Re: [vpp-dev] VXLAN Tunnel IF Names

: "John Lo (loj)" <l...@cisco.com> Date: Wednesday, 7 February 2018 at 15:34 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, Jon Loeliger <j...@netgate.com> Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] VXLAN Tunnel IF Names I guess Jon’s poin

Re: [vpp-dev] VXLAN Tunnel IF Names

Hi Jon, I feel I must ask ☺ “That has to match a VPP interface by name. But what name?” why does it need to match a VPP interface name? shouldn’t = MyVxlan23. Your control plane maintains mappings between MyVxlan23 and VPP’s sw_if_index. /neale From: on behalf

Re: [vpp-dev] Problem in forwarding multicast traffic

Hi Juan, When setting multicast routes one must specify the accepting (or RPF) interface for the prefix. So, additionally, you need; ip mroute add 224.0.0.5 via GigabitEthernet0/7/0 Accept note though that while an interface can be configured to be both and accepting and forwarding

Re: [vpp-dev] New fd.io vpp project committer vote: Marco Varlese

h Burns (krb) <k...@cisco.com>; Florin Coras (fcoras) <fco...@cisco.com>; John Lo (loj) <l...@cisco.com>; Luke, Chris <chris_l...@comcast.com>; Damjan Marion (damarion) <damar...@cisco.com>; Neale Ranns (nranns) <nra...@cisco.com>; Ole Troan <o...@cisco.com

Re: [vpp-dev] Consolidatation of fib_ip_proto() functions?

Hi Jon, I would welcome such a patch. /neale From: Jon Loeliger <j...@netgate.com> Date: Thursday, 1 February 2018 at 17:18 To: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Subject: Consolidatation of fib_ip_proto() functions? Neale, I h

Re: [vpp-dev] adding large number of route prefixes

Hi Konrad, As of 18.01 the amount of memory available for IP routes is controlled in the startup config with: ip {heap-size } /neale -Original Message- From: on behalf of Konrad Gutkowski Date: Thursday, 1 February 2018 at 03:01

Re: [vpp-dev] Arp doesn't work after classifier configuration

Hi Brindiya, Could you please show me the output of: sh ip fib 6.6.6.1/32 Thanks, neale From: on behalf of bindiya Kurle Date: Monday, 29 January 2018 at 10:04 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: [vpp-dev] Arp

Re: [vpp-dev] Howto implement L3 p2p tunnel interface without assigning IP to the interface?

a do-it-yourself stats scheme. /neale From: Andreas Schultz <andreas.schu...@travelping.com> Date: Friday, 26 January 2018 at 13:55 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, Ole Troan <otr...@employees.or

Re: [vpp-dev] Howto implement L3 p2p tunnel interface without assigning IP to the interface?

these APIs to automatically IP enable GTP interfaces on interface creation. Regards, neale From: Andreas Schultz <andreas.schu...@travelping.com> Date: Thursday, 25 January 2018 at 23:47 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" &l

Re: [vpp-dev] Howto implement L3 p2p tunnel interface without assigning IP to the interface?

Hi Andreas, Not accepting IP[46] packets on any interface type that is not IP[46] enabled is a basic security feature. To IP4 enable an interface you have two option; 1) Assign it an IP address 2) Make it IP unnumbered to another interface that does have an address, e.g. set int

Re: [vpp-dev] Re-verify a Commit?

Hi Jon, Leave a code review comment of: recheck that will poke JJB to go do its thing again /neale From: on behalf of Jon Loeliger Date: Tuesday, 23 January 2018 at 17:59 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] Re-verify a Commit?

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP equivalent of the vrf commands in Cisco

Hi Reza, Can I refer you back to this previous thread; https://lists.fd.io/pipermail/vpp-dev/2017-August/006254.html /neale From: on behalf of "mirzaei.reza" Date: Tuesday, 23 January 2018 at 09:27 To: Vpp Dev

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS-TP support

Hi, I am not aware of any effort now, nor in plan, for MPLS TP. Contributions are welcome ☺ Regards, neale -Original Message- From: on behalf of Алексей Болдырев Date: Friday, 19 January 2018 at 22:40 To: vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] Create an arc

path when the adjacency is reached, and hence the TX interface known, is ip4-rewrite. /neale From: korian edeline <korian.edel...@ulg.ac.be> Date: Thursday, 18 January 2018 at 14:41 To: "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com>, "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra.

Re: [vpp-dev] Create an arc

), where it will receive all packets egressing through that interface post rewrite encapsulation. /neale -Original Message- From: korian edeline <korian.edel...@ulg.ac.be> Date: Thursday, 18 January 2018 at 12:36 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>,

Re: [vpp-dev] Create an arc

uot;Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com> Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2018 at 16:21 To: korian edeline <korian.edel...@ulg.ac.be>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] Creat

Re: [vpp-dev] How can i setup multi-vrf mpls configuration in vpp?

Hi Reza, I would suggest you start with this: https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/MPLS_FIB and then if you’ve further questions, perhaps a diagram outlining what you would like to configure. Regards, neale From: on behalf of "mirzaei.reza"

Re: [vpp-dev] question about load balance

ierre Pfister (ppfister)" <ppfis...@cisco.com> Date: Wednesday, 10 January 2018 at 10:39 To: 薛欣颖 <xy...@fiberhome.com> Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] question about load balance Hello, You w

Re: [vpp-dev] question about load balance

Hi Xyxue, It does match your configuration. You requested a 2:1 ratio un-equal cost load balancing, you got a 5:3, which VPP considers to be close enough. It’s not exact because the number of buckets in a load-balance is always a power of 2. /neale From: on

Re: [vpp-dev] mpls routing

Hi Holoo, I see nothing wrong with your VPP config. So please collect a packet trace and the output of: sh mpls fib 400 Thanks, neale From: on behalf of Holoo Gulakh Date: Tuesday, 26 December 2017 at 17:39 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"

Re: [vpp-dev] gerrit 9904 VIRL verification is failing

Hi Nitin, Hit the ‘reply’ button and post a review comment of: recheck that will poke Jenkins to redo the verification. /neale -Original Message- From: on behalf of "Saxena, Nitin" Date: Wednesday, 27 December 2017 at 14:38 To:

Re: [vpp-dev] Need Help on an ipsec Problem

t;Bin Zhang (binzhang)" <binzh...@cisco.com> Date: Tuesday, 19 December 2017 at 02:28 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Need Help on an ipsec Problem Hi Neale, Man

Re: [vpp-dev] a problem about dhcp

Hi Xyxue, Please file a JIRA ticket at: https://jira.fd.io/secure/Dashboard.jspa /neale From: on behalf of 薛欣颖 Date: Saturday, 16 December 2017 at 07:26 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] a problem about dhcp Hi guys,

Re: [vpp-dev] mpls API

Hi Holoo, The MPLS API is at; /src/vnet/mpls/mpls.api there are examples of the various types of MPLS FIB entries in the unit-tests. See; /test/test-mpls.py hth /neale From: on behalf of Holoo Gulakh Date: Sunday, 17 December 2017 at

Re: [vpp-dev] Need Help on an ipsec Problem

Hi Bin, I expect your IPsec tunnel is not enabled/configured to accept IPv4 packets. Do: sh int featuee and if you see: ip4-unicast: ip4-drop then the tunnel is configured to drop all IPv4 packets. In order to enable any interface to receive IP it must either have an IP address applied;

Re: [vpp-dev] mpls tunnel in l2 mode del error

Hi Xyxue, Did you remove the tunnel from the bridge before it was deleted? /neale From: on behalf of 薛欣颖 Date: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 04:14 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] mpls tunnel in l2 mode del error Hi

Re: [vpp-dev] How can i use VPP as MPLS PE/P device

Another hastily assembled, on-demand guide: https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/MPLS_FIB /neale From: on behalf of "wangchuan...@163.com" Date: Wednesday, 6 December 2017 at 09:11 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] How can i use

Re: [vpp-dev] SR MPLS not effective

. Regards, neale From: 薛欣颖 <xy...@fiberhome.com> Date: Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 12:44 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcama...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] SR MPLS

Re: [vpp-dev] Bug?

By ‘receive’ in this context, I assume you mean it accepts the packet that has arrived on the wire. As opposed to the fact that the packet did indeed arrive at that interface - clearly it is not the receiving device that influences which packets arrive at which interfaces. So, let me bounce

Re: [vpp-dev] Fwd: :: Setting Mac address on Vlan interface

? Perhaps you could show a packet trace for the forward and reverse direction. Regards, neale From: Prabhjot Singh Sethi <prabh...@techtrueup.com> Date: Monday, 4 December 2017 at 12:53 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "prabh...@techtrueup.com" &l

Re: [vpp-dev] Fwd: :: Setting Mac address on Vlan interface

an BVI. This is an L3 port attached to a bridge-domain. -Original Message- From: "prabh...@techtrueup.com" <prabh...@techtrueup.com> Date: Friday, 1 December 2017 at 18:37 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <

Re: [vpp-dev] Fwd: :: Setting Mac address on Vlan interface

To: Omer Majeed <omer.maj...@rwth-aachen.de> Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Fwd: :: Setting Mac address on Vlan interface hi Neale, we are expecting to be able to ha

Re: [vpp-dev] SR MPLS not effective

sh mpls fib 210 st trace <<< for a ‘bad’ packet. thanks, neale From: 薛欣颖 <xy...@fiberhome.com> Date: Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 10:23 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcama...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] Fwd: :: Setting Mac address on Vlan interface

Hi Omer, You can set the MAC address of a ‘host’ interface when it is created: create host-interface name [hw-addr ] you can also change it after creation: set interface mac address but you cannot set the MAC address of a VLAN interface. A VLAN interface will always have the same MAC

Re: [vpp-dev] SR MPLS not effective

vember 2017 at 08:13 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcama...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] SR MPLS not effective Hi Neale, After add the 'mpls local-label add non-eos 33 mpls-l

Re: [vpp-dev] sr mpls fault

Hi Xyxue, I’ll look into the crash. In the meantime, perhaps your config is somewhat curious. What is your intention with 3.1.1.0/24? It has been added as an extranet route (i.e. it’s in table 0 and table 1) but in table 0 you have an override of the route via the SR steering. If you remove

Re: [vpp-dev] default route

Tldr; Deleted no. modified yes. There is always an entry for the all zeros address (a.k.a the default route) in the IPv4 and IPv6 FIB. Principally this exists so that in the data-plane after looking in the FIB for a match there is no need to say ‘if (matching-entry-exists)’, since as a last

Re: [vpp-dev] Issue with MPLS local label CLI

DBGvpp# From: "Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" <mgrad...@cisco.com> Date: Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 14:14 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: RE: Issue with MPLS local label CLI

Re: [vpp-dev] Issue with MPLS local label CLI

Hi Marek, Accidental breakage on my part. Fixed in: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9520/ /neale From: "Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" <mgrad...@cisco.com> Date: Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 10:53 To: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Cc: "

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS LABEL problem

Hi Xyxue, You need to create the default MPLS table before you enable an interface for MPLS. So in your sequence this command: set interface mpls host-eth1 enable should have returned an error. I’ve patched with https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9519/ so now one gets; DBGvpp# set int mpls loop0

[vpp-dev] Deprecate [S]NAT APIs

>From src/plugins/nat/nat.api /* * Old "snat" APIs, will be deprecated after 17.10 */ is it time? /neale ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

[vpp-dev] RFC: Import/includes in .api files

Hi All, I’d like to be able to re-use types defined in one .api file in many other .api files. My specific objective is to re-use a fib_path_t across the many APIs that describe a destination to which to send packets. My first attempt at this is: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9489/ I updated

Re: [vpp-dev] FW: Coverity build failed with 18 errors

Hi Chris, Thank you. Please let me know if the build remains on strike ☺ /neale -Original Message- From: "Luke, Chris" <chris_l...@comcast.com> Date: Friday, 10 November 2017 at 14:53 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, Chris Luke <chr...@

Re: [vpp-dev] FW: Coverity build failed with 18 errors

Hi Chris, And this one for VOM: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9374/ /neale -Original Message- From: <vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io> on behalf of "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Date: Friday, 10 November 2017 at 11:59 To: Chris Luke <chr...@flirble.o

Re: [vpp-dev] FW: Coverity build failed with 18 errors

Hi Chris, I just pushed: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9370/ to fix the use of integer types in BIER. I’ll look at the VOM ones too. /neale -Original Message- From: on behalf of Chris Luke Date: Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 22:05 To:

Re: [vpp-dev] And Boost Log too?

Hi Jon, It doesn’t need it. I must have left that in by mistake. I’ll take it out. Thanks, neale From: on behalf of Jon Loeliger Date: Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 20:56 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] And Boost Log too?

Re: [vpp-dev] gtpu tunneling decap-next ip4 issue

Hi Ryota-san, I glad it works now. I couple of comments, marked [nr], on your setup are inline below. Regards, neale -Original Message- From: Ryota Yushina <r-yush...@ce.jp.nec.com> Date: Monday, 6 November 2017 at 10:12 To: "Ni, Hongjun" <hongjun...@intel.com>

Re: [vpp-dev] IPV6 Forwarding error

t;yug...@telincn.com" <yug...@telincn.com> Date: Monday, 6 November 2017 at 04:55 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] IPV6 Forwarding error Hi neale, I add this protection, but other errors come out in many dif

Re: [vpp-dev] IPV6 Forwarding error

Hi Ewan, I would guess that fib_index0 is invalid. /neale From: on behalf of "yug...@telincn.com" Date: Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 11:11 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] IPV6 Forwarding error Hi all, Here is ipv6

Re: [vpp-dev] Can't ping VPP int addr, until VPP int ping outside first

Hi John, Could you please provide a packet trace from VPP whilst it is unresponsive. Thanks, neale From: on behalf of John Wei Date: Friday, 3 November 2017 at 20:20 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] Can't ping VPP int addr,

Re: [vpp-dev] dpdk output function

Hi Yuliang, It will call: vnet_interface_output_node() from src/vnet/interface_output.c There is also a TenGigabitEthernet5/0/1-tx node. Since you Are using DPDK on this interface, that will call: dpdk_interface_tx() from src/plugins/dpdk/device/device.c hth neale From:

Re: [vpp-dev] Segmentation fault in ikev2 test

Hi Xyxue, If you don’t have at a FIB with index 2 (i.e. you haven’t created to additional IP tables/VRFs) then: The '(vnet_buffer (p0)->sw_if_index[VLIB_TX] ' is 2 when 'del-sa' execute fail. is certainly the cause of your crash. I would attempt to determine when and where this value was

Re: [vpp-dev] problem in l3 VLAN

Hi Xyxue, Support for VLANs on host/af_packet interface was added rather recently. See: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8435/ and its cherry-picked cousins. /neale From: on behalf of 薛欣颖 Date: Tuesday, 31 October 2017 at 02:10 To:

Re: [vpp-dev] GRE error on vpp 17.04

er 2017 at 05:34 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] GRE error on vpp 17.04 Hi neale, Do we need to set ip address on gre interface? Regards, Ewan ____ yug...@telincn.com

Re: [vpp-dev] GRE error on vpp 17.04

.@telincn.com> Date: Tuesday, 24 October 2017 at 10:10 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] GRE error on vpp 17.04 Hi neale, There is no overlapping sub-net, here are more info. root@ubuntu:/home/ewan# vp

Re: [vpp-dev] GRE error on vpp 17.04

Hi Ewan, Are you adding an overlapping sub-net? Can we see please: sh int addr regards, neale From: on behalf of "yug...@telincn.com" Date: Monday, 23 October 2017 at 10:20 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] GRE error on

Re: [vpp-dev] not_last parameter of ip_add_del_route from ip.api

Hi Marek, It can be removed. /neale From: "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com> Date: Wednesday, 18 October 2017 at 13:30 To: "Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" <mgrad...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-d

Re: [vpp-dev] [vppsb-dev] Router plugin with VPP 1707 - incoming OSPF Hello packets are dropped by VPP

Hi Michael, It is present in 17.04 also. /neale From: Michael Borokhovich <michael...@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, 11 October 2017 at 19:09 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: "Shaw, Jeffrey B" <jeffrey.b.s...@intel.com>, "vppsb-...@lis

Re: [vpp-dev] [vppsb-dev] Router plugin with VPP 1707 - incoming OSPF Hello packets are dropped by VPP

; Date: Wednesday, 11 October 2017 at 05:34 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: "Shaw, Jeffrey B" <jeffrey.b.s...@intel.com>, "vppsb-...@lists.fd.io" <vppsb-...@lists.fd.io>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] [v

Re: [vpp-dev] Mac Address Api Changes

+1 From: on behalf of Jon Loeliger Date: Tuesday, 10 October 2017 at 22:55 To: "John Lo (loj)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Mac Address Api Changes On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 2:41 PM, John Lo (loj)

Re: [vpp-dev] [vppsb-dev] Router plugin with VPP 1707 - incoming OSPF Hello packets are dropped by VPP

Hi Michael, Both of; vppctl ip mroute 224.0.0.0/8 via GigabitEthernet0/4/0 Accept vppctl ip mroute 224.0.0.0/8 via local Forward the first says you are accepting (i.e RPF checks on) GigE0/4/0 the second says you are ‘forwarding/replicating’ to VPP’s local IP stack. The mfib equivalent of

Re: [vpp-dev] Router plugin with VPP 1707 - incoming OSPF Hello packets are dropped by VPP

Hi Michael, Could you give me a ‘sh trace’ ? Thanks, neale From: on behalf of Michael Borokhovich Date: Monday, 9 October 2017 at 18:14 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] Router plugin with VPP 1707 - incoming OSPF Hello

Re: [vpp-dev] Multiple VRFs in 1609

ctober 2017 at 15:49 To: "Shaw, Jeffrey B" <jeffrey.b.s...@intel.com> Cc: "Pierre Pfister (ppfister)" <ppfis...@cisco.com>, Florin Coras <fcoras.li...@gmail.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, &qu

Re: [vpp-dev] Adding IP Addr to Multiple IFs

Hi Jon, We don’t support overlapping subnets on interfaces. I was trying to fix the cases where it is errorneously allowed with this patch: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8057/ but I’ve not yet found all the CSIT failures yet. /neale From: on behalf of Jon Loeliger

Re: [vpp-dev] mpls tunnel configuration through JVPP

Hi Jozef, To what did you set: mt_sw_if_index ? It should be ~0 on the creation of a new tunnel. /neale -Original Message- From: Jozef Glončák <jozef.glon...@pantheon.tech> Date: Friday, 29 September 2017 at 04:09 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.i

Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces

te: Thursday, 28 September 2017 at 13:07 To: "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com> Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "John Lo (loj)" <l...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, Akshaya Nadahalli <

Re: [vpp-dev] Static Route Data API Data Structures

Hi Jon, Some answers inline. Thanks, neale -Original Message- From: Jon Loeliger <j...@netgate.com> Date: Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 16:42 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Static Ro

Re: [vpp-dev] Problem in ARP reply

Hi Andrew, Can you describe your use case/requirements in more detail please. Addresses on the subnet the ARP request arrives on, the ARP proxy range configured and a packet trace indicating what you consider to be incorrect behaviour. Thanks, neale From: on

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 1704 and router plugin

Hi Bhanu, Sorry, then I’m out of ideas. And I don’t have access to similar HW to try and reproduce and debug. A var args issue is still my best guess. /neale From: Bhanu Chander Gaddoju <bhanu.gadd...@nxp.com> Date: Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 10:24 To: "Neale Ranns (nr

[vpp-dev] 17.07.01 Released

Dear All, The 17.07.01 release is now available on a nexus server near you. Best regards, neale ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 1704 and router plugin

Hi Bhanu, Can you give us some information on the CPU arch, OS and compiler version you are using please. My best guess at the issue here is the problem of integer promotion through a variadic function. Perhaps you could test this idea by declaring; int fproto = FIB_PROTOCOL_IP4; And then

Re: [vpp-dev] JVPP API for adding MPLS local label

CLI: sh mpls fib API: mpls_fib_dump /neale From: Jozef Glončák <jozef.glon...@pantheon.tech> Date: Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 11:16 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] JVPP A

Re: [vpp-dev] JVPP API for adding MPLS local label

Hi Jozef, It’s mpls_route_add_del Regards, neale From: on behalf of Jozef Glončák Date: Monday, 11 September 2017 at 13:48 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: [vpp-dev] JVPP API for adding MPLS local label Hello

Re: [vpp-dev] u32 vs uint32_t

+1. I’ll patch the uses of uin32_t. /neale From: on behalf of "Dave Barach (dbarach)" Date: Monday, 11 September 2017 at 18:59 To: Dave Wallace , Florin Coras , "Luke, Chris"

Re: [vpp-dev] Static Route Data API Data Structures

-Original Message- From: Jon Loeliger <j...@netgate.com> Date: Tuesday, 29 August 2017 at 21:23 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Static Route Data API Data Structures >> As

Re: [vpp-dev] Static Route Data API Data Structures

Hi Jon, Some answers inline. Regards, neale -Original Message- From: Jon Loeliger <j...@netgate.com> Date: Tuesday, 29 August 2017 at 20:40 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Static Ro

Re: [vpp-dev] Static Route Data API Data Structures

changes to make the verify jobs pass. This will take a few weeks (because vacations). Regards, neale -Original Message- From: Jon Loeliger <j...@netgate.com> Date: Tuesday, 29 August 2017 at 14:49 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] Static Route Data API Data Structures

Hi Jon, (apologies for repeating some of what you already know, but from the top…) A VRF is virtualisation of a router’s *IP* routing and forwarding. VRFs are typically identified by a name (and again typically named to refer to the VPN customer they represent). IP packets in VRF RED must be

Re: [vpp-dev] Packet loss on use of API & cmdline

t 2017 at 14:24 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, Florin Coras <fcoras.li...@gmail.com> Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] Packet loss on use of API & cmdline Hi neale, Thanks for the reply, and please don’t

Re: [vpp-dev] Packet loss on use of API & cmdline

Hi Colin, The instances of barrier syncs you have correctly identified, occur only in the exceptional cases of route addition/deletion and not in the typical case. - adj_last_lock_gone () is called when that adjacency is no longer required, i.e. we are removing the last route, or

Re: [vpp-dev] Set up MPLS via jvpp

Hi Andrej, Can you please show me exactly was data is passed across the API? Thanks, Neale From: Andrej Mak <andrej@pantheon.tech> Date: Monday, 21 August 2017 at 07:05 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TEC

Re: [vpp-dev] Set up MPLS via jvpp

, neale From: "Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" <mgrad...@cisco.com> Date: Friday, 18 August 2017 at 06:00 To: Andrej Mak <andrej@pantheon.tech>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)"

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Packet Generator and pg0 IP address

Hi Michael, Yes you do have to give the pg interface an IP address before it will accept IP packets. We use pg interfaces in the unit-tests so they have to act like real interfaces for us to be able to test all the features. Regards, Neale From: on behalf of

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS labels question

VPP does not have MPLS trace-route support. I’d suggest using the packet trace; trace add 50 show trace /neale From: Алексей Болдырев <devel-net-ne-vleza...@yandex.ru> Date: Monday, 14 August 2017 at 23:52 To: Michael Borokhovich <michael...@gmail.com>, "Neale Rann

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS labels question

to as a ‘bind’. It says, whatever IP does for 10.100.2.0/24, MPLS should do for label 222. It will add the eos and non-eos entries appropriately. /neale From: Michael Borokhovich <michael...@gmail.com> Date: Monday, 14 August 2017 at 18:20 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisc

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS labels question

On master branch the CLI has changed subtlety to allow one to specify multiple output-labels: ip route add 10.100.2.0/24 table 1 via 10.100.4.12 GigabitEthernet0/6/0 out-labels 222 333 note the change from ‘out-label’ to ‘out-labels’. In older versions passing multiple

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS labels question

Hi Michael, ‘add’ is the default. It’s necessary to specify ‘eos’ because it I the end-of-stack entry you are adding and the default (i.e. without ‘eos’) is to add the non-end-of-stack entry. Regards, neale From: on behalf of Michael Borokhovich

Re: [vpp-dev] Spurious make test failure (container POC)

Hi, I think I’ve fixed this with; https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8007/ it was a genuine bug. /neale From: on behalf of "Ed Kern (ejk)" Date: Thursday, 10 August 2017 at 17:59 To: "Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)"

[vpp-dev] Verify jobs failing - opensuse

Hi All, The verify jobs are failing due to the new opensuse job, e.g. from: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8001/ error is below. Can we please fix ASAP or disable them. Thanks, Neale 18:49:56 [vpp-verify-master-opensuse] $ /bin/bash /tmp/hudson7746568270930707597.sh 18:49:56 make[1]:

Re: [vpp-dev] ip6 route add bug

v3...@rit.edu> Date: Thursday, 10 August 2017 at 14:47 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "John Marshall (jwm)" <j...@cisco.com>, Minseok Kwon <mxk...@rit.edu> Subject: ip6 ro

Re: [vpp-dev] Configuring multiple VFRs

Hi Michael, Those configs will work with newer versions of VPP. Are you able to upgrade to 17.07? Thanks, neale From: on behalf of Michael Borokhovich Date: Wednesday, 9 August 2017 at 18:50 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] API Change: Dedicated SW interface Event

). I’ll give it till the end of the week, then press the button if there are no objections. Thanks, neale -Original Message- From: "Luke, Chris" <chris_l...@comcast.com> Date: Wednesday, 9 August 2017 at 14:25 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>,

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] API Change: Dedicated SW interface Event

Hi All, Any objections or support for this proposal? Thanks, neale -Original Message- From: <csit-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io> on behalf of "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Date: Monday, 7 August 2017 at 16:02 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp v17.07 ping assert

Heckman <steve.heck...@arris.com> Date: Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 19:16 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp v17.07 ping assert Neale, Sorry, I'm a bit new to this. I'm

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp v17.07 ping assert

Hi Steve, Could you please press the cherry pick button on those review[s] to get them into stable/1707. Thanks, neale -Original Message- From: on behalf of "Heckman, Steve" Date: Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 17:01 To:

Re: [vpp-dev] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7856/ Review gerrit please

Merged. Thanks, neale From: on behalf of Thomas F Herbert Date: Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 16:05 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7856/ Review gerrit please All: Could someone please review

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] API Change Proposal: explicit FIB table create and delete

Wallace <dwallac...@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 22:19 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, "csit-...@lists.fd.io" <csit-...@lists.fd.io>, "honeycomb-...@lists.fd.io"

[vpp-dev] API Change: Dedicated SW interface Event

Hi All, I would like to propose the addition of a dedicated SW interface event message type rather than overload the set flags request. The over-loading of types causes problems for the automatic API generation tools. https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7925/ regards, neale

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 Release

: Алексей Болдырев <devel-net-ne-vleza...@yandex.ru> Date: Monday, 7 August 2017 at 10:30 To: "Kinsella, Ray" <ray.kinse...@intel.com>, "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "Luke, Chris" <chris_l...@comcast.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io&

Re: [vpp-dev] Million prefixes - FIB test

Hi Vitaly, Can you explain to me what you mean by ‘stops responding’? If you can execute ‘sh fib mem’ that implies it’s still responsive? Are you sure you are adding 1 million unique addresses at step 2? Regards, neale From: on behalf of Vitaly I

  1   2   3   >