for things like
tabs. But it also destroys part of Wicket's programming model.
Eelco
On 4/30/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Yeah there's just no perfect world as long as browsers work the way
they work. The big, really big advantage of client state saving
HttpSessionStore imp and PageEvictionStrategy.
Hold a few page/page versions in mem. dump old pages to the database.
And get them again only when requested. Delete everything when the session
itself is invalidated...
Unlimitted back button..
johan
On 4/30/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED
have problem understanding this.
The links are regular wicket 'Link's?
(e.g. new Link() { onClick() { tab.switchPage(X); } }?
I just don't understand. Clicking on navigator increases page versions.
Why are the links pointing to older page version?
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
For instance
Ok, I got just IM-ed by Johan. I think *I* don't have my day. I'm
totally wrong here, as the whole page gets rendered everytime, and the
history is thus in sync.
Forget all the answers I gave on this thread. Duh.
Eelco
On 4/30/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the moment you
Yeah, Martijn and me are working on Wicket In Action (Manning). It'll
be a few months; it's a lot of work and I found that you really have
to have inspiration days for writing.
Anyway, working on it. Until then, please use this list, the IRC
channel, the WIKI and whatever other means we have for
Due to the lack of time most of us have here, we need to make choices.
I think the WIKI is great for getting the contributions from the
community itself, though the core devs - especially Gwyn - regularly
update it too. But it's really great to see more people are helping
out and writing items on
don't always
fully illustrate some conceptsthat's there the wiki comes in.
On 5/1/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Due to the lack of time most of us have here, we need to make choices.
I think the WIKI is great for getting the contributions from the
community itself
Hi all,
Yesterday I committed a wizard component in wicket-extensions, and
some wizard examples in wicket-examples. It's the result of a couple
of iterations (first try was last year), but I've nailed it now. I
hope it's a good mix of something that is easy to use, has a shallow
API, but is
I can't speak for the wicket committers, but in my opinion users should
be encouraged to write down as much as possible in the wiki, even if the
quality is not perfect. Other people can (and will, in my experience)
improve it and remove redundant or false information.
Exactly :)
Eelco
Hi,
While it wouldn't be considered best practice, you could. There are
several tags, like dropdownchoice, that write out pieces of HTML
without creating sub elements first.
Eelco
On 5/3/06, Ashley Aitken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy All,
I am new to Wicket, just looking around for an
Yeah. That looks like something that could have easily been prevented
by *testing* before committing.
Eelco
On 5/3/06, Ari Suutari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I noticed that myself also. I'll compile from svn.
I'm just a little worried by new bugs being introduced at
this late in RC phase
a
reference to it and it's a little bit odd as a constructor argument.
Sven
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Done.
Eelco
On 4/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to override FeedbackMessagesModel.processMessages() to be able to add
special messages. This seems to be one of its intended
in.
Eelco
On 5/3/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
since you are the one who losened it up, do you mind adding some defensive
code into the constructor? :)
-Igor
On 5/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I loosened it up a bit.
Eelco
On 5/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED
You can do what is outlined here:
http://wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Create_dynamic_markup_hierarchies_using_panels
Or - like the article says, add all visible components and use the
isVisible property (or override the method) for turning them on or
off.
Or use Fragments, which work like
The idea is that you set a Compound/BoundCompoundPropertyModel on the
parent (or further up the hierarchy) of these components.
setModel(new (Bound)CompoundPropertyModel(userBean));
add(new TextField(name));
Bound and the normal CompoundPropertyModel do not differ much from
each other, except
MVC is not Struts! (MVC is *much* older.) I wouldn't even say that
Struts is MVC.
You might even argue that Swing isn't the MVC as it was proposed. But
yeah, that's why I try to keep calling those frameworks 'model 2'
instead.
Eelco
---
On 5/4/06, Vincent Jenks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't hear great things about Struts! My experience w/
Java/J2EE/Java EE before wicket was Servlets+JSP+Hibernate (and JDBC),
and I've only been doing Java for about a year. I had made a living
off of Microsoft technologies for years prior to
No clue, sorry. Could you be more specific about which models and
which components your problem applies to? To my knowledge, we haven't
been doing any wild with models lately.
Eelco
On 5/4/06, Dipu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I updated the the wicket source tree from svn trunk and my
You only can get it from the request:
((WebRequest)getRequestCycle().getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest.getSession().
Eelco
On 5/5/06, Ingram Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
We try to merge Wicket into a legacy servlet application which use
plain HttpSession to manage loginUser or
On 5/5/06, Vincent Jenks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't get the impression that I'm entirely without complaints
with my Wicket learning experience.
Hurry, it's an open source project, and anyone can contribute to make
it better! I think so far we have been taking our users quite
For anyone that follows the Wicket blogs: I'm making a new attempt at
this. And as there is nothing like starting over with stuff, I've
decided to move to wordpress: http://chillenious.wordpress.com/. The
blog will be mainly about Wicket. I'll try to be good this time and
regularly write, and
Though that will only work when your servlet container is configured
to have access to that directory as one to serve files from, right?
Eelco
On 5/6/06, Timo Stamm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor Vaynberg schrieb:
so what you need is something that maps to some url and when invoked
streams
context - I've never tried that - but it's
not guaranteed according to the spec.
Eelco
On 5/6/06, Timo Stamm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eelco Hillenius schrieb:
Though that will only work when your servlet container is configured
to have access to that directory as one to serve files from, right
a method like add is deliberately protected by final to ensure it will
work like it is supposed to, no matter what component hierarchy you're
in. So, before opening up such a method, we would like to be
absolutely sure there are no alternatives for it.
In your case there are a couple of things
i have used it quiet a bit and it seems to work fine. so i would be +1 for
making it enabled by default.
I can confirm that :) +1 for enabling by default.
Eelco
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
that didn't get any chapters for proofreading: you're
probably not on the list. Sorry, you'll have to wait for the actual
book and keep on using this list etc . But thanks for offering anyway!
Thanks,
Eelco
On 2/9/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On second thought, please do volunteer. I
Thanks for your reactions concerning starting up an
internationalization project guys. If I ever have a spare moment in
the next few weeks, I'll try to start it up. Might take a while
though, so I hope you're not in a hurry :)
Eelco
---
Using
Cool, thanks for sharing that. If you're interested, it would be very
much appreciated to write a few lines about this at our WIKI:
http://wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Stories
And anyone else reading this (including the guys from Servoy and
Topicus), it'd be nice to share a few lines there
Working on it at this actual moment :) Writing, writing, writing.
Eelco
On 5/8/06, Mark Derricutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/8/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those people that have reacted, I want to let you know that I gave
the complete list to Manning. They didn't
It's one of these components we'd still like to have in our
distribution. Didn't happen so far yet though. There's a contribution
here
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1416392group_id=119783atid=684977
(with a patch) you might find useful. There were a couple of things I
Could you please provide a patch? You already have it on your computer
right? I'll apply it right away.
Thanks,
Eelco
On 5/8/06, karthik Guru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure if there is any interest in
wicket.contrib.markup.html.velocity.VelocityPanel. But just
for the sake of
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Tags with wicket:id attributes are coupled to Wicket components, while
wicket:xxx are more like processing instructions. I/ we feel like
this is a big distinction and should be communicated as such.
what about my other message about a CompositeComponent. how is it so
You can still use OGNL, just not by default for the PropertyModels
etc. We removed OGNL as it had seriously bad performance - it showed
up as the last hotspot we had when profiling Wicket -, and it doesn't
seem to be maintained actively anymore (in fact, I had to wait for a
bug fix for almost a
Fine with me. If something thinks of a nice API.
Eelco
On 5/8/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems common enough, shouldn't we add this to core (of course, only
when it works :-))?
Martijn
On 5/8/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
try this:
Image image =
It'll give people choice though. Not everyone cares about
previewability in the same fashion.
Eelco
On 5/9/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it depends on what job you are in. It is nice for the person
who has to maintain the properties. If I were a html designer I'd
component or not) for such a thing?
And if it is not a wicket component we make it a special (none raw markup)
tag?
and if it is a wicket component already we just put a special object in the
tags attributes?
johan
On 5/9/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It'll give people choice
Typically you'd use the validator when you only want to validate
whether the input follows a certain pattern. But if you want a string
to be formatted between input and ouput, such a converter makes sense.
Eelco
On 5/9/06, Bruno Borges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the difference between
Or take a look at what's in wicket.extensions.util.resource and look
at the Slider component in YUI for an example. I think it's cleaner
like that (keep the javascript in seperate files and run some variable
substitution over it).
Eelco
On 5/9/06, Ittay Dror [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i
I haven't looked into it deeper, but it sounds to me that we could
make it slightly easier. We already have post processing filters, so
personally I would think we would be consistent to have pre processing
filters too. I know the functionality to do this is there already, but
we might come up
Yep. Bruno, It's trivial to make your own component classes - probably
textfields, no? - that have an API that's more to your taste. It's one
of Wicket's main ideas to make creating custom components easy, so why
not make use of that?
Eelco
On 5/9/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$${key}? Or whatever you want.
I don't need this behavior to be in wicket core. I'm much more
interested in clean and simple preprocessing filters, something wicket
lacks currently.
-Matej
Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. If we have that
Martijn is writing about localization for Wicket In Action now. I'm
sure he'd appreciate it if someone would write up some notes about how
to do this on the WIKI.
Eelco
On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matej Knopp wrote:
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL
at runtime.
--Andrew
On 5/9/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn is writing about localization for Wicket In Action now. I'm
sure he'd appreciate it if someone would write up some notes about how
to do this on the WIKI.
Eelco
On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
:) It's not to bluntly stop the discussion or anything. I just that it
might not be obvious to everyone that creating custom components/ a
set of base widgets tailored to your need/ taste works great.
Eelco
On 5/9/06, Bruno Borges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure... I got the message. :)
PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, i got most of it.
last question: can the template have a way to loop on a list? if not, then how
do you suggest i templatize the messages, so their formatting is kept in the js
file?
thanx,
ittay
Ittay Dror wrote:
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Or take a look at what's
Cool! Thanks a lot. One thing: it is advisable to start your page's
markup files with:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
So that the encoding is set properly. If that is not put in the
markup, it renders quite funny on my box :)
Maybe you want to take a look at these buttons too? You can look
But it realy shouldn't be a quick fix. IMO we should first improve the
general resource chain. Additional an text based filter in between
would be very easy than.
Juergen
Well, we consider you being the markup masta :) I'm certainly not in
favor of a quick fix anytime, anywhere in Wicket.
afford the alcohol to make that livable...
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
On 5/9/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I definitively like about the pre-processor/ filter is that it is
very efficient. Only for static messages though, but that's the whole
idea on these special tags
Yeah, it's UTF-8. Don't forget to set the encoding type in your
editor. That's done for Eclipse if you update.
Eelco
On 5/9/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What encoding (?xml version=1.0 encoding=) did you use for
FormInput_ja.html. My browser shows some rubbish which I
Yeah, Wicket is not perfect and neither are we. That's why we discuss
here and see whether we can reach common ground. Then everyone will be
happy! :)
Eelco
On 5/9/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the flipside is of course that we were able to refactor a ton without
breaking too much
On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
I don't mind API breaks. Not at all. If I touch code that is not a part
of Stable API, I take the risk of having to change my code when wicket
version changes. I really don't mind.
Well, not everyone agrees with you. Some
] wrote:
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Or take a look at what's in wicket.extensions.util.resource and look
at the Slider component in YUI for an example. I think it's cleaner
like that (keep the javascript in seperate files and run some variable
substitution over it).
what do you mean by 'variable
Yeah, I'm not totally crazy about that either. But the fact that we
only try to convert when there is a converter set comes from:
* some components, like CheckBox use their own kind of conversion, and
thus override the convertValue method
* some users strongly objected against Wicket always
It's something we probably will try to get rid of for Wicket 2.0;
instead of the pessimistic, register first approach we have now, we
can choose an optimistic approach which will allow disallow in a
similar fashion as file filters work.
Eelco
On 5/10/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nicer if it could be integrated in our existing link classes.
Eelco
On 5/11/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you could make a nice component for that?
AnchorLink?
it is requested before so maybe it is a simple class for the core.
johan
On 5/10/06, Jerry Smith
Hi Ali,
What version of Wicket are you using and what is the exception you
get? If you got some code to share, maybe it's best to file and issue
(bug report) with the code attached to it.
Eelco
On 5/11/06, Ali Zaid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys;
It's been a long time since I have a time
Or hide your business logic in 'services' and make those
transactional. That gives you most control, but also is a bit more
work.
Eelco
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with
On 5/11/06, Ali Zaid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hay Guys;
Glad you like the idea, as for adding a setter, I don't think it's any
different than overridding the method as above, as wicket always does
Yeah, you got a point there too. So we don't have to add the property,
unless it's a clear win
?
AttributeModifier?
On 5/11/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I like that idea. So, if the contents of the url start with #,
we append that to the url... that's the idea, right?
What do other people think/ votes?
Eelco
On 5/11/06, Ali Zaid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hay Guys
That might be the idea, but doesn't work either. It's always overriden
by ServletWebRequest.getLocale, which in case it can't make up the
locale from the request header, defaults to the server's locale -
which is not the locale that is set as the default for Wicket.
Eelco
On 5/11/06, Igor
This is needed because some applications aren't localized, and it's not
necessary because some websites are regional (not world wide). And because
of this, I must avoid Wicket from displaying messages in
English/Japanese/Chinese or whatever computer the user (let's say some
brazilian guy
on the end, but there's no need for it.
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 08:21 -0600, Vincent Jenks wrote:
+1 - I think that's pretty cool! Couldn't that be done w/ an ExternalLink? AttributeModifier? On 5/11/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, I like that idea. So, if the contents
Hmmm... that looks like a mess. The default locale of resource
settings does not seem to be used at all. Furthermore it does look
like that method is supposed to 'fix' the session (and btw it helps
for executing test cases), as resources naturally fall back on files
without the localized
I guess he wants to digest it fully.
Eelco
On 5/11/06, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Won't that make it hard to read?
On 5/11/06, Ali Zaid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hay :) when do we expect this? I want to eat this book!!! :)
in
code this feature like the way it's been proposed, there will be no way to
inform the ISessionFactory about some things like User info at logon time.
Am I wrong?
On 5/11/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know. That seems to be the original idea of the default
locale, though
Well, this one worked :)
On 5/12/06, Alvar Lumberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, this is a test e-mail. I'm sending it because two previous
messages didn't get through. Nothing to see here, press delete.
Sorry.
---
Using Tomcat but need to
Header contributions are a problem currently with AJAX. Please look
for the discussion we had about this earlier this week.
Eelco
On 5/12/06, Samyem Tuladhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I include a panel into a page after the page has been loaded through
ajax, I do not get the content
Yeah, use markup inheritance. See wicket-examples,
http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t69357.html, the test cases and
there's probably something about it on the WIKI.
Eelco
On 5/13/06, smallufo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have a custom component (form) that extends Panel
I want to extend
Wow, this was a big thread. But now it seems to have died quitely.
Could someone please fetch conclusions and put this in an RFE?
Eelco
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with
Please take a look at the wizard example in wizard-examples.
Basically, it works just like any other form/ panel, so you can use
whatever tricks you want.
Eelco
On 5/16/06, Michael K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I 've been playing with the latest Wizard example this morning as well as
Looks very cool indeed. Looks like the next version of Echo to me :).
At this time I'm not sure where the opportunities for integration are.
Being able to embed google widgets comes to mind first. But we'll have
to let it sink in a bit I guess.
It can't find any source code - other than the
Hi,
You can use a Link with a PopupSpecification. And you can (or should
be able to) actually attach a link to any tag, including a button tag.
Eelco
On 5/17/06, Nino Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Was wondering if any body has an example on howto create a popup button?
I've looked
, popText_omraade);
Button openword = new Button(openword) {
protected void onSubmit() { overide code}
}
openword.add(mylink);
add(openword);
/java
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne af Eelco Hillenius
Sendt: on 17-05-2006 12:05
I think what Ittay's and your case have in common is that you try to
make an update of multiple fields atomic. Wicket doesn't support
transactional updating of properties, and honestly I would know how to
fold such a thing elegantly in Wicket without making things a lot more
complicated.
Actually, I think IResourceSettings.useDefaultOnMissingResource(true);
is meant for something else: message bundle resources. So that is used
when you try to load a localized string that can't be found.
Regarding components being referenced in your markup, but not added in
the component tree:
Thanks a lot. I just added the buttons.
Eelco
On 5/14/06, Takeshi Matsuba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
Thank you for your advice about encoding.
Now,I localize buttons too.
please see followed diff output.
***
*** 59,64
--- 59,72
On 5/17/06, Ittay Dror [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what if the framework will allow a ComponentManager to be associate with a
component?
What would it do though? The naming implies it might do anything,
while this topic is about models or even more specifically model
updates.
it can then
We've got the 'inspector bug', build by Jonathan I believe, and which
you can see in action in wicket-examples (see the 'i' icon top left).
And you can profile with any Java profiler you like. For instance
YourKit: http://www.yourkit.com/, which we use to profile Wicket.
Eelco
On 5/17/06,
On 5/17/06, cowwoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure by now you've all heard of http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/
Yes we have as there has been messages on this earlier today on this list.
I was wondering if this would help with any back button issues in
Wicket?
It's certainly an intriguing idea (have a look at haxe.org if you find
it interesting), but I don't really believe in this concept. It is very
difficult to abstrahize the features (or should I say quirks) of
different browsers. Some months ago, I had a look at several javascript
libraries and it
to incorporate such an HTML scrap into a
Wicket application, versus one written in a framework such as Echo 2
that abstracted away the HTML completely?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco
Hillenius
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 10:58 AM
it will be the mediator between the components and the model (like the
Controller in MVC)
Currently the component is the controller, so it would be an extra indirection.
if the framework interacts with the manager, rather than directly with the
components, for the purpose of updating the
On 5/17/06, Bruno Borges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will Wicket take care of cleaning up the HttpSession sometimes in a while?
I mean, we create lots of components, for lots of pages the User is
accessing. How Wicket know which objects must be removed and with which
frequency it will do that?
one written in a framework such as Echo 2
that abstracted away the HTML completely?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Eelco
Hillenius
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 10:58 AM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket
so, no separation
There is, but not stricktly to the MVC pattern. There is no Java
framework that I know of that adhers to that original pattern anyway.
Certainly not the frameworks that claim to be 'MVC' frameworks.
Wicket comes closest to Swing. The components combine controller +
view -
i thought the component is the view.
Like Swing, Wicket components currently are controller + view. MVC is
just a name game though, as there are models, converters and
potentially a whole load of stuff in between.
hmmm,
class Component {
protected IController
a formvalidator to make sure that all required fields have good
values? that would make the update transactional.
-Igor
On 5/17/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/17/06, Ittay Dror [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what if the framework will allow a ComponentManager to be associate
The only thing to take care of is not to allow IE6 to work in
standard-compliance mode. So far, I had no problems with this setup. I'm
doing quite complicated layouts using just css (no tables) and
everything works fine. I just hope that IE7 won't screw everything up.
Judging from the posts on
Yeah, I like that. I'll try to give it a look today.
Eelco
On 5/18/06, nato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, would the named anchor be supported in the next version of Wicket?
BTW, I vote for Link.setAnchor() so that I could set the anchor dynamically.
I also vote for the proposed a
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco Hillenius
Sent: 17. maj 2006 12:41
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] popup button
Simpler than that. I just added this example to wicket-examples/link-o-matic:
Java
could use instead?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco Hillenius
Sent: 18. maj 2006 11:04
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] popup button
Don't override the onclick method.
Eelco
On 5/18/06, Nino Wael
There are more ways, but Borders, Panels and Fragments are the
preferred ones (and markup inheritancee of course). Is there anything
you can't do with them?
Eelco
On 5/18/06, Paulo Sérgio Medeiros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
im new to wicket and was wondering if 'reusable panels'
I think Topicus implemented that. Not sure... Martijn/ Johan?
Eelco
On 5/18/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michiel Trimpe wrote:
Has anyone already tried to implement LDAP-authentication with Wicket?
Wicket has nothing to do with authentication. You might consider using
Acegi or
Many ways to do it. You might even consider throwing in some AOP.
Eelco
On 5/18/06, Frank Silbermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably only in contruction. I want to know how often users are using
various pages, and not the number of operations they perform on each one.
(In other words,
]
mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf
Of Eelco
Hillenius
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 10:58
It was, but I could never find enough time to finish it, and the
longer it was in there, the less happy I was with the result.
Were you using it? Sorry if removing it caused inconvenience, but it
just wasn't finished.
Eelco
On 5/20/06, Dorel Vaida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah. sorry :)
On 5/20/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we wheren't talking about the GWT at this time anymore but about CSS and
the content-box model.
johan
On 5/20/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean it doesn't work? As the target platform? Sure
Finally, you found a reason to start your blog!
Eelco
On 5/20/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We use yourkit as our own wicket profiler (maybe we could even make hooks in
wicket that hooks again in there api so that we can hot profile it somehow)
But what i wanted to say is
Hi all,
We made a branch about two days ago for Wicket 1.2, which we'll use
for maintaining 1.2. Trunk/ Head will be used for Wicket 2.0, and will
be highly experimental for a while. What's currently in there can't
even be used at all until we finish converting to generics.
So, if you were
What is your question exactly? Do you want to know how to deal with
nested model objects (the address property), do you want to be able to
'batch edit' multiple customers (use a ListView, with property
replaceItems == false) or do you want to have a detail form for your
address (use either a new
1201 - 1300 of 3028 matches
Mail list logo
