Re: Entry to "Phenomena Reports"

At 12:46 pm 29-01-05 +, you wrote: >At 08:20 pm 28-01-05 -0500, Colin Quinney wrote: > >>>The following Hutchison Effect forum post is beyond belief, >> but then again after Bill Beaty's wandering stir stick, who knows? : >> I have no

Re: Britz: Not enough gas to cause explosion?

Ed Storms wrote: and Mike Carrell responded; I suggest several facts must be kept in mind when proposing the hydrino explanation. 1. Energy is only released when hydrinos are formed, not when accumulated hydrinos are returned to "normal". Correct. I was discussing Patapov's Yusmar machine with

Re: Britz: Not enough gas to cause explosion?

In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Sat, 29 Jan 2005 20:51:49 -0700: Hi, [snip] >For an explosion to occur, a shock wave must be produced. Simply having >energy suddenly produced in a volume would only cause the temperature go >up, and ionization to occur with a flash of radiation. The sudden

Re: A question for the electrochemists

It's pretty simple. The potassium metal created at the interface between the electrolyte and the Hg cathode is amalgamated and drops below the suface where it is protected from oxidation. As you say you want a turnover of the potassium back into the electrolyte, you would want to avoid agitati

Re: Accident Report from Mizuno

> > Robin van Spaandonk > > All SPAM goes in the trash unread. Easy way to can spam! In Linux, get into your K-Mail program where you get your mail...sans virii. By the way, of cos' your sniffin the net as an 'ordinary user' and not as the 'root' user. Never sniff the net as the 'super'.

Re: Britz: Not enough gas to cause explosion?

Robin van Spaandonk wrote: In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:53:23 -0700: Hi, [snip] I don't understand how "instantly" is possible. Two entities must get together. This takes time. Of course it does, however that time is very short on human scales, provided that the

Mechanics of magnetism

OK, I've been trying to get my head around the mechanism behind magnetism.  I see a magnetic field as a disturbance in the aether caused by a moving charge.  Where I bog down is trying to understand how this disturbance overcomes the natural repulsion between like charges.   The mental experiment I

Re: Accident Report from Mizuno

In reply to thomas malloy's message of Sat, 29 Jan 2005 01:39:20 -0600: Hi, >And, Robin Von Spaandonk replied; > >>In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:53:19 -0800: >>Hi, >> >--- Mike Carrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>Possibly. In an old cell, hydrinos, or their compo

Re: A question for the electrochemists

In reply to Michael Foster's message of Sat, 29 Jan 2005 19:30:52 -0500: Hi Michael, [snip] > >I hate to suggest this in an era of hyperhysteria about >toxic substances, but a mercury cathode would likely >do the trick here. You just have a shallow layer of >Hg at the bottom of your cell and make

Swartz papers added to Collections/ICCF10.htm

Okay, I added two of M. Swartz's ICCF10 papers to: http://www.lenr-canr.org/Collections/ICCF10.htm (You may need to reload the page to see them.) Swartz mentioned there are three papers, but I cannot find the other one. I left a blank slot for it. If I remember what the third paper is (or if h

Re: Physics Today 1/25/05 - Feder

Mitchell Swartz wrote: > Thereafter, you also received copies of then entire three papers by > email and we discussed them, No, I never did. I doubt the papers can be e-mailed, because you told me they are large, and e-mail can only handle a few megabytes. > so your credibility is ZERO with

Re: A question for the electrochemists

I hate to suggest this in an era of hyperhysteria about toxic substances, but a mercury cathode would likely do the trick here. You just have a shallow layer of Hg at the bottom of your cell and make sure the wire that passes through the electrolyte to the the Hg is insulated. If you are careful

Physics website

I came upon this website which seems to be capable of answering any obscure question about those areas you're not sure about...   http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/

Re: Physics Today 1/25/05 - Feder

Mitchell Swartz wrote: > Mr. Rothwell: >You are an absolute untruthful person. Witnesses watched me hand you > the papers > and the CD-ROM containing them at Gene's funeral Yes. As I said -- about a dozen times -- I could not read that CD-ROM. Please upload the papers to your own web page

Re: Physics Today 1/25/05 - Feder

At 05:12 PM 1/29/2005, you wrote: Mitchell Swartz wrote: >>We put the titles back! They are in the database! > >Nonsense. The three papers are NOT in the ICCF-10 data base at > http://www.lenr-canr.org/Collections/ICCF10.htm > which is (inaccurately) entitled " That list only includes papers th

Re: Britz: Not enough gas to cause explosion?

In reply to Vince Cockeram's message of Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:56:58 -0800: Hi, [snip] >Indeed! When I was running a glow discharge in H2 + K, I had an 'event' that >I can not explain. >I had run this experiment probably a hundred times and had never seen what >occurred. >A run on March 18, 2000 at

Re: Britz: Not enough gas to cause explosion?

In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:53:23 -0700: Hi, [snip] >I don't understand how "instantly" is possible. Two entities must get >together. This takes time. Of course it does, however that time is very short on human scales, provided that the density of catalyst and

Re: Physics Today 1/25/05 - Feder

Mitchell Swartz wrote: >>We put the titles back! They are in the database! > >Nonsense. The three papers are NOT in the ICCF-10 data base at > http://www.lenr-canr.org/Collections/ICCF10.htm > which is (inaccurately) entitled " That list only includes papers that we have on file at LENR-CANR

Re: Vortex Web Site

Terry Blanton writes, > > ... not that there's anything wrong with that... > > Ah-hah! 'Fess up, Jonesie. It's yours, innit? Nah... You don't really think I could write something like, "There is no hope for this world with academic egghead physics, which amounts to intellectual masturbation,

Re: Britz: Not enough gas to cause explosion?

- Original Message - From: "Mike Carrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 9:28 AM Subject: Re: Britz: Not enough gas to cause explosion?

Re: Britz: Not enough gas to cause explosion?

In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:28:19 -0500: Hi, [snip] >> I don't understand how "instantly" is possible. Two entities must get >> together. This takes time. Once energy is released from this collision, >> the local process stops. If additional energy is to be release

RE: Electron "Shotgun" Electrogravity Field?

Hey Fred. Although it will surely be the case that you will generate the E field in question ( at least the time changing part ) what I fail to see is why this should relate to gravity. It's the weak point of Hoopers argument; he does nothing other than assert the connection. Observing that ordina

Re: Vortex Web Site

--- Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... not that there's anything wrong with that... Ah-hah! 'Fess up, Jonesie. It's yours, innit? __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.co

Re: Vortex Web Site

- Original Message - From: "Terry Blanton" > If this dude isn't a subscriber here, he should be: > http://www.vortexpluswater.com/free_thinking_and_free_energy.htm You mean because of pervasive over-optimism, massive use of hyperbole, obvious disregard for the "mainstream" of science,

Re: Electron "Shotgun" Electrogravity Field?

Fundamental Tenets of Physics:   1, A moving Bunch of Charges creates a Bunch of Magnetic Field/s.   2, A Time-Varying Bunch of Magnetic Field/s creates a Bunch of Electric Field/s..   Hence, a pulsed high current (6 to 27.2 volts DC) diode should create a Bunch of Electrons with Drift Velociti

UFO Propulsion

Different from Fred's flying fluorescent: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ufophysics/ufoplasmaengine.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

Vortex Web Site

If this dude isn't a subscriber here, he should be: http://www.vortexpluswater.com/free_thinking_and_free_energy.htm __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250

Re: Britz: Not enough gas to cause explosion?

ED Storms wrote: > > Mike Carrell wrote: > > > Ed Storms wrote: > >>2. Hydrino production can only be produced rather slowly, only as > >>rapidly as normal H diffuses to the active site and the resulting > >>hydrino diffuses away. > > > > > > No. Hydrino production can proceed at any speed, inclu

Re: Britz: Not enough gas to cause explosion?

Mike Carrell wrote: Ed Storms wrote: I suggest several facts must be kept in mind when proposing the hydrino explanation. 1. Energy is only released when hydrinos are formed, not when accumulated hydrinos are returned to "normal". Correct. 2. Hydrino production can only be produced rather slowly

Re: Britz: Not enough gas to cause explosion?

Ed Storms wrote: > I suggest several facts must be kept in mind when proposing the hydrino > explanation. > > 1. Energy is only released when hydrinos are formed, not when > accumulated hydrinos are returned to "normal". Correct. > > 2. Hydrino production can only be produced rather slowly, only

Re: Accident Report from Mizuno

I can't speculate on the nature of the explosion but if the photo was taken before the glass was disturbed - ie pieces of the base in place - the explosion was probably quite small. The nature of the cracks in the glass suggest to me that it was in a high state of internal tension. Note the reg

Re: Entry to "Phenomena Reports"

At 08:20 pm 28-01-05 -0500, Colin Quinney wrote: >>The following Hutchison Effect forum post is beyond belief, > but then again after Bill Beaty's wandering stir stick, who knows? : > > QUOTE: > Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 3:13 pmPost su

Re: Physics Today 1/25/05 - Feder

At 11:08 AM 1/28/2005, Jed Rothwell continues his patent nonsense, and wrote: Mitchell Swartz wrote: > First,The matter involves the TITLES of the papers delivered at ICCF-10. > The "files" discussed here are not the papers, but the NAMES of the papers > and the names which were removed. W

Re: Assistance For Posting Mitchell Swartz's Papers On LENR-CANR.ORG

At 06:02 PM 1/27/2005, you wrote: Dear Dr. Swartz, In answer to my private e-mail inquiry about this matter, Jed Rothwell said that he'd be happy to make your research papers available on lenr-canr.org, but that he was unable to find the files on your website, and that his CD drive could not read

Re: Entry to "Phenomena Reports"

Hi Colin, That sounds very interesting. Thanks. I'll look into all that. Cheers Frank At 08:20 pm 28-01-05 -0500, you wrote: >Hi Frank, > >To review background Beta Aether I joined your group. >B-A sounds similar to subquantum gas (liquids, particles, etc) proposed by >several authors, but

Re: Accident Report from Mizuno

At 9:22 AM 1/26/5, Jed Rothwell wrote: >[I will upload an Acrobat version of this report that includes photographs.] > >Accident Report > >Tadahiko Mizuno >Division of Quantum Energy Engineering, >Research group of Nuclear System Engineering >Hokkaido University [snip] >The >cell was placed inside