Sorry!
This is a kidding set of e-mails. Photons did always lead to evaporation
of water since the earth is covered by water. Even more surprising is
that ice does sublimate just from solar irradiation...
So following such hoax science today is standard to diffuse a field by
usst claiming
Nice to see someone else got around to discovering this effect. I observed this
phenomenon 15 or 20 years ago, using a 532 nm laser. As these dorks will
finally get around to discovering, this effect varies greatly with the
refractive index of the material and the degree of polarity.
In the late 19th and early 20th century the physics community began to
enshrine mathematical ingenuity as the best way to resolve the tensions
between theory and experiment and grew increasingly dismissive of
philosophical questioning and speculation.
The theory of Special Relativity is typically
Faraday's message to Maxwell parallels Aristotle's complaint about the
Egyptians. Aristotle implied words to the effect that the ancient Egyptians
thought that the physical world should obey mathematics instead of math
describing reality. There's a lot of that going on today. The so-called
Faraday wrote this 10 years before Maxwell published his first work on
electromgnetism in 1856 which was titled "On Faraday's lines of Force"
Maxwell's equations were first published in 1862. It seems Maxwell
interpreted Faraday's writings in a manner that was consistent with an
aether.
I would
Hmmm... A year after Maxwell's equations. Maxwell can't have been too happy
about that, as his equations described the behavior of the aether. And he
repeatedly claimed that he had merely expressed Faraday in conventional
mathematical form.
On Monday, April 15th, 2024 at 8:04 PM, MSF wrote:
>
This gives you an idea what a deep thinker Faraday was. Do you know if he
posited this idea before Maxwell published his equations? I thought I had read
everything Faraday wrote. Somehow I missed this one.
MIchael
On Monday, April 15th, 2024 at 12:08 PM, H L V wrote:
> This is a quote from a
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 1 Apr 2024 22:56:25 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Uranium is at least 10'000x more harmless than Plutonium
>
Storing plutonium is wasteful anyway. Use it as fuel.
>So its a bad idea...
>
>
>J.W.
>
>
>On 01.04.2024 21:10, Robin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Why not
Uranium is at least 10'000x more harmless than Plutonium
So its a bad idea...
J.W.
On 01.04.2024 21:10, Robin wrote:
Hi,
Why not store nuclear waste in worked out Uranium mines? After all, "nuclear
material" was stored there for billions of
years before we dug it up.
Crypto currency
If these two statements are logical implications of Maxwell's equations,
a) A magnet that is not moving with respect to the aether will not have an
electric field.
b) A magnet that is moving at a constant velocity with respect to the
aether will have an electric field.
Then consider this thought
The law of Faraday is very clear any change in magnetic flux induces
charge hence a field.
Many untrained physicists write j (current) instead of q what is wrong.
To measure a current you have to cut the ring (rim) of charges what
leads to dragging forces and movement of charge over e.g. a
The question of whether the magnetic field rotates in the faraday disc
generator is a question that is related to aether theories in particular
or any theory of privileged reference frames in general. It got me
wondering if there are alternate ways to test for the presence of an aether
or a
As most might know, in physics we only know force fields. Thus so called
field lines (magnet field) are equipotential cuts of the space covered
by fields. Of course you never can draw such a line as all sources are
in constant motion/rotation.
The static magnetic field is a special case as it
Sorry, the last word should be 'magnet' rather than 'magnetic'.
harry
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:02 AM H L V wrote:
> Another visualization of the behaviour of magnetic fields without the
> concept of lines of force.
> When the magnet is moved around it simply changes the orientation of all
>
Another visualization of the behaviour of magnetic fields without the
concept of lines of force.
When the magnet is moved around it simply changes the orientation of all
the little compass needles.
The notion of lines of force tends to make one think the magnetic field is
somehow mechanically
Here is a physical demonstration of the situation using a ferrofluid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bn41nPOGq-U
The ferrofluid does not rotate with the cylindrical magnet, which supports
the idea that the magnet's field does not rotate with the magnet.
(There is a little bit of movement but the
It depends what you mean by a field. If you imagine the field is made of
wire-like filaments which are fastened to an atom then you would expect the
field to translate and rotate whenever the atom translates and rotates. On
the other hand if you imagine the field is a vector field then the field
In reply to H L V's message of Tue, 5 Mar 2024 09:28:31 -0500:
Hi,
You don't need an experiment to figure this out. The field obviously rotates
with the magnet.
This is because the field is not a single entity. It is the sum of all the tiny
fields created by the electrons attached
to
Instead of measuring voltages, another approach would be to measure how the
entire assembly moves in response to the various relative rotations. In
order to observe such effects, the entire assembly should be self contained
so that it is free to slide over a level surface. The relative rotation of
I asked the Bot about F's original paper:
https://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmanelectroche.pdf
My questions were mainly about these two paragraphs:
(a) Excess enthalpy generation is markedly dependent on the applied current
density (i.e. magnitude of the shift in
the chemical potential) and is
Document processing AI is also making progress. Adobe Acrobat just added a
new feature, the AI Assistant. It works with documents in native Acrobat
format, not a scanned document converted to Acrobat. I tried it with my
book, but it said, "the feature only supports files with less than 120
pages."
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:12:40 -0500:
Thanks Jed.
[snip]
>I do not think so.
>
>I had an older Leaf, which I gave to my daughter. I do not recall anything
>like that.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
Buy electric cars and recharge them from solar panels on your
Robin wrote:
Does anyone know if the original version of the Nissan Leaf, released in
> 2010, had bi-directional charging capability?
>
I do not think so.
I had an older Leaf, which I gave to my daughter. I do not recall anything
like that.
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 15 Jan 2024 00:30:33 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>No the earth is not at the magnetic radius. She is inside the tense
>solar plasma flux.
>
>All mass is magnetic flux mass. E.g. the Bohr radius is the first
>magnetic resonance radius. The second you get by
No the earth is not at the magnetic radius. She is inside the tense
solar plasma flux.
All mass is magnetic flux mass. E.g. the Bohr radius is the first
magnetic resonance radius. The second you get by multiplying it with
(pi/alpha)^2. This you then can multiply with the sun's proton's
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 15 Jan 2024 00:02:25 +0100:
Hi Jürg,
Would you care to reply to the other questions?
[snip]
>You are correct! I made a Kopernikus turn and did look at the sun's belt
>
>
>J.W.
>
>On 14.01.2024 19:53, Robin wrote:
>> In reply to Jürg
You are correct! I made a Kopernikus turn and did look at the sun's belt
J.W.
On 14.01.2024 19:53, Robin wrote:
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sun, 14 Jan 2024 06:43:05 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
That's the fact. The Van Allen belt is the magnetic resonance region
(radius) of the SUN.
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sun, 14 Jan 2024 06:43:05 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>That's the fact. The Van Allen belt is the magnetic resonance region
>(radius) of the SUN. You can calculate it with the spherical metric for
>magnetic mass. Same for the Galaxy MOND radius.
I'm not quite
That's the fact. The Van Allen belt is the magnetic resonance region
(radius) of the SUN. You can calculate it with the spherical metric for
magnetic mass. Same for the Galaxy MOND radius.
J.W.
On 13.01.2024 01:55, Robin wrote:
Hi,
Perhaps charged particles in the Van Allen belts are
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Wed, 3 Jan 2024 08:50:35 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>There is only one physics = reality.
>Santilli, Mills,Holmlid all see the same shrunken hydrogen. Without the H*/D*
>step there is no CF/LENR.
...but they all have different explanations for it. :)
>For
Are you referring to the same reaction Prof. Leif Holmlid was talking about?
There is only one physics = reality.
Santilli, Mills,Holmlid all see the same shrunken hydrogen. Without the H*/D*
step there is no CF/LENR.
For certain coatings we see X-ray spectra in the range from 4keV..16keV (our
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Wed, 3 Jan 2024 06:19:31 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>Lock at the picture. Only the innermost kernel of thousands of protons
>will possibly fuse or form H*-H*. H*-H* is an exothermic reaction nearly
>delivering 500eV.
Are you referring to the same reaction Prof.
Lock at the picture. Only the innermost kernel of thousands of protons
will possibly fuse or form H*-H*. H*-H* is an exothermic reaction nearly
delivering 500eV.
The first step anyway is stripping of Oxigen!
Of course much better science would be needed. But who wants to kill
standard model
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Wed, 3 Jan 2024 05:14:56 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>What accelerating free electrons?
>
>This is a kind of hand waving. The bubble implodes so all momenta point
>inwards. Heat will strip up the electrons what adds a further inward
>momenta due to photon emission
What accelerating free electrons?
This is a kind of hand waving. The bubble implodes so all momenta point
inwards. Heat will strip up the electrons what adds a further inward
momenta due to photon emission (1/2 of this energy) . Impact speed is
7..10km/s.
Crucial is that the electrons
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Wed, 3 Jan 2024 02:36:56 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>Factually the best update (2009) about sono fusion is given in ::
>https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StringhamRwhenbubble.pdf
>
>J.W.
Quote from the above paper:
"The initially dense cluster is further
Factually the best update (2009) about sono fusion is given in ::
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StringhamRwhenbubble.pdf
J.W.
On 03.01.2024 00:37, Robin wrote:
Hi,
You might take a look at the work of Dr. Randell Mills
(http://brilliantlightpower.com/).
A severely shrunken H2 molecule
Because many thousands of negative pressure are produced within the cavity.
On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 at 22:14, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Huang, B.-J., et al., *Water can trigger nuclear reaction to produce
> energy and isotope gases.* Scientific Reports, 2024. *14*(1): p. 214.
>
>
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:53:36 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>(Jones said that current density depends on the surface area. That is a
>geometry error. Current density is a function of surface area.
>It is as if Jones said that mass density varies with volume. Or that joules
Personally, I doubt we will ever have reliable hot fusion reactors. Low
energy fusion, a different story.
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023, 1:29 PM Robin
wrote:
> In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 12 Dec 2023 11:37:52 -0500:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >
>
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 12 Dec 2023 11:37:52 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>https://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Nuclear-Power/Another-Major-Milestone-in-the-Race-for-Nuclear-Fusion.ht
There is only a car mafia constraint.
Initially there was a plan to change accumulators at "gas stations". But
this does not allow the manufacturer to charge you 3x more than the
accumulator's real value if you buy an expensive car. It also means
that you have a bit less design freedom.
For "small" isotopes it is easy to predict the shape and the exact 4D
quantum structure.
But *shape is not the driver for LENR.* Cold fusion (LENR) only runs if
you can transport the excess energy out of the center of mass reaction.
This is also the reason why hot fusion is bare nonsense. For
You are a dreamer!
Laws are here to protect the wealthy criminals that also influence,
steer the large companies and states. These folks don't like security
for people at all.
There are highly criminal states like USA that enforce (e.g, Apple,
Microsoft, CISCO even chips manufactures) by
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 6 Dec 2023 20:44:35 -0500:
Hi Jed,
I meant, are there any personal favourite papers in the latest proceedings?
>Robin wrote:
>
>
>> Do you have any personal highlights?
>>
>
>When they held this conference in 2000, the conference organizers told me I
Robin wrote:
> Do you have any personal highlights?
>
When they held this conference in 2000, the conference organizers told me I
had to ask individual authors to send me papers. Some authors were anxious
to have their work at LENR-CANR.org. Others did not want their work
uploaded. I ended up
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 6 Dec 2023 17:18:57 -0500:
Hi Jed,
Do you have any personal highlights?
>Proceedings uploaded:
>
>Scaramuzzi, F., ed. *ICCF8 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference
>on Cold Fusion*. Vol. 70. 2000, Italian Physical Society, Bologna, Italy:
If it won't fit in the hole, you can't use it.
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023, 6:01 PM Robin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Form should always play second fiddle to function.
> This means that no matter what you are creating, the primary concern
> should always be that it works. Once it's working,
> you can worry about
I'll give an overview of the exploit here:
• FoR divergence depends on inertial isolation
The body that you wish to accelerate for discount work expenditure must
gain momentum without inertial interaction with its environment.
This thus precludes conventional inertial interactions per N2, in
In the last config the best CoP seemed to converge to around 3.5.
Bessler indicated CoP's of 4 were possible, in one passage seemingly
implying a factor of 16:
Der wird ein großer Künstler heißen,
Wer ein schwer Ding leicht hoch kann schmeißen,
Und wenn ein Pfund ein Viertel fällt,
Es vier Pfund
We all wait for the first device with COP >2!
J.W:
On 04.12.2023 09:59, Vibrator ! wrote:
Just a heads up for anyone interested - i've succeeded in my long-held
objective of cultivating and harvesting a divergent inertial frame.
The energy density is whatever you want - just make up some
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Wed, 29 Nov 2023 08:13:10 +0100:
Hi,
The problem with a remote origin is that friction will slow it down.
Interstellar space is not empty, just scarcely
populated.
>Plasma jets from black holes are ejected up to 60c relative to our
>motion. Thus I
Plasma jets from black holes are ejected up to 60c relative to our
motion. Thus I would be modest and concede that we humans still lack the
knowledge to fully understand what can happen with matter.
J.W.
On 28.11.2023 20:11, Robin wrote:
Hi,
Given that it can't have come from deep space,
Robin wrote:
> A few comments:-
>
> 1) I seem to recall someone else having used Calcium Oxide before.
>
Dufour in transmutation studies.
Iwamura also in transmutation studies.
Note that Ed explains the role of the inert calcium oxide particles here:
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Mon, 27 Nov 2023 15:59:24 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Wonderful!!
>
>See:
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjtPZR55r30
A few comments:-
1) I seem to recall someone else having used Calcium Oxide before.
2) Perhaps unrelated, but 36 microns is the wavelength of a
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 17 Nov 2023 19:26:01 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin wrote:
>
>
>> I have an electric heater that can be controlled to within 1/10 of a
>> degree centigrade . . .
>
>
>That is remarkable. That is a laboratory grade thermostat.
I should have said precision,
Robin wrote:
> I have an electric heater that can be controlled to within 1/10 of a
> degree centigrade . . .
That is remarkable. That is a laboratory grade thermostat.
> The only explanation I can think of is that the house is well insulated
> and has a long time constant, so that early
Harry
I was quoting wikipedia and I disagree with the quote.
-- Original Message --
From: "H L V"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 12 Nov, 23 At 21:10
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
I have heard different accounts of what mot
t;H L V"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday,
12 Nov, 23 At 16:39 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special
Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
I should not have said "seems".
It does more accurately predict the amount of stellar aberration.
t something added later.
>
>
> But now relativistic mass gets discarded so all that extra stuff might
> also be discarded anon.
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "H L V"
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Sunday, 12 Nov, 23 At 16:39
> Subj
But now relativistic mass gets discarded so all that extra stuff might
also be discarded anon.
-- Original Message --
From: "H L V"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 12 Nov, 23 At 16:39
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
I should not hav
gt;
> When contrasting a Newtonian calculation with an Einsteinian calculation -
> its usually not given.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "H L V"
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Sunday, 12 Nov, 23 At 15:18
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: R
>>>seems <<<
???
When contrasting a Newtonian calculation with an Einsteinian calculation
- its usually not given.
-- Original Message --
From: "H L V"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 12 Nov, 23 At 15:18
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Specia
Even if it is impossible to measure the one way speed of light according to
Einstein's theory, astronomers use a specific finite one way speed of light
to explain the phenomenon known as stellar aberration. Astronomer's have
been studying this phenomenon for nearly 300 years. The amount of
was
rejected.https://beyondmainstream.org/dr-louis-essen-inventor-of-atomic-clock-rejects-einsteins-relativity-theory/
-- Original Message --
From: "Jürg Wyttenbach"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 12 Nov, 23 At 12:20
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR)
On 12.11.2023 12:59, ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
>>I think there are aspects of QM that are rather well established,
but much less so with SR.
It seems to me that Quantum Physics is open to many different
interpretations and really isn't dogmatic about which is true.<<
QM I (SChrödigner) is
ations, but
unlike Quantum physics rarely admits to the different interpretations.
For instance -- Lorentz transformations can be interpreted the
Einsteinian or Lorentzian way.
-- Original Message --
From: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 12 Nov, 23 At 00:50
On 12.11.2023 01:50, Jonathan Berry wrote:
Another idea I came across is that gravity is a result of time dilation!
Gravity, as shown exactly in SOP, is a very weak "nuclear" force. Time
dilation as origin of a force is a nice fantasy - just good for a Disney
movie.
J.W.
--
Jürg
Discussing about physics needs years long reflection about what physical
> constants mean and how these interrelate and are measured.
>
A constant is an obsession and assumption that it will continue under all
conditions.
In the case of Light speed it is an illogical assumption if we apply what
t.
But will check out what the translation issue is, thanks.
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 23:13, ROGER ANDERTON
wrote:
but it is
-- Original Message --
From: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov, 23 At 06:34
Subjec
Well, yes in theory it could be infinite as I explained but I didn't say
that.
And I don't think it is likely to be that we are moving in effect
infinitely fast through the Aether.
What astronomers teach is an assumption.
On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 at 10:22, H L V wrote:
> In the video by Veritasium
In the video by Veritasium he says the one way speed of light could in
principle be infinite and that
there is nothing to stop us from saying we are seeing the distant stars as
they are now rather than as they were hundreds of years ago.
He states this without mentioning the fact that this
I didn't say it can be infinite, I just said the 2 way speed only has to
average to C.
Now, I guess it could be infinite if you were moving infinitely fast, then
the speed of light the other way would be half C to make the round trip C.
But moving infinitely fast seems problematic.
On Sun, 12
Also if the speed of light depended on direction would it even be possible
to establish a reliable communication link between a transmitter and a
receiver which are moving at different inclinations and at different
speeds?
Harry
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 1:19 PM H L V wrote:
>
> If the one way
If the one way speed of light can be infinite then there would be no
rational basis for claiming
that when we look deeper and deeper into the universe we are looking
further and further back in time.
Harry
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 3:28 AM Jonathan Berry
wrote:
> If you ask most people, most
--
From: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; evg...@groups.io; aethericscien...@groups.io
Sent: Friday, 10 Nov, 23 At 02:20
Subject: [Vo]:Re: Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
A few updates...
First because the Michelson Morley claim seemed plausible but
It's always interesting to question what is considered our standard point
of view even when it works so well. Special Relativity is common sense in
my opinion and is why I would never give it up. However, what always
bugged me was time and using it as a 4th dimension. One of the concepts of
A few updates...
First because the Michelson Morley claim seemed plausible but not totally
conclusive, I wasn't doing the math myself and math isn't my thing so I
farmed that out to AI's that kept on having different ideas so to be sure I
had to really drill down and figure out the best most pure
Which means
"they" don't believe in a definitively defined theory, but instead
believe in a theory that is in constant flux/change.
-- Original Message --
From: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov, 23 At 22:40
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polish
that Einstein’s relativity has been misunderstood
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TiJZA-trjU
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "ROGER ANDERTON"
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov, 23 At 13:28
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Po
been
misunderstood
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TiJZA-trjU
-- Original Message --
From: "ROGER ANDERTON"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov, 23 At 13:28
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
One-way and two-way speed of light would b
Message --
From: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov, 23 At 10:52
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
What I mean is that there might be translation issues, but I doubt it
was a translation issue relating to Einstein not
t;one way" part.
But will check out what the translation issue is, thanks.
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 23:13, ROGER ANDERTON
wrote:
> but it is
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Jonathan Berry"
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov,
23 At 09:16
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
but it is
-- Original Message --
From: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov, 23 At 06:34
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
I doubt it's a tra
but it is
-- Original Message --
From: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov, 23 At 06:34
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
I doubt it's a translation issue.
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 at 22:24, ROGER ANDERTON <mai
se on him what he should
> have meant using those terms.
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Jonathan Berry"
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; evg...@groups.io; aethericscien...@groups.io
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 Nov, 23 At 08:28
> Subject: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Spe
: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; evg...@groups.io; aethericscien...@groups.io
Sent: Wednesday, 8 Nov, 23 At 08:28
Subject: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
If you ask most people, most physicists, and most LLM's (Large Language
Models) if the one way spee
If you ask most people, most physicists, and most LLM's (Large Language
Models) if the one way speed of light is constant they all will say it is
and that it is part of Special Relativity (SR).
If you ask most, "how can that be", they will answer the contraction of
space and dilation of time, but
Yes I remember, but I was not familiar enough with magnetic levitation to
appreciate that his configuration defied conventional expectations.
Sometimes it can be a struggle to find an audience that is knowledgeable
enough to see the significance of a novel observation performed with
rudimentary
Good observation, but I don't think the angle of the light source is great
enough to account for the number of helical turns within the
given length of the tube.
harry
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 6:20 PM MSF wrote:
> One other thing. If you aim a laser into the inside of a transparent tube,
> you
One other thing. If you aim a laser into the inside of a transparent tube, you
get that barber pole effect spiraling around at a greater or lesser frequency
depending on the angle of the beam into the interior of the tube. So that may
explain the barber pole in the video.
--- Original
I can't even begin to express how conceptually and experimentally wrong this
demonstration is. The first thing is the perpetuation of the mistaken idea that
photons are wiggling in a sinusiodal fashion. When you see that sine wave, it's
a graph of the varying field as the wave propagates. It's
The ARV story is chaff; misdirection to fill the void with something
semi-plausible, at least to some degree of consistency, yet whilst only
providing bumsteer. The UFO equivalent of red mercury. Visitors' craft
are obviously surrounded by some kind of glowing orb phenomenon, commonly
assumed to
As I was eating some soup (on day 5 of the fasting mimicking diet) I
wondered why I didn't try putting a pyramid in a box?!
I took a Pyramid I made from A4 Paper where I printed a Template for a
Pyramid of my own design, this design uses an effect I discovered and then
found another researcher
BTW, just curious about things with a high dielectric constant as these
have been correlated with both Free Energy (a researcher with a coil around
a Barium Titanate coil inputting a special frequency got a blue glow and
free energy out, yes, Barium again pops up).
But also I recall reading about
Sorry, there was a missing character in the final link. Here is the correct
link.
_Goethe’s Theory of Colors from the Perspective of Modern Physics_
What is yellow? by PehrSall
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_1WiWGndZw
PehrSall is a physicist who is interested in the history and science of
color theory. He has many video's in which he investigates Newton's and
Geothe's color theories experimentally.
He also has a video on Land's two color
i'd have to look at that very carefully in light of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbr0fQfJC-8
He cites some compelling reasons it might be busted, but, you never know.
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 03:12, Terry Blanton wrote:
> It's Back...LK-99 second chance? Silicon?
>
>
>
It's Back...LK-99 second chance? Silicon?
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/lk-99-patent-update-suggest-it-could-work
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 11:25 AM Terry Blanton wrote:
> And a new candidate with "dancing" Cooper pairs.
>
>
>
The delay? I don't think we're in a hurry. And clearly no one else on the list
has an interest in our discussion.
Spectral colors and their perception are my business. I've made literally
billions of square meters of diffraction gratings, mostly decorative patterns.
Yellow and magenta have
1 - 100 of 97209 matches
Mail list logo
