Re: [Wicket-user] Eclipse don't copy .html to output folder

Bingo!Thank you a lot. - PaoloOn 7/4/06, smallufo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eclipse 3.2Project - Properties - Java Compiler - Building - Enable projectspecific settings - Output folder - Filtered Resourcesremove *.htmldone! Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 forms without suppressAccessChecks?

You get the error because you are using CompoundPropertyModel and has the security manager in tomcat turned on. CompoundPropertyModel uses introspection to set / get properties and for doing that, it needs to run with permission java.lang.reflect.ReflectPermission suppressAccessChecks You can

Re: [Wicket-user] Show pages dependent on client's IP address

Thank you very much, Johan. I failed to mention that I'm still on Wicket-1.1.1. Is there a way to do this with Wicket-1.1.1? - Johannes Johan Compagner wrote: remote address can be get from the http request (of the WebRequest from the RequestCycle) The snoop servlet does this

Re: [Wicket-user] Show pages dependent on client's IP address

yes just get the real http request (just cast the wicket.Request to WebRequest and get the HttpRequest from it)On 7/5/06, Johannes Fahrenkrug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Thank you very much, Johan. I failed to mention that I'm still on Wicket-1.1.1. Is there a way to do this withWicket-1.1.1?-

Re: [Wicket-user] Show pages dependent on client's IP address

Johan, thanks a lot. For anyone who was following this, here's how I'm getting the IP of the client now: HttpServletRequest httpRequest = ((ServletWebRequest)getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest(); System.out.println(httpRequest.getRemoteAddr()); - Johannes Johan Compagner wrote: yes

[Wicket-user] too much synchronization in wicket?

this is from RequestCycle: private final void processEventsAndRespond() { // Use any synchronization lock provided by the target Object lock = getRequestTarget().getLock(this); if (lock != null) {

Re: [Wicket-user] too much synchronization in wicket?

Ittay Dror wrote: this is from RequestCycle: private final void processEventsAndRespond() { // Use any synchronization lock provided by the target Object lock = getRequestTarget().getLock(this); if (lock != null) {

Re: [Wicket-user] too much synchronization in wicket?

thanks for the quick response. is there any way around it? what happens if i don't lock? Matej Knopp wrote: Ittay Dror wrote: this is from RequestCycle: private final void processEventsAndRespond() { // Use any synchronization lock provided by the target

[Wicket-user] Testing Wicket 1.2 on Glassfish b48

I'm testing an app I just finished and is currently running on JBoss on Sun's Glassfish (SJAS 9.0) to test compatibility and see if it's a viable option going forward w/ our enterprise efforts. I seem to be having an issue w/ storing objects in session. Wicket runs fine until I utilize the

Re: [Wicket-user] Testing Wicket 1.2 on Glassfish b48

Caused by: java.io.NotSerializableException:com.sun.ejb.containers.EJBLocalObjectInvocationHandlerDelegateat java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1075) looks like a bug in sun's impl of ejbs?-IgorOn 7/5/06, Vincent Jenks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I'm testing an app I

[Wicket-user] RadioChoice, default selection

I am using the RadioChoice class in Wicket 1.2 import wicket.markup.html.form.*; RadioChoice radio = new RadioChoice(choice); ListString choices = new ArrayListString(); choices.add(a); choices.add(b); choices.add(c); radio.setModel(new

Re: [Wicket-user] RadioChoice, default selection

You could just set the option in your model. Jeremy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Sullivan Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 2:31 PM To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Wicket-user] RadioChoice, default selection I am

[Wicket-user] form processing

I need some help with the following scenario.I have a form and when a user is halfway through it, there is a button which leads to another page. The user enters values in that second page and then goes back to the first one. The user should be allowed to continue entering values and the original

Re: [Wicket-user] Testing Wicket 1.2 on Glassfish b48

I don't know, I would believe that if I weren't able to make a Stateful bean and use it exactly how I did in Wicket, outside of this project. I setup a test project and their stateful/stateless beans work flawlessly when tested against JSP/Servletsthe problem arises w/ Wicket + SFSB on

Re: [Wicket-user] Testing Wicket 1.2 on Glassfish b48

well, the problem might be that it is serialized by wicket itself. this is done because you have the logger set to debug to help identify things you put into session that might not be serializable. maybe the container doesnt serialize the same way so when the container does it its not a problem,

Re: [Wicket-user] Testing Wicket 1.2 on Glassfish b48

That's kind of what I was thinking...and afraid of myself - that Glassfish isn't playing nicely w/ Wicket when attempting to serialize - otherwise the error doesn't make much sense. I'm building a little test-app to demonstrate right now. If this is the case, what can be done to work around it,

Re: [Wicket-user] Testing Wicket 1.2 on Glassfish b48

the stuff in session is only serialized because you have the logger set to debug, if you turn that off it should be fine. -Igor On 7/5/06, Vincent Jenks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's kind of what I was thinking...and afraid of myself - that Glassfish isn't playing nicely w/ Wicket when

Re: [Wicket-user] form processing

Doesn't setDefaultFormProcessing(false) work for you? The values should be preserved even if model is not update. At least if you're using wicket 1.2 or newer. -Matej Alexei Sokolov wrote: I need some help with the following scenario. I have a form and when a user is halfway through it,

Re: [Wicket-user] Testing Wicket 1.2 on Glassfish b48

I'm not entirely sure what you meant by having the logger set to debug...but I'll assume that you meant I was missing this from web.xml?... init-param param-nameconfiguration/param-name param-valueDEPLOYMENT/param-value

Re: [Wicket-user] form processing

Yeah, the raw input is always updated, so getInput will give the updated value, and it is also used to set the output value of form components. Eelco On 7/5/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doesn't setDefaultFormProcessing(false) work for you? The values should be preserved even if

Re: [Wicket-user] Testing Wicket 1.2 on Glassfish b48

well, serialization error happens here: at wicket.protocol.http.HttpSessionStore.setAttribute(HttpSessionStore.java:62) if you go there you will see: // Do some extra profiling/ debugging. This can be a great help // just for testing whether your webbapp will behave when using // session

Re: [Wicket-user] getSession().invalidate() and Wicket 1.2

how do you make youre logoutpage?If that is made in a form request or link then by default we do a redirect after postso the logout page is redirected to instead of directly rendered.johan On 7/5/06, Mark George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Johan.@SuppressWarnings(serial)public class LogoutPage

Re: [Wicket-user] too much synchronization in wicket?

if you don't lock then pages and sessions must take care of that they are not thread safecurrently wicket is for the most part (99%) thread safe.Maybe we could loose it a bit and say we only sync around the active page. But then if you hold a page in another page. And set that as a respond then we

Re: [Wicket-user] Exception using CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy and DropDownChoice

can you make a bug report for this?On 7/5/06, Adam Smyczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All,I am getting a StringIndexOutOfBoundsException when I changeselection in a DropDownChoise component that haswantOnSelectionChangedNotifications set to true. It looks like it isrelated to

Re: [Wicket-user] Testing Wicket 1.2 on Glassfish b48

Alright, I stuck a log4j.properties into my src folder, rebuilt, redeployed - still get the same exception...here's my properties file (copied from wicket-examples): log4j.debug=false log4j.rootLogger=INFO log4j.logger.org=INFO log4j.logger.com=INFO log4j.logger.net=INFO log4j.logger.nl=INFO

Re: [Wicket-user] Testing Wicket 1.2 on Glassfish b48

i dont know, but if the stack trace is exactly the same then log4j still thinks debug level is enabled on that package. -Igor On 7/5/06, Vincent Jenks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alright, I stuck a log4j.properties into my src folder, rebuilt, redeployed - still get the same exception...here's

Re: [Wicket-user] RadioChoice, default selection

Thanks. I changed my implementation: radio.setModel(new Model(a)); This is a whole lot simpler than the CompoundPropertyModel approach that I was using. (BTW, my form has only input field: the radio choice) Sean Levy, Jeremy wrote: You could just set the option in your model.

Re: [Wicket-user] too much synchronization in wicket?

Johan Compagner wrote: if you don't lock then pages and sessions must take care of that they are not thread safe currently wicket is for the most part (99%) thread safe. Maybe we could loose it a bit and say we only sync around the active page. But then if you hold a page in another

[Wicket-user] SSL

How can I implement a way switch over to https? Depending on how the user navigates I need to swich over to https from a form submit. Every time I try a different way to implement this transparently I receive Caused by: wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Already redirecting to '/app/Checkout'.