On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Bence Damokos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Jan-bart de Vreede > wrote:
>
>> Hey
>>
>> So someone sent me the internal-l mail and I do think that the "zero
>> real-world" thing is taken out of context here. But a few points
>>
>> 3) I am sure t
On 14/09/12 18:08, Jan-bart de Vreede wrote:
4) Doesn't every survey contain questions that don't apply to the whole
responding audience?
No, because the answer would not be terribly useful. In all surveys I
have seen in my work life [statistics work -- I don't design much
surveys myself, b
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Jan-bart de Vreede wrote:
> Hey
>
> So someone sent me the internal-l mail and I do think that the "zero
> real-world" thing is taken out of context here. But a few points
>
> 1) Lets not have these discussions on internal-l, there is no reason to
> not have
Hey
So someone sent me the internal-l mail and I do think that the "zero
real-world" thing is taken out of context here. But a few points
1) Lets not have these discussions on internal-l, there is no reason to not
have those in public
2) See 1)
3) I am sure that the data set allows us to see ch
On 9/12/12 4:14 PM, Jan-Bart de Vreede wrote:
Hey
So I might have missed some mails on this thread (perhaps because they were not
posted on this public list) but I highly doubt that Sue perform surveys that do
not have a real-world impact on our operations. I know that the results of the
pr
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:57 AM, charles andrès wrote:
> Because we all agree that there is now such thing like a zero real-world
> impact survey, we really hope that the raw results of this survey will be
> made as public as possible (privacy issue), and that in the future , survey
> including
Dear Jan-Bart,
Unfortunately the exact wordings was "I'll point out also that there are zero
real-world implications for the survey results".
Because we all agree that there is now such thing like a zero real-world impact
survey, we really hope that the raw results of this survey will be made as
Hey
So I might have missed some mails on this thread (perhaps because they were not
posted on this public list) but I highly doubt that Sue perform surveys that do
not have a real-world impact on our operations. I know that the results of the
previous surveys were used in several discussions (i
Hello Tilman,
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Tilman Bayer wrote:
> Hi Delphine,
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Delphine Ménard wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Tilman Bayer wrote:
> ...
>>>
>>> Still, I was aware that there had been some objections to that
>>> question by chap
Great, THANKYOU for finally moving on this.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 10:24:39 -0700
> From: Tilman Bayer
> To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Upcoming Survey, Feedback requested, and
> Office Hour
> Message-ID:
>
Hi Delphine,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Delphine Ménard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Tilman Bayer wrote:
...
>>
>> Still, I was aware that there had been some objections to that
>> question by chapter representatives (which I don't assume have to do
>> with the fact that respo
Le 22 août 2012 à 13:11, Cristian Consonni a écrit :
> 2012/8/21 Delphine Ménard :
>> If, however, we're going to mix editor's experience and satisfaction
>> about Wikimedia, I am cruelly missing any kind of feedback question
>> about the work of the chapters and/or other organisations or grou
2012/8/21 Delphine Ménard :
> If, however, we're going to mix editor's experience and satisfaction
> about Wikimedia, I am cruelly missing any kind of feedback question
> about the work of the chapters and/or other organisations or groups in
> the Wikimedia Universe that would give people the right
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Tilman Bayer wrote:
> I'm not sure she actually said that. In any case, it is wrong -
> question D6 in the last survey asked if there was a Wikimedia chapter
> in the country where the respondent lived
> (https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:December_2
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Delphine Ménard wrote:
> Hi, sorry to fish out a very old message, but since the survey is
> about to go live, I would like to share some concerns I have about it.
> Unfortunately, I was on holidays as this announcement came out, so
> couldn't do it earlier.
>
> I
Hi, sorry to fish out a very old message, but since the survey is
about to go live, I would like to share some concerns I have about it.
Unfortunately, I was on holidays as this announcement came out, so
couldn't do it earlier.
I find the idea of an editor's survey to be extremely important, since
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Christine Moellenberndt <
christine...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *Hi everyone,
>
> It's been a bit since I last emailed this list (or any list, for that
> matter!)... you may remember me, I worked at the Foundation last year in
> the Community Department, working with P
17 matches
Mail list logo