On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Jeff Driscoll hcarb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:58 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Joshua Cude's message of Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:20:48 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I was talking about running it above boiling, but way below the level
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Jeff Driscoll hcarb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:58 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Joshua Cude's message of Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:20:48 -0500:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Jeff Driscoll hcarb...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would you divide the energy to vaporize 1 g of water (starting at
10 C) by the energy to heat it from 10 C to 100 C (liquid)? Seems
random to me.
Because those are the two extremes of a situation that results in
In reply to Joshua Cude's message of Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:20:48 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I was talking about running it above boiling, but way below the level needed
to boil it all. Different thing. And it's easy. The power can range within a
factor of 7. In this case, anywhere between 600W and about 5
Yep...
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:58 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Joshua Cude's message of Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:20:48 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I was talking about running it above boiling, but way below the level needed
to boil it all. Different thing. And it's easy. The power can range within a
Nice... well, high time for a few of Rossi's trusted friends to
ensure that he is alerted quickly...
Not convincing calculations. What is the density of water that can be
sustained in droplets and what is the size of the droplets before they
coalesce and rain back?
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope. When you put 800 W into something like this, a large fraction of it
radiates from the cell into the surroundings.
The cell is insulated.
It is too hot to touch
Joshua Cude wrote:
You only get a stable water/steam mixture in a closed vessel (a
teapot).
Why? If it takes say 1 kW to raise the temperature of the flowing
water to 100C, and then you supply 1.5 kW (using only and electric
heater), then only part of the flowing water will get
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
**
Joshua Cude wrote:
You only get a stable water/steam mixture in a closed vessel (a teapot).
Why? If it takes say 1 kW to raise the temperature of the flowing water
to 100C, and then you supply 1.5 kW (using
While I am also a skeptical, even rough approximation gives a huge
output gain. Above 100 degrees means gas, and pumping a mixture would
require either another pump, by means of ventilation. Ventilation is
noisy and would require a large opening. Even 1% of liquid is a thick
fog, which is not the
Joshua Cude wrote:
There is no chance any of the water would vaporize with only ~800
W input.
You would not any steam at all. Even with this high input power,
any steam at all is proof there is anomalous heat.
What are you talking about. You just did the calculation yourself
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
While I am also a skeptical, even rough approximation gives a huge
output gain. Above 100 degrees means gas,
A temperature reading within a degree or two of 100C is consistent with a
mixture of gas and liquid.
and
This is going into an infinite loop. Trying to explain that with only
800 is just too hard for me. Thanks for trying.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
**
Joshua Cude wrote:
There is no chance any of the water would vaporize with only ~800 W
input.
You would not any steam at all. Even with this high input power, any
steam at all is proof there is anomalous
YOW -- WHAT YOU JUST SAID
On 11-06-24 04:20 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
So the only way for Rossi to make it produce a little steam and a lot
of hot water would be for him to adjust the anomalous heat output. It
would be a miracle if Rossi has such good control over the anomalous
heat that
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.comwrote:
YOW -- WHAT YOU JUST SAID
On 11-06-24 04:20 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
So the only way for Rossi to make it produce a little steam and a lot of
hot water would be for him to adjust the anomalous heat output. It
On Jun 24, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
YOW -- WHAT YOU JUST SAID
On 11-06-24 04:20 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
So the only way for Rossi to make it produce a little steam and a
lot of hot water would be for him to adjust the anomalous heat
output. It would be a miracle
Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope. When you put 800 W into something like this, a large fraction of it
radiates from the cell into the surroundings.
The cell is insulated.
It is too hot to touch according to witnesses. The insulation means it takes
longer to get hot on the
20 matches
Mail list logo
