*1. Will there be two 1MW stations in november, 1 in greece and other in
USA?
1- Not impossible =*
How do you exactly translate this answer ? A little poll:
- Maybe yes
- Maybe not
- If we can do it
- Yes
- No
- ???
2011/5/12 Alan J Fletcher
From the *Rossi Speak- English dictionary*: please try to guess, perhaps
you will be lucky
I still have not the slightest idea how many E- cats had been (tested) in
the greatest functional clutter. I strongly dislike the idea of
multi-modular scale up.
Peter
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:23 AM,
Not Impossible = Highly unlikely...
-Mark
_
From: Andrea Selva [mailto:andreagiuseppe.se...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 11:24 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: MAJOR eCat plans : 1MW USA Customer ?
1. Will there be two 1MW stations in november, 1 in greece
About a month ago Mauro said that what had happened was thus far a proof of
safety.
Now that they admit there was a full meltdown in the reactor, do you now
still think that Nuclear power is safe? (or will every meltdown be the
exception?)
After weeks of denials and downplaying the truth, TEPCO
Japanese Nuke Reactor Suffered a China Syndrome Meltdown
Nuclear meltdown at Fukushima plant
One of the reactors at the crippled Fukushima Daiichi power plant did suffer
a nuclear meltdown, Japanese officials admitted for the first time today,
describing a pool of molten fuel at the bottom of the
Japanese Nuke Reactor Suffered a China Syndrome Meltdown
Nuclear meltdown at Fukushima plant
One of the reactors at the crippled Fukushima Daiichi power plant did suffer
a nuclear meltdown, Japanese officials admitted for the first time today,
describing a pool of molten fuel at the bottom of the
I wonder what color they will be?
http://www.myfoxny.com/dpps/news/japan-nuclear-reactors-giant-tents-dpgonc-20110513-fc_13185892
Japan to Cover Damaged Nuclear Reactors with Giant Tents
Updated: Friday, 13 May 2011, 8:07 AM EDT
Published : Friday, 13 May 2011, 8:07 AM EDT
(Dow Jones) - Giant
About a month ago Mauro said that what had happened was thus far a proof
of
safety.
You're right, but thus far was just after the first explosion, and based
on publicly available information.
I changed my mind just one or two days later, after the explosion in
number 3, and particularly, the
The reason that Andrea Rossi is so desperate to frame his E-Cat as nuclear
is no mystery among patent attorneys who have looked into the various
filings.
Here is the first reason (priority date 2000):
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=1rHHEBAJdq=20090146083
Rossi's side may counter
At 11:23 PM 5/12/2011, Andrea Selva wrote:
1. Will there be two 1MW
stations in november, 1 in greece and other in USA?
1- Not impossible =
How do you exactly translate this answer ? A little poll:
Maybe yes
Maybe not
If we can do it === if we can sign that
At 09:02 AM 4/26/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 10:50 PM 4/25/2011, Mark
Iverson wrote:
FYI:
Here's an article for all you
theorists...
Scientists suggest spacetime has no
time dimension
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-04-scientists-spacetime-dimension.html
-Mark
No problem ...
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Yes, this is the year of the Cicada 13 yr cycle.
... even vortex buzzed out for a while ... what happened to yesterday's
post?
I sent the ITER/LENR post and Vort stopped flowing; so, I emailed
Billb and soon thereafter
My personal interpretation of a possible Rossi maybe response:
Around the end of the summer season I do a lot of Hot Air Ballooning.
My mind is elsewhere. Maybe I'll get two stations completed by
October...or by November - maybe not.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
Science and Storytelling 10 Questions for the Directors of the
Upcoming Cold Fusion Documentary, THE
BELIEVERS
http://coldfusionnow.wordpress.com/2011/05/13/science-and-storytelling-10-questions-for-the-directors-of-the-upcoming-cold-fusion-documentary-the-believers/
THE BELIEVERS is the
Gnorts, vorts,
Next month a fifty year old 600 MW coal plant inside the perimeter of
Atlanta is scheduled to go off line. Coming on line will be a 2.5 GW
natural gas plant.
From: Alan J Fletcher
1. Will there be two 1MW stations in november, 1 in greece and other in
USA?
2. Not impossible =
How do you exactly translate this answer ? A little poll:
* Maybe yes
* Maybe not
* If we can do it === if
Okay, let's try again: 7.3 10^3 ft^3/s. Geeze, maybe someone else
should do the math.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
That should read 7.3 ft^3 per second. Fat fingers.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Harry, they appear to be an intentional variation on smooth spheres see
images http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carved_Stone_Balls mostly with 6 knobs
each.
Megalith construction aid
A theory on the movement of 'monument stones' has been put forward as a
result of an observed correlation
I am listening to an on-line broadcast of an interview with a Prof. Koide of
Kyoto U. He says the latest indications are that the reactor vessel is not
holding water. Therefore it must have a fairly large hole in the bottom.
Yikes!
The TMI reactor walls were eroded by hot rubbleized reactor
Hello group,
Have a read here:
https://register.epo.org/espacenet/application;jsessionid=540A3872CC4B88F0AD00B0BC9241BCE3.RegisterPlus_prod_1?number=EP08873805lng=entab=doclist
In specific, at these entries:
29.04.2011 Citation filed by a third party
29.04.2011 Observations by third parties
Jones, I hope you are wrong.
Another possibility is that Defkalion knows that Rossi's patent claims
are very weak or even futile. The 1mW plant will serve to impress investors
and *secure* loads of money quickly so that they can stay ahead of the
competition, at least for a while.
Harry
My
On 2011-05-13 20:06, Harry Veeder wrote:
Another possibility is that Defkalion knows that Rossi's patent claims
are very weak or even futile. The 1mW plant will serve to impress investors
and *secure* loads of money quickly so that they can stay ahead of the
competition, at least for a while.
yes, from those photos it is clear that they were not simply unfinished spheres.
Harry
From: francis froarty...@comcast.net
To: hlvee...@yahoo.com
Cc: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, May 13, 2011 1:03:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:One-man Stonehenge
Harry, they appear to be an intentional variation
Hi,
On 13-5-2011 19:03, francis wrote:
Harry, they appear to be an intentional variation on smooth spheres
see images http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carved_Stone_Balls mostly
with 6 knobs each.
As usual Wikipedia is clueless again.
The items at the Wikipedia page look very much like
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
They didn't seem to be waiting for Rossi to complete his megawatt plant.
Hmmm. Sounds like a variation on the original story. I wonder when
AR gets paid?
T
High-Rydburg-catalyzed fusion (HRCF)
This quote from Edmund Storms has always intrigued me. I always test and
compare any new prospective Rossi reaction theory that comes up against it.
[quote] Edmund Storms: Rossi hit upon this somewhat by accident. He was
using a nickel catalyst to
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder
Jones, I hope you are wrong.
Note: my worries are only precautionary - and thus far there is NO evidence of
a scam on the part of Defkalion. But certainly, they do appreciate that the
patent claims are weak. Who wouldn't?
HV: Another
Hi,
On 13-5-2011 18:58, Terry Blanton wrote:
Okay, let's try again: 7.3 10^3 ft^3/s. Geeze, maybe someone else
should do the math.
I guess Terry is trying to tell us 2067.13 m^3/s ;-)
Kind regards,
MoB
Hi,
On 13-5-2011 21:19, Man on Bridges wrote:
Hi,
On 13-5-2011 18:58, Terry Blanton wrote:
Okay, let's try again: 7.3 10^3 ft^3/s. Geeze, maybe someone else
should do the math.
I guess Terry is trying to tell us 2067.13 m^3/s ;-)
Kind regards,
MoB
Okay, 2067.13 m^3/s in case of 73,000
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
But why wait? - they could have billions in the bank NOW - with a proven
self-runner.
I am not so sure that merely self running would attract billions
quickly. I think it would have to self run for a very long time for
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
I am not so sure that merely self running would attract billions
quickly. I think it would have to self run for a very long time for
people to believe it. Finsrud's mobile kinda self runs doesn't it?
Doubt it. Finsrud can have billions in the
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Doubt it. Finsrud can have billions in the bank when they prove it in a
university setting.
That's my point. It's not only gotta self run; but, they have to be
able to tell exactly why. That may be a while in coming.
T
Ah Finally!
Ladies and Gentlemen! Time for this evening's main attraction! We have
two different POVs dueling for supremacy. This evening's fight theme:
Would a self-running Rossi demonstration device be taken seriously by
the world, or would a 1 Megawatt thermal plant suffice.
In one corner we
The cause of the cold fusion reaction must be universal as a lowest common
denominator among all the various varieties and instances of its occurrence.
In the same way that a solid like coal, a liquid like petrol, and a gas like
methane can each burn through a common hydrocarbon combustion
Terry, what happened to Paul Sprain's motor anyway?
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 8:20 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah Finally!
Ladies and Gentlemen! Time for this evening's main attraction! We have
two different POVs dueling for supremacy. This evening's
On Friday, May 13, 2011 1:08 PM Axil wrote
[snip] Neither Mills nor Rossi has discovered the true theoretical basis for
cold fusion because that basis only addresses their particular reaction. The
universal truth of cold fusion must explain all of its varied manifestations
that have been
--- On Thu, 5/12/11, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yeah, well... that's what I would have done. But who
listens to me! ;-)
Hey, at least you get replies!
I do the math showing that Rossi's (erroneous, due to mysterious typo?) claim
of 58g Nickel 30,000
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:31 PM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry, what happened to Paul Sprain's motor anyway?
Believe it or not, it's presently locked up in a warehouse along with
boxes of various pumps and lights and other sundry products.
I am not at liberty to discuss it in
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 10 May 2011 14:00:37 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
People will own a car for every day of the week.
That doesn't make any difference. They can still only drive one at a time.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sat, 14 May 2011 07:58:05 +1000:
Hi,
[snip]
I would be very surprised if someone didn't learn how to regulate the output
from an E-cat within months of the first one coming on the market.
...in fact, almost starving it of Hydrogen would probably work.
In always on mode, the point is that energy is being produced if the car is
in use or not.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:59 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 10 May 2011 14:00:37 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
People will own a car for every day of the week.
That
Du calme...
First of all, keep in mind that everybody here who's been paying
attention has realized that Rossi lies like a rug. He makes stuff up,
he says things that can't be true, he contradicts himself.
Furthermore, the gang here seems to me to be a bit polarized, into two
main
I wonder if there are two separate mechanisms at work in the Rossi reaction;
the one that supports standalone self running and potential meltdowns and
another separate mechanism that supports active control of the reaction
through the positive action of the control box thereby supporting well
Thanks, Kyle.
I didn't check your math, but I bet it's correct. It fits with the
general picture. (And the conclusion is pretty funny, really...)
I still want to know how come we haven't seen a sample of anything from
Rossi which didn't show natural isotope ratios. Rossi's claimed to
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Tue, 10 May 2011 22:39:21 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Well, if it were that easy to make neutrons, we'd be making them all
the time. What happens when a slow proton meets a slow electron,
assuming they are free, is that a hydrogen atom is formed, not a
On 05/13/2011 06:45 PM, John Berry wrote:
other forms of energy
Hmmm, funny you don't just say oil.
Or perhaps there is something I don't know and I should take the term Light
Brigade more literally? Was the war over all that Silicon in the sand to
make Solar Cells?
Of course oil can't be
I believe that the Ni-H theory that Rossi advertizes is invalid and I hold
that fusion of multi H is occurring.
The same reaction that produces transmutation in the pure carbon/water
experiment is at work in the Rossi reaction.
This involves activation of H- ions and clustering under the
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Thu, 12 May 2011
09:04:28 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Such apparent ignorance seems to suggest, at least to me, that
something else is responsible for generating all the mysterious
exothermic heat. That certainly is the 64 trillion dollar question.
*Bohr orbit. It takes energy -- a lot of energy, apparently, -- to
bring an electron and a proton into close proximity*.
If the negatively charged particle (muon) is heavy then the barrier to
fusion is low. Being so very heavy and long lived, if a H- ion finds a
positive particle it will readily
the designer now says:
it was all a fake...someone came to visit...the device has probably been
destroyed...
http://pesn.com/2011/05/11/9501823_Romeros_Self-Sustaining_Muller_Dynamo_Drama
The same old story.
Harry
From: John Berry aethe...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, May 8,
The ROMEROUK.pdf has been updated, you could grab it from
selfrunning_free_energy_device_muller_motor_generator_romerouk_version1_1.pdfhttp://www.scene.org/~esa/merlib/romerouk/selfrunning_free_energy_device_muller_motor_generator_romerouk_version1_1.pdf
In reply to Kyle Mcallister's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 14:42:21 -0700 (PDT):
Hi Kyle,
[snip]
I would have figured something of this magnitude (double meaning intended, re:
energy) would have generated some discussion. If I did the math wrong, hell,
I'd have expected to be told so.
[snip]
You
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 12 May 2011 09:38:01 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=1rHHEBAJdq=20090146083
Quote: where p is an integer greater than 1, preferably from 2 to 200.
This is a bit strange, because Mills knows perfectly well that the absolute
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 19:00:30 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I don't necessarily believe it either. I just thought it was interesting to
point out what is really at stake here, if it should turn out to be true.
I dont believe Rossi when he says that Ni is being consumed in
I just don't believe that, first off we know that there is more than
enough recoverable solar energy to take care of all energy demands many
times over.
And that's just solar, yes there would need to be a big project of
installation and you would need to store the energy in the day time to use
at
He had large offers he turned down, it is pretty transparent that he was
scared off.
The claim that he faked it does n't agree with the evidence.
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com wrote:
the designer now says:
it was all a fake...someone came to visit...the
*Each year a typical 1000 mega-watt (MW) commercial power reactor will
produce 300 to 500 pounds of plutonium -- enough to build between 25 - 40
Nagasaki-sized atomic bombs.)*
* *
A reactor that produces bomb grade plutonium (aka pu239) must be stopped
frequently and reprocessed to avoid
Since we're not going to get a ONE experiment which eliminates ALL Fakes
I'm moving towards a slightly more probabilistic approach
http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_proof_frames_v501.php
I've added a 2x2 evaluation to each method (fake material):
We also estimate the Fake's Feasibility (could
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 18:10:14 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
In always on mode, the point is that energy is being produced if the car is
in use or not.
That would be true, if they were indeed in always on mode, however with a warm
up period of even half an hour, one could still
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 18:56:06 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
If the negatively charged particle (muon) is heavy then the barrier to
fusion is low. Being so very heavy and long lived, if a H- ion finds a
positive particle it will readily fusion with it.
If that is so, then one
Alan -
Why would a self-powered experiment of adequate run time not eliminate all
possible fakes?
Note: the experiment is contained on a moveable cart - no wires, cables, or
other connectors going in or out. It can be started from grid power and then
moved out of doors if necessary. There
Right, that is the function of the internal heater. Reaction only occuring at
the high temps adjacent to the heater, falling off quickly to the periphery.
Self-running would be at very high temps throughout; then the only control is
H2 pressure, and that may not be enough control to prevent
At 04:45 PM 5/13/2011, Jones Beene wrote:
Alan -
Why would a self-powered experiment of adequate run time not eliminate
all possible fakes?
Note: the experiment is contained on a moveable cart no wires, cables,
or other connectors going in or out. It can be started from grid power
and then
Didn't Tesla have a patent based on varying a permanent magnets strength? :)
In case it doesn't Jog your memory he has a patent that involves heating a
magnet (or iron?) till it loses it's magnetization.
Personally I am sure that Overunity is possible from open magnetic circuits
and loose
On 05/13/2011 08:20 PM, John Berry wrote:
I just don't believe that, first off we know that there is more than
enough recoverable solar energy to take care of all energy demands many
times over.
And that's just solar, yes there would need to be a big project of
installation and you would need
At 04:45 PM 5/13/2011, Jones Beene wrote:
Why would a
self-powered experiment of adequate run time not eliminate all possible
fakes?
Or a self-powered world-tour steam engine?
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 10 May 2011 15:07:19 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
From http://atom.kaeri.re.kr/cgi-bin/nuclide?nuc=Ni-62n=2 one can see that the
cross section for neutron absorption by Ni62 at thermal energies (~ 2E-8 MeV) is
about 14 barn.
Dividing this into the atomic volume of
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:10 PM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
Didn't Tesla have a patent based on varying a permanent magnets strength? :)
In case it doesn't Jog your memory he has a patent that involves heating a
magnet (or iron?) till it loses it's magnetization.
It's called the
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 18:49:11 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I believe that the Ni-H theory that Rossi advertizes is invalid and I hold
that fusion of multi H is occurring.
There is no reason why this would result in Copper, but it would make sense for
it to result in Nickel,
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
One can see that the cross section for neutron absorption by Ni62 at
thermal energies (~ 2E-8 MeV) is about 14 barn.
Yes of course - that is a thermal neutron - which changes everything. There
is no thermalization mechanism in this reactor
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:20 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah Finally!
Ladies and Gentlemen! Time for this evening's main attraction!
I hate to disappoint the audience; but, there will be no fight here.
I understand Jones' opinion, respect his opinion and
Well, explain how it is to be tested and we'll give it a shot.
T
My opinion is that the conservation of energy is generally accurate and than
magnets and most conditions tend to be conservative.
However this is all dependent on the state of the underlying medium of
matter and energy, if
I don't believe in them. I have seen this happen more than once in
SOHO videos. A coronal mass ejection corresponds with a comet
collision:
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/05/13/stunning-video-comet-collides-sun/
T
In reply to Esa Ruoho's message of Thu, 12 May 2011 11:54:10 +0300:
Hi,
[snip]
Mankind currently only harvests a minuscule
fractionhttp://www.dailytech.com/Company+Poised+to+Blanket+Former+Sears+Tower+With+2+MW+of+Solar+Panels/article21194.htm
of
the estimated 12.2 billion kilowatt-hours of solar
In reply to Esa Ruoho's message of Thu, 12 May 2011 11:54:10 +0300:
Hi,
[snip]
In certain materials, they
found, the magnetic field of light was strong enough to bend electric
charges into a 'C' shape.
...read: Strong enough to bend the path, that a charge follows, into a C
shape.
Regards,
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 12 May 2011 19:53:03 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The word battle is underway on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Energy_Catalyzer
It is alleged that some of the discussion results from people whose
livelihood depends on ITER and they are intentionally
In reply to Mauro Lacy's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 19:35:09 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
Tapping it from the Van Allen belt? I have my doubts.
So do I for that matter! :)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
On 05/13/2011 08:20 PM, John Berry wrote:
I just don't believe that, first off we know that there is more than
enough recoverable solar energy to take care of all energy demands many
times over.
And that's just solar,
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 18:05:59 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
One can see that the cross section for neutron absorption by Ni62 at
thermal energies (~ 2E-8 MeV) is about 14 barn.
Yes of course - that is a thermal neutron
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 21:55:42 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I don't believe in them. I have seen this happen more than once in
SOHO videos. A coronal mass ejection corresponds with a comet
collision:
No disagreement to speak of - not to mention in a couple of months I might
be arguing Terry's position and he might have mine. But the truth will out,
and therefore let me state a present concern more succinctly. First, rent
the movie Boiler Room if you have not seen it... for the entertainment
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 09:04:51 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I wonder what color they will be?
I wonder how long it will be before they catch on fire and burn up. ;)
http://www.myfoxny.com/dpps/news/japan-nuclear-reactors-giant-tents-dpgonc-20110513-fc_13185892
Japan
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:51 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I wonder how long it will be before they catch on fire and burn up. ;)
At least they will not have to worry about lighting the area beneath
the blue canopy of denial.
T
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 15:16:47 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
[quote] Muon-catalyzed fusion is a process allowing nuclear fusion to take
place at temperatures significantly lower than the temperatures required for
thermonuclear fusion, even at room temperature or lower. A muon
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 15:16:47 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
A muon is something that is massive and has a negative charge. By analogy, a
High-Rydburg(HR) state of hydrogen can build a compound virtual particle
that is very heavy and has a large negative charge. Because the
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 15:16:47 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Lifetimes of HR have been observed at about 100
microseconds to seconds based on their quantum excitation states.
Yet no one conducting these experiments observes fusion reactions?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
A compound negative particle is required to explain the production of many
elements in the Rossi ash besides Copper.
8 - Oxygen
9 - Fluorine(captured to form fluorides)
10 - Neon (outgased ?)
11 - Sodium
12 - Magnesium
13- Silicon (mentioned as ash)
14 - Phosphorus
15 – Sulfur
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 23:35:44 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Actually, only a compound particle is required. It doesn't have to be negative
(neutral would work too).
A compound negative particle is required to explain the production of many
elements in the Rossi ash besides
Rossi detected excess heat production when he was experimenting with CO2 and
H reactions to catalyze CH4. The excess heat production was small but
detectable.
IMHO. he added NiO nano-powder and pulsed power glow discharge of graphite
to optimize H- cluster production and to increase heat
The multi-H reaction could be producing vast amounts of nickel because of
its magic number. But no one can really tell how much nickel participates
in the reaction including Rossi.
Regards.
Axil
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:53 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Axil Axil's message of
A safer nuclear reactor should be meltdown proof, proliferation safe,
passively air cooled, deployed underground with waste (stable in 1000 years)
shipped off site for centralized underground storage.Such a reactor is
possible to build.
In fact, the Chinese are developing this type of
What if it works and the energy source isn't Nuclear?
Or possibly that it in Nuclear but it is an entirely different to what we
know?
IMO that it is anomalous and makes no sense makes it more likely to be real.
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The multi-H
My definition of a nuclear reaction states that if transmutation is found
then it must be nuclear.
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:28 AM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
What if it works and the energy source isn't Nuclear?
Or possibly that it in Nuclear but it is an entirely different to
Mills has told many times that he has nothing to do, and is not interested
at all in Rossi's technology.
Otherwise take in consideration that in case of the hydrino
energy, the heat released per unit of weight of hydrogen is
only approx. 200 times greater than by burning.
Watch the news re. Mills
94 matches
Mail list logo
