On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
This theory has no bearing on the results. The theory may be wrong, but
the technique has been independently tested, and it works.
So they claim. But the demonstrations are not impressive. I'm not aware of
any
There are scientists that report much better results:
http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/204israel.html
citation:
- Run #64b gave 1500% excess heat over a duration of 80 hours with a
total excess energy of 4.6 Megajoules
So, why do they all stare at Rossi and his poor COP and
Why? Because Rossi has apparently cracked the reliability issue. I can
tell you he is being super conservative about the COP number. The 1 MW
test had virtually NO input power. close to infinite COP, 5.5 hours of
heat after death until finally the customer's acceptance engineer said
I have
There are scientists that report much better results:
http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/204israel.html
citation:
- Run #64b gave 1500% excess heat over a duration of 80 hours
with a total excess energy of 4.6 Megajoules
So, why do they all stare at Rossi and his poor COP and
I think more his +10 kW outputs with a few 100 watts in is hard to
question and that is which causes the stares and envy. As for
questionable methods, the 15 Jan test was done under the supervision of
the university professors and scientists. As Rossi said in the video, we
did the tests as
What circus? Rossi brought a Door Knob and stove pipe style reactor to
the university for testing. Set it up with their test equipment and
advise. Did the test the way they desired, as the university people were
in the room (like Celani who tried to get / steal a spectrum) and
measured around
The circus is the continual refusal by deniers that call over 1
year of published peer reviewed (Levi, Kullander, Celani, etc)
test data rubbish when it is the deniers that are making up
rubbish claims. You want science? Wait until Rossi sells me a
E-Cat and you can give it your all, that is
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
There are scientists that report much better results:
http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/204israel.html
citation:
- Run #64b gave 1500% excess heat over a duration of 80 hours with a total
excess energy of 4.6 Megajoules
Dardik's
Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com wrote:
If you are so sure Rossi has the goods, why don't you pay him the
money now - none of that escrow nonsense - in return for a 10
percent discount, or for putting you at the top of the waiting
list - or both?
Did Rossi make those offers? Are you
Are you saying Levi, Celani, Kullander, Essen,Bianchi, McKubre,Focardi,
etc and Rossi are ALL fools, idiots, liars or incompetents? If you throw
mud at Rossi you throw mud at them as well.
As for our venture, we need to wait for Rossi to post the technical
specification for the high
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
Are you saying Levi, Celani, Kullander, Essen,Bianchi, McKubre,Focardi,
etc and Rossi are ALL fools, idiots, liars or incompetents? If you throw
mud at Rossi you throw mud at them as well.
No. You're putting up
Are you sure Puthoff was so skeptical to start with? He spent more than a
decade spending public money to research paranormal even before meeting
Yuri Geller.
2011/12/11 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you sure Puthoff was so skeptical to start with? He spent more than a
decade spending public money to research paranormal even before meeting
Yuri Geller.
Neither Targ nor Puthoff were properly skeptical of
I never found a way to make vapor carry more than 1/1 of its volume in
liquid when any of its parts are sltighly off horizontal. So, I cannot
convince myself that humidity meters would be useful at all.
2011/12/11 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Daniel Rocha
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.dewrote:
There are scientists that report much better results:
http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/204israel.html
citation:
- Run #64b gave 1500% excess heat over a duration of 80 hours with a total
excess energy of
Mass in must = mass out, or else pressure inside would steadily increase.
From: Daniel Rocha [mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 9:19 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:What is so special abbout Rossi?
I never found a way to make vapor carry more than
Subject: RE: [Vo]:What is so special abbout Rossi?
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:29:17 -0800
Mass in must = mass out, or else pressure inside would steadily increase… From:
Daniel Rocha [mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 9:19 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
This sort of claim Unique to the ET experiments is the use of a new
understanding of wave modulation. Rather than dc, dc + ac, dc pulsed or
bi-level perturbation, the waveforms being subjected (successfully) to test
by ET employ waves fractally nested in a
as
vapor is ~1800.
-m
From: Robert Leguillon [mailto:robert.leguil...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 10:34 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:What is so special abbout Rossi?
Just a thought, FWIW:
The pressure does increase, raising the boiling temperature, decreasing
19 matches
Mail list logo
