Preferred: michael
Alternate: mmacfadden
Thanks
Michael
On Dec 8, 2010, at 12:37 AM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
On Dec 7, 2010, at 8:30 AM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
-- Committer Accounts --
I assume for those on the initial committer list who don't already have
to the
imagehttps://docs.google.com/drawings/edit?id=12RSnga-D2WtyBUVnSQPG2Vjfk2ttxaLaoTH34y2Y7tchl=enauthkey=CKr-_L0N
.
-Tad
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Tad Glines tad.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I
that in the end it takes
a) too long because of unforeseen issues
b) if something breaks, it is difficult to see what caused the problem.
I am all in for a code cleanup. I am just not sure that doing it together
with the source code move is the best timing.
Greetings
Torben
2010/12/10 Michael
Toben,
I agree and would echo your sentiments.
I think that waveprotocol.org can remain the central place where the wave
protocol is managed and wave in general is discussed. Waveprotocol.org should
have all WIAB stuff eventually moved over to Apache, such that it is not linked
to any one
,
everybody will receive a notification. Infra people have their internal task
queue, so it may take a bit more time.
Andrus
On Dec 22, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
Andrus,
Thanks for your help, has anything happened on the creation of the accounts
yet. I haven't seen anything
Committers,
I was notified earlier that my committer account had been created. I was able
to log in and get everything set up. Could the rest of the committers sound
off as to whether or not they got their accounts created?
~Michael
P.S. Hopefully all the committers are subscribed to the
This has come up several times. Tad Glines and I have talked about this a few
times on the forum. I the idea would be to implement a SQL DB persistence
layer via JPA and/or apache JDO. Tad has a bit of a schema design worked up,
which I am sure he could re-post if necessary. I think we were
recommend to give it a try for the Wave site.
Andrus
On Jan 10, 2011, at 7:51 AM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
All,
I am going to be bootstrapping the wave project website for the
incubator. For this we have a few options on how we want to maintain the
site. The three main options
Glines tad.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems like we are leaning towards the Apache CMS for several reasons:
1) It is being adopted by the larger apache community.
2) The confluence based wiki is being phased
All,
Any ideas why when a gadget is added to the blip it seems to have a height of
20px, rather than the heigh specified in the gadget definition?
Michael
, that's the height it
gets.
When I add a gadget to a wave, the height does gets adjusted to the correct
height after the gadget loads. Does that not happen for you?
(Gadgets do seem to have an ugly border around them for some reason).
-Dave
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Michael MacFadden
All,
CWIKI
--
The confluence space has been created. I don't think that I have access to
edit content yet. I think one of the mentors needs to create an account or
grant privileges to the committers.
CMS
-
I think the CMS stores the content in SVN. To that end we may need
Andrus,
My confluence user name is: michael.macfadden
As far as getting SVN set up, should I just put in an INFRA jira issue for that?
~Michael
On Jan 25, 2011, at 11:28 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
On Jan 25, 2011, at 5:41 AM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
All,
CWIKI
I don't object to a fork at all. That is the nature of open source software.
What is unfortunate, is that it seems that this group did not attempt to
approach the WiaB community to address the issues before forking. There is an
opportunity to work together to reach common goals.
As for the
We may indeed want to open the wav protocol google group again after we get
organized around protocol and WiaB separation.
On Jan 19, 2011, at 2:42 PM, Alex North wrote:
Hi all,
I've flipped the moderation bit on the wave-proto...@googlegroups.com group.
It's now obsolete (or at least
working.
Thanks.
~Michael
On Feb 8, 2011, at 6:26 AM, Lennard de Rijk wrote:
I'm guessing you had no luck yet since it still redirects to
waveprotocol.org?
Greetings,
Lennard
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 17:08, Michael MacFadden michael.macfad...@gmail.com
wrote:
Mentors,
I was trying
All,
I am actually being useful this week. I have created the basic site layout in
SVN. It is located here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/site/trunk/
I also just created an INFRA jira to have the CMS turned on for wave.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3464
Wavers (yes, I said it...wavers),
I have pushed some more changes to the wave site. If any one is interested in
helping with some content generation, let me know. We should probably start
thinking about how we want the site to come together. We could definitely use
some graphic design to
Not sure if this is 100% on topic or not, but I do think its important that
over time we mature the relationship between the server and client and offer
clean APIs and/or reusable modules for implementing clients. I am not sure the
code or the protocol do this well at the moment. I know there
installed? Is this not the case?
-Tad
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
Wave is now set up in the review board, so we can do code reviews on this
system. This was one of the last items that needed to be set up before
Andrus,
I believe I still don't have access to the JIRA for WAVE. If you could make me
an administrator, or the project lead, then I can add other people. Getting
JIRA set up is one of the last infrastructure items I think we need to tackle
before starting to move the code over. Any help
on startup.
2011/3/22 Michael MacFadden michael.macfad...@gmail.com
Yuri,
Two comments. First in java apps on things like JBoss, Tomcat, Jetty, etc,
sometimes it is actually the server that runs into this problem. Meaning
the server is opening file resources, pipes, ports, etc. The problem
:
Sure,
I'd probably suggest something like the following then:
Web Client
Federation
Server
Extensions
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
James,
I suggest, we break the conversation in to two parts. If setting up
, Michael MacFadden michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
Wave is now set up in the review board, so we can do code reviews on this
system. This was one of the last items that needed to be set up before the
migration could start. I'll be sending out an email tomorrow
and http://i.imgur.com/mLnaN.png
2011/3/21 Michael MacFadden michael.macfad...@gmail.com
Yuri,
I agree that the current logo's if they are opens source, should
at
least
be in the running.
~Michael
On Mar 21, 2011, at 1:05 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
The Wave Protocol group and Fed One
I seem to recall some back and forth on the wave protocol logo and the fed one
logo (on this thread). Just wasn't sure if we came to a conclusion on that.
~Michael
On Mar 30, 2011, at 7:29 AM, Lennard de Rijk wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 16:24, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad
Yuri,
I think this is a good start. I think we should get some comments from the
thread and then post this up to the web site in the getting involved section.
A couple things I would add are:
- The use of @Override.
- Under optimization, if dealing with loops or iteration evaluate the growth
Infra,
The wave inucubator project is starting to migrate the project infrastructure
from Google to Apache. Currently, we are looking at how to import issues in to
our Jira Project at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE
I know that Jira support importing from a CSV which I think I
All,
I am working with the infra crew to get our Jira issues ported over. The way
we do this is to basically give them a CSV of the current issues. The
question is what do we want to export exactly from the google code project and
does anyone know how we can export them.
From the issue
All,
I have been working with infra to get the new svnpubsub mechanism in place on
the site to avoid having to SSH into people.apache.org and do an svn up after
making changes in the CMS system. This should be in place now. I will be
testing it out this week. I will keep you all posted.
. All
improvements to the script are very welcome.
Soren
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I am working with the infra crew to get our Jira issues ported over. The
way we do this is to basically give them a CSV of the current issues
it into the JIRA web
interface or point JIRA at a file on the JIRA server that contains the
script.
I've use this to import both comments and attachments.
-Tad
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I need to circle back with the infra
All,
The svnpubsub mechanism for updating the site is now working. From the CMS,
when you publish changes, they will now automatically be pushed to the live
site. You don't have to do the update from people.apache.org anymore and the
changes are fairly instantaneous, which removes the 30-60
with the protocol itself abstracted away.
~~
Reviews of anything, by anyone;
www.rateoholic.co.uk
Please try out my new site and give feedback :)
On 10 April 2011 00:13, Michael MacFadden michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
Nelson,
There has been large debate on XMPP in wave. The general
Is it really an Apache License? If you click on the license link they mention
CDDL and GPL2?
Other than the license issue, any idea what the stability or activity of this
project is. Seems like its worth a look at least.
~Michael
On Apr 10, 2011, at 7:32 AM, Nelson Silva wrote:
I may have missed some discussion elsewhere, but in my opinion a 1.0 release
can't be done until we migrate over fully to the apache development
infrastructure. I think the biggest blocker right now is Jira. Once we get
the issues migrated over we can get the source code moved over as well.
I agree, I know it's petty semantics, but I would say a 0.x release would be
more appropriate.
That said, James's point is well taken that simply going through the release
exercise is important and will focus us regardless of what the version number
actually is.
~Michael
On Apr 22, 2011,
of labels.
On Apr 22, 2011, at 7:59 PM, Christian Ohler wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:32, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
James has built a script (linked below) that is a good start, but dosn't as
of yet grab the comments.
I just fixed this (and some other
All,
I have made significant enhancements to the issue export script which should
allow us to move the issues over. Here is what I did
The id was shortened to simply the issue Id number from the url.
The columns were re-ordered and renamed to line up with how Jira typically
orders them.
The
be
migrated?
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I would like to recommend we cut over from Google Code to Jira with in the
next few days. Once the CSV export is satisfactory, I simply need to place
the file on people.apache.org
When do we want to schedule the cut over? I can put the request in today...
~Michael
On Apr 23, 2011, at 2:44 PM, James Purser wrote:
+1 To the issue freeze and migrate option
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
I think everything
a link to the new Jira
system.
Beyond that I will take an export of Google Code tonight and submit an INFRA
Jira issue for the CSV for import tomorrow. Thanks.
~Michael
On Apr 24, 2011, at 8:37 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
The sooner the better imho.
2011/4/24 Michael MacFadden michael.macfad
, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
Unless I get any objection. Let's freeze the Google Code Issue
repository. To my knowledge there is no way to actually turn off the
repository. The only thing I think we can do is change the User Template
).
Thanks Michael,
-Dave
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
I have created the INFRA Jira issue here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3596
I will keep you all posted.
~Michael
On Apr 24, 2011, at 10:03 PM, Yuri Z. wrote
https://issues.apache.org/jira-test/browse/WAVE
On Apr 27, 2011, at 2:31 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
The link is missing.
2011/4/28 Michael MacFadden michael.macfad...@gmail.com
All,
The Infra guys have done a dry run of the Jira import. The results can be
seen here:
It's not perfect, but I
cause as much trouble as it
solves. I'm not fundamentally against it but I'd like to be confident
there are solid reasons/benefits to the waveprotocol project for
migrating to maven.
My 2c.
Dan
Στις 27 Απριλίου 2011 7:51 π.μ., ο χρήστης Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com
Hi Bruno,
It's has largely stagnated since we are in the process of migrating from that
web site to the new Apache Infrastructure. My hope is that the Road Map will
be the topic of discussion over the next month or so. We need to get our
developer wiki up and running first. Was there any
.
Regards,
Rohit
The diamond cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without
trials
http://mytechrantings.blogspot.com
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I am not sold on maven at this point. Don't get me wrong I
All,
Wave's Jira instance is now live. The issues have been imported. At this
point we should be making all new issues and comments to existing issue in
Jira. The Google Code Issue system should no longer be used. Here is the URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/wave
~Michael
All,
It looks like some folks are already doing this, but we should take this
opportunity to go through the Jira instance and close out issues that are no
longer relevant. As we start to build a road map for the future we can align
issues to releases and target versions.
Feel free to create
All,
I have updated the wave incubator project page:
- Added a news item for the Jira set up.
- Added Yuri to the committer list.
- Added Lennard's Apache Id to his committer entry.
- Removed Sanitgo as a mentor.
- Added infrastructure item.
Thanks.
one
We won't have to file a bug for every patch we submit, right?
Dan
Στις 30 Απριλίου 2011 1:10 π.μ., ο χρήστης Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com έγραψε:
On a related note, we should also get in the habit of putting the Jira Issue
number in as well. When we move to SVN
possible value.
- Don't assume that problems can be solved later, either have a clean
2011/4/28 Michael MacFadden michael.macfad...@gmail.com
Yuri,
I don't think we can view it as to high a price right now vs later. The
fact of the matter is that if we push it off to some later date
group should produce a plan with measurable milestones. The
plan should state the task, amount of effort, timeline, and who is assigned
to which task.
3. At this point we will be able to discuss this concrete suggestion and
make a vote.
2011/4/30 Michael MacFadden michael.macfad...@gmail.com
://mytechrantings.blogspot.com
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
Yuri,
Totally agree. Thanks for structuring this in this way.
Nelson,
Let's start another thread to discuss how a possible maven migration might
go. Why don't you start
All,
Let's start a new thread focused on planning out what a possible move to maven
would look like. I know it's easy to dive in to the code and just start
playing around, but if not done right, we are going to get a lot of push back
from others on moving to maven. We need to plan this out
Thomas,
Thanks for your comments. Let me ask a follow up question. Would a standard
and documented client server protocol also be required to really make this
work? I have to admit I have been talking about this a lot without really
understanding the state of the current c/s protocol. It
Upayavira,
I have admin access to the wave Jira. I can take care of it.
Committers,
Please sign up and let me know your what your Jira Id is. To be clear, you
have to go to the Jira site and actually register a username there. This is
different than your apache committer id.
~Michael
Yuri Lennard,
You should both have access now. Let me know if this is the case.
~Michael
On May 3, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
mime jira id is: yurize
2011/5/3 Michael MacFadden michael.macfad...@gmail.com
Upayavira,
I have admin access to the wave Jira. I can take care
All,
We have been making steady progress on the infrastructure migration. The next
steps in my mind are:
SVN Migration
This is pretty self explanatory, but we need to start thinking about how and
when we want to do this.
Code Reviews
Once we move to SVN we can start using
Soren and Christian should now be set up as committers in Jira.
~Michael
On May 3, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Soren Lassen wrote:
My Jira Id is sorenlassen.
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
Upayavira,
I have admin access to the wave Jira. I
Daniel,
Your all set.
~Michael
On May 3, 2011, at 7:29 PM, Daniel Danilatos wrote:
danield
Στις 4 Μαΐου 2011 12:20 μ.μ., ο χρήστης David Hearnden
hearn...@google.com έγραψε:
My JIRA username is: hearnden.
-Dave
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad
is gjeyapaul.
Thanks,
Gokul
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
Upayavira,
I have admin access to the wave Jira. I can take care of it.
Committers,
Please sign up and let me know your what your Jira Id is. To be clear, you
believe I
should be changing the status of the JIRA to something else from OPEN, I
think I may need additional privileges to do so.
Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks a bunch.
Regards,
Gokul
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
Gokul
in the command prompt to trigger
normal build process. I think I will try it with a fresh copy of the code
again.
Thanks,
Gokul
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
Gokul,
I have applied your patch to the tip of the repository. I haven't
Gokul,
I think you can close the review for this item:
http://codereview.waveprotocol.org/590001
~Michael
All,
I am not advocating a change at all, just looking for some info...
I noticed that we use the Google XML Pages (GXP) technology for some of the UI
in WiaB. I understand why you would want to use a template based solution
rather than raw servlest writing HTML. I also know what the
then the HTML is valid. Also it is more
secure.
The greatest issue with GXP is very poor documentation.
2011/5/13 Michael MacFadden michael.macfad...@gmail.com
All,
I am not advocating a change at all, just looking for some info...
I noticed that we use the Google XML Pages (GXP) technology
Velocity: http://velocity.apache.org/
And
FreeMaker: http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/
Are two popular ones for Java. Both have extensive documentation.
~Michael
On May 14, 2011, at 8:01 PM, Lennard de Rijk wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 17:45, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad
also struggled with GXP when using it for
the first time, but when you get used you start to like its advantages.
2011/5/15 Lennard de Rijk ljvder...@gmail.com
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 17:45, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
I have heard many comments from new developers
and relevance to our
project, not just because it's apache.
Dan
Στις 15 Μαΐου 2011 3:39 μ.μ., ο χρήστης Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com έγραψε:
JSP is not really in the same class as GXP, Velocity or FreeMaker. All
three of these were implemented to account for the shortcoming
All,
I have been tracking down some rendering issues for Blips and have come across
a question in how we are rendering Blips. In poking around I have come up with
a rendering / structure question relating to Blips and the Meta Toolbar.
My understanding is that the Meta term refers to the tool
It's not just the documentation. The only release we have is a Beta release
from 2008 and there hasn't been any activity on the project since 2009. For
all we know, Google isn't using or advancing this technology. There certainly
isn't a large and thriving community around it. Google could
All,
Is there a way to delete waves from WiaB? From a development standpoint when
working on bugs having to do with creating new waves your WiaB instance quickly
gets polluted with a large number of test waves that seem to hang around
forever unless you blow away your persistence.
I know
/17 Michael MacFadden michael.macfad...@gmail.com
All,
Is there a way to delete waves from WiaB? From a development standpoint
when working on bugs having to do with creating new waves your WiaB instance
quickly gets polluted with a large number of test waves that seem to hang
around
All,
Now that we are rolling on Jira, I think it's time to start thinking about
migrating to the apache SVN. Can we set a goal timeframe for this? To do this
I would recommend any one who is working on a large outstanding project in
their own workspace to try to wrap those up. We probably
mercurial to git, and then from git to
svn.
Here are the links: hg-git
http://hivelogic.com/articles/converting-from-mercurial-to-git/
http://hivelogic.com/articles/converting-from-mercurial-to-git/git
-
svn
: http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ImportingFromGit
2011/5/22 Michael
Please review the following regarding Apache SVN Git Mirrors:
http://www.apache.org/dev/git.html
I think this should ease the transition to SVN. I believe according to the
Apache process we really do need to move in to SVN for the time being. The
question is when and how are we going to do
If you need any help getting thing going, I would be more than happy to help.
We could do desktop sharing through skype or something.
~Michael
On Jul 15, 2011, at 12:12 PM, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
err..sure.
That could take awhile, still getting set up here. :)
Got the Wave Panel Harness to
Is it possible that jetty is binding only to localhost. For example in my
server.config I have the following:
http_frontend_public_address = localhost:9898
http_frontend_addresses = ${http_frontend_public_address}
Basically in this configuration if I hit http://localhost:9898 it will work.
Thanks for putting this together. It's great that you are interested in WiaB.
To answer one of your questions, this kind of document really should be posted
on the apache incubator web site. However, I have been struggling with how we
should really manage this web site. The Apache CMS is a
I'll take care of it for the moment. We can turn it back on when it makes
sense.
On Aug 12, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Soren Lassen wrote:
I'm tired of the emails from jenkins.
Shall we shut jenkins down?
Is there someone who knows how and is willing to do it?
Soren
.
2011/8/19 Andrew Ragone ajr9...@rit.edu
Ok good to know. Is there a way we can reach out to him?
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Matt Richards mricha...@gmail.com
wrote:
As far as I recall, I thought Michael MacFadden was taking the lead on
infra
related items.
On Thu, Aug 18
I have been intermitently seeing this on chrome as well. I am on Mac OSX 10.7.
I was also having an issue testing a recent patch on Chrome, when I tested the
patch on safari it worked fine. So, we may be having some issues with chrome.
On Aug 28, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Ruxiao Ma wrote:
Thanks
I just verified that this test fails for me also.
On Aug 28, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
Hmm, just tried to run the ClientFrontendImplTest and all tests passed for
me... Strange. I ll try to investigate it.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Ruxiao Ma m...@hcc.im wrote:
Now recloning
In case you're not following the other thread that just started on this. Yes,
we are also having some issues.
On Aug 27, 2011, at 10:24 PM, James Purser wrote:
Hi all,
Long time no speak and all that.
I've just pulled the tip down and told it to build and I'm now getting test
All,
There has been several threads on the usefulness of the current wave web site,
the lack of consolidated information, and the feasibility of maintaining the
current site. I would like to get some ideas on the infrastructure we should
use to maintain the site. I strongly believe that we
of common CMS systems.
So, to reiterate, are you using the Apache CMS, and if so, in what ways
does it lack?
Upayavira
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 07:20 -0700, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
There has been several threads on the usefulness of the current wave web
site
).
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
Honestly at this point, I would vote for just a clean check in. While we
can talk about he use of having the history in the SVN, the fact of the
matter is that I don't think it is really important
) for this report?
Cheers
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Matt Richards mricha...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree, at this point it would likely be best for a clean check in.
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
Honestly at this point, I would vote
Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 good to see some progress here!
I am really looking forward to a first release :-)
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we have reached a consensus on the clean check in approach. We
is not GIT - but very GITish. Maybe this is an option for
you? If yes, you should ask at infra if that works or not.
Cheers
Christian
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
Yuri,
I wanted to coordinate with you on this. Is there a date/time
Yes,
Lets just proceed as planned. Again, I can do it whenever.
~Michael
On Sep 28, 2011, at 12:34 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
+1 to make the clean check in to SVN now.
@Michael, is it OK with you?
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Christian Ohler oh...@google.com wrote:
We could do a clean
Shall I do the check in this weekend?
On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:01 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
Can you do it then when you ll have time?
Thanks
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes,
Lets just proceed as planned. Again, I can do it whenever
- let me know - I can handle this.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
Shall I do the check in this weekend?
On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:01 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
Can you do it then when you ll have time?
Thanks
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:59 PM
All,
After many months our migration from Google Code to the Apache SVN has finally
been completed. The code can now be checked out at the following SVN URL:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/trunk/
We have effectively made the google code repository read only for the time
, David Hearnden hearn...@google.com
wrote:
Great work Michael.
-Dave
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Fab, thanks Michael, great to see it done.
Upayavira
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 8:18 AM, Michael MacFadden
mich...@macfadden.org wrote:
All
/
---
(Updated 2011-11-23 23:13:59)
Review request for wave, Michael MacFadden and vjrj.
Summary
---
Adds support for the onGadgetStateChanged event to the Robot API
Diffs
-
src/org/waveprotocol/box/server/robots/passive
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2936/#review3525
---
Ship it!
LGTM
- Michael
On 2011-11-26 13:50:29, Yuri Zelikov
://reviews.apache.org/r/2882/
---
(Updated 2011-11-22 19:13:17)
Review request for wave, Michael MacFadden, Tad Glines, and vjrj.
Summary
---
Refactors the SearchService related classes to allow easier integration of
alternative
1 - 100 of 343 matches
Mail list logo
