Lest we not forget ... A field was never a physical thing. Fields have
always been a mathematical artifice used to describe/visualize the action
at a distance supplied by charges - stationary and in motion.
According to Hotson, these actions at a distance are all transmitted by the
essentially
Well said. I love it when Hotson is quoted.
He was intuitive about bringing Dirac’s mathematics down to earth, that he must
have addressed the DDL – but a quick google turns up nothing specific.
From: Bob Higgins
Lest we not forget ... A field was never a physical thing. Fields
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Well said. I love it when Hotson is quoted.
Especially someone as knowledgeable as Professor Higgins!
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:19:53 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:15 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Actually no place in the Universe is completely free of fields.
Another possibility is that there is no such thing as a field.
You've been reading CC.
In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 18 Aug 2014 23:11:51 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
And, it is possible to create an opposite field to balance out that natural
one that is measured within a small location in space. This is done with
pairs of coils, etc.
Dave
There isn't just a
-Original Message-
From: mixent mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Aug 19, 2014 5:44 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 18 Aug 2014 23:11:51 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
And, it is possible to create
radiation. That
acceleration can readily be due to an external electric field or a magnetic
field that is directed properly.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Aug 19, 2014 5:44 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy
True, and that energy finds itself being radiated into open space.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Aug 19, 2014 6:39 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
Circular motion produces
...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Aug 19, 2014 6:39 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
Circular motion produces acceleration and requires energy to maintain.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:36 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
wrote:
At any point in space
...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Aug 19, 2014 6:54 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
Not necessarily. If the energy can be focused into a tight beam that negates
the inverse square law, energy pumped into a rotating particle system can
greatly amplify
6:54 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
Not necessarily. If the energy can be focused into a tight beam that
negates the inverse square law, energy pumped into a rotating particle
system can greatly amplify both the power carried by photons and the field
carried by virtual
momentum into linear momentum or vice versa.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 16, 2014 6:20 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sat, 9 Aug 2014 12:40:38
janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Aug 18, 2014 2:36 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1212.5465v2.pdf
I think what you are looking for is a half soliton or a plasmoid. Both form a
majorana spinner type quasiparticle where
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sun, 17 Aug 2014 23:22:45 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
Actually no place in the Universe is completely free of fields.
Of course a particle moving within a magnetic or electric field emits
radiation due to acceleration. This is the normal behavior and I was
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:15 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Actually no place in the Universe is completely free of fields.
Another possibility is that there is no such thing as a field.
Just valleys and hills in a wave
On Monday, August 18, 2014, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:15 PM, mix...@bigpond.com javascript:;
wrote:
Actually no place in the Universe is completely free of fields.
Another possibility is that there is no such thing
Couldn't you, being the creative person you are, explain all
interactions by some form of quantum entanglement?
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:22 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Just valleys and hills in a wave
On Monday, August 18, 2014, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On
Yes, I mean no. Uncertain.
On Monday, August 18, 2014, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Couldn't you, being the creative person you are, explain all
interactions by some form of quantum entanglement?
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:22 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com
javascript:;
Ooooh, timely.
Two Drums and a symbol walk off a cliff
Ba-dum-tssst
http://instantrimshot.com/
Click the red-button
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:20 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I mean no. Uncertain.
On Monday, August 18, 2014, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
, Aug 18, 2014 6:19 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:15 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Actually no place in the Universe is completely free of fields.
Another possibility is that there is no such thing as a field.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Another possibility is that there is no such thing as a field.
What would we do without fields? If there is no such thing, what replaces
them?
Eric
of converting angular momentum
into linear momentum or vice versa.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 16, 2014 6:20 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sat, 9 Aug
particle.
Combinations can radiate if their spin states can be lowered in net energy.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 16, 2014 6:24 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
In reply to David Roberson's
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sat, 9 Aug 2014 12:40:38 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
I guess that spin energy is strongly associated with angular momentum while
thermal energy tends to be considered associated with linear momentum.
Off centre linear momentum is angular momentum.
Regards,
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sat, 9 Aug 2014 13:15:37 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
That is the model that I try to understand Axil. But I do not believe that an
isolated single moving particle can emit thermal energy directly.
...unless it happens to be in a magnetic field, in which case it
Jones--
You may be right. However, Rossi in later demos was upset at observers trying
to monitor the radiation from his 2011 test as I recall. In addition Focardi
was advising Rossi at that time and had been helping him for some time
before that with theory of the reaction. Focardi
Bob,
The best answer for the “Celani incident” three years ago - and the burst of
radiation detected then, is that initially - Rossi required radiation
triggering in order to start the reaction, but once started, the source was not
needed. Thus the incident with Celani is fully explained.
Jones--
Thanks for that bit of Vortex history.
I tend to believe what Focardi said. I wonder about your best explanation of
the Celani incident. Has there been a statement from Rossi or Focardi before
his passing to agree with your conclusion?
Bob
Sent from Windows Mail
Bob,
You are travelling to Bologna soon, correct?
I’m sure you will be in a good position to find out exactly what happened.
Please let us know.
From: Bob Cook
Jones--
Thanks for that bit of Vortex history.
I tend to believe what Focardi said. I wonder about your
Jones--
I have my list of questions already and need to prioritize
I’ll report back..
Bob
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 2:21 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Bob,
You are travelling to Bologna soon, correct?
I’m sure you
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 4:45 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
I wrote:
If this value is accurate, at that precision I believe we have +/- 1 0.21 eV to
use for free energy speculation.
Sorry -- +/- 0.21 eV. (I need a personal editor
From: Bob Cook
Keep in mind that Rossi claims low energy radiation that could be from
positron-electron decay
Bob,
That claim was dropped years ago. Do you see it after mid-2013?
In fact, in an early test at Bologna, an expert was employed with a specialized
detector for
eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 4:45 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
I wrote:
If this value is accurate, at that precision I believe we have +/- 1
0.21 eV to use for free energy speculation.
Sorry -- +/- 0.21 eV. (I need
might have some input that would be helpful.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 4:45 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
I wrote:
If this value is accurate
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Regarding one of Dave’s questions yesterday regarding spin interactions, it
has been my thought that orbital spin momentum can be changed into
intrinsic spin angular momentum without any violation of spin conservation.
Both linear and angular momentum are conserved through the emission of muon
neutrinos as the meson decays to a negative muon. It is this muon that
catalyzes fusion of hydrogen in the proton proton (PP) reaction.
Remember the conservation of Byron number.
Nature has specific rules for particle interactions and decays, and these
rules have been summarized in terms of conservation laws. One of the most
important of these is the conservation of baryon number. Each of the
baryons is assigned a baryon number
In the explanation of the Piantelli reaction , Piantelli has a hydrogen
negative ion catalyzing the fusion reaction. I wonder if all the
conservation laws are conserved in this reaction? I seems to me that an
object as complicated as a negative hydrogen ion would participate in a
reaction with all
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Piantelli needs to lay out how all the conservation laws are maintained in
his reaction.
It would also be nice if someone knowledgeable about hydrinos can explain
how an electron (spin=+/- 1/2) becomes a photon (spin=0) at
I seems to me that an object as complicated as a negative hydrogen ion
would participate in a reaction with all the conservation laws conserved.
should read
I seems to me that an object as complicated as a negative hydrogen ion
would find it very hard to participate in a reaction with all the
Interesting comparisons.
Bob
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Friday, August 8, 2014 5:54 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
In automotive engineering, there are several idealized energy transfer
cycles which involve four clearly segmented stages of engine
Well done, Jones!
Creativity works with bisociations (see Kostler)
Peter
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
In automotive engineering, there are several idealized energy transfer
cycles which involve four clearly segmented stages of engine operation. For
Thanks Peter and Bob. Here are a couple of additional thoughts on an emerging
nanomagnetism hypothesis.
Nanomagnetism can be operational parallel to other processes in any experiment,
even a novel form of “fusion” if that exists. Nanomagnetism can be part of a
dynamical Casimir effect as
dear Jones
This was your second remarkable and citable idea during recent days- the
first being your Mizuno D/Ni review/synthesis.
ONLY NEW IDEAS CAN SAVE LENR!
Peter
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Thanks Peter and Bob. Here are a couple of additional
The most important unsolved problem in physics is arguably proton/quark spin
dynamics. The superset of this problem is underappreciated – variability of
proton mass.
It is a surprise to many scientists that quark mass is highly variable and
apparently has been for billions of years …
Very interesting, creates a greater context of our problems, but we
have specific problems too. I have just started to write a paper about
the roots (more local) of LENR 's problems.
Storms considers my air poisoning hypothesis also a silly distraction
but we are unable to get reproducible
must be available.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 11:20 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
The most importantunsolved problem in physics is arguably proton/quark spin
that leads to the release of the stored
energy and methods to enhance that process must be available.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 11:20 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
From: David Roberson
*
*I want to ask you about your thougths about the variation in proton
mass. Should the variation be measurable with high sensitivity mass
spectrometers?
Yes and no. This is not unlike the problem of mass-4 similarity between D2
and He but
Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 12:01 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
The spin of the proton is the big puzzle in particle physics. The quarks in the
proton contribute less than half of the required
...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 12:01 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
The spin of the proton is the big puzzle in particle physics. The quarks
in the proton contribute less than half of the required proton spin. The
gluons contribute
as I try to connect the dots.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 12:14 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
From: David Roberson
*
*I want to ask
...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 12:14 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
From: David Roberson
*
* I want to ask you about your thougths about the variation in proton
mass. Should the variation be measurable with high
on, but this is the way my mind processes
interactive ideas as I try to connect the dots.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 12:14 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
From
as I try to connect the dots.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 12:14 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
From: David Roberson
*
*I want to ask you about
, but is the
same true for momentum? I suspect not.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 12:34 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
I assert that the magnetic component of matter as released
...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 12:42 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
Can random thermal motion ever be converted into spin?
I assert that this is the underlying mechanism of LENR.
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 12:40 PM, David Roberson
, but is
the same true for momentum? I suspect not.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 12:34 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
I assert that the magnetic component of matter as released
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 12:42 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
*Can random thermal motion ever be converted into spin?*
I assert that this is the underlying mechanism of LENR.
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 12:40 PM, David Roberson dlrober
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 12:42 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
*Can random thermal motion ever be converted into spin?*
I assert that this is the underlying mechanism of LENR.
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 12:40 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 12:45 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
Thermal motion produces infrared photons that are central to the LENT reaction.
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014
: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
Thermal motion produces infrared photons that are central to the LENT
reaction.
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
*Can random thermal motion ever be converted into spin?*
I assert that this is the underlying
forms, but is the
same true for momentum? I suspect not.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 12:34 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
I assert that the magnetic component
-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 1:07 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
If energy comes from the strong force, and gluons, the force carrier of the
strong force also carry spin, then magnetic energy can carry the energy derived
from the strong force, that energy is nuclear
Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 1:07 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
If energy comes from the strong force, and gluons, the force carrier of
the strong force also carry spin, then magnetic energy
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 9:18 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
The wiki article seems to tie down the proton mass quite accurately, but it
may just be the accuracy of the calculation instead of actual measurements.
I would be interested in seeing actual mass measurements by real
I wrote:
If this value is accurate, at that precision I believe we have +/- 1 0.21
eV to use for free energy speculation.
Sorry -- +/- 0.21 eV. (I need a personal editor.)
Eric
Another point to add to this thread -- it's kind of a cool idea to think
there might be different energy levels for the proton (or neutron). I
gather that the idea is that the constituent particles of the proton
(currently believed to be quarks) can be in different states of angular
momentum (in
I wrote:
I gather that the idea is that ... some kind of shell model [is involved].
Another analogy that might be relevant -- there could be different
isotopes for protons and neutrons, e.g., bound states with differing
numbers of quarks.
Eric
From: Eric Walker
* The wiki article gives the proton (rest) mass as being 938.272046(21)
MeV/c^2
* If this value is accurate, at that precision I believe we have +/- 1 0.21 eV
to use for free energy speculation.
That is CODATA. Of course, it is no less accurate than any of
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
That is CODATA. Of course, it is no less accurate than any of the others.
Unfortunately, it is no more accurate either. How can it be when quarks
have variable mass?
Variability in the mass of the quark does not prevent an
The energy from LENR comes from gluons.
The standard model of physics got it right when it predicted where the mass
of ordinary matter comes from, according to a massive new computational
effort. Particle physics explains that the bulk of atoms is made up of
protons and neutrons, which are
@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 4:45 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
I wrote:
If this value is accurate, at that precision I believe we have +/- 1 0.21 eV to
use for free energy speculation.
Sorry -- +/- 0.21 eV. (I need a personal editor.)
Eric
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 9 Aug 2014 06:55:58 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
We can note that Cravens adds samarium-cobalt to his active mix. This material
is permanently magnetized.
You might also note that natural Samarium contains two long lived radioactive
isotopes, Sm-147 (15%) Sm-148
From: Eric Walker
… How can it be when quarks have variable mass?
Variability in the mass of the quark does not prevent an accurate proton mass
from being specified. What it does is places a bound on the numerical
precision that an accurate proton mass value can have
You still
coupling and magnetic field interaction.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 5:01 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
Another point to add to this thread -- it's kind of a cool
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 5:36 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
From:Eric Walker
Ø Thewiki article gives the proton (rest) mass as being 938.272046(21) MeV/c^2
Ø Ifthis value is accurate, at that precision I believe we have +/- 1 0.21 eV
touse
energy over eons.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 6:04 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
From:Eric Walker
…How can it be when quarks have variable mass
.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 6:04 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
*From:* Eric Walker
… How can it be when quarks have variable mass?
Variability in the mass
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
We can note that Cravens adds samarium-cobalt to his active mix. This
material is permanently magnetized.
You might also note that natural Samarium contains two long lived
radioactive isotopes, Sm-147 (15%) Sm-148 (11%), both of which decay
From: Axil Axil
99% of the proton mass comes from the gluon binding energy. I just want to add
more detail about why the proton is heavier than the three constituent quarks
that make up the proton…
Nonsense. Where did that bogon come from? It must be a typo…
Energy states are always quantized based on a quantum number so that there
will be ascending levels of energy in the protons.
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 5:36 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
From: Eric Walker
* The wiki article gives the proton (rest) mass as being 938.272046(21)
MeV/c^2
* If this value is accurate, at that precision I believe we have +/- 1 0.21 eV
to use for free energy
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
... the proton which will then constitute a normal proton again with 3
quarks.
My recollection is that there are three valence quarks which contribute
to the charge and spin of the proton, together with a multitude of sea
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2014/jul/11/gluons-get-in-on-proton-spin
Gluons get in on proton spin
New research shows that gluons carry most of the protons spin
snip
In the latest work, a group of theorists – Daniel de Florian
http://users.df.uba.ar/deflo/deflo/main.html, from the
of being able to somehow extract this source of
energy? Jones, I think you might have some input that would be helpful.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 4:45 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy
eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 4:45 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
I wrote:
If this value is accurate, at that precision I believe we have +/- 1
0.21 eV to use for free energy speculation.
Sorry -- +/- 0.21 eV. (I
87 matches
Mail list logo
