The result is not plausible, actually if you burn 1kg hydrogen, the heat of
combustion will suffice to evaporate ~20kg water. But this is an easily
measurable quantity.
Peter
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Rich Murray rmfor...@gmail.com wrote:
Correctio -- I should say, 36 -- 216 kg/hour
Molecular Investigations into the Mechanics of Actin in Different Nucleotide
States
Ji Y. Lee, Tyler M. Iverson, and Ruxandra I. Dima*
J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 186-195
Wish he didn't live so far away... Sniff!
-Mark Iverson
Congrats, Google says he is *somebody!*
*
*
A very interesting subject. He collaborstes witha Romanian lady; where?
Peter
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Molecular Investigations into the Mechanics of Actin in Different
Nucleotide States
Ji Y. Lee,
Hi Peter...
He's at the Univ of Cincinatti, Ohio, USA.
Want's to be an Anesthesiologist...
-Mark
_
From: Peter Gluck [mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 1:13 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: OT: Can a proud uncle crow about his nephew's first
Fine profession but highly risky (both for the patient and the
anesthesiologist)- my mother's cousin, Dr Paul Radnay was a great one
worked at the Montefiore Hospital in New York, if I remember well
Peter
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.netwrote:
Hi Peter...
Here is some correspondence from Celani and Rossi. I assume this means
the steam was vented out of the window. I had a comical image in mind of
people trying to conduct an experiment amidst clouds of steam, like
something from Monty Python.
Another comical scenario would be the hidden wires
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/01/19/rossi-and-focardi-lenr-device-prob
ably-real-with-credit-to-piantelli/
But he is still giving the most credit to Piantelli, when probably that is
completely wrong, and the three things which led to this breakthrough were
(in order of importance):
1)
Dear Jones,
Have you read my answer to Ed Storms's message you have cited here?
I do not agree with him regarding the main points.
The things are always much more complicated than they seem to be.
Re your point 1) what do you know about this nano-Ni work- what when was
accomplished?
Do you know
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
*/PLEASE!/* Let's strive for a little more precision in the language
here!
It was *not* disinformation, which is misinformation that is
_deliberately_ disseminated in order to influence or confuse rivals
(WordNet 2.0)
Exactly right. There is no advantage to a
On 01/19/2011 11:06 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Stephen - How can you presume that there has been no deliberate
attempt to confuse the situation?
OK, my apologies! I /assumed/ (apparently incorrectly!) that your
choice of words was accidental rather than intentional.
Of course if you meant to
Hi Fran:
Yes, agreed... The comment about steam was only half serious!
The thought there was that the steam was 'exhaust' and dilution of the 'fuel'
with exhaust would
decrease efficiency. But that was thinking of this thing like an internal
combustion engine...
However, no one has commented
Peter,
As a humorous note, in an ethnocentric kind of way, you can probably
appreciate this comment.
The name Dr Andrea Rossi, has been around for some time in thermoelectrics,
but prior to recently I had been under the impression that this person was a
woman, since that name in the USA is
The Q and A between Krivit and Rossi (on the NET link that Jones refers to
below) has Rossi giving
many additional tidbits...
One is that books by Greiner and Cooks were important to his success...
This is what Rossi has to say about it:
the more important books (for me, Greiner and Cooks) do
This from the italian article sent to Jed by Pierre (earlier posting):
The prototype, already covered by patents owned by Maddalena Pascucci, wife of
Ross[i]...
Article in La Republicca Bologna : http://bit.ly/gm9mlQ (translation is not
perfect !)
That must be a translation error... but it
Mark,
I think the danger is to the Casimir geometries in the synthetic
catalyst formed by the nano powders not to the people standing around the
equipment. I disagree with Ed Storms theory that this is first and foremost a
nuclear reaction but agree with his assessment regarding the
If you go back to the Miley/Holmlid finding of hydrogen densities in the IRH
range, then a runaway reaction is not out of the question, even at low
pressure (or by stopping the H2 flow).
Horace, Terry and a few others who have followed both LENR and Mills will
probably remember the Vince Cockeram
Are you implying that this was (partly) Maddy's idea, by that comparison :-)
http://www.teslasociety.com/Mileva.htm
. I think it more likely the (25 million Euro) bill for toxic dumping may
have had a little something to do with it too, bankruptcy laws being what
they are in some
Hi Mauro,
I'm glad your follow-up on Miles Mathis was not lost because of the
recent Italian Brouhaha.
Your initial introduction to Mathis to the Vort Collective got my
attention. I started reading his papers. The article that has
interested me the most was the one in regards to: Explaining the
This from Rossi's website comment section...
But no one in Russia has been able to find the right combination to
exploit/enhance the energy
production in almost 40 years...
I guess that's where Rossi-Focardi come in... or did it just happen by chance?
Given that there are 6e9 people on the
No, not really... but do we know anything about his wife's technical
background???
The thought was really about his needing to protect the IP rights from those
who have a grudge
(legal or otherwise) against him... so he assigned the legal rights to someone
else...
If this is as big as it
Dear Jones,
I have no problems with the masculinity of the name Andrea, I am very fond
of opera music and Andrea Chenier by U. Giordano is one opera I like much.
To be sincere I absolutely do not care if somebody is a PhD or not. Do you
know Cipolla's Laws of Stupidity? One of these laws says
Here, among other things, is a transcription of the press conference
translated into Russian:
http://oko-planet.su/science/scienceday/57397-holodnyy-termoyad-zarabotal.html
Google translate does a pretty good of translating the Russian into English.
- Jed
On Jan 19, 2011, at 7:38 AM, Mark Iverson wrote:
Hi Fran:
Yes, agreed... The comment about steam was only half serious!
The thought there was that the steam was 'exhaust' and dilution of
the 'fuel' with exhaust would
decrease efficiency. But that was thinking of this thing like an
On Jan 18, 2011, at 8:44 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:
Welcome back to the fray, Horace!
Thanks! I'm not really back in the fray. Just stopping in briefly.
I'm hoping to get back in eventually, but have pressing problems at
the moment.
Its been about 9 months since your last postings...
See:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/866
We are working on an electrical demonstration for 2011. As reported
we have and continue to have experts independently run the systems
with full disclosure of the chemistry and full characterization of
the
I sent this earlier and nothing came back through vortex to me, so
I'm sending it again.
On Jan 19, 2011, at 7:38 AM, Mark Iverson wrote:
Hi Fran:
Yes, agreed... The comment about steam was only half serious!
The thought there was that the steam was 'exhaust' and dilution of
the 'fuel'
Here is an interesting comment from the Russian discussion. Apparently,
Rossi told someone not to use a particle detector. This person thinks
that means the reaction is not difficult to suss out with a detect.
QUOTE Google Translation:
In general, if we assume that all this is true, it is
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:31:25 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Of course if you meant to imply that Rossi was intentionally trying to
mislead everyone when he said it was 1500 degrees in there, then
'disinformation' was indeed the right word.
[snip]
You are all making a
Horace:
I've noticed that the vortex server is taking longer than usual.. sometimes up
to 30 to 40 minutes
to get a posting thru and out to the subscribers...
Hope its not getting what the birds have!
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheff...@mtaonline.net]
Sent:
Harry Veeder noted the PesWiki report:
http://pesn.com/2011/01/17/9501746_Focardi-Rossi_10_kW_cold_fusion_prepping_for_market/
This is a good summary. Lots of details in one place, such as the fact
that Rossi says they plan to ship the first units in three months, and
they are manufacturing a
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
You are all making a mountain out of a molehill. Obviously the average
temperature was 400 ºC, while there were hot spots where the temperature
exceeded the melting point of Ni, as it became fused in places.
Takahashi told me there is a form of low-temperature
Jed,
I emailed you. Please respond.
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, January 19, 2011 8:17:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a longer duration black box test would prove issue without
disclosure
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:33 PM, noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
Jed,
I emailed you. Please respond.
Is that no one or noonie? I used to get a nooner occasionally.
eg
T
So, Celani and Rossi both clarify that the output steam is vented to
the outside air -- I'm glad to see that issue cleared up -- I concur
that the evidence strongly shows the huge heat output is real.
This establishes the reality of unknown fundamental physics, easily
accessible in small, simple,
One detail worth exploring further was the statement from Rossi that only
hydrogen works, and that deuterium kills the reaction !
That is counter-intuitive to say the least. Everyone in hot fusion knows for
an absolute fact that deuterium is the more active nucleus, right? And
everyone in LENR
Thanks, I put this on Rossi's blog -- very interesting to read the old article.
Robert A. Heinlein in The Rolling Stones wrote fine science fiction
for teenagers in 1952 about a family vacationing from the Moon to
Mars, in a rocket powered by Single-H... I read it over and over.
Rich Murray
hmmm...consider this...
A CANDU fission reactor needs lots of slow neutrons, so it uses heavy water as
a
moderator instead of light water.
Harry
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, January 19, 2011 9:27:47 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Deuterium kills the reaction?
Would weighing the entire apparatus before and after reveal a concealed
chemical
reaction?
Harry
From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, January 19, 2011 11:35:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Krivit relents
On 01/19/2011 05:37 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
It is
Yes, I think Jones has a point...
We know that at least some of the input power is used to feed a (resistive)
heating element when
starting up the reactor... i.e., you have to 'preheat the oven before baking
the cookies'! :-)
This initial power level is ~1000W - 1200W. After the reaction
39 matches
Mail list logo
