I guess it would be more like a Session.exists() :)+1 for that. it's backportable.FrankOn 8/26/06, Jaime De La Jara
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I think Igor proposal, session.exists(), is correct and it could be added without
any impact.Jaime.i think thats better then an npe, didnt even know we were
A high-class Java framework debate? Impossible. The stakes are too low for any class other than none.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated
remind me again why we let smartasses in?-IgorOn 8/25/06, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it would be more like a Session.exists() :)+1 for that. it's backportable.
FrankOn 8/26/06, Jaime De La Jara
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Igor proposal, session.exists(), is correct and it
Eelco wants company.On 8/26/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remind me again why we let smartasses in?-IgorOn 8/25/06,
Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it would be more like a Session.exists() :)+1 for that. it's backportable.
FrankOn 8/26/06, Jaime De La Jara
[EMAIL
yes it is backportable (that method)but we can't kill the exception throwing in 1.2 that is not backportable.johanOn 8/26/06, Frank Bille
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it would be more like a Session.exists() :)+1 for that. it's backportable.Frank
On 8/26/06, Jaime De La Jara
[EMAIL
If I were the teacher, my student passed me by far ;)
Eelco
On 8/26/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eelco wants company.
On 8/26/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remind me again why we let smartasses in?
-Igor
On 8/25/06, Frank Bille [EMAIL
you are so humble, anyways just checked in exists() for app and session, seems requestcycle doesnt follow the same rules and will just return null - not something we should tweak in 1.x stream because of silent failure.
-IgorOn 8/26/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I were the
The not-throwing exception change could go into 1.3 IMO.
Martijn
On 8/26/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you are so humble, anyways just checked in exists() for app and session,
seems requestcycle doesnt follow the same rules and will just return null -
not something we should
Hi All,
I was one of the early users of Wicket before 1.0. I
did a lot of work to use Wicket with my JDO
implementation JDOMax (no longer supported). In the
process I learned a lot about why it is harder than it
has to be to use many ORM frameworks with Wicket and
Tapestry.
I'm a member of JSR
hi,
my thought is: with EJB3 and hibernate (and both together if you want) - why
do we need more ?
regards,
korbinian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
von Geoff hendrey
Gesendet: Samstag, 26. August 2006 18:54
An:
because there is always an opportunity to make the wheel rounder - aka innovation :)-IgorOn 8/26/06, Korbinian Bachl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:hi,my thought is: with EJB3 and hibernate (and both together if you want) - why
do we need more ?regards,korbinian -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von:
i glanced over the code - but i dont get it after the first glance. perhaps you can explain what difficulties you hit when using wicket and an orm to help us better understand.seems to me like you are trying to work with a ui connected to a persistence layer - without a service layer in between.
:-( That's just what lots of people say in java forums when a new
Wicket release is announced :
We already have [replace with the framework you think is the market
leader] , why the hell should we learn a new one ?
One of java's strength is in the choice we have to make our job done :-)
I'm in favor of Session.get() returning null in 2.0, if not earlier.
You could add exists() in 1.3 and deprecate it in 2.0.
Gili
Frank Bille wrote:
I guess it would be more like a Session.exists() :)
+1 for that. it's backportable.
Frank
On 8/26/06, *Jaime De La Jara*
Shades isn't threatening to JDO, EJB, or Hibernate.
I'm a member of the JDO2 expert group, and I've built
a free JDO driver, which as far as I know was the only
non-commercial driver to pass the Sun TCK for JDO, at
the time. It was called JDOMax. I recently stopped
supporting it and I've taken the
hmm, thats pretty interesting. let me show you how it is done with a fully transparent orm - maybe it will give you some ideasclass EntityModelT extends LoadableDetachableModelT { private final Class clazz;
private final Serializable id; public EntityModel(Class clazz, Serializable id) {
ive read your blog, and agree with some points you make about full orm solutions. but as i said i couldnt grasp everything from looking at the code youve provided. are you planning on writing tutorials for shades in the near future as it sounds appealing.
-IgorOn 8/26/06, Geoff hendrey [EMAIL
Hi Igor,
Don't get hung up on the loop. As I noted, there is
an automatic way to do it, which you provided, using
the BoundPropertyModel. Shades works fine with this.
I've had these debates too many times before. I'm able
to argue both sides, and believe both sides. When we
put ourselves into a
Hi Igor,
Cool.
I'm trying to find the right venue for open sourcing
Shades, and for putting up the javadocs, etc. I was
wondering why you guys left codehaus?
-geoff
--- Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ive read your blog, and agree with some points you
make about full orm
solutions.
We left codehaus because at that time we had some issues with the
support. They didn't respond in time and somtimes not at all. But
Martjin may give you more details
Juergen
On 8/26/06, Geoff hendrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Igor,
Cool.
I'm trying to find the right venue for open
What can I do if I have a simple form with AjaxSubmitButton and some
TextArea,
every submit I want to update the TextArea with some new text (it can't be
read only model because it get's an input) ???
--
View this message in context:
We left Codehaus because we had to wait for weeks for even an answer
to Jonathan's request of adding another committer (me). So we decided
to go to SF where we were less dependent on other people.
SF works. I've heard good stories about http://developer.berlios.de/.
And you could consider
Maybe try again a few times? Could be your connection failed.
Eelco
On 8/26/06, ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please see attachment image
i want checkout svn co
https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket/branches/WICKET_1_2/wicket-parent
as Mr Igor told.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary
add the textarea to the target provided by the button's onsubmit() call and the textarea will be repainted.-IgorOn 8/26/06, Roman Mandeleil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What can I do if I have a simple form with AjaxSubmitButton and someTextArea,every submit I want to update the TextArea with some
there is also google oss hosting which i have heard good things about. http://code.google.com i believe.-IgorOn 8/26/06,
Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We left Codehaus because we had to wait for weeks for even an answerto Jonathan's request of adding another committer (me). So we
another interesting problem i find with identity in full blown orms is that it can cause a nasty cascade of loading object graph when using business identity instead of db identity.if you have school-semester-class relationships and you do not want to depend on db identity which is the recommended
Lorin Metzger wrote:
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
The problem that I had was that it seemed like all other
requests for that session were also blocked even ones that had nothing to do
with that behavior.
You would have to make sure the request for a push behavior is
Yeah, forgot about that. http://code.google.com/hosting/
Eelco
On 8/26/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there is also google oss hosting which i have heard good things about.
http://code.google.com i believe.
-Igor
On 8/26/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We
Hi, playing with the phonebook example app. I ran into the problem of how can be updated the contents of a page whose instance is passed to another page constructor?. In the phonebook the back page is ListContactsPage and the page that holds the instance is EditContact. This happens when one adds
the problem with the approach is that a behavior is tired to a component that is tied to a page. any thread accessing the page needs to block because you dont want two or more theads working on the page.i think you need to take a bit of a different approach
have a threadsafe queue of push events
贵公司负责人（经理/财务）您好：
我是深圳联欧有限公司的，我公司实力雄厚，有着良好的社会关系。因进项较多
现完成不了每月销售额度，每月有一部分增值税电脑发票，海关代征（6%左右）和
普通商品销售、广告、服务费、劳务费、咨询费、交通运输、建筑安装、餐饮等，
国税、地税发票（1.5%至1%左右），优惠代开或合作,点数较低，还可以根据所做数量
额度的大小来商议优惠的点数。我公司成立多年一直坚持以诚信为中心立足商场中，
本公司郑重承诺所用绝对是真票！更希望能够有机会与贵司合作!
如贵公司在发票的真伪方面有任何疑虑或担心，可上网查证或我司直接与贵司去
税务局抵扣核对。
i dont really understand what you are sayinggenerally this is not the problem because at the end of the request the models are detached - so when the page renders again - even from some saved reference - the models are attached again and the appropriate data/component hierarchies are refreshed
--
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:05:21 +0300
From: Janne Hietam?ki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Applying Style Sheets to Wicket Portlet
Components?
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
hello all
i found the code like this in the AjaxPagingNavigator.
protected void onAjaxEvent(AjaxRequestTarget target){
if ((pageable instanceof MarkupContainer) !(pageable instanceof
ListView))
}
this makes dataview wont work well.
or AjaxPagingNavigator wont support
Hi.
Sorry, i didnt write this in the previous mail
when i try the wicket
examples(wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.PageablesPage) in the IE(all
wicket 1.2.1)
the wicket ajax debug shows
ERROR: error while processing response: [object Error].blah blah
but it works well in the firefox.
and i
you cannot update tr/td/tbody and a few others via outerhtml which is how our ajax updates work - it makes IE choke.-IgorOn 8/26/06, Koji Lin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi.
Sorry, i didnt write this in the previous mailwhen i try the wicketexamples(wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.PageablesPage) in the
I have tried it and it is not works, do you have any idea why ?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Refreshing-page-contents-tf1367256.html#a6004232
Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com.
-
are there any _javascript_ errors? anything interesting in the ajax debug window?-IgorOn 8/26/06, Roman Mandeleil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I have tried it and it is not works, do you have any idea why ?
--View this message in context:
thanks
what means outerhtml?
I foud in
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=wicket-0:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.PageablesPage
the ajax reponse looks like this
*?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?ajax-responsecomponent
id=data ![CDATA[table id=data
the difference is that in the original example the entire table is updated - where as in your example the table is updated - which works fine - and then only the td containing the navigator is updated - which causes the error.
outerhtml:
Ok it looks for component with id: [form.id]_[component.id], now it works
if i give
that special id to the component but it good for a workaround, the more
intuitive behavior is when
the response will find component by it's origin id.
--
View this message in context:
Thanks Igor,
but the original example(i downloaded and never modify, i just put
the war in tomcat ).
the example will make
the table is updated - and then only the td containing the navigator is
updated(found in wicket ajax debug window).
The page renders well but ajax debug windows shows
right - that error is because the td is updated. i dont understand why the first time it shows just the table but the second time the table and the pager - did you change anything? why does it change behavior all of a sudden?
-IgorOn 8/26/06, Koji Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Igor,but the
heh, you didnt call setOutputMarkupId(true) on the textarea before you tried updating it via ajax? that is a prereq for any component you will be adding to the ajax target.-Igor
On 8/26/06, Roman Mandeleil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok it looks for component with id: [form.id]_[component.id], now it
No i didnt change the example.
i just put the wicket-examples-1.2.1.war into my tomcat
and just runs the example
http://localhost:8080/wicket-examples-1.2.1/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.PageablesPage
the IE will complain the error
so i try to download
45 matches
Mail list logo
