RE: [Vo]:[Vo] X-rays in LENR

Alain, very nice citation! Fran From: alain.coetm...@gmail.com [mailto:alain.coetm...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alain Sepeda Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 2:39 AM To: Vortex List Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:[Vo] X-rays in LENR Lou Pagnuco on LENR-Forum found an arxiv paper.

[Vo]:Vladimir Vysotskii about his LENR philosophy and strategy, INFO too!

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/12/dec-29-2015-v-vysotskii-explains-his.html -- It was some hard work with this issue but today I am a rather contented witness of what happens in LENR. Much more interesting than a detective story Peter Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania

RE: [Vo]:X-rays in LENR

From: alain.coetm...@gmail.com Lou Pagnuco on LENR-Forum found an arxiv paper "X-ray laser pulses from solids" …do you think it have connection ? http://arxiv.org/pdf/1512.08504v1.pdf Yes, there is a most interesting paper, and with a

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] X-rays in LENR

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote: Peter Hagelstein discusses the Karabut results in -- > "Directional X-ray and gamma emission in experiments in condensed matter > nuclear science" > >

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] X-rays in LENR

It would also be interesting to retest on an outgassed lattice to see if the effect still occurs. Fractional ambient gases instead of hydrogen. Fran From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 3:47 AM To: vortex-l Subject: EXTERNAL: Re:

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion likely operating temperature and cost advantage

I wrote: > Anyway, in Table 1 you can compare the overnight capital costs per > kilowatt of capacity for various sources: > > Advanced natural gas, $2,095 > Nuclear, $5,530 > Onshore wind power, $2,213 > Photovoltaic, $4,183 > As I said, I think this is what it costs per kilowatt installed and

Re: [Vo]:Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project

OOPS DEFAULT http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2015/12/15/nrg-ivanpah-faces-chance-of-default-PGE-contract On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > This is a 110 MW concentrating solar power (CSP) project in Nevada, with a > central tower, on 1,600 acres of land.

Re: [Vo]:Request upvote support

On December 25 when I wrote this, 108 people clicked on the New York Times link to view the video. The next day 27 viewed it, and the day after that 12 came. I expect this reflects the decline in the number of people reading the article. Anyway, this gives you a sense of how much public interest

Re: [Vo]:Whopper of the Week

When you say that "Cold Fusion at 300C would be fine for automobiles ...", you have to take into account the fact that the 300C is the loaded temperature of the system. In RF technology, it is commonly known that to get maximum transfer of power from a real source having a real source impedance

Re: [Vo]:A way to reinvestigate the Patterson cell?

Bob Higgins wrote: > I believe George Miley has thoroughly analyzed the Patterson Cell beads. > Miley had a relationship with Patterson, and I believe that he had some of > Patterson's beads for analysis at the university. > That is correct. He looked at them closely

Re: [Vo]:A way to reinvestigate the Patterson cell?

I believe George Miley has thoroughly analyzed the Patterson Cell beads. Miley had a relationship with Patterson, and I believe that he had some of Patterson's beads for analysis at the university. I think Miley's interests now are for higher temperature LENR. He has LENR as a replacement

[Vo]:Wind power nameplate capacity exceeds nuclear power

This is in Japanese, but you can Google translate it: http://www.asahi.com/articles/ASHDT41F8HDTULZU009.html The graph shows total nameplate capacity in units of 100 GW. In other words, both wind and nuclear power now have about 400 GW nameplace installed capacity. Here are the numbers for 2014:

[Vo]:Cold fusion likely operating temperature and cost advantage

Bob Higgins wrote: When you say that "Cold Fusion at 300C would be fine for automobiles ...", > you have to take into account the fact that the 300C is the loaded > temperature of the system. In RF technology, it is commonly known that to > get maximum transfer of

Re: [Vo]:Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project

I hope that someone (Faraday Future, Tesla Motors, Apple) buys these things or The company. They should, right? Sent from some iDevice. Written by Esa. > On 30 Dec 2015, at 02:41, ChemE Stewart wrote: > > OOPS DEFAULT > >

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] X-rays in LENR

The is something special about the layered structure of graphite. I would follow that lead. On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > > Lou Pagnuco on LENR-Forum found an arxiv paper. > > do you think it have connection ? > > I see also connections with