On 06/27/2014 01:51 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
wrote:
My favourite toy to this purpose is Kiwix:
* download a recent file for your favourite wiki at
http://download.kiwix.org/zim/wikipedia/ ,
* download Kiwix to open it http://download.kiwi
As someone who worked with Rod for the last four years on the Wikipedia
Education Program, I wanted to take this opportunity to thank him for all
the strategic work, problem solving, training development, and budget
wrangling he’s done behind the scenes that have made the Wikipedia
Education Progra
Of course, happy to hear from you as always, Pine.
On Jun 27, 2014 12:39 PM, "Pine W" wrote:
> Thanks for the update, Anasuya.
>
> As you have probably heard, I'm currently working on an article for the
> Signpost about the education program, and I might have a few questions for
> you off-list s
Thanks for the update, Anasuya.
As you have probably heard, I'm currently working on an article for the
Signpost about the education program, and I might have a few questions for
you off-list sometime in the next several days or next week.
Pine
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Anasuya Sengupta
Dear friends and colleagues,
Rod Dunican (currently the Director, Wikipedia Education Program at WMF)
has announced that he is leaving the Foundation at the end of this month.
We are truly sorry to see him go; he has been such a critical part of the
Wikipedia Education Program and strategy for man
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
wrote:
> My favourite toy to this purpose is Kiwix:
> * download a recent file for your favourite wiki at
> http://download.kiwix.org/zim/wikipedia/ ,
> * download Kiwix to open it http://download.kiwix.org/nightly/bin/latest/ ,
> * start press
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Pete Forsyth
wrote:
> What I *did* want, and am still waiting for, is some explanation from Erik
> Möller, the WMF's Deputy Director, about his inflammatory claim that the
> Wikimedia Commons community may be turning into a "CLUB OF ZEALOTS"
> (emphasis mine).
>
I'm delighted to see a document that is clear enough to encourage useful
comments from non-techies (on some parts of it)
I have 5, at increasing levels of specificity
1) At least in the US, the need for increasing contributions by
underrepresented groups is not limited to women. Various ethnic g
Several people have replied to my latest message. I'd like to reiterate - I
thought I was clear, but just to be certain:
I have never claimed that all discussion on Commons is perfect, or that
incivility or poor decisions never occur there.
I did not intend to open this discussion as a free-for-a
Correction - the first line should read "available and searchable across
WMF projects." Apologies for double posting.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nathan wrote:
> The issue is *about* Commons but doesn't only affect Commons,
> particularly the discussion around alternative methods of makin
The issue is *about* Commons but doesn't only affect Commons, particularly
the discussion around alternative methods of making not-purely-free files
available and searchable across Commons. As you can see from the growing
discontent with Commons, this URAA issue is not the only problem. It's
merely
@Nathan
You said "so if you want to argue that such users should be positively
identified, then please make some practical suggestions (which you have
conspicuously avoided doing so far). How should identities be confirmed? In
what circumstances should the ID information be disclosed, and to wh
Anyone with even a passing familiarity with the notice boards on Commons, or
who is subscribed to this mailing list, will be aware of a huge, wide-ranging
and unfocused set of disputes and ill-natured arguments that have been raging
for several months. The disputes are becoming more and more int
Hi again Luis,
Thank you for commenting my open letter to Lila. I guess if I send an open
letter I should expect open responses, however I surely hope Lila will speak on
the matter, "yea," "nay," or "not of concern to me," as I asked.
Yes, I recall your previous response to my previous email (w
Trillium,
Let's be clear about a few things. The only data that checkusers get is a
subset of the data that the WMF webservers (and all other webservers
throughout the Internet) collect on all visitors. This is data that is
voluntarily disclosed by readers (although they may not all be aware of
it
>
> MMORPG players
:-(
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
United
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Peter Southwood <
peter.southw...@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> Indeed, and as there is a notice on the Wikilegal article stating that it
> is not legal advice, it can and will be ignored by those who think they
> know better.
> Cheers,
> Peter
That message on their eve
Indeed, and as there is a notice on the Wikilegal article stating that it is
not legal advice, it can and will be ignored by those who think they know
better.
Cheers,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org]
> Well, just yesterday I saw a (good but slightly amateurish-looking) image
> that is to be deleted because the metadata embedded in the /other/ images
> of the uploader indicates multiple cameras were used. Clearly, no one has
> more than one camera, so it must be a copyright violation. (would pos
Aren't you mixing things a little bit ?
Nobody denies that there are problems with video support, Search engine and
image display. But this is not (completely) the responsability of the
Commons community. The software is provided by the foundation, and we deal
with what they give us. If you want t
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Pete Forsyth wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
>
> > than aggressively purging content in the fear that a single byte of
> > potentially non-free content may infect the repository.
> >
>
> You're attacking a straw man. I hope you do n
Minutes and slides from Monday's quarterly review of the Foundation's
Analytics team are now available at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Metrics_and_activities_meetings/Quarterly_reviews/Analytics/June_2014
.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> to increase accoun
Erik Moeller, 27/06/2014 03:55:
As an update on the goals process for WMF engineering, we've begun
fleshing out out the top priorities for the first quarter.
This has already been an interesting and useful exercise, I feel. Those
are indeed goals which need help from everyone who can. Which br
Pete Forsyth wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
>>than aggressively purging content in the fear that a single byte of
>> potentially non-free content may infect the repository.
>
>You're attacking a straw man. I hope you do not sincerely believe anybody
>acts out of such
Hi,
2014-06-27 5:57 GMT+05:30 Pete Forsyth :
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
>
>> than aggressively purging content in the fear that a single byte of
>> potentially non-free content may infect the repository.
>>
>
> You're attacking a straw man. I hope you do not sincerely
25 matches
Mail list logo