What? Again?
http://www.itworld.com/article/2875112/ibm-is-about-to-get-hit-with-a-massiv
e-reorg-and-layoffs.html
Excerpt:
IBM is expected to go through a massive reorg next month that will
reportedly see 26% of its 430,000-strong work force let go, or 111,800
people. If that figure
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:48:59 +1100:
Hi,
[snip]
Typo:
If the pairing was of protons with neutrons, it would make any difference
^ (wouldn't)
whether they were even or odd, as long as there were equal
This question does not involve a chemical reaction. True, no chemical
reaction can ionize hydrogen. When hydrogen in the ground state is ionized
to the plasma state, it requires 13 electron volts. per atom.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Bob Higgins
Dear Friends,
Short note regarding what will come
this week:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/01/weekstart-it-will-be-great-lenr-week.html
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know why you think it is impossible.
I think so because every textbook and every expert says it is impossible,
and because I am familiar with the upper limits of chemical fuel energy
density. I have read a lot about both conventional and
Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com wrote:
Piantelli was describing the various ways that energy can be stored in an
experiment with hydrogen, and included the comment about 1,312 kJ/mole for
IONIZED hydrogen.
It is not possible to store this much energy in hydrogen.
If you multiply
I don't know why you think it is impossible. Energy storage in ions may be
impractical for any significant energy storage, but the ionization energy
is exactly as he describes. Even though it was described as energy/mole,
it is no different than saying 13.6 eV/atom. No one ever said a mole
I have been experimenting with the data collected by the Mizuno calorimeter and
have derived an interesting system to compensate for the short comings of that
device in an effort to uncover an accurate measurement of the true energy
produced by that pulse drive waveform. The final results are
Bob--
What you say if obvious and needs to be considered IMHO.
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
From: Bob Higgins
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A strange and screwy claim by Piantelli
I don't know why you think it is
When an electric arc is applied to water, the water is decomposed into
oxygen and hydrogen. But hydrogen is excited to high energy levels. When
the hydrogen is absorbed by palladium, the hydrogen carries the high energy
of excitation into the hydride. The Palladium retains that energy of
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
When an electric arc is applied to water, the water is decomposed into
oxygen and hydrogen. But hydrogen is excited to high energy levels. When
the hydrogen is absorbed by palladium, the hydrogen carries the high energy
of excitation into the hydride. The
I really don't want this topic to drag on - it is making a mountain out of
an ant hill. Strictly speaking Piantelli is correct. There are hydrogen
ions and anions adsorbed onto a properly prepared surface of Ni (read his
patent application, now published). It is a small, probably negligible
Bob Higgins and Axil--
In nano Ni systems we have discussed many ideas about the nature of H(D) in
such systems. This has included the potential existence of Cooper pairs of H,
BEC's of these pairs, ionized hydrogen plasmas, H monatomic gas, H diatomic
gas, and various forms of molecular and
The Piantelli system uses a heater not an arc. The systems that Piantelli
is criticizing use arcing in water (heavy or light), for example, a PF
cell.. If the experimenter does not turn on his calorimeter until the
system is totally excited, it will look like the system is giving off
excess
I suppose there will evolve a molecular scale device of about 1,000 atoms,
interacting by light speed signals, with local memory modules directly
adjacent in six directions -- what would be the cycle time for this?
Since 1660 the growth of all science has been exponential -- that's the
actual
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
They will have the power of today's Watson computer, which is to say, they
will be able to play Jeopardy or diagnose disease far better than any
person. I expect they will also recognize faces and do voice input better
Well said !
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 7:00 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:doubling speed every 2 years for decades more, Intel silicon
photonics now revolutionizing data centers, Michael Kassner: Rich Murray
2015.01.26
All boolean functions (meaning all programs) can be parallelized to only 2
gate delays. The problem is your computer ends up with more gates than
there are elementary particles in the universe.
A good deal of real computation consists of, in essence, decompressing a
compressed form of the the
It is my contention that the Ni/H reactor is a proof of principle for the
quantum computer. In the Ni/H reactor energy is shared instantaneously
between all the plasmonic components of the reactor because there exists a
condition of global BEC maintained throughout the reactor.
On Mon, Jan 26,
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Architectures that attempt to hide this problem with lots of processors
accessing local stores in parallel are drunks looking for their keys under
the lamp post.
I disagree. The purpose of a computer is solve problems. To process data.
Not to crunch
The Nanor is an example of a quantum based solid state LENR photonic device
that operated in a state of quantum entanglement. A quantum computer could
well be based on the Nanor.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
It is my contention that the Ni/H reactor is a
This is nonsense.
In microcomputer architecture there is something known as the radius of
control, which is bounded by the distance that can be traversed by a signal
from a processing unit to memory and back. That feedback time is, even in
some hypothetical all-optical computer, limited by the
The mechanism that underpins the quantum computer is entanglement and the
speed of entanglement is instantaneous. Computing components will be
connected through long rang entanglement so data will be shared
instantaniously.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:15 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Did Piantelli explain how his negative hydrogen ion(protide) theory does
not violate the conservation of angular momentum. since two electrons are
in orbit around a proton. What happens to that angular momentum when the
Protide enters the nucleus?
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Bob Higgins
Bob, I don't know if anyone responded to this. I have been busy and I am
not going back through emails to catch up.
One thing to notice is that stainless steel, particularly thin stainless
steel should not be used above 800C with pressurized hydrogen. At 400C,
stainless is OK, but by 800C the
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The Piantelli system uses a heater not an arc. The systems that Piantelli
is criticizing use arcing in water (heavy or light), for example, a PF
cell.. If the experimenter does not turn on his calorimeter until the
system is totally excited, it will look
doubling speed every 2 years for decades more, Intel silicon photonics now
revolutionizing data centers, Michael Kassner: Rich Murray 2015.01.26
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2015/01/doubling-speed-every-2-years-for.html
[ See also:
exponential information technology 1890-2014 10exp17 more MIPS
27 matches
Mail list logo
