Re: [libreoffice-website] Forward to wrong DICTIONARIES URL

webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote: On 10/31/2011 04:24 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Andrea Pescetti schrieb: The right issue link is: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42408 Argh, of course! I mentioned this many months ago. It seems to point to the OOo site that is

Re: [libreoffice-website] Forward to wrong DICTIONARIES URL

On 31/10/2011 07:29, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Dictionaries download is broken, please urgently see "Bug 42408 - the address referred by tools -> languages -> more dictionaries online doesn't work" The right issue link is: https://bugs.freedesk

Re: [libreoffice-website] Conference Management System for our next LibreOffice Conference

On 20/10/2011 Andreas Mantke wrote: I propose for a wiki page, where we can collect all the requirements for our new CMS. I think it would help, if the teams from the last OOo/LibreOffice conferences would jump in and share there thoughts / experience / needs. My only experience (when organiz

Re: [libreoffice-website] Error in license page

On 05/08/2011 Italo Vignoli wrote: New contributions are LGPLv3+/MPL, so I do not think that the "or later" has any specific meaning. The + after the license means that once a new version of the license is available the contribution does not need to be re-licensed as the license is automatically

Re: [libreoffice-website] Error in license page

On 05/08/2011 Christian Lohmaier wrote: I changed the page to read: "LibreOffice is licensed under the terms of the LGPLv3 (new contributions are dual-licensed under both LGPLv3+ and MPL)." OK, since this seems stable I've just updated http://it.libreoffice.org/download/licenza accordingly.

Re: [libreoffice-website] activation of my account

Jonathan Aquilina wrote: On 8/10/11 1:04 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: a few days ago. I was able to: - Register to the website - Set my password - Propose a new project and request that it was published - [ It was indeed published by some unknown administrator ] - Create and publish a release

Re: [libreoffice-website] activation of my account

Rainer Bielefeld wrote: My suggestion: report a bug (Details you find on . If someone else will have the same problem, he will be cheered up a little seeing that he is not alone ;-) Since it seems that only a handful of people registered

Re: [libreoffice-website] Reviewer for the new template and extension repository

Andreas Mantke wrote: The reviewer should look about the license and that the project intent to be usefull for LibO (not spam, joke etc.). If we look later at the files, we had to test, if they work with specific versions of LibO. But that is not the task for the reviewer, when he decides if he p

Re: [libreoffice-website] Error in license page

Florian Effenberger wrote: Andrea Pescetti wrote on 2011-08-05 10:30: minimal and straightforward: use the same license indication in http://www.libreoffice.org/download/license/ and in the page footer, i.e., remove the wrong "(or later)" from the text. hm, I'm not sure, but

Re: [libreoffice-website] Error in license page

, i.e., remove the wrong "(or later)" from the text. I fixed it in the Italian translation, but if there are reasons to keep "(or later)" in the Italian version too we will comply. Regards, Andrea. On 18/06/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote: While working on the Italian translati

Re: [libreoffice-website] LibreOffice Extension-Template-Website with new Layout/Logo

Andreas Mantke wrote: Am Dienstag, 26. Juli 2011, 21:46:17 schrieb Olivier Hallot: - the plone logo in the url line or browser tab should be changed for TDF logo, no? I bet you already noticed that... :-) if you have a link to the favicon, I can incorporate it into the new layout. I can't fin

Re: [libreoffice-website] LibO-Ext-Templ-Website: Status Update and Asking for Proposals

Andreas Mantke wrote: > because we had to set up our repository asap, because the OOo-Ext- > Repo seemed to pass away soon. Actually, on a side note, by one of those incredible coincidences it seems that http://extensions.services.openoffice.org is in great shape now, since the OSUOSL guys fixed t

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: LibreOffice-Extensions-Template-Website

Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > 2011/7/3 Andreas Mantke > > GPL|GPL - GNU General Public License| > > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/GPL/2.0/ > > LGPL|LGPL - GNU Lesser General Public License| > > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/LGPL/2.1/ > > BSD|BSD License (revised)|http://opensource.org/lic

Re: [libreoffice-website] LibreOffice-Extensions-Template-Website

Andreas Mantke: > Am Montag, 27. Juni 2011, 19:02:42 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > > For usability, I'd prefer not to have a default here. Otherwise, people > > may overlook the field and it might well happen that someone uploads an > > extension that gets tagged as "GP

Re: [libreoffice-website] LibreOffice-Extensions-Template-Website

On 24/06/2011 Andreas Mantke wrote: > the license has to be specified for every release inside the project. > The default license is GPL, if the author don't change. (Resending, it seems it was not delivered... sorry if you get it twice) For usability, I'd prefer not to have a default here. Other

Re: [libreoffice-website] LibreOffice-Extensions-Template-Website

Marc Paré wrote: > Regarding one of those items on the wiki page: "Extension transfer from > OOo repository ", we should make sure that if we do this that we try to > find the author of the extensions to give proper attribution. When I > looked at the templates and hoped to transfer some from th

Re: [libreoffice-website] LibreOffice-Extensions-Template-Website

Italo Vignoli wrote: > On 6/19/11 11:25 AM, Marc Paré wrote: > > Could you suggest another description that we could use that would be > > more appropriate for us? > I think that we should use "free software license, preferably copyleft" Just "free software license" linked to http://www.gnu.org/ph

[libreoffice-website] Error in license page

While working on the Italian translation of the license page, I saw that http://www.libreoffice.org/download/license/ states that "LibreOffice is licensed under the terms of the LGPLv3 (or later)". The "(or later)", unless something really unexpected happened right now, is just wrong and it should

Re: [libreoffice-website] LibreOffice-Extensions-Template-Website

On 17/06/2011 Andreas Mantke wrote: > We need a proposal for the text on this home page that explains what > extensions and > templates are used for, why they are so helpfull. Then the user of the site > should be > encouraged to provide extensions and templates to the new site. The text shoul

Re: [libreoffice-website] [Proposal] A central employment-office-like web structure for LibO volunteers

On 23/05/2011 Gianluca Turconi wrote: > since few days I'm discussing a proposal about the creation of a > employment-office-like collaboration tool for LibO volunteers. Here is my > original proposal: > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Website/LibreOfficeWiki/Proposed#Central_Employment-offi

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: Links to Extensions

On 12/05/2011 Sophie Gautier wrote: > On 12/05/2011 01:32, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > I kind of expected that a new site development would have been announced > > here. > > it seems that it's just what Andreas did ;) Consider it like Litmus, we > test the tool, tr

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: Links to Extensions

Andreas Mantke wrote: > I'm working on such an environment for LibreOffice for some weeks in > my spare time. I hope to solve some bugs in the product, that I > created for this purpose. Ah, surprise! I admit I find it weird that there is a test website in the .libreoffice.org hierarchy active sin

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: Links to Extensions

Alexander Thurgood wrote: > "USERS BEWARE : the extensions site > appears to be currently suffering from availability issues", etc, this > does not actually solve the underlying problem. A quick whois tells me > that the servers are registered to Sun (no surprise there), so we remain > dependent on

Re: [libreoffice-website] Upcomming LibOConference: Conference Tool

Andreas Mantke wrote: > He gave me also a link to a site which compared the available open source > conference > managing systems: > http://feeding.cloud.geek.nz/2010/05/list-of-open-source-conference.html That post does not list COD (it's mentioned in the comments), a free, open-source and no-c

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: On forums for LibreOffice

On 28/04/2011 Christian Lohmaier wrote: > fragmentation of the knowledge, etc. There just is no point in > creating more and more forums. I agree on this. > The problem is with the ads the libreofficeforum.org uses. Yes, so far. But once this is solved, there could still be problems with the dom

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: Version 3.3.1 New Features and Version 3.3.0

On 23/02/2011 Nino Novak wrote: > As LibO is a downstream derivate of OOo, apparently any feature from > OOo makes or can make it into LibO (unless removed by the LibO devs > for some reason - is there any???) Existing OpenOffice.org features that have been removed, deprecated or are rumored to be

Re: RE : [libreoffice-website] Re: On forums for LibreOffice

On 31/01/2011 drew wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 07:56 +0100, Stefan Weigel wrote: > > For me, there is absolutely nothing against presenting support for > > LibreOffice at sites that use OpenOffice.org branding. I'd say I agree with Stefan's opinion here; but in general my point would be that th

Re: RE : [libreoffice-website] Re: On forums for LibreOffice

On 28/01/2011 Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > It's especially the last one in the list but they could get a new url soon, > so stay tuned. Would it really make sense? I perfectly agree with a domain name change in cases like oooauthors.org -> odfauthors.org, but relocating http://user.services.openoffi

RE: [libreoffice-website] [Drupal] The road ahead and missed opportunities

Narayan Aras wrote: > And yet LibO requires full download for each version. > Immediately after taking over, Oracle made OOo upgradable. > Oracle cares about this. We don't. > We pander to the contributors instead. > How much time was devoted to making LibO upgradable with patches? For what is re

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: new features page ...

On 14/01/2011 Sophie Gautier wrote: > a small amount of Go-oo > features have been incorporated for now. More will come later, once > our users base is consolidated. Really? I expected most of the Go-OO features had made their way into LibreOffice, or at least http://planet.go-oo.org/ made me thi

Re: [libreoffice-website] [Drupal] The road ahead and missed opportunities

Italo Vignoli wrote: > I have seen mentions of these "23 roles" many times, but I have not seen > a list where they are described in detail. It looks like they have been > developed without even asking the SC members - or the group of the > founders - if this was the right approach. Since nobod

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: What's the official policy about the LibO website: Drupal or no Drupal?

On 16/12/2010 Marc Paré wrote: > We are also fortunate with having as TDF/LO member and Drupal > members, Andrea Pascetti Well, technically TDF/LO does not have members yet as far as I know; I'm active in mailing lists and that's it. I know this is what you meant by "member", sorry but I feel the

RE: [libreoffice-website] What's the official policy about the LibO website: Drupal or no Drupal?

On 15/12/2010 Narayan Aras wrote: > Oracle Open Office offers update. > Their marketing brochure actually boasts of large savings based on > this single difference. > So why does LibO not talk about "online updates" as a development goal > at all?? > Also, since Oracle OO also is open source, adopt

Re: [libreoffice-website] What's the official policy about the LibO website: Drupal or no Drupal?

Sophie Gautier wrote: > We are a very very large > community and hence have very different needs, QA, l10, docs come at the > topf of my mind. Our community is not new, it comes with a past of work > and usage. I agree with this. The OpenOffice.org volunteers now employ dozens of tools, see sli

Re: [libreoffice-website] Download-Selector Script - Feedback wanted

Christian Lohmaier wrote: > "gather-the-downloads" script via an iframe to the site and rather > have a solution that can be cached in future, I added the > functionality to silverstripe itself. > http://pumbaa.ooodev.org:7780/home/download-and-sub/ Nice! Whatever the implementation, it's very goo

Re: [libreoffice-website] For those who want to work on the CSS / code / missing translations on the CMS

On 13/11/2010 Christian Lohmaier wrote: > the css and related files as well as the silverstripe code and related > files have been uploaded to git and can be accessed/downloaded from > github Thanks! Is it (at least theoretically) possible to do something similar with the actual site content? We h

Re: [libreoffice-website] Language list on the homepage

On 07/11/2010 Stefan Weigel wrote: > Am 07.11.2010 17:21, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > > > A usability issue I see in http://test.libreoffice.org/ > > You are invited to improve it. Have you already got your access as a > publisher to the CMS? Of course I had registered and

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [tdf-discuss] FreeDesktop Bugzilla

Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > I don't know if and how easy this would be in drupal. So far I have > coded a very simple webform in "django" (python is my thing :-)) to > allow uploading a document and a comment. This would be elementary in Drupal. > The only thing that is then left, is to link the up

Re: [libreoffice-website] Modules for Documentation Framework

e experimenting with D7 anyway, and this project would be time well spent for them, while they might not be very keen to donate time for yet another D6 project). Regards, Andrea Pescetti. -- E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are avail

[libreoffice-website] Language list on the homepage

the mouse on it, shows the available languages in an overlay? Regards, Andrea Pescetti. -- E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Re: [libreoffice-website] ConfCall wiki page broken?

On 04/11/2010 Florian Effenberger wrote: > believe me - we *NEED* a WYSIWYG editor, if we want large contributions > to the wiki (which we do). ;) Large in what sense? A large number of contributors or a few contributors making a large amount of work each? I would say that in the first case the

Re: [libreoffice-website] Documentation framework for LibreOffice?

Andreas Mantke wrote: If we want to use a CMS, we had to decide, if we want to use Plone, which some of the documentation-contributors already know, or another CMS (Drupal, Alfresco etc.) I never used the OOoAuthors structures intensively, but recently the Italian OpenOffice.org documentation

Re: [libreoffice-website] CMS decision: Silverstripe

ing Drupal infrastructure. Anyone available to discuss this at the next DrupalCon in Chicago http://chicago2011.drupal.org/ maybe? ...and then if the Steering Committee decides not to migrate we will just fork again! (I'm joking, of course). Regards, Andrea Pescetti. -- E-mail to website+h...@

Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMS - Prototype or demo?

Benjamin Horst wrote: > we'd need to set up a separate demo site on someone else's hosting > account, because no one else has access to the filesystem on his > webserver. And, for those not knowing Drupal, access to the filesystem is a prerequisite for installing modules, something I probably shou

Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMS

Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi Rimas, > > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Rimas Kudelis wrote: > > 2010.10.23 03:26, Christian Lohmaier rašė: > >> [...] > >> And when the target-page's name is change, the links are not updated, > >> but just happen to work because of the redirect/duplication tha

Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMS

Drew Jensen wrote: > So - proposal - if no agreement is coming then a vote? > Either that or let the SC choose as I read the minutes. I don't think the Document Foundation community is ready for a democratic vote. Probably every move and decision taken so far has been taken by the Steering Committ

Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMS

Marc Paré wrote: > So, there are 2 things to consider: > 1. Does the SC wish #1 [AP: translatable pages] or the #2 [AP: subsites] > option? > 2. Can either Silverstripe and Drupal support either of these scenarios. > > Opinions on #2 is the one that is really important for this thread. > > Could

Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMS

Benjamin Horst wrote: > I am also available for Drupal support, and Jim Benstead (a friend of > mine) volunteered to help earlier in the thread too. If Drupal is chosen, I can help by: - studying an overall infrastructure for a Drupal-based network of sites with a nice, modern flow of information

Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMS

Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > If the Document Foundation must choose a tool that will be > > flexible enough to rebuild all the current OpenOffice.org infrastructure > > on it > > No. I strongly disagree. N

Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMS

Sophie Gautier wrote: > Just to point that we need to handle i18n and l10n easily also, this > is important to think this multilanguage way till the beginning. Then I'll have to ask again what you mean by this! 1) Having translatable pages (meaning: an English about page at http://www.documentfou

Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMS

filled) to migrate to a distributed SCM after one year. Best regards, Andrea Pescetti. -- E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Re: [libreoffice-website] CMS requirements / suitability testing

atabase-based CMSs; I haven't seen Keith's initial setup, but if it follows this approach I'll happily have a look. Otherwise... OK, tell me if there is still interest in a Drupal demo and willingness for a fair assessment and we'll see. Best regards, Andrea Pescetti. -

Re: [libreoffice-website] improved the mailing list archives

Florian Effenberger wrote: > Andrea Pescetti wrote on 2010-10-15 21.28: > > Is there the possibility to add the message date too in the message > > lists like http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website ? ... > > should work now ;) Thanks, it is much more convenient this wa

Re: [libreoffice-website] improved the mailing list archives

/lists/website ? I had to look for messages in the archives a few times and I would have found very helpful to have dates somewhere on the list. Regards, Andrea Pescetti. -- E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available a