I'm not too sure about using dots for index/ map references. It
differs from OGNL:
http://www.ognl.org/2.6.7/Documentation/html/LanguageGuide/indexing.html.
And personally, I think it is usefull to be able to distinct single
from indexed properties just by looking at the expression. Is it
/that/
: Ognl.getValue(string, anHashmap);
so the need to do [sd] even with juk why is that needed ...?
On 10/27/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not too sure about using dots for index/ map references. It
differs from OGNL:
http://www.ognl.org/2.6.7/Documentation/html/LanguageGuide
We're comitted to 1.4, so that's fine.
Eelco
On 10/27/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh of course, that's what I meant. What Java version do I have to
write for? I believe that Pattern was introduced in 1.4. Is that too
late a version?
On 10/27/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED
with juk why is that needed ...?
On 10/27/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not too sure about using dots for index/ map references. It
differs from OGNL:
http://www.ognl.org/2.6.7/Documentation/html/LanguageGuide/indexing.html
Oh, and of course AbstractPropertyModel.ognlExpression should be
replaced by e.g. .expression or something similar.
Eelco
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course
Free
Oh, and while your at it, this
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4950148 is another
bug that would be helpful for Wicket to be solved.
Eelco
On 10/27/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonathan filed a bug report with SUN that he thinks, when solved, will
improve
Jonathan filed a bug report with SUN that he thinks, when solved, will
improve some Wicket stuff. Wanna vote? Read it at:
http://jroller.com/page/JonathanLocke/20051027
Eelco
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
Get Certified
Yeah, that's true. You're right. Maybe it isn't such a good idea then.
Eelco
On 10/27/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On 10/27/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AbstractPropertyModel could work with something like a
propertyresolver/ delegate (one more
Furthermore, you should never ever call a overridable method in a constructor.
Eelco
On 10/27/05, Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#: Christian Essl changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 10/28/2005
12:54 AM :#
Is AOP realy needed for that?
Propably I do not
request cycle impl you will get that component
interface handling
(that doesn't have anything to do with web/http)
On 10/28/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, we have done some ofline discussing on this topic too. For 1.2.
we could start thinking about a better model
I this case, are there any good reasons /not/ to remove final? As far
as I can see, it doesn't really leak many implementation details if we
make some methods final.
Funny thing that the authors tag has Jonathan and me... I can't recall
writing this, and I don't think Jonathan did :) Will the
I agree with Matej.
Eelco
On 10/30/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my opinion, there's no need for another indirection. From what I've
seen, new users are already confused about models, making them even more
complicated isn't imho the way to go.
I think that Ognl models should
Not core, but a support project is nice. Please take a look at
wicket-stuff and look (in CVS) at the wicket-contrib-navmenu project.
There's an example for it in wicket-stuff-examples.
I need more people to participate/ contribute to this too, so please help.
Eelco
On 10/30/05, Andrew Berman
Actually, we're working on that right now. If you take a look at HEAD,
you'll find the basis of authorization support integrated in Wicket.
Eelco
On 10/30/05, wang lei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use wicket for over months and develop one project with it.
So i have a suggestion for wicket core or
We certainly should do. What's your use case?
Eelco
On 10/31/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I developing a wicket app that need to check Access to app resources
any ideas for implementing this feature?
---
This SF.Net
Tabs like that could work too. Maybe easier than navmenu. The idea
behind navmenu was that navigation inherently is a tree structure -
possibly just one level - but in such a way that you wnat to access
each level seperately (so that you can render each level
independently). Having a tree makes it
You can override renderHeadInitContribution. You need to call super
too though, if you want dojo to keep working.
Eelco
On 10/31/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know much about the AjaxHandler, but with markup
(wicket:head) copying is done only once by default. May be
There aren't that many subscriptions to announce, that's why I'm
forwarding it to the user list.
Thanks Miko!
Eelco
p.s. only honest anwers of course :)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Miko Matsumura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Oct 31, 2005 4:31 PM
Subject: [Wicket-announce] Vote for
Thanks for the hint. I didn't sign up, but I always liked magnolia.
Maybe it's time to check it out :)
Eelco
On 10/31/05, Janne Hietamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
http://forums.about.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?nav=messagestsn=1tid=1584webtag=ab-java
Vote for Wicket here
There is a delay of a couple of hours between the developer servers
(ssh) and the public servers (pserver) of sourceforge.
Eelco
On 11/1/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm...I just pulled from HEAD and #2 is still not working. Looking at the
code, I didn't see the change you made
oh, and yes, the only way to never have timeouts is to use
bookmarkable page links as bookmarkable pages do not use a prior
session (in fact, if you don't have a session yet and you navigate to
a bookmarkable page, a new session is created).
Eelco
On 11/1/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED
I wasn't too impressed by WADI's progress to be honest. Seems to be
yet another dead project.
Eelco
On 11/1/05, Dan Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Eelco--
For anyone else who is looking, the param in web.xml is
session-config
session-timeoutTIME_IN_MINUTES/session-timeout
That's easy to do in Wicket. You can nest anyway you want in your
forms, including using listviews (though don't forget to set the
optimizeItemRemoval property to true).
Eelco
On 11/2/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I wonder if it is easily feasible to have functionality
I never liked that name either. Other people did and we settled for
it. Just the way the world works sometimes :)
Eelco
On 11/2/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/2/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's easy to do in Wicket. You can nest anyway you want in your
, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, something like that could work pretty well. I think you should
take a look at how paged lists work (package
wicket.markup.html.navigation.paging).
Eelco
On 11/1/05, Stijn de Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a new user
Kidding of course. He's doing fine. He's working on Wicket in the
background now and then, but is mostly focussing the zillion other
things he's doing with his life.
Eelco
On 11/2/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He abducted him and threw him into a river. That bastard just got too
He abducted him and threw him into a river. That bastard just got too vocal!
On 11/2/05, Francis Amanfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haven't heared from him here since a long time. Just out of curiosity! :-)
Francis
---
SF.Net email is
on the page you pointed to, it is very easy in Wicket and
IMO much more flexibel.
Juergen
On 11/2/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/2/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's easy to do in Wicket. You can nest anyway you want in your
forms, including using
I just created it for you:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1347328group_id=119783atid=684975
Eelco
On 11/3/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can report bugs here:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=119783atid=684975
On 11/3/05, blackboy zabaha
That should work. Might be a bug. Could you pls try to step into it?
Eelco
On 11/4/05, Marco van de Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I encountered somewhat unexpected behavior when I tried using
getBodyOnloadContribution().
When adding custom Ajaxhandlers to components I noticed that the
and sensible.
Martijn
On 11/4/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though there has been much debate about allowing such markupdriven
configuration (with me being in favor for allowing it to some extend),
configuring components like that is not 'the Wicket way'. Rather, you
would do any
Yeah, there's no scripting in Wicket. Everything has to be full
components etc. What you can do however, is create a component that
generates the whole javascript for you, e.g. working with string
replacements. Best way to start with that is looking at the sources of
some Wicket component, like
I see absolutely nothing wrong with lookups at that level. It's less
code than you would need for any component configuration and it's more
efficient too. And there are just no disadvantages, are there?
And... for this whole discussion: if you like one approach... go
implement it now! Create your
Sure. Use wicket.markup.html.pages.RedirectPage for server-side
redirecting to a non-wicket locations. If you want to inlcude things
likes JSP pages into Wicket pages, you can use the
wicket.markup.html.include.Include component. The latter is a bit
rough, so if you need better support on that
-06 15:38:06 -0700, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Sure. Use wicket.markup.html.pages.RedirectPage for server-side
redirecting to a non-wicket locations. If you want to inlcude things
likes JSP pages into Wicket pages, you can use the
wicket.markup.html.include.Include component
And you are sure the queries you want to run are page/ component
independent, right? What you are doing is request based, which is
fine, but which is not nescesarily a component based way of doing
things.
Eelco
On 11/7/05, Steven McNeel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I think I've read all
That kind of hooks exist. One of our goals for 1.2 is to further
formalize this, and also have better pluggable support for url
handling and state handling. We are getting some ideas on how this
could look, but it is stuff you really have to think through well.
Eelco
On 11/7/05, Sven Meier
PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll give it a shot. To be honest, I'd really like some more docs about the
AJAX stuff. I've looked at the examples and they don't really provide the
high-level overview I need to get my head around it.
On 11/8/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the HEAD
There is no way for Wicket to remove jsessionid (at least no legal
way). It's your servlet container that appends it. When you support
cookies however, there should be no need to encode this id in the url,
and I think some servlet engines don't append it if this is the case.
Eelco
On 11/8/05,
I don't know much about that package, but afaik the dataview project
will be dropped in favor of the extensions project.
Eelco
On 11/8/05, Gili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use recompile code that uses PageableGridDataView which
used to work. The problem is that
There sure is a mismatch; component based frameworks emerged because
of the mismatch Model 2 frameworks with page parts. Requests in Model
2 frameworks map to page wide actions. The controller/ view handler
has to ensure the state of all elements of the page are kept in sync
and rendered
Problem with that is that input type=button value=wicket:message
key='labelKey'// is not valid xml.
Eelco
On 11/9/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like wicket:message key=../ as long as it would work how normal JSP
tags currently work. In other words, I would be able to do this:
Sure. You need nothing special for Wicket to work with any servlet
container. Just configure as you like/ use plugins from your IDE.
Eelco
On 11/9/05, Paulo Sérgio Medeiros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can i use tomcat instead of Jetty? (is there a 'tomcat-config.xml'
somewhere to configure?)
Most of em do, though we all have kind of our different 'expertises'.
The currently active developers are yours truly, Juergen, Johan, Igor
and Martijn, though Martijn is mainly doing site/ builds/ promotion
etc. Gwyn is the man for Wiki. Jonathan is not really active, but does
some work in the
If they are not in the scope of components but in the scope of a
request, than it's fine to put the logic in a custom request cycle.
Nothing wrong with that. Just wanted to make sure you have to be in
that scope :)
Eelco
On 11/10/05, Steven McNeel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all the
I think/ agree that while Wicket's strong point lies in the fact that
we keep things clean and code-centric, having easy localized string
replacement without going through the whole requirement of having
Wicket components in a matching hierarchy is a very good exception to
the rule.
Eelco
On
It is possible; you can implement a strategy for that. It's super-easy
nor is it a prefered way of doing things, so imo such a plugin doesn't
have to support it.
Eelco
On 11/11/05, Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#: Martijn Dashorst changed the world a bit at a time by saying on
Thanks! Would you feel like combining efforts with the stuff that Igor
did (and that's in wicket-stuff cvs as wicketeer)?
Eelco
On 11/12/05, Joni Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just released a new version of wicket plugin for eclipse.
Isn't it a bit strange that Eclipse downloads all these org.eclipse.*
jars as dependencies, while it should have that already?
Eelco
On 11/12/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks! Would you feel like combining efforts with the stuff that Igor
did (and that's in wicket-stuff cvs
Why? It's part of the default header info whether a client accepts
cookies or not isn't it?
Eelco
On 11/12/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
App servers HAVE to put that in the first URL, because it's really the
second (because of the redirect). The server doesn't know if the
client is
Ate Douma (Jetspeed) worked on that some time ago, and expressed he
wants to help build it in for Wicket 1.2. However, Ate has been very
bussy for quite a while now, and I don't know whether he'll have time
soon. We kind of had the agreement portlet support should be in Wicket
medio Januari.
it at wicket-stuff or at laughing panda? I'm open to anything but have a
slight preference over the latter. I prefer svn over cvs and laughing
panda will offer other cool services like cruisecontrol and jira (soon).
Joni
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 12:52 -0800, Eelco Hillenius
Or use
public class SimpleImage extends WebComponent {
public SimpleImage(String id, String imgSrc) {
super(id, new Model(imgSrc));
}
public SimpleImage(String id, IModel imgSrcModel) {
super(id, imgSrcModel);
}
protected
Just an idea Juergen... could that be related to the fact that p is
one of those tags we allow to be unbalanced (doesn't need a closing
tag)?
Eelco
On 11/15/05, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Kulak wrote:
Here we go. Right now you'll get a RuntimeException. Change the ps to
divs
Although that shouldn't be a label as there is no body to replace.
Just a WebMarkupContainer, or in this case even better a WebComponent
suffices.
Eelco
On 11/15/05, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= James Yong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
= Johan Compagner jcompagner at gmail.com
If you
Sounds to me you are looking for something more special purpose :)
Why don't you create a panel factory or something similar? You could
make container components that would allow you to do a if/else like
construction in your markup, but I wouldn't be a big fan of that. I
think working with panels
all the modules you listed.
--sam
On 11/16/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, there's:
wicket-contrib-spring-examples
wicket-contrib-examples
wicket-contrib-examples-hibernate3
wicket-contrib-freemarker
wicket-contrib-fvalidate
wicket-contrib-gmap
wicket-contrib
It would be nice if this thread ended up with some recommendations on
how the (default) form processing itself might be enhanced in order to
support complex validation/ model updating.
Just a note to say that it's okay to send in patches that touch wicket-core :)
Eelco
How about the percentage it takes up in comparison of the total
computing for one request? Any other bottlenecks you can identify? Or
was - like Johan said - OGNL one of the biggest hurdles?
Eelco
On 11/17/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I took CompoundPropertyModel from 1.2 and
A lot of tbd :) I think if you want to compare, there's nothing that
beats taking a look at code. Wicket has e.g. a hangman example and a
component reference (part of wicket-examples); if you take a look at
that code, and maybe try something yourself, you should get a fairly
good idea.
Some of
Martijn and I are writing Wicket In Action currently. We're not using
the gradual examples thing like e.g. Tapestry In Action has because we
don't like it that much. Maybe Martijn more than me, but I thought
such a book-wide example is too far fetched to be useful. Personally,
I am much more
setting up a support
company for Wicket. I would need it for several things, giving
official Wicket support being one of them. If demand is large enough,
such a company can be fact in a few months from now.
Eelco
On 11/17/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn and I are writing Wicket
Yeah. It was a feature.
Eelco
On 11/18/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The password text field, when resetPassword=false, is always
re-rendered with the value of the model ...
On 11/18/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
When delving into the code, I found
Thanks, it's fixed.
Eelco
On 11/20/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
there's a bug in JRImageResource that the size of output image does not
reflets the zoom. (It's always the same - iamage than gets cropped).
I wanted to submit a bugreport and commit a patch but I can't even
I don't agree with wicket-contrib-data being obsolete. What happened
is that I created some basic Hibernate support classes last year, and
that other people commented that they didn't like them so much, and
wanted to add alternatives. From there it grew into the bunch a quasi
related classes it is
In case you have a small test project or something, I would be very
interested in taking a look at that and see if there's anything we
need to do to make Wicket behave better with sitemesh. There has been
more interest in it, so we might setup a small project for it too
(wicket-stuff).
Eelco
On
. That
is why in my previous email i asked for a concrete list of
features/requirements so that we can put something together that will please
most people, call it official, and put this issue to rest once and for all.
-Igor
On 11/20/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't agree
Thanks. Much better now. I implemented a couple of small changes on
top of it, please check out whether you agree (find the patch
attached).
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi.
There's a slight performace problem with JRResource, that it creates
JasperReport in it's constructor. I've 10
You could best take a look at the sign-in example of wicket-examples.
It has a custom session - which can be used to store information you
want to keep during the whole user session - and it has an example of
how to prevent access/ redirect to a login page for a non logged on
user.
Eelco
On
I think you can do stuff like that now, at least partially. I'm just
now starting to work on further improving this (or at least exploring
some ideas).
Eelco
On 11/22/05, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to create a URL that looks like:
What I'm - kind of offline - am working on right now is something that
at least partially acomplishes that. It's a big refactor (luckily as
we always made sure not to expose too much without breaking public
API's so far) and I'm combining it with other things like improved
state management and
: Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] DatePicker and opera
Does the original jscalendar work in Opera? If it does, the problem is
with the component, otherwise it is jscalendar.
Eelco
Because bookmarkable page links do not 'post back' to the server but
instead they refer to bookmarkable pages they can't be called as links
from WicketTester, right?
Eelco
On 11/23/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry, but I do not understand the question. What is the bug?
I kind of missed this discussion as I was working on the request cycle
handling refactoring. After a short offline discussion with Johan, I
took this as part of the refactoring too. The new way of handling
(still has to be discussed with the other devs after I'm further with
it, but I think it is
Also please note that we're in the middle of refactoring some of the
wicket internals, and the solution as currently implemented might
change a bit still (though hopefully only the internals). Hope to be
done with the larger part after this weekend.
Eelco
On 11/25/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL
Actually, instead of just looking at the name, continuations, you
should look at want you want to acchieve. And then the large thing
with continuations would be that you could do:
... init components ...
... render page ...
... getUserInput and do something with it ...
... processAndWait ...
Or you could make your models a lit more intelligent, making it
independent of the components. Both are good.
Eelco
On 11/26/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whoops, my method should be getInput not getValueSorry.
Should be:
public String getInput() {
String val =
See http://www.wicket-library.com/. At the bottom it says:
Thanks to Kattare
Many thanks to Kattare for sponsoring this site and for helping us get going.
Eelco
On 11/26/05, Jesse Sightler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just curious... where are the examples with attribution? I had never
noticed
The stack trace and error page should provide enough information to
figure that out. Can you find it and send it as a reply?
All logging in Wicket goes via commons logging usually using the class
name for loggers. Most people will probably use Log4J as the
implementation, which means you can turn
Hi all,
Who of you have plans of going to JavaPolis? Belgium beer is the best
beer of the world, and Antwerp is supposed to be a cool city. That
just asks for getting together with a couple of people and have a
couple of those yellow foamy ones!
If you're going, please send an email to this list
If you wan't to contribute, feel free to do so. :)
Erm... he doesn't have commit rights? :)
I think it is an open RFE to upgrade this js files, right?
Eelco
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
Maybe it's in a cache somewhere locally, or you build it without
issues maven clean first (which you should always do in order to have
a clean build).
To fix it: test with a SNAPSHOT first. If that works and you don't
want to make a new release (/and/ you didn't upload the version
anywhere yet,
Hi Frank,
I'm working alone, and
have a lot of freedom in the tools and frameworks I choose.
That's the best job :)
Wicket sounds like a good approach – said to be easier to learn and use than
JSP/Struts or JSF; and I could cannibalize the html generated by the ASP.NET
pages, insert Wicket
Thanks,
I guess you might as well get ready for some complaints :
- Not so good Spring integration
Why? Igor and a couple of others build some pretty decent Spring
support now? It's all in HEAD, and there has to be a proper build for
it made, but I think we now have Spring integration that
So when the FAQ asks, When will Wicket use Java 5? -- they're asking
about using Java 5 to develop the Wicket framework, not wicket
applications?
Yep. There are a couple of features that would be a great fit for
Wicket. For instance, we could have stronger typed models if we use
Javav 5's
, but it renders our component useless except if you
want to run everything from eclipse
Marco Ruud
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Maybe it's in a cache somewhere locally, or you build it without
issues maven clean first (which you should always do in order to have
a clean build).
To fix
Sure. Does the phone book example covers all the basic Spring support things?
Eelco
On 12/1/05, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm fine with it. I constantly send people to the phone book example,
so might as well make it the primary example.
Martijn
On 12/1/05, Igor Vaynberg
Indeed. Don't we want some example on your annotation stuff Igor?
Eelco
On 12/1/05, Eduardo Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phone book does not make use of wicket-contrib-spring.
2005/12/1, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sure. Does the phone book example covers all the basic Spring
Hi,
Who wrote http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Struts ?
I like it!
Eelco
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
The easiest way to test whether you wicket application behaves well
when serialized, turn on the debugging logging for WebSession, like:
log4j.logger.wicket.protocol.http.WebSession=DEBUG
Eelco
On 12/2/05, Marco van de Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It should be fixed in CVS version. though I
you should use requestcycle.setResponseTarget with ComponentRequestTarget
Eelco
On 12/2/05, Marco van de Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any concrete (simple) code example for rerendering a part of a
page? I tried myRequestCycle.request(myComponent), but all I got were
huge errors in
Hi, answers below
http://localhost:8081/quickstart/app?bookmarkablePage=com.theoryinpractice.testapp.pages.CommentsPage
Is there a way to get the app to resolve the above using something like:
http://localhost:8081/quickstart/app/page/Podcomments
or even
Not only considering... we build it in! :)
There's a couple of things we are working on yet, which are stated in
the TODO doc in the niceurl example package. By looking at the commit
log (Juergen did some fresh commits), these issues are getting closer
to being fixed too.
Eelco
On 12/3/05, Jeff
I haven't taken a look at the latest code yet
Well, please do that first before commenting :)
Eelco
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search
The logical place here would be your Application/ WebApplication
object. You could combine this with init parameters in web-xml and
reading them in the Application.init method. Or, in case you want to
use Spring, use Spring config to configure your Application
properties.
Eelco
On 12/4/05,
Yep. You can get the application from several places, like
Component.getApplication (and note that Pages are Components too) or
as a falltrhough, when in a request, you can always call
Application.get() (slightly less efficient though, as that is done by
threadlocal map lookup). And you have to
we already have 3 user lists and one admin list although i bet not that many
subscribed to our most recent announcements list.
announce has 34, wicket-user has 253 at this moment.
i think we have more then
enough lists already. if it was up to me we wouldnt even have wicket-stuff
lists as i
of
ajax. because the clicks do not change the browser's url the browser
never records them in the history - and how could it.
-Igor
On 12/5/05, *Eelco Hillenius* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dojo makes backbutton support possible, but probably
I don't know. What is the main problem you are having (hard coding
url's probably), and do you have an idea of how support should look
like? For instance, would it (ssl/ normal) be something you could
configure your page maps with?
Any other people been doing this? How do competing frameworks
of security settings.
Eelco
On 12/5/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The wicket:head tag exists for a different reason. You can use it when
you create custom components, such as the datapicker, that use css/
javascript to function. You want to reuse these components on your
pages
701 - 800 of 3028 matches
Mail list logo
