In a recent email, Ed Storms observed that the sample of the Lugano ash
that was tested was probably not at all representative of the material that
was active in the reactor core. At the temperatures measured, many of the
materials would have melted (or vaporized), and those that did not melt
The fact the the Ni62 particle was still functional and had its tubericles
intact points to the fact the particles was not melted and was no hotter
than the outside of the reactor. To explain this LENR miracle, see my
thread called: Super-fluidic heat flow.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Bob
Following on to this line of thought ... Given the temperatures that the
reactor had been operating in actual operation, many of the constituents of
the fuel powder would have either melted, vaporized, or sintered to the
inside of the reactor core vessel. Thus, when removing the ash for test,
the
Particle 1 was analyzed and found to contain Ni62. Its photo shows that its
tubercles were not melted and the particle was therefore cold. Your
reasoning must be reversed. Particle 1 came from the COLDEST part of the
reactor. The induction coil is also cold and must have been located close
to the
FYI, you can search all of Rossi's blogs using this handy link:
http://www.rossilivecat.com/all.html
Here is an entry from Aug. 28 2014 where Rossi states that his Rossi
effect seems to enrich nickel to Ni62, and that Ni62 seems to improve
the efficiency of the reaction. H
-Original Message-
From: Brad Lowe
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=853cpage=12#comment-992087
Quoting Rossi: We think that our process, the so called “Rossi Effect”, is, as
a serendipity, also a system to produce 62Ni, because only this fact can
explain the formation of
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
- The uniformity of the Ni ash concerns me, the burn mechanism somehow
converts all natural Ni isotopes (smaller and larger!! so fusion and
fission in evidence) to Ni62, but with miraculously no
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:52 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I may have missed the paragraph that stated the amount of material that was
taken from within the reactor as ash. Did they recover approximately the
same amount as was put in?
Approximately 1 gram of fuel was added at
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Sorry – but this reactor is made of alumina – which is a proton conductor.
Beta alumina is among the best proton conducting ceramics but you would
never use any form of alumina if you wanted to retain a supply of hydrogen
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
more magic involved? fusion + fission transmutations that release copious
neutrinos with no gammas, betas, neutrons or alphas?
Apart from a few suggestions here and there, the main reactions that have
been
So its may be possible the main energy source is pepD and associated
reactions. This may also gives D for neutron striping reactions.
Torulf.
On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 08:42:26 -0700, Eric Walker wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Sorry - but this
reactor is made of
Please read the paper. Levi says the tube is sintered.
Sintered alumina would have about 6% porosity. It will not contain hydrogen at
high or low temperature.
However, it is unclear as to whether the fuel was admitted already inside a
separate hermetically sealed ampoule.
If so, that
I looked into the diffusion of tritium from reactor pipes and discovered
that oxygen, carbon, moly, and silicon can slow hydrogen diffusion by 20
orders of magnitude. You might wonder why all of these elements were
present in the fuel load. Rossi is very cleaver.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:42 AM,
will be required.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Oct 11, 2014 11:29 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:52 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I may have missed
David,
I strongly disagree with the conclusions you have expressed regarding the
ash sample isotope fraction.
First, as I explain in this (rather-long-winded) mail from yesterday, the
ENTIRE ASH SAMPLE BULK was analyzed by ICP-MS as consisting of 99.3%
enriched Ni-62.
( see:
the key argument is that we don't have a theory on how it works, and we
have no idea if Ni62 is active, an ash, or anything...
heat is produced, and this man have to learn calorimetry like Huizenga,
Parks,
and most nuclear physicist who imagine that they are the center of the
world, and disdain
Robert,
Whether you know it or not, you may have put another nail in
coffin of any faint hope that this report is valid, and not a fraud. What's
more, in answer to Ransom, it could be a deliberate fraud.
Let me put it this way, if
_
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 4:16 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Isotope conversion completeness, was RE:
[Vo]:Pomp weighs
...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 4:16 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Isotope conversion
completeness, was RE: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in
Let me put
, was RE:
[Vo]:Pomp weighs in
Ok - I can buy the cyclic reaction, but how do you explain
the great preponderance of Li-6 in the ash, compared to all other isotopes?
That does not indicate a cycle so much as a major shift... and where are the
intermediaries in the nearly
In reply to Robert Ellefson's message of Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:24:55 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
While this still only represents a small sample of the complete reactor ash,
I have a difficult time believing that a substantial fractionation of nickel
isotopes occurred. I suspect that most of the other fuel
]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 4:16 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Isotope conversion
completeness, was RE: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in
Let me put
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Why is the Ni62 nearly pure? The reaction was stopped for reasons which were
pre-planned, and not related to a depletion of reactants. They made this
clear.
There was an earlier thread about the possibility of burn-in,
: RE: Isotope conversion
completeness, was RE: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in
Let me put it this way, if what you say is
true - that the sample tested to 99.3% purity of Ni-62, then we have a
major
problem. Are you certain
Beene
[mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 4:16 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Isotope conversion
completeness, was RE: [Vo]:Pomp weighs
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
...and besides there is the little matter of all that excess energy.
All that excess?
In fact, here is nothing that can be called scientifically proved excess
energy at all... this is because the experiment is fatally flawed in using a
IR
I
f I read the information correctly reactor is only transparent to
I.R. below a wavelength of about 5 microns ( almost 0% transmissive
at wavelengths longer than 5 microns) and they used I.R. cameras that
were sensitive in the range of 7.5 microns and 13 microns. Therefor
the cameras
]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 4:35 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Isotope conversion completeness, was RE:
[Vo]:Pomp weighs in
Ok - I can buy the cyclic reaction, but how do you explain
the great preponderance of Li-6 in the ash
Harry and Jones,
I do not believe that the discovery of highly-enriched isotopes is the result
of fraud. I think that the variable fractions of isotopes between the surface
and the bulk of the ash indicates that isotopic enrichment was occurring
in-situ. The apparent fact (if true) that
Thanks!
Harry
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Robert Ellefson vortex-h...@e2ke.com
wrote:
Harry and Jones,
I do not believe that the discovery of highly-enriched isotopes is the
result of fraud. I think that the variable fractions of isotopes between
the surface and the bulk of the
Subject: RE: Isotope conversion
completeness, was RE: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in
Let me put it this way, if what you say is
true - that the sample tested to 99.3% purity of Ni-62, then we have a
major
problem. Are you certain
this question can change the COP, not the bottom line :
at lower input power, the temperature is much higher for the active version.
2014-10-10 7:40 GMT+02:00 Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is wonderfully
It may be hard to get ro operating temp with only the electric power supply
and no LENR.
Bob Cook
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE SmartphoneRobert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent point. Would be easy enough to do a second control run even now
to add some
The dimethyl siloxane type of polymer will confine hydrogen since oxygen
carbon and silicon all keep hydrogen from escaping.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The Lithium Aluminum Hydride was not added to the fuel mix for its good
looks. The Hydride had a
this is an old tactic that Beaudette debunked.
the physicist ignore voluntarily that heat above chemistry level is a
nuclear ash.
maybe Jed can make a better historical perspective than me.
as I've read, the chemist were so bad in particle detection, and physicist
so bad in calorimetry, that
bad logic
even a fraudster cannot change the physics of heat.
a fraudster need to control his environment. he makes pony show.
he ensure condition for his fraud. he does not let people play with his
reactor, choose methods...
the fraud hypotheis are empty... they don't even consider the
tthe isotopic shift observed is probably only a side effect of the real
reaction.
from others LENR experiments one can suspect that hydrogen is the fuel,
and that Ni is just modified.
that the surface of the powder is pure Ni62 maye be simply that it is
cooked by the reactions, stay stable, and
, Oct 8, 2014 10:51 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't imagine how, but perhaps what was left behind inside the reactor
when added to the ash would show that no isotopic shifts took place.
Sorry, but that makes no sense. The material
Two things:
On 10/08/2014 11:07 PM, Robert Lynn wrote:
The uniformity of the Ni ash concerns me, the burn mechanism somehow
converts all natural Ni isotopes (smaller and larger!! so fusion and
fission in evidence) to Ni62, but with miraculously no radioactive
isotopes produced?
Patterson,
And being a 3rd part test I would assume Rossi does not have access or
opportunity to switch out anything.
From: Blaze Spinnaker [mailto:blazespinna...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 10:26 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in
Jed, perhaps someone
On 10/09/2014 07:00 AM, Roarty, Francis X wrote:
And being a 3^rd part test I would assume Rossi does not have access
or opportunity to switch out anything.
From page 7 of the report:
The dummy reactor was switched on at 12:20 PM of 24 February 2014 by
Andrea Rossi who gradually
brought
: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 8:47 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in
Many things do not add up here, especially the drastic changes from the
original E-Cat.
The more I read the more skeptical is my outlook on this.
Could some clever troll have gotten hold
A point of clarification if I might. The siloxane was never present in the
reactor. It was the adhesive used to fix the ash particles, after removal
from the reactor, so they could be analyzed for isotopic composition. The
odd thing about the isotopic analysis: if you read the appendix you will
From: Axil Axil
The dimethyl siloxane type of polymer will confine hydrogen
since oxygen carbon and silicon all keep hydrogen from escaping.
No, that is incorrect. As Steve High says, this material was never in the
reactor.
This is a high temperature polymer
That is true, Fran - but as of now – this is looking more unbelievable to me
than the very first Rossi demo – the “steam or hot-air” version.
This is no longer a hydrogen reactor. That is a huge change in focus. As
someone else has commented, at least now Rossi has now backed himself into a
At 05:46 PM 10/8/2014, Jones Beene wrote:
Many things do not
add up here, especially the drastic changes from the original
E-Cat.
I don't have any problem with the design evolution.
The original warm cat went from a large tube boiler to a
small tube boiler to a kettle.
The hotcat went from a
torulf.gr...@bredband.net wrote:
The fraud hypothesis is an obvious option.
If it is so obvious then please explain how it would be done. By Rossi, I
mean. Obviously if Levi et al. wanted to commit fraud they could simply
publish fake data. They could make up the whole thing without doing an
--On Thursday, October 09, 2014 5:07 AM -0400 Craig Haynie
cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
It does look like the system ran until its fuel was exhausted.
The unused fuel shows the natural isotope composition from both SIMS
and ICP-MS, i.e. 58 Ni (68.1%), 60 Ni (26.2%), 61 Ni (1.1%), 62 Ni
yes, they probably choosed the most extreme sample to make a statement.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Ron Wormus prot...@frii.com wrote:
--On Thursday, October 09, 2014 5:07 AM -0400 Craig Haynie
cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
It does look like the system ran until its fuel was
Jones, I think you have far insufficient data to jump to the conclusion
that this is no longer a Ni-H reaction. Earlier, the hotCat used
stainless, and it worked just fine. Before that, it was just added H2
gas. Just because alumina is used now does not mean it is beta alumina
or even uncoated
Thanks this looks fine.
Rossi have to declare watt material he
used.
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 09:41:33 -0600, Bob Higgins wrote:
Jones,
I think you have far insufficient data to jump to the conclusion that
this is no longer a Ni-H reaction. Earlier, the hotCat used stainless,
and it worked
Stephen Pomp asserts that it is possible to use commercially available
isotopes to make an ash sample that gives the same values as measured in
the report. Setting aside the issues of how Rossi would switch samples and
his motivation for doing so, we should ask if Pomp is exaggerating the
I think this report was very good from many aspects. I understand from the
comments that the Pomp's of this world now have one and only one way to
deny the existence of Rossi's E-cat and that is to say that Rossi is an
fraud and a magician.
As much as I want to be critical and as much as it is OK
Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, they probably choosed the most extreme sample to make a statement.
I do not think they chose the samples. I think they only analyzed two and
they reported on both. If they had analyzed 10 or 20 I think they would've
said so.
- Jed
I think a line is being crossed in regard to the accusations made. While there
are many points to be debated, accusing professionals of being part of a fraud
is something that should answered in a courtroom as defamation.
-
This is correct thinking and a real path to truth.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
tthe isotopic shift observed is probably only a side effect of the real
reaction.
from others LENR experiments one can suspect that hydrogen is the fuel,
and that Ni
Chris Zell chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote:
I think a line is being crossed in regard to the accusations made. While
there are many points to be debated, accusing professionals of being part
of a fraud is something that should answered in a courtroom as defamation.
I agree with your
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
This is correct thinking and a real path to truth.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
wrote:
tthe isotopic shift observed is probably only a side effect of the real
reaction.
from others LENR experiments one can suspect
From an electromagnetic point of view, nickel and lithium perform the same
no matter how many neutrons are included in their nuclei.
The testers should not have run the reactor at 1400C. That high operational
temperature would have partially melted many of the nickel particles
thereby reducing
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The testers should not have run the reactor at 1400C.
I do not think they knew it would get that hot.
That high operational temperature would have partially melted many of the
nickel particles thereby reducing the power output of the test reactor.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
This is wonderfully simple calorimetry. The easiest I have seen in cold
fusion. If you cannot understand this, you cannot understand any
experiment, and you know nothing about this subject.
To be honest, the calorimetry
Excellent point. Would be easy enough to do a second control run even now
to add some confidence to the calorimetry. The alumina + wire will be
off-the-shelf all someone need do is ask Rossi for specs of tube and wire -
he should be happy to provide them in the interests of clarity.
On 10
Who took the fuel-ash samples, and there?
I can not find a account
for this.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:57:13 -0400, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Pomp, pomp, pomp:
http://stephanpomp.blogspot.se/2014/10/the-cat-is-dead.html [1]
He
apparently believes that calorimetry does not work, Prof. Stephan
it seems to be as Beaudette observed with nuclear physicist.
they imagine calorimetry is not science by cooking (and even cooking is
serious)
2014-10-08 23:57 GMT+02:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Pomp, pomp, pomp:
http://stephanpomp.blogspot.se/2014/10/the-cat-is-dead.html
He
Pomp makes a point though... the whole document is meaningless compared to
the ash measurement. Who cares about heat / input / blah blah lbah if
we're doing transumation without radiation.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
it seems to be as Beaudette
The simple reality is this - either Rossi has just changed reality as we
know it or not. There is no longer a gray area at all.
I'm betting he's a fraud, simply because the probability of him doing this
is too incredible. What he's done is nothing short of miraculous. It is
total inflection
I have to admit that it would be trivially easy for an apprentice
magician to construct a container into which you insert (say) white
powder as fuel and later on extract black powder as ash.
But the calorimetry stands.
Pomp doesn't even denigrate the calorimetry : he just ignores it
Because
If Rossi switched out the ash, he's a fraud. End of story.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
I have to admit that it would be trivially easy for an apprentice magician
to construct a container into which you insert (say) white powder as fuel
and later on
Many things do not add up here, especially the drastic changes from the
original E-Cat.
The more I read the more skeptical is my outlook on this.
Could some clever troll have gotten hold of the manuscript and changed it just
enough to make it barely believable, so long as one does not
Transmutation has be seen in LENR experiments for many years and even Ed
Storms says that Transmutation has nothing to do with the LENR reaction.
This test result does not tell us anything new.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Many things do not add up
From the last line on page 53...
Sample 2 was the fuel used to charge the E-Cat. It’s in the form of a very
fine powder. Besides the analyzed elements it has been found that the fuel
also contains rather high concentrations of C, Ca, Cl, Fe, Mg, Mn and these
are not found in the ash.
Does this
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm betting he's a fraud, simply because the probability of him doing this
is too incredible. What he's done is nothing short of miraculous.
It is more miraculous than what Fleischmann and Pons and several hundred
other groups have done. Do
I meant that Rossi is NO more miraculous than what FP and hundreds of
others have done. Only the scale is larger.
The Chicago Pile 1 one-watt nuclear reactor was as momentous as the fission
bomb explosion. The scale was different, but they were equally convincing.
If you do not believe that, or
Jed, it doesn't matter. If the ash is a fraud, Rossi is a fraud. Plain
and simple. I'm not interesting in debating the other aspects of the
experiment because of the complexities involved in calorimetry.
There are no such complexities in the ash which makes the discussion very
One possibility that I haven't seen discussed is that the internals of the
reactor are responsible for the change in composition in some way. I
can't imagine how, but perhaps what was left behind inside the reactor when
added to the ash would show that no isotopic shifts took place.
On Wed,
Jed, don't you think it is strange that the isotopic composition of the ash
closely resembles what is commercially available.
Also the ash is free of other elements that were present before the run.
That would make sense if the ash came from a commercial source
which didn't contain these elements.
From Blaze
I'm not interesting in debating the other aspects of the experiment because
of the
complexities involved in calorimetry.
But Mom! Why can't I stay up till 10:00 PM?
Because I told you so. Now go to bed!
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.orionworks.com
Jed sez:
Pomp, pomp, pomp:
Because the bible of nuclear physics tells me so.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.orionworks.com
zazzle.com/orionworks
Blaze sed:
If Rossi switched out the ash, he's a fraud. End of story.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%BCbler-Ross_model
See item #3: Bargaining
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.orionworks.com
zazzle.com/orionworks
Another possibility is that someone switched out the ash on Rossi to
discredit him However, I would have assumed that Rossi would have
complained about that immediately on his blog
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
Blaze sed:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
If Rossi switched out the ash, he's a fraud. End of story.
Here is something you think about. Why would he switch out the ash? What
possible benefit would that bring to him? What motivation would he have?
The answers are no reason, none and none.
Lithium and nickel are just the spark plugs of the reaction. Other elements
were transmuted but the ash analysis did not pick this part of the reaction
mechanism up. There was a preconception of what the reaction should look
like that has no basis in reality.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:21 PM,
Jed, perhaps someone is trying to discredit Rossi and thought this was the
best way to do so.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
If Rossi switched out the ash, he's a fraud. End of story.
Here is
Unfortunate that in this day and age of trivial-cost 24/7 video
surveillance that there isn't a complete audio-video log of such a critical
experiment. Such precautions would, of course, be unprecedented but no
more so than the purported impact of the technology.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:21 PM,
notice that there was no copper transmutation in this test. The reason:
whenever you deploy the power in a different way, you change what the
powder will produce in the reaction. Rossi glued the powder down using a
silicon glue. He wanted to spread the powder out. He did not pack the
powder into
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
Jed, perhaps someone is trying to discredit Rossi and thought this was the
best way to do so.
Do you mean, someone else swapped out the ash, putting in unnatural
isotopic materials?
I do not think that is possible. Only Levi et al. and Rossi
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunate that in this day and age of trivial-cost 24/7 video
surveillance that there isn't a complete audio-video log of such a critical
experiment. Such precautions would, of course, be unprecedented but no
more so than the purported impact of the
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not interesting in debating the other aspects of the experiment
because of the complexities involved in calorimetry.
This is wonderfully simple calorimetry. The easiest I have seen in cold
fusion. If you cannot understand this, you cannot
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't imagine how, but perhaps what was left behind inside the reactor
when added to the ash would show that no isotopic shifts took place.
Sorry, but that makes no sense. The material that came out proves there are
isotopic shifts. What
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunate that in this day and age of trivial-cost 24/7 video
surveillance that there isn't a complete audio-video log of such a critical
experiment. Such precautions would, of
It is strange if the ash contents really do resemble what is available
commercially.
I read one suggestion on facebook, that the reactor could contian special
compartments like a magician's trick box . One thing goes in and a
different thing comes out depending on how the box is manipulated.
De-cloaking long term lurker.
Latest test result issues that raise my suspicions:
- The uniformity of the Ni ash concerns me, the burn mechanism somehow
converts all natural Ni isotopes (smaller and larger!! so fusion and
fission in evidence) to Ni62, but with miraculously no radioactive
You have some unfounded assumptions in your thinking that are the same
assumption that the testers suffer from.
The reaction does not center on the nickel or the lithium. The LENR
transmutation is done in the hydrogen and the aluminum and other elements.
Did you see this line on page 53?
Sample
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
You have some unfounded assumptions in your thinking that are the same
assumption that the testers suffer from.
The reaction does not center on the nickel or the lithium. The LENR
transmutation is done in the hydrogen and
Can you get Ni62 at 90% enragement from a commercial source? Why not just
add some copper to the ash, it is cheaper to create that fraud.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:21 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
You have some
Each nickel particle had a different surface presentation and isotopic
content. That would be hard to get COTS.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you get Ni62 at 90% enragement from a commercial source? Why not just
add some copper to the ash, it is
so the claim is essentially that this soup of elements were also consumed
to exhaustion, without changing power input or output as their quantities
reduced, in an amazingly perfect process that has as its only product the
highest binding energy Ni62 (also consuming Ni64) and without creating any
NiH2 Zn* Ni + He
2H(1) + Ni(64) Zn(66)* Step1
Zn(66)* Ni(62) + He(4) Step 2
You also suffer from the nuclear physics syndrome where reactions are fixed
over all systems. Each LENR system has a unique transmutation
character based on the way the magnetic field emitters are deployed. In
fact,
According to Pomp you can fake the ash with commercially available samples.
Now perhaps Pomp's claim is an exaggeration and it is only possible to
roughly approximate the ash.
I'll let the experts decide.
Harry
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you get
Each LENR system has a unique transmutation character based on the way the
magnetic field emitters are deployed. In fact, each nickel particle
produces a different reaction.
You should read and understand Appendix 3 to educate your preconceptions.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Axil Axil
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
