecules and
Hi Jones,
Consider the possibilities resulting from the existence of a shrunken molecule:-
Deuterium molecules that had not shrunk far enough to fuse might easily be
confused with Helium. They are chemically non-reactive, and very close to the
same mass.
Those that have shrunk far enough to
From: "mix...@bigpond.com"
> The decay you describe only applies to free neutrons, i.e. those that have
acquired enough energy from a different source to allow them to escape their
original nucleus.
Hi Robin
Not exactly - "decay" was meant to encompass more than standard free neutrons.
From: Axil Axil
Regarding: "but sadly, almost everything else out there, as theory, is
demonstrably weaker if it cannot explain the lack of lack of radiation as well."
> This lack of radiation is due to the polarization of particle chirality. The
> strength of the weak force is
Regarding: "but sadly, almost everything else out there, as theory, is
demonstrably weaker if it cannot explain the lack of lack of radiation as
well."
This lack of radiation is due to the polarization of particle chirality.
The strength of the weak force is proportional to the proportion of left
It is appreciated in the standard physics of the neutron that a small fraction
(approximately one in 1000) of the decay of free neutrons happens with an
emitted gamma (soft x-ray actually) - which is in addition to a slower beta
electron emission than normal, and also a neutrino. This channel
English translation of reference as follows:
Features of the periodic discharge in the fluid flow and the specifics of
its impact on the electrode material
12/29/2008
The results of the study of the structure of cluster and plasma formations
in the near-electrode space during and after exposure
More...
Conformation of Ken Shoulders EVO theory.
Black EVOs are pictured. They are really spooky looking.
Also magnetic vortex flux tubes are called " fluxes"
Action of the EVO can continue for months on the surface of metals,
Of particular note as follows:
Quote
"During the study of the
If you take a look at the reference(
https://mephi.ru/content/articles/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=1689_1=1),
figure 7, you will see that the magnetic vortex flux tubes have a cross
section in the nano-meter range at the point where the tubes touch the
surface of the metal. The black vortex solitons
In light of the new Parkomov material and the interest in "strange radiation"
it seems that there are about a dozen candidates for this phenomenon: some of
which are feasible on paper like the EVO but most are extremely unlikely. It
has come down to the rock bottom realization that either
A "second type of neutron" whether it is ultra low momentum or not, would be
largely indistinguishable in characteristics from ultra dense hydrogen UDH but
with a variation in lifetime. It would not be the UDH of Holmlid which he
thinks is long-lived, but there are many theories which are
neutron detectors in the antarctic ice sheet
should read
neutrino detectors in the antarctic ice sheet
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 4:44 PM Axil Axil wrote:
> No, I stated 1 million GeV correctly.
>
> See
> http://restframe.com/downloads/tachyon_monopoles.pdf
>
> I beleive what Keith Fredericks is
No, I stated 1 million GeV correctly.
See
http://restframe.com/downloads/tachyon_monopoles.pdf
I beleive what Keith Fredericks is seeing is an analoge tackyon as
characterized as a quasiparticle. It is actually a molecule of ultra dense
matter that can host a superconductive condensate of
The model that I came up produced one strange result.It needed a 4th type of
neutrino the condensate neutrino.This neutrino would have a variable energy
depending on the size of the condensate.
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 12 Oct 2018 15:12:31 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Please look at this document from L.I. URUTSKOEV who coined the term
>"Strange Radiation"
>
>http://disq.us/url?url=http%3A%2F%2Faflb.ensmp.fr%2FAFLB-297%2Faflb297m330.pdf%3A3YRq8EiVHq9VyTnY_19ahXnNf5A=2168707
>
>page
It definitely seems reasonable to try to link "strange radiation" with a second
kind of neutron.
Not too many choices for a particle that has no charge, high mass and a
lifetime in minutes.
There are a couple of theories out there on the web, further towards the far
fringe, which include a
Please look at this document from L.I. URUTSKOEV who coined the term
"Strange Radiation"
http://disq.us/url?url=http%3A%2F%2Faflb.ensmp.fr%2FAFLB-297%2Faflb297m330.pdf%3A3YRq8EiVHq9VyTnY_19ahXnNf5A=2168707
page 1160 part 4
"Rather surprising is the mere fact of recording radiation at the
Arguably the LENR theorists with the most impressive credentials
(notwithstanding having unappreciated concepts) are Widom/Larsen and Peter
Hagelstein. Both espouse controversial theories involving a new type or
characteristic of neutron - for explaining excess heat. Because fission
neutrons
25 matches
Mail list logo
