term of taking decision.
13. Proactive
Olaniyan Olushola
Team Lead, WUGN
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Comet styles
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 3:55 AM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Reply To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] What kind of ED would
Olaniyan Olushola
> Team Lead, WUGN
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
> Original Message
> From: Comet styles
> Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 3:55 AM
> To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> Reply To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] What kind of ED would you li
of taking decision.
13. Proactive
Olaniyan Olushola
Team Lead, WUGN
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Comet styles
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 3:55 AM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Reply To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] What kind of ED would
Balázs Viczián, regarding "First as interim (as a 'probation period') then
if the staff feedback meets the pre-agreed satisfaction level on agreed key
areas, as permanent."
Well, staff feedback and after independent, critical assessment from each
board member. Earlier in this thread, I think, Pete
term of taking decision.
13. Proactive
Olaniyan Olushola
Team Lead, WUGN
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Comet styles
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 3:55 AM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Reply To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] What kind of ED
Hi all,
reading all the above, my 2 cents would be: Internal promotion (in a
broader sense: a current or ex-employee or someone 'close and experienced
enough').
First as interim (as a 'probation period') then if the staff feedback meets
the pre-agreed satisfaction level on agreed key areas, as pe
On the Vision thing -
There is a leadership vision, and an organizational/movement vision.
The leader should articulate theirs. The organizational one needs to come from
everyone but would likely be articulated by the ED after that process.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb
What kind of ED would you like to see?
* Someone who knows how the wiki works or atleast has basic knowledge
on how to "edit" wikis.
* Someone who wants to work on "building" the encyclopaedia, not the
bureaucratic side which our last ED was more focused on.
* Someone willing to work on improvin
On 26 February 2016 at 16:57, Leigh Thelmadatter
wrote:
> Should only the staff have a say in this vision? Almost all, if not all,
> of this talk is about what the staff wants.
>
You are correct that non-staff should have a say in the vision, of course.
It affects everyone in the movement, as w
> Greg, agree 100%, but that's not how I understood the question and the
> results of the staff survey. It seemed the staff expected the vision from
> the ED/Management.
I think you're misinterpreting.
The agree/disagree statement was:
"Senior leadership at Wikimedia have communicated a vision t
Should only the staff have a say in this vision? Almost all, if not all, of
this talk is about what the staff wants.
> From: yastrak...@wikimedia.org
> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 03:45:28 +0300
> To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] What kind of ED would
Greg, agree 100%, but that's not how I understood the question and the
results of the staff survey. It seemed the staff expected the vision from
the ED/Management.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Greg Grossmeier wrote:
>
> > Subbu, one of the chief complains I heard about Lila was that she did
> Subbu, one of the chief complains I heard about Lila was that she did not
> provide a clear vision. Yet, if we choose stewardship over leadership,
> that, at least in my mind, implies more of a mediator than a leader,
> without providing any clear vision themselves. So is vision no longer a
> r
Subbu, one of the chief complains I heard about Lila was that she did not
provide a clear vision. Yet, if we choose stewardship over leadership,
that, at least in my mind, implies more of a mediator than a leader,
without providing any clear vision themselves. So is vision no longer a
requirement
On 02/26/2016 05:39 PM, Lodewijk wrote:
I would suggest you discuss what kind of qualities you seek in an ED,
Having more of an attitude stewardship over leadership .. i.e. this is
not a place or space to primarily fulfil personal ambitions.
Subbu.
__
On 2016-02-26 6:39 PM, Lodewijk wrote:
I would suggest you discuss what kind of qualities you seek in an ED, what
kind of person you would be looking for - rather than specific people.
Above all, and foremost amongst any quality an ED should have is to be
an *excellent* communicator. I see th
16 matches
Mail list logo