Maybe the gamma burst was the culprit?
OTOH "Cygnons" could be Positronium (coupled electron-positron pairs).
Fred
http://www.energystorm.us/Transmutation_Of_Radioactive_Nuclear_Waste-r80699.html
Studies have shown that all proposed transmutation processes to treat RNW using neutron
Interesting to associate this photon transmutation study with
the D + D He-4 + 24 Mev (photons) and transmutations in CF.
- Original Message -
From: Frederick Sparber
To: vortex-l
Sent: 3/17/2006 7:09:18 AM
Subject: Re: Cold Fusion Supernova 1987A]
Maybe the gamma burst was
I have feared that, perhaps, we have encountered fundamental problems
with trying to squeeze more energy density and low cost efficiency out
of an
electrochemical process such as batteries depend on. Where can we go
beyond lithium?
That's why the ultracap approach is so exciting - it's a whole
I agree, progress in this field can't be incremental. The main issue with
electrochemical batteries (lithium or whatever they might come up with in
the future) is cost in the long run due to limited life (in number of
recharges). A dry parallel plate type capacitor such as the EEstor device
Michel Jullian wrote:
I couldn't agree more about CF, I am all for it, that's why I get so
frustrated that CF issues aren't addressed a bit faster and with
more efficiency, do we want to see this thing working in our lifetime I wonder?
That all depends on politics. If we could persuade the
Frank,
This structure
has the property that no two rings are interlocking, therefore
if
any one of the rings is removed, then all three separate. That
would indicate temporary stability...
I was trying to visualize it with three proper rings and I
couldn't. I now
see why. It's cos they
That's why I think videos of working experiments which would make nice
stories for TV should be taken.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: Simple comparison electric car versus
From what I've seen on this topic, no one has suggested putting a high
efficiency
battery (comparable to the one in your vehicle) or other storage device in
your garage
and charging it with a rooftop solar panel, windmill (this was done down on
the farm in the 1930s),
waste heat device, then
Jones.
You picked up on the 137 contact points of (Crotalus cerastes Particlaes)
didn't you? :-)
Particle Wavelength Lambda = hc/E = circumference of frictionless jar.
containing said snake
Frequency f = c/lambda = 1.23e20 Hz for electron or positron.
Displacement current I = q*f =19.68
The Sabori Inert Gas Vacuum Engine
According to the video, a forerunner to this engine was brought to U.S.
by Hungarian, Joseph Papp. Sabori joined him in 1985, investing a large
sum of money in a joint venture. Mr. Papp refused to share, per
contract agreement. The case ended in court in
Vorts,
A recent comment I read several weeks ago from my subscription to Kiplinger
Forecasts caught my attention.
The newsletter claimed that there would be a [new] form of energy storage
technology that would debut sometime in 2007 in both New York and California.
The technology would allow
Any way you slice it, Michel battery storage of electricity off the Grid is
the most practical way to store Pipeline Hydrogen for Vehicle use.
Fred
Michel Jullian wrote:
Well no the Eiffel Tower couldn't support a windmill on top as it already
supports TV emitters, and your scheme would make
Vorts,
The recent flywheel Beacon Power technology that was brought to my attention made me wonder if there might be an economic advantage in manufacturing smaller scale versions of this technology that perhaps could be installed in a typical homeowner's basement to store "surplus" electricity,
(reply pb not gone Fred)
Ok if by battery you mean ultracaps :) Wait, what do you mean by Pipeline
Hydrogen?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Frederick Sparber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: Simple comparison electric
Michel Jullian wrote.
Ok if by battery you mean ultracaps :) Wait, what do you mean by
Pipeline
Hydrogen?
Hydrogen produced on a large scale by electrolysis or coal and biomass
gasifican etc,
delivered to the user by pipeline.
Production based on demand eliminates the economically elusive
-Original Message-
From: Michel Jullian
BTW Fred (and other distinguished vorts) I would be interested in your
opinion on the EEStor patent I discovered a few days ago
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.html (copy-paste app
number
0040071944, I haven't found how to link
Hi Ham,
Yes, I did like the app, and had a few thoughts about it.
K.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:28 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EEStor Patent(was: Simple comparison electric car versus
gasoline)
Hi K, do you think it can work? (you seem to have a reply-to problem just
like Fred BTW)
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Keith Nagel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 8:55 PM
Subject: RE: EEStor Patent(was: Simple comparison electric car versus
-Original Message-
From: Keith Nagel
Hi Ham,
Yes, I did like the app, and had a few thoughts about it.
At 0.5 kWh per mile that's 104 miles for the 52 kWh, 336 lb battery
assuming linear discharge and total depletion.
Is the battery heavier when charged? g
Terry
Mike and his wife drove into town to celebrate the occasion.
On the drive home, Mike was pulled over by a policeman who
informed him that his wife "had fallen out of the car when he
turned the corner a few miles back, but she was unhurt".
"Thank the Lord!." Mike exclaimed, "I though I was going
104 miles range isn't much! Are you sure about the 0.5 kWh per mile for an
electric car?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: EEStor Patent(was: Simple comparison electric car versus
gasoline)
-Original Message-
From: Michel Jullian
104 miles range isn't much! Are you sure about the 0.5 kWh per mile for
an electric car?
Uh, the first message in this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg12220.html
Wow, hey Fred, we have something in common.
BTW, how's the house coming? You get any bites yet?
K.
-Original Message-
From: Michel Jullian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:02 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: EEStor Patent(was: Simple comparison electric
http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/002383.html
The Gorlov turbine looks like a winner. It has been around a while.
Too bad it is so slow to progress. Maybe the new energy prices will
change that.
-Original Message-
From: Michel Jullian
104 miles range isn't much! Are you sure about the 0.5 kWh per mile for
an electric car?
While 0.5 kWh was quoted previously, paragraph [0073] of the patent app
says:
It is estimeated that is (sic) takes 14 hp, 746 watts per hp, to power
Thanks, sorry I have caught the thread en route, I should have looked it up
myself. Jed/Wikipedia said 0.3 to 0.5 kWh in fact, 52 kWh would be nearly
acceptable for say 0.3 kWh/mile on the road (170miles=300km range), and 0.5
kWh in town, 104miles in town as you said.
The thing is with this
BTW, the stereo music alone from some cars here in Atlanta will limit the
range to well below 100 miles.
LOL :)
Yes there is a problem with the figures, it may be that EEStor talks about
european cars, and Jed/Wikipedia about US cars ;)
Michel
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL
Hi,
On Sun, 15 Oct 2000 I wrote:-
--
In reply to Mitchell Jones's message of Sat, 14 Oct 2000 17:18:54
-0500:
[snip]
***{How can pressure rise from 8 to 5200 mbar after all of the CO2 in the
atmosphere--i.e., 90% by
Yes, they will follow the field lines; but there's not much large-scale
order to the galactic magnetic field, so it's more a diffusion process,
once the particles leave the supernova's immediate area. There's no
significant recombination- not enough electrons moving close to the same
speed,
-Original Message-
From: Robin van Spaandonk
Now, 5 years later we see:-
http://www.physorg.com/news11858.html
At the same time we also see:
http://www.newscientistspace.com/article/dn8857-big-new-reservoir-of-wate
r-ice-suspected-under-mars.html
http://tinyurl.com/heqdz
The
Truth be told.Ferrar (is his last name) sent it to me somewhat hacked
up. I enjoyed his delightful creativity so much that I edited his draft
it into standard AP-style news copy and sent it back to him.
Gotta hand it to this guy..he really has a great sense of humor and also
has his ear
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:45:30
-0500:
Hi,
[snip]
States with significant wind resources are thousands of miles away,
and you cannot transmit electricity that far. Georgia has no
significant renewable energy resources.
It is a shame you cannot transmit
forward from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Akira Kawasaki)
[Original Message]
From: What's New [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 3/18/2006 12:58:12 AM
Subject: [BOBPARKS-WHATSNEW] What's New Friday March 17, 2006
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Mar 06 Washington, DC
1. THE
In reply to RC Macaulay's message of Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:54:43
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
People being creatures of habit, will choose the least painful method.. which
is .. do nothing.
Richard
They will however choose something if it is perceived to result in
an immediate benefit. I.e. if you give
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:03:49
-0900:
Hi,
[snip]
Polar carbon dioxide increasing at surprising rate. See:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,,1729255,00.html
In 1990 this key cause of global warming was rising at a rate of 1
part per million (ppm).
In reply to Frederick Sparber's message of Wed, 15 Mar 2006
01:05:11 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=2002ApPhL..81.1098Kamp;db_key=PHYamp;data_type=HTMLamp;format=
Abstract~ We have investigated effects of electric fields on the yield of
secondary
On Mar 17, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:03:49
-0900:
Hi,
[snip]
Polar carbon dioxide increasing at surprising rate. See:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,,1729255,00.html
In 1990 this key cause of global
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:10:01
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
This ring means that three objects are entangled. If you pick up
any one of them, the other two
will follow. However, if you cut one of them off, the other two
will fall apart, Chin said.
There is something magic
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:15:08
-0900:
Hi,
[snip]
If it is indeed true then I could not agree more that it is
catastrophic. I think independent confirmation is badly needed, not
just at Mount Zeppelin but all over the polar regions. Too bad NASA
has been
On Mar 17, 2006, at 9:33 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
(BTW krill are crustaceans, so they should be creating CO2, not
consuming it).
Check out:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/02/060206230630.htm
I mentioned krill because I think I read about an unexplained krill
population
40 matches
Mail list logo