Hello Matt
On 26.11.03, you wrote:
--- snip ---
I have replied personally to keep this off the list.
Why? I find that your reply could be very interesting and informative.
Because it usually spirals out of control with people whining that
we neglect them and our opinions suck etc.
I'll
Hello Voyager Group,
I'm following the current discussion with great interest.
FYI:
I'm working as webmaster for SONY. One of my targets
is to improve the browser compatibility of Sonys websites.
Because of this I tested many (over 20) different webbrowsers.
On my personal opinion the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Franco Coccini
Sent: 27 November 2003 09:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [voyager] Re: What?
Ciao Matt Sealey,
On 26-Nov-2003, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Boehn, Gunnar von
Sent: 27 November 2003 09:59
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [voyager] Re: What?
I would like to give some comments to the Amiga browsers:
- All Amiga browsers lack css
On 27/11/03, Matt Sealey wrote:
this is exactly the usual habit of Genesi . . . . .but please . .
stop to play to the little Secret Agent.
See what I mean?
I don't talk as a Genesi employee here. I do not represent Genesi in
ANY communication outside of the company. Here, I am a Vapor
Gunnar Wrote:
Its sad that the developement of the Amiga browsers
seems to be slowed down. I saw no updates of Ibrowse
and Voyager for a long time.
I think it's kind of a snowball effect. The last few years saw the
slowing of the ball, so it may take a bit to build up the momentum
again. It
] Re: What?
I would like to give some comments to the Amiga browsers:
- All Amiga browsers lack css.
Because of this and some JS issues Sony websites won't work.
It would be nice to have css available for Amiga
sometimes in the future.
But that Sony sites are broken is our
On 20/11/03, Matt Sealey wrote:
Unfortunately for 68k users, until a 600MHz 68080 appears, some of the
functionality of modern browsers is going to be far beyond your reach
anyway, the same way that Aweb has split now into APL and KHTML
versions to accomodate both, Voyager may do the same.
On 20/11/03, Julian Aronowitz wrote:
What we do expect from the developers of such
things as Voyager and AWeb is to correct some of the
inabilities or finish some of the upgrades to allow
those programs to continue to be able to access
sites. We do not expect to be able to swallow huge
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Don Cox
Sent: 26 November 2003 14:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [voyager] Re: What?
On 20/11/03, Matt Sealey wrote:
Unfortunately for 68k users, until a 600MHz 68080 appears, some
On 26/11/03, Matt Sealey wrote:
Unfortunately for 68k users, until a 600MHz 68080 appears, some of
the functionality of modern browsers is going to be far beyond your
reach anyway, the same way that Aweb has split now into APL and
KHTML versions to accomodate both, Voyager may do the same.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Don Cox
Sent: 26 November 2003 16:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [voyager] Re: What?
I think you misunderstood.
Your original post suggests that the problem is the slow speed of the
CPU
In a message of 26-Nov-03 Matt Sealey wrote:
Your original post suggests that the problem is the slow speed of the
CPU. This certainly makes Flash almost useless on a real Amiga. It is
not a problem on Amithlon.
I have replied personally to keep this off the list.
Why? I find that your
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Uffe Holst
Sent: 26 November 2003 20:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [voyager] Re: What?
In a message of 26-Nov-03 Matt Sealey wrote:
Your original post suggests that the problem
Hello Targhan
On 24/11/2003, you wrote:
Go here: http://www.vapor.com/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
You should be able to manage your subscription from there
How do I unscribe from this list as I have to move and will be off the
net for a month.Thanks!
Why bother ?
Are you worried about an
Hi Dave,
wish to check out what transpired during the time he
or she was away. Would not that person have to sub-
scribe again if he or she had unsubscribed? Are
there other choices?
You know, I'm pretty sure Listar has some kind of Vacation command.
If I remember right, you can send an
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Targhan
Sent: 25 November 2003 15:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [voyager] Re: What?
Hi Dave,
wish to check out what transpired during the time he
or she was away. Would not that person
OH Well,Iff !!!PLEASE!!! doesnt work,nothing will,Forced to purchasing
a PC!!!/Intel Processor.
RESIGNED
APH.
Jocke wrote:
There's always a good excuse for a 68k build :)
See my challenge of ten.
--
--
Regards,
Dave 'Targhan' Crawford
Jocke Wrote
Where Amigans, we don't have fun. Look at Neko, he's trying to be funny, and
everyone despises him for it ;)
Doh! You're right! What was I thinking?! ;)
--
--
Regards,
Dave 'Targhan' Crawford
Hey, don't feel bad. I had to purchase a PC (thru force) a while back
too. I use my Pegasos much more often and 1/2 the time I run Amithlon
on the PC, but I did have to get a PC for a past job :-((
OH Well,Iff !!!PLEASE!!! doesnt work,nothing will,Forced to purchasing
a PC!!!/Intel Processor.
At 10:02 AM 11/24/03 -0500, you wrote:
Hey, don't feel bad. I had to purchase a PC (thru force) a while back
too. I use my Pegasos much more often and 1/2 the time I run Amithlon
on the PC, but I did have to get a PC for a past job :-((
OH Well,Iff !!!PLEASE!!! doesnt work,nothing will,Forced
In a message of 24-Nov-03 Alan Crandall wrote:
How do I unscribe from this list as I have to move and will be off the net
for a month.Thanks!
Have a look at:
http://www.vapor.com/lists/
--
Uffe Holst
Go here: http://www.vapor.com/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
You should be able to manage your subscription from there
How do I unscribe from this list as I have to move and will be off the net
for a month.Thanks!
--
--
Regards,
Dave 'Targhan' Crawford
In a message of 24-Nov-03 Targhan wrote:
Go here: http://www.vapor.com/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
Have you ever managed to get a password so you actually can managed
you subscribtion?
I think the easiets is to write Listar and get told how to unsubscribe.
--
Uffe Holst
Hi Dave,
On Sun, Nov 24, 2003, you wrote:
Go here: http://www.vapor.com/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
You should be able to manage your subscription from there
How do I unscribe from this list as I have to move and
will be off the net for a month.Thanks!
--
--
Regards,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jocke Sjoblom
Sent: 22 November 2003 17:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [voyager] Re: What?
On 2003-11-22, Uffe Holst wrote:
In a message of 22-Nov-03 Michael J. Roberts wrote:
3.3.127
On 2003-11-23, Matt Sealey wrote:
MorphOS currently ships with 3.4.4. Bugs fixed: all MorphOS
ones. Speedups: all for MorphOS. New features: not worth making
a 68k release build for :)
Gr!!! ;)
There's always a good excuse for a 68k build :)
Regards,
Jocke 'Zerohero' Sjoblom
Like getting it to PRINT!
PLEASE!!!
TIA APH
On 2003-11-23, Matt Sealey wrote:
MorphOS currently ships with 3.4.4. Bugs fixed: all MorphOS
ones. Speedups: all for MorphOS. New features: not worth making
a 68k release build for :)
Gr!!! ;)
There's always a good excuse for a
Hey Stephen,
I would highly suggest a Pegasos, particularly if you want to use the
new Voyager versions anytime soon.
Hello Folks,
I like using Voyager
As Matt says, the 060 is now out of date, I expect my humble Amiga
(060) to run the apps designed for it, I am saving for an A1 so I can
Jocke wrote:
There's always a good excuse for a 68k build :)
See my challenge of ten.
--
--
Regards,
Dave 'Targhan' Crawford
On 2003-11-23, Targhan wrote:
Jocke wrote:
There's always a good excuse for a 68k build :)
See my challenge of ten.
Let me see...
For at least ten of us it's the only way of running Voyager?
Regards,
Jocke 'Zerohero' Sjoblom
On 23-Nov-03, A P Hemming wrote:
On 2003-11-23, Matt Sealey wrote:
MorphOS currently ships with 3.4.4. Bugs fixed: all MorphOS
ones. Speedups: all for MorphOS. New features: not worth making
a 68k release build for :)
Gr!!! ;)
There's always a good excuse for a 68k build :)
Jocke Wrote:
On 2003-11-23, Targhan wrote:
Jocke wrote:
There's always a good excuse for a 68k build :)
See my challenge of ten.
Let me see...
For at least ten of us it's the only way of running Voyager?
Hrm, I guess the email was buried. The challenge is that ten of the
On 2003-11-23, Targhan wrote:
Hrm, I guess the email was buried. The challenge is that ten of the
mailing list members buy a Pegasos. When that happens, I go on a
warpath to annoy all the Vapor developers (email, phone, whining at
the boss) until there is a new compile for the 68k version
Jock wrote:
Believe me, I would if I could afford it, but with me getting married next
summer, I really can't justify getting one more computer...
Wow! Congradulations then!
--
--
Regards,
Dave 'Targhan' Crawford
On 2003-11-23, Targhan wrote:
Jock wrote:
Believe me, I would if I could afford it, but with me getting married
next
summer, I really can't justify getting one more computer...
Wow! Congradulations then!
Thanks, but that wasn't really the point ;)
Regards,
Jocke 'Zerohero' Sjoblom
Jocke wrote:
Wow! Congradulations then!
Thanks, but that wasn't really the point ;)
Ah, heh ;) Well, pester a friend or two into buying a Pegasos--I'll
count that! :-P
--
--
Regards,
Dave 'Targhan' Crawford
Hello Targhan
On 23/11/2003, you wrote:
Jocke Wrote:
On 2003-11-23, Targhan wrote:
Jocke wrote:
There's always a good excuse for a 68k build :)
See my challenge of ten.
Let me see...
For at least ten of us it's the only way of running Voyager?
Hrm, I guess the email was
least one of the Vapor guys has agreed to the challenge!
Are they that desperate to increase Pegasos sales ?
Strange logic; buy a Pegasos to get a 68k update ?
What? No, I am trying to have a little fun is all. Why does
everything have to be uber-serious?
--
--
Regards,
Dave 'Targhan'
On 2003-11-23, Targhan wrote:
least one of the Vapor guys has agreed to the challenge!
Are they that desperate to increase Pegasos sales ?
Strange logic; buy a Pegasos to get a 68k update ?
What? No, I am trying to have a little fun is all. Why does
everything have to be uber-serious?
Hello Jocke
What? No, I am trying to have a little fun is all. Why does
everything have to be uber-serious?
Where Amigans, we don't have fun. Look at Neko, he's trying to be funny, and
everyone despises him for it ;)
rofl ...
Regards
--
Robin - http://www.amiganiac.net/
Hello Matt
On 20/11/2003, you wrote:
[Snip]
Of course we are not that mean and nasty, we just have other things to
do. Development for MorphOS is, to us, important - but 68k platforms
aren't being neglected any more than we don't ship Voyager updates by
release on MorphOS. The version on
In a message of 22-Nov-03 Michael J. Roberts wrote:
3.3.127 ? Have I missed somehing here
No, I just think Matt missed the right key :)
--
Uffe Holst
Hallo Michael,
Am 2003-11-22 schriebst Du:
Hello Matt
On 20/11/2003, you wrote:
[Snip]
Of course we are not that mean and nasty, we just have other things to
do. Development for MorphOS is, to us, important - but 68k platforms
aren't being neglected any more than we don't ship Voyager
On 2003-11-22, Uffe Holst wrote:
In a message of 22-Nov-03 Michael J. Roberts wrote:
3.3.127 ? Have I missed somehing here
No, I just think Matt missed the right key :)
Nope, 3.3.127 is, afaik, included on the MorphOS CD.
Regards,
Jocke 'Zerohero' Sjoblom
Hello Uffe
On 20/11/2003, you wrote:
In a message of 20-Nov-03 Matt Sealey wrote:
Even though I liked the feel of Voyager a lot better than the feel
of any of the other Amiga browser, I have switched completely to
IBrowse. With IBrowse I am actually able to browse most sites.
Is that
Hello Franco
On 20/11/2003, you wrote:
Ciao Jorgen Danielsson,
On 20-Nov-2003, you wrote:
Hello ,
On 2003-11-20, you wrote:
A pegasos owner, are you? You just seems to get worse every day. I asked
a question. Either what I wrote was true or it wasn't, so what? And I
didn't call anyone
Ciao Brian Sharman,
On 20-Nov-2003, you wrote:
Hello Franco
On 20/11/2003, you wrote:
AWESOME
a Flame on the Voyager ML!
I'll write a review :-D
Sadly it's all w'ere likely to get on this ML these days.
Even Matt seems to be hibernating now that the weather turned cooler.
Hello Franco
On 20-Nov-03, you wrote:
Ciao Brian Sharman,
On 20-Nov-2003, you wrote:
Hello Franco
On 20/11/2003, you wrote:
AWESOME
a Flame on the Voyager ML!
I'll write a review :-D
Sadly it's all w'ere likely to get on this ML these days.
Even Matt seems to be
Hello shane,
On 2003-11-20, you wrote:
Kevin
You are dead right there is no need for ignorance and plain bad manners.
Perhaps J=F6rgen knows no better.
The only thing that is dead is Voyager.
/Jörgen
No, I don't own a pegasos, although I've seen one in action locally here
(seattle). And 'asking' someone if they're lazy, in the tone you used, is
the same thing as calling them lazy, which again, is hardly going to
motivate someone to helpfully reply to you
kevin
Hello ,
On 2003-11-20,
Hello ,
On 2003-11-20, you wrote:
So we have tones here now. Must have missed that, or perhaps you're using
'say' ;-) .
/Jörgen
No, I don't own a pegasos, although I've seen one in action locally here
(seattle). And 'asking' someone if they're lazy, in the tone you used,
is the same thing
:)
--
Matt Sealey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 November 2003 16:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [voyager] Re: What?
No, I don't own a pegasos, although I've seen one in action locally here
Hello Matt,
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003, you wrote:
snip
Unfortunately for 68k users, until a 600MHz 68080 appears,
some of the functionality of modern browsers is going to be
far beyond your reach anyway, the same way that Aweb has
split now into APL and KHTML versions to
Matt saw free to write:
it jumped a few versions before and after. We didn't release any of
them. MorphOS users are stuck with the lame, buggy edition (that's
sarcasm, btw) that we gave them on the MorphOS CD, just like you're
stuck with 3.3.127.
After trying to actually use the MorphOS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Julian Aronowitz
Sent: 20 November 2003 19:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [voyager] Re: What?
Hello Matt,
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003, you wrote:
snip
Unfortunately for 68k
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Julian Aronowitz
Sent: 20 November 2003 19:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [voyager] Re: What?
asking you for any answers as I know from what you
told us, that you are mainly the beta tester.
My
In a message of 20-Nov-03 Matt Sealey wrote:
Voyager's big discrepency is in it's DOM implementation,
not the ability to execute Javascript. Certain operations
are not implemented fully (function calls across framesets)
but then again certain functionality *is* implemented to
much
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Uffe Holst
Sent: 20 November 2003 20:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [voyager] Re: What?
In a message of 20-Nov-03 Matt Sealey wrote:
Voyager's big discrepency is in it's DOM implementation
In a message of 20-Nov-03 Matt Sealey wrote:
Even though I liked the feel of Voyager a lot better than the feel
of any of the other Amiga browser, I have switched completely to
IBrowse. With IBrowse I am actually able to browse most sites.
Is that supposed to be motivational? :)
I
Hello Uffe
Just like I probably will be one of the first to be willing
to pay for an update.
Put in 'copypaste' and 'save as text' and I would pay too :-)
Even/Especially for the MOS version ;-)
But for my daily internet usage I will have to choose the browser that
works with most sites,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Uffe Holst
Sent: 20 November 2003 22:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [voyager] Re: What?
In a message of 20-Nov-03 Matt Sealey wrote:
Even though I liked the feel of Voyager a lot better
PROTECTED]
A4k / CSMkII-060 / CV64 / 50M-RAM / 2.1G-IDE + 2G-SCSI / 33.6k
Voyager3 / Miami 3.2b / MUI / MWB (All Reg'd)
- Original Message -
From: Uffe Holst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 3:23 AM
Subject: [voyager] Re: What do you want
Scritto da Ben Preece il giorno 29-Mar-00 20:58:06:
+ What's your biggest problem with V?
JavaScript implementation (not blaming Vapor authors, nonetheless it does not
work often enough with real world sites out there)
+ What has been the best improvement or addition in the last year?
Hi Uffe,
On 10-Apr-00 you wrote: [voyager] Re: What do you want in Voyager?
Well, as I have mentioned more than once, my cache is close to 200
MB, so Voyager scanned and scanned and scanned and after around 8
minutes it stopped scanning. Then nothing happened -- I suppose it
was sorting
In a message of 10-Apr-00 Peter Stuart wrote:
Also, I just tried the APDF plugin whilst Offline, tried to load the
test.pdf file, and got a blank screen. Same thing with Miami.pdf. Hmmm, I'll
try it whilst Online shortly. Anyone else have any luck???
As you probably have seen in a
On 10-Avr-00 00:14:16, Uffe Holst wrote:
Yes, with respect to this I was very glad for VNG 2.95. I was able to
maintain the size of the cache pretty precisely. Recently I noticed that
my cache in a very short time had increased from 220 MB to 381 MB -- a
bit scary, because I really don't
In a message of 10-Apr-00 David Gerber wrote:
Yes, with respect to this I was very glad for VNG 2.95. I was able to
maintain the size of the cache pretty precisely. Recently I noticed that
my cache in a very short time had increased from 220 MB to 381 MB -- a
bit scary, because I really
Hello Peter,
on 10-Apr-00 you wrote :
» Hi Norbert,
» What is the matter with the "About:Cache" function found under
» the "Cache/Goto Disk Cache" pull down menu? I know that maybe
» it's missing some of the sorting functions of the old V2.xx but
» you can at least still browse the cache.
In a message of 10-Apr-00 Norbert Roth wrote:
But to get things into the right relation, my intention was
to remark that a thing like V-NG's tiny CacheBrowser would
be nice for V³ too. Nothing more, nothing less.
I'm well aware of the fact that there are many other things
which have
On 10-Avr-00 12:30:02, Uffe Holst wrote:
This bug has been fixed in 3.1 and you get a new Cache Pruner as a bonus.
As long as V³ trims it nicely at 256 MB, I am more than satisfied :)))
But I did noticed the Cache Pruner. It reports "3237k used" and that is not
very much i accordance
In a message of 10-Apr-00 David Gerber wrote:
Well, for obvious reasons V won't calculate the size of the cache everytime
you start it so it stores it. Since this is a new feature it might not be set
correctly. Open the Cache Pruner and press the 'Start' button, it'll begin
scanning the
Hello David,
on 08-Apr-00 you wrote :
» Hi;
»
...snip [V³'s cache management]
» When I was paying for internet access, to cut online time to a
» minimum, I used to quickly skim through all the sites I needed
» to see. This would hold them in the cache, then I'd log off and
» read them
Hi Norbert,
What is the matter with the "About:Cache" function found under the
"Cache/Goto Disk Cache" pull down menu? I know that maybe it's missing some
of the sorting functions of the old V2.xx but you can at least still browse
the cache.
The only two annoying things I have found with V3 is
In a message of 10-Apr-00 Peter Stuart wrote:
The only two annoying things I have found with V3 is that it still refuses
to close the dowload window after a succesful download. (B4 you ask, Yes, it
is set correctly in the prefs.)
Hmmm... I have just downloaded V³ 3.1 and the flash and
What is the matter with the "About:Cache" function found under the
"Cache/Goto Disk Cache" pull down menu? I know that maybe it's missing
some of the sorting functions of the old V2.xx but you can at least
still browse the cache.
Yes, it functions as it should, which is minimal at best. If
- Original Message -
From: Uffe Holst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 9:14 AM
Subject: [voyager] Re: What do you want in Voyager?
In a message of 10-Apr-00 Peter Stuart wrote: . then Uffe responded
two annoying things I have found with V3
Hello Peter
On 10-Apr-00, you wrote:
Also, I just tried the APDF plugin whilst Offline, tried to load
the test.pdf file, and got a blank screen. Same thing with
Miami.pdf. Hmmm, I'll try it whilst Online shortly. Anyone else have
any luck???
Same here... :(
Steve
Hello Uffe
I reported against one of the pre=releases that the D/L window would only
close when the option to keep aborted downloads was enabled. Maybe that is
still the case.
On 09-Apr-00, Uffe Holst wrote:
UH
UH In a message of 10-Apr-00 Peter Stuart wrote:
UH
UH The only two annoying
: [voyager] Re: What do you want in Voyager?
In a message of 10-Apr-00 Peter Stuart wrote: . then Uffe responded
two annoying things I have found with V3 is that it still refuses
to close the dowload window after a succesful download. (B4 you ask,
Yes, it
is set correctly
Hmmm. Thanks Bob, I'll check it out.
Regards,
Peter.
- Original Message -
From: Bob Quintal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 12:02 PM
Subject: [voyager] Re: What do you want in Voyager?
Hello Uffe
I reported against one of the pre=releases
Salve Robyn!
10-dub-00 00:34:56 wrote Robyn Steve the following
in *"(ML) Voyager"* area about "[voyager] Re: What do you want in Voyager?", and I
quote (in part):
Also, I just tried the APDF plugin whilst Offline, tried to load
the test.pdf file, and got a blan
Hi;
I don't understand - I've never really understood why everyone made quite such a big
deal about deleting stuff from the cache, but I've never heard any put it quite like
this before...
The cache handles itself, so how could you need "more space"??
It is, after all, just a cache -
On 29-Mar-00, Ben wrote:
+ What's your biggest problem with V?
Being unable to easily Delete unwanted files in the V3 Cache
directory, to free up space for more browsing.
+ What has been the best improvement or addition in the last year?
V3 seems faster, but I am still using VNG2.95 most of
Hi,
Then why are the WarpJPEG/PNG datatypes much faster than any 68k equivalent?
I thought they weren't, which is why I made the comment :)
I'm sure Neil Bothwick said that V's image decoding, using the optimised 060
image decoders was faster than using the PPC image decoders, under
On 30-Mar-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm I nearly forgot. There should be PPC image decoders and maybe html
parser as well. Certainly under WarpUp :-)
Kindly regards
I dunna what you are quoting exactly, If I wrote
' '
I'm certainly not the only one :)
Phil
On 02-Avr-00 21:28:00, Gavin Kinsey wrote:
But wasn't it 'proved' that PPC decoders would be no faster (or even a
little slower) than highly optimised 060 image decoders?
Then why are the WarpJPEG/PNG datatypes much faster than any 68k equivalent?
Although, ppc decoders should not be a
Hi Ben
On 29-Mar-00, you wrote:
+ What's your biggest problem with V?
+ What has been the best improvement or addition in the last year?
+ If you decide to use IBrowse instead of V, why is that?
+ What feature is your biggest want?
I'd say my main problems with Voyager is the way it prints
I received a message from Ben Preece, a reply follows,
+ What's your biggest problem with V?
Badly laid out sites, usually where sections are supposed to be side-by-side
and V puts them below each other.
+ What has been the best improvement or addition in the last year?
Javascript.
+
Greetings... Chris
On 30-Mar-00, Chris Wiles wrote:
Somewhat incomplete HTML support (especially alignment).
Yep, but I think we require more 'specifics', where possible. ie. if
HTML is incomplete, what tags are missing and, where tags are missing,
which ones do you want adding/supporting?
On 30-Mar-00,* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*, of Planet Eros, wrote these Wise Words:
Gil I'm not trying to bug you,
Takes a heck of a lot more than THAT to bug me
but someday I've the weird impression
I've already lived that..
You have but
Hey! I am an old coot... compared to many of
On 30-Mar-00,* Norbert Roth*, of Planet Eros, wrote these Wise Words:
» And, when I can afford it, I WILL buy AWeb...
Before you'll do so, buy a gfx-board. ;-)
I think you are the 34,560th person to suggest that... : )))
Does your Pentium also run on an 8 color screen
or perhaps the
On 10-Oct-10,* David C.*, of Planet Eros, wrote these Wise Words:
Gil,
I tried to send you a dtype that would make AWeb a little better,
but your email addy bounced it.
THAT is strange! I get hundreds of mails a day... I wonder
why my ISP decided to bounce you?
So, go to the Aminet and
On 29-Mar-00, Ben Preece wrote:
+ What's your biggest problem with V?
Having to constantly reload MooBunny posts several times before the
palette comes out right.
Difficult to set up the bookmarks for a single user not using Contact
Manager.
+ What has been the best improvement or addition
Hello Ben
BP + What's your biggest problem with V?
Javascript. javascript. javascript.
BP + What has been the best improvement or addition in the last year?
the 3 in V3.
BP + If you decide to use IBrowse instead of V, why is that?
IB is getting closer and closer to V and has nifty
On 30-Mar-00, Sealey, M. wrote:
The thing I'd like to see is CSS support. I believe IB2.2
has CSS support now, and the sites I visit with it look great.
Like fuck it has (sorry for the swearing), IB2.2 doesn't have
anything of the sort.
Regards
What it has is support for dynamic
On 30-Mar-00, Gil Knutson wrote:
On 29-Mar-00,* David C.*, of Planet Eros, wrote these Wise Words:
Yer kidding, right?
No I'm not. Voyager and AWeb are constantly being upgraded, and it
had been many a moon since IB2.1 was first seen.
Ahh I think you will find that IB2.2 is now out.
On 30-Mar-00, Sealey, M. wrote:
The thing I'd like to see is CSS support. I believe IB2.2
has CSS support now, and the sites I visit with it look great.
Like fuck it has (sorry for the swearing), IB2.2 doesn't have
anything of the sort.
What it has is support for dynamic fonts.
"Stephen Lebed" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The thing I'd like to see is CSS support. I believe IB2.2 has CSS support
now, and the sites I visit with it look great.
No, it does not. There are currently no Amiga browsers with CSS support.
--
Hello Gil,
on 30-Mär-00 you wrote :
...snipp [Intro - much about V³, IB and AWeb]
» And, when I can afford it, I WILL buy AWeb...
Before you'll do so, buy a gfx-board. ;-)
» I did not use it much before because it did not do what I
» wanted, in a way I want. I do not feel badly about
»
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
