Hi Anshi,
I suspect you are too early. There are people in Wikieducator who are trying
to work towards offering services such as what you request, and for a wide
range of subject areas.. but as far as I know there is not anyone yet ready
for your specific request.
I'd suggest doing a few
was at CNIE earlier this week and participated on this panel
discussinghttp://www.athabascau.ca/CNIE-RCIE/sess/pres_en.php?presentation_id=145open
educational resources (OERs). Educators are periodically afflicted with a
psychological condition called Cute Kitten Syndrome. This syndrome
manifests
it is very late in China , but before I go to bed ,wake up forgot what I
wanted to say to George Simens's Post :
1 I think it is totally or partly waste of time to translate the whole
course of MIT especially what Taiwan is doing now , too radical , let me
finish , they even translate the name
I am working on a project at WE and I want to create a print version
of project. What I'm wondering is how to best display the links on the
WE side, so the transition to print is the smoothest possible. Any
thoughts?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
Hi everyone,
Over the past few days a few WikiEducators have started talking about
quality assurance and review processes. A QA and review page has been
set up in the WIkiEducator namespace:
http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Quality_Assurance_and_Review
The purpose
The purpose of this
Hi Declan -- in text below ...
On May 5, 6:41 pm, Declan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter,
I took a quick look at some of the maturity model pages you linked
to. The approach looks interesting and I agree that framing some
goals in the context of a rubric could have some advantages. I use a
Hi Leo,
OCW is an impressive project by virtue of MITs involvement. They were
certainly a landmark project in the global OER landscape. However, I'm
not a great fan of many of the OCW initiatives for the following
reasons:
* Most OCW projects, including MIT use the NC restriction in their
Hi Peter,
Thanks for starting this thread --- these are tough and challenging
questions.
I think we need to think about whose temperature we're measuring
smile. Is it the content or is it the community. So when we're
talking about the health of the WE OER community -- this is something
Hi Seth,
For the benefit of the list, our current implementation of wiki ==
print enables us to specify print specific templates.
Therefore {{Template:Foo}} will render normally on WE, however
{{Template:Foo_print}} can be used to specify print specific
rendering. So if you want to remove
Wayne,
I believe we are trying to push into new ground. That of measuring the
quality of wiki based OER. And I like that Leo agreed, reuse and
recontextualization is most important.
I also believe that the only people who can measure the health of a
Grade 7 geography lesson for Pakistan are the
Thank you Peter , you are amazing ! I am reading what you and Wayne wrote
very carefully and really learning a lot from both of you .I am not sure if
I understand the animal analogy , I would like to give my 2 cents to this on
the quality or healthy wiki resources .
1 What is the purpose of the
Hi Peter and Leo
Good discussion -- although I think we may be talking cross purposes
here? That is saying the same thing from different perspectives.
I think the extent that content is reused and recontextualised is an
excellent of the health of our community.
You're right -- the measure of
Hi Leo,
These are good examples of the kinds of processes that should be
incorporated into our evolving capability maturity model for WE. These
are the key processes that will help us in building the quality we
are striving for.
I think that the challenge we are going to face is related to the
13 matches
Mail list logo
