Good point, David
I should have checked that first.
Unless huge amounts of Ni63 are created, it would not be useful.
Perhaps, the Ni65 is viable since its half-life is 2.5 hours.
The webpage at -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nickel-68m2#Nickel-68m2
- references 63mNi and 65mNi.
I cannot
In reply to Jojo Jaro's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 13:40:47 +0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Have you come up with a way to produce these hydrinos cheaply (in terms of
energy.)?
It seems to me that the first step is to prove your theory with a relatively
cheap Hydrino Generator. I guess once you are able to
I wrote:
Two questions:
- Do we have solid evidence that there is a dynamic NAE rather than a
static one? Or is the evidence just barely above noise at this point?
- If there is no clear evidence yet, is there a clever experiment that
could settle this question for at least one
On June 06, 2012 JOjo said It seems to me that the first step is to prove
your theory with a relatively
cheap Hydrino Generator.
I disagree, based on Jan Naudts explanation of the hydrino you need a
relativity cheap hydrino maker :_)
Fran
-Original Message-
From: Jojo Jaro
63mNi and 65mNi are excited isomers of the two respective isotopes.
See The NUBASE evaluation of nuclear and decay properties at:
http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
Pages 6-9 describe isomer definitions.
Pages 42-43 include excitation energies and half-lives for both of these
Robin, I would think the velocity of the proton of the same energy as compared
to an electron would be the square root of 2000 or 45 times slower due to the
velocity squared relationship. Now, if the proton slows down much faster than
the electron then the deceleration would be a lot greater.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:31 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
That is the main reason that I do not believe that the process you
outline is valid. The WL theory looks like a free lunch to me.
I think everyone wants a free lunch. Proton people want to lower the
Coulomb barrier
I must not understand the hydrino concept very well Robin. I thought that the
hydrinos formed by releasing energy into some other catalyst. Is this in error?
Why do you mention a cost of 4000 eV per hydrino? How is that number derived?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent
To get a idea about the speed of the proton, it might be possible to make a
comparison with the speed of the neutron at various temperature. This might
be OK because the proton and the neutron are about the same size and
weight. The neutron is just a proton and an electron together…Right!
2000K
In reply to David Roberson's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 02:54:53 -0400 (EDT):
Hi Dave,
[snip]
I must not understand the hydrino concept very well Robin. I thought that the
hydrinos formed by releasing energy into some other catalyst. Is this in
error?
No, that's correct. In fact even in my
I wonder if this assumption is correct.
In superconductivity, you get electrons to bind together by reducing the
temperature of the material to very low temperatures; you remove energy.
The cooper pair of electrons have less energy than their precursor
quasiparticles.
You might need to take
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
You might need to take energy away from the nucleus to lower its coulomb
barrier.
You make an excellent point. I misstated what I meant to say -- the proton
people want to overcome Coulomb repulsion for free.
I also
In reply to David Roberson's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 02:46:07 -0400 (EDT):
Hi Dave,
[snip]
Robin, I would think the velocity of the proton of the same energy as compared
to an electron would be the square root of 2000 or 45 times slower due to the
velocity squared relationship.
You are
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 03:20:33 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I wonder if this assumption is correct.
In superconductivity, you get electrons to bind together by reducing the
temperature of the material to very low temperatures; you remove energy.
The cooper pair of electrons
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 00:24:05 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
I also realize there's a third species of people -- Hydrino people. I'm
sure they want something for free too.
No, the Hydrino people want to give you some extra for the privilege. ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
Robin, let me see if I got this right.
1. Your machine (proposed machine) will take H2 (Hydrogen Molecule) and
convert it to Hy2 (hydrino molecule.). Theoritically you can do this in
copious amounts with an output of energy.
2. Then, you take the Hy2 molecule and split it into Hy+ and Hy+
Mars One will be second anyway. ;-)
The whole story at:
http://vodo.net/pioneerone
Download for free the first 6 episodes, worth watching. If you enjoy
contribute to cover production costs of next episodes.
mic
2012/6/6 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com:
Realities shows are successful
I'm sorry, but as an engineer if you imagine that you can build a fusion
powered spacecraft with an exhaust velocity of 7.5e6m/s and 40MW of engine
power per kg of spacecraft (from rocket equation with 20% fuel use in 2
days at 1g thrust), when nobody can yet build a viable self sustaining
fusion
I say, why waste time going to Mars, when you can shoot for the stars! We
need to set our goals and/or expectations higher or farther actually. While
it would be a very cool thing to have some fellow Humans residing on Mars,
it's getting there in a vastly improved capacity that will enable
I guess one could look at a neutron as being similar to a proton plus an
electron but I am not sure that the exact analogy holds up under scrutiny. For
one thing, when a neutron decays you get more out of it than the electron and
proton. There is a pesky antineutrino and a substantial amount
Thanks Robin, I did not realize that you were starting with the molecules. Now
it adds up.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Jun 6, 2012 3:09 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mills Hyrdrino project (was :about Triumph
The simple, and correct thing to do is *study*the current BLP website,
particularly the 'technical presentation', the FAQ, etc. There is more than
ample proof of the physical existence of the hydrino state listed. There is
no point in trying to create a HE version of a hydrino, although such might
Of course, we all want to eat. Before the dust settles there may be even more
species of people to feed.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Jun 6, 2012 3:24 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:about Triumph Management (and
The basic problem that Mills has had is in producing an attractive COP in a
commercial package. He probably has achieved this with CUHT as described on
the current website. Robin appears to seek the fusion path with a H[1/127]
pseudo-neutron. While Mills has reported spectroscopic evidence of
Based on evidence, the neutron is believed to be comprised of positive
core surrounded by a negative shell:
http://www.terra.es/personal/gsardin/news13.htm
However in recent years there is evidence which suggests the neutron
is comprised of three layers: a central negative core which is
Interesting to consider the possibility that bio-transmutation might
contribute to thermo-regulation (maintaining a consistent body temperature);
and what happens when one has a fever, how is that transmutation rate
throttled up and down? Do cold-blooded animals lack this transmutation
process???
Does anyone accept the quark model for the neutron? I find it hard to
reconcile anything of that nature with a three layer model.
I would think that by now with all of the super accelerators that this would be
well defined.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder
This experiment is designed to see if neutrons can decay without
emitting neutrinos.
http://media.caltech.edu/press_releases/13520
If neutrons can that would conflict with the standard model.
harry
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:08 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Does anyone accept the
I didn't think it would be enough, but a story on da web said it was a
safe way to observe the transit.
harry
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Robert robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
I used a pair of binoculars to project the image of the transit on to a dark
surface. With a bit of
In reply to Robert Lynn's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:55:31 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
You don't understand the nature of technological breakthroughs do you.
I'm sorry, but as an engineer if you imagine that you can build a fusion
powered spacecraft with an exhaust velocity of 7.5e6m/s and 40MW of
http://www.salon.com/2012/06/06/ray_bradbury_american_optimist/singleton/
In reply to Jojo Jaro's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 15:46:06 +0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Robin, let me see if I got this right.
Sorry, no.
1. Your machine (proposed machine) will take H2 (Hydrogen Molecule) and
convert it to Hy2 (hydrino molecule.). Theoritically you can do this in
copious amounts
Sadly I do understand, I am just not blind to the implied engineering
requirements. *40MW/kg !* The highest power to weight machines
(outside of bombs) that humans have ever build were the space shuttle main
engines, they did about 3MW/kg utilising a supply of LH2, the best possible
coolant,
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Michele Comitini
michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.salon.com/2012/06/06/ray_bradbury_american_optimist/singleton/
There's an anecdote that Bradbury once bet L. Ron Hubbard that he
could not create a religion that would be recognized by the IRS. If
In reply to Robert Lynn's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 22:49:45 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
That is a luxury you do not have
with fusion in an ultra-high Isp engine.
It is also a luxury you don't need.
The trick is to perform the reaction in space itself.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
There's an anecdote that Bradbury once bet L. Ron Hubbard that he
could not create a religion that would be recognized by the IRS. If
true, I'm sure that Ray is paying Ron off somewhere in that great
somewhere.
Stranger in a Strange Land was one
what's going on and on and on, from void to smudge to diamond...: Rich
Murray 2012.06.06
Eternal Exponential Expansion of Science
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post1342135.html#p1342135
Thank you Chrisw, for your reasonable consideration.
I often, as an informal hobby, note all the
Like Friedwart Winterberg's Supermarx concept?
http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/12/micro-fusion-for-space-propulsion-and.html
I really like the concept, but there is still no way that it can achieve
the power to weight required to give 1g at 7.5e6m/s Isp. Heat loads and
driver power requirements
In reply to Robert Lynn's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 22:49:45 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
Sadly I do understand, I am just not blind to the implied engineering
requirements. *40MW/kg !* The highest power to weight machines
(outside of bombs) that humans have ever build were the space shuttle main
I will study the BLP website and hydrino proof that you are alluding to,
although my reading list is quite long at this time. I am concentrating my
study on theoritical avenues that are more promising and my actual
replication attempts. Axil's charge accumulation ideas are much more
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
There's an anecdote that Bradbury once bet L. Ron Hubbard that he
could not create a religion that would be recognized by the IRS. If
true, I'm sure that Ray is paying Ron
Hello group,
Have a read at this blogpost from nasawatch.com (it's not a NASA website
although its name might suggest otherwise to some). While its owner has
a generally quite negative stance against LENR/CF, his questions and
their answers provided by Dennis Bushnell, LaRC Chief Scientist,
Rossi update,
The SSM (self sustained mode) is regulated by the control system based
on a complex interaction between parameters. The longest period can be 2
hours, as an average the self sustained mode runs for the 50% of the
total time. The ionizing electromagnetic emissions have no
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:59 PM, integral.property.serv...@gmail.com
integral.property.serv...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi update,
The SSM (self sustained mode) is regulated by the control system based on a
complex interaction between parameters. The longest period can be 2 hours,
as an average the
Is it just me or does it seem that the numbers don't add up?
In SSM, COP should be infinite (or at least some ridiculously high number.)
And if he is running SSM 50% of the time, his overall COP should be
significantly higher than 6. The only way for him to get an overall COP of
6 is if his
Ah,
Addressing five decades of debate, Stanford engineers determine how
collective electron oscillations, called plasmons, behave in individual
metal particles as small as just a few nanometers in diameter. This
knowledge may open up new avenues in nanotechnology ranging from solar
See ghoulish photos:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/toddvanluling/dead-bodies-on-mount-everest
It is amazing what people will do. This is an example of the extremes they
will go to.
- Jed
From the lips of Rossi,
I am very practical: I am not at all interested to theories of “gurus”
who explain theories more or less TCL ( time-consuming-and-losing). I am
exclusively interested to apparatuses able to work. In our field we are
too much filled up with theorists who write
PET theories, gotta luv 'em.
T
In reply to Robert Lynn's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 23:40:14 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/12/micro-fusion-for-space-propulsion-and.html
At least two differences.
1) There is no explosion, but rather a continuous burn.
2) There is only very minimal photon production (when
Hey Gang,
I found a paper which seems to summarize the many methods for the efficient
decomposition of Hydrocarbons to H2 and carbon and carbon nanotubes - all of
which may be critical ingredients in the Flat Plate/Propane based systems that
many have had success with.
51 matches
Mail list logo
