O'Sullivan
> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:45:11 -0700
> From: bi...@eskimo.com
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:~Norway proof of concept/Man-made Man-played~
>
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
>
> > WHO ARE YOU WORKIN
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
WHO ARE YOU WORKING FOR If you don't cough up the details we won't
get paid. And I for one do not want to be unemployed.
No worries, a quick secure-satphone call to the Tesla pulsed-xray
wavecomplex-emitting global satellite
Re: Newton's Torsion Physics: I am inclined to concur:->~JHO~
> From: jone...@pacbell.net
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:~Norway proof of concept/Man-made Man-played~
> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:54:09 -0700
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
> But the much m(is)aligned Norway Spiral had nothing to do with
Gennady's Torsion Physics. It had a lot to do with Newton's Torsion
Physics:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx8i5EfmYU4
Yes. It is too easy to build a house of cards out of an event
Bravo! Debunk away~:-)
> Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:05:30 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:~Norway proof of concept/Man-made Man-played~
> From: hohlr...@gmail.com
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010
y
ingress/egress fuild dynamc system with All Atom's Proton-Centres as
Mirco-Balanced-Singularity-Torus micro-packages. Buy it; don't buy it; freely
presented to those free to accept or reject. So what? I thought that was the
'real' overreaching goal of Vortex-l in the first pla
arrogant; & absurd; and unworthy of vortex-l.
Since I have 'belabored' your-alls patience; these explanations are due; but
as justifications every person is responsible to their own take, pro-or-con on
the whole affair. Ciao Amigos~JHO~
From: aethe...@gmail.com
Date: Sun
r it's not too difficult to project the
trajectory of it by paying attention to events, statements, and particularly
'what is not said' in light of the former. Cheers~JHO~
From: orionwo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:~Norway proof of concept/Man-made Man-
But the much m(is)aligned Norway Spiral had nothing to do with
Gennady's Torsion Physics. It had a lot to do with Newton's Torsion
Physics:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx8i5EfmYU4
JHO'S would probably enjoy reading Hoagland since they do seem to have
common beliefs:
http://www.enterprisemiss
Isn't this a bit backwards?
Shouldn't we be skeptical of the person often talking in all caps, making up
new words and claiming government connections?
Maybe Jack's stuff is a distorted view of the work I'm doing, or maybe it's
bunk I am not in the right mood to check, but Jack, have you shared an
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan
> wrote:
>> ?Am I speaking with contracted
>> Govt.-debunkers/hecklers/discreditors/here.
>
> Esa is not the government debunker assigned to Vortex-L. That is my job.
For all the Vo
For Mr. O'Sullivan
I noticed you recently stated:
> I was invited by our Govt. to consult a back-engineering effort to play
> catch-up to the Russians who by their best intel was completely convinced
> was REAL TECHNOLOGY.
Which part of the government invited you to back engineer "REA
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:06:42 +0300
Subject: Re: [Vo]:~Norway proof of concept/Man-made Man-played~
From: esaru...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
the nature of your accusations leave no room for the truth. no matter what i
say to this, you will continue believing that i am paid by t
was this sentence going to get finished?
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Zachary Jones wrote:
> Jack,
> If indeed you did or are no
>
> Sent from my mobile
>
> On Sep 24, 2010, at 4:51 PM, "Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan" <
> alset9te...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > was invited by our Govt. to consult a
Jack,
If indeed you did or are no
Sent from my mobile
On Sep 24, 2010, at 4:51 PM, "Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan"
wrote:
> was invited by our Govt. to consult a back-engineering effort to play
> catch-up to the Russians who by their best intel was completely convinced was
> REAL TECHNOLOGY. It
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan
wrote:
> ?Am I speaking with contracted
> Govt.-debunkers/hecklers/discreditors/here.
Esa is not the government debunker assigned to Vortex-L. That is my job.
T
the nature of your accusations leave no room for the truth. no matter what i
say to this, you will continue believing that i am paid by the government of
a country that i've never been in. if i explain and verify i've never been
in the states, you will hastily whip out some "but they came to you an
r. Cheers;
Jack Harbach O'Sullivan
> CC: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> From: esaru...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:~Norway proof of concept/Man-made Man-played~
> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 08:05:08 +0300
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>
> The least you could do is provide a
The least you could do is provide a reference, preferably on a Russian official
public website to this public darkenergy claim of yours.
iPoni sent dis message. Esa Ruoho wrote it.
On 24.9.2010, at 0.34, "Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan"
wrote:
> FACT? * * * ! MOSCOW has publically announced that th
*Man-made & Man-played* yea the bloody 'caps' again*
?Wagers that this is fiction? Ultimately 'credibility' is the currency to
chance/No?
ref: public& (obvious) 'proof of concept'--->'Norway Spiral'*
*Hyper-Dimensional Torsion Physics aka Singularity Physics aka Transdimensio
20 matches
Mail list logo
