Although I don't know the cause of Tony's problems, when I tried to get an
automated email sent from the listserver just now, Gmail automatically
transferred them into the social category so that they weren't visible,
which initially led me to assume that they weren't making it through. Some
email
Yeah, Hanlon's razor perhaps should be remembered here! :-) Not that I
mean to imply any incompetence on the part of the list administrators,
but I do imagine that it's more likely that someone's made a mistake
here and is not being actively mean.
And Toby, I do recall reading an email from
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Sam Wilson s...@samwilson.id.au wrote:
Yeah, Hanlon's razor perhaps should be remembered here! :-) Not that I mean
to imply any incompetence on the part of the list administrators, but I do
imagine that it's more likely that someone's made a mistake here and is
Hi all,
Just to confirm, this was a deliberate removal and not a technical error.
Two brief points here:
1. This was not a unilateral action that I took - it was a discussion that
the committee had in its January meeting, and decided on as a whole, in
addition to being a decision that was
On 16 March 2014 17:50, Steven Zhang steven.zh...@wikimedia.org.au wrote:
2. … but actively disrupting the list is against both the rules and spirit
of the list, and always has been. …
[Citation Needed], I see no rules
http://www.wikimedia.org.au//wiki/Mailing_list or
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mailing_lists
Please respect
Wikiquettehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Etiquetteand avoid
personal attackshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_personal_attackson
the mailing lists, especially in the subject header as this is likely
to
be
On 16 March 2014 19:18, wikimediaau-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
John, given that you were not involved in this and you have integrity,
would you care to undo what Steven and Charles done to Tony.
Cheers
Scotty
I trust that John has the good sense not to do the mailing list
On 16 March 2014 15:45, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
So I would suggest for the future (1) when kicking someone, say so and
why (unless there's a really good reason not to) (2) have a mix of
list admins.
I'll note also we have occasionally put people on moderation when
they're
Warning, Russavia: you are coming perilously close to being sued. Keep
repeating your behaviour and I'll have no choice to be file a case. If
the list administrators are prepared to accuse me without basis of
making personal attacks while letting other members personally attack
me, they will
Craig,
Can you possibly explain how John doing the RIGHT thing would be a wheel
war.
If we were to apply on-wiki rules here, John undoing Steven's action would
be normal practice. If Zhang were to come along and undo John's action,
then this would be wheel warring.
The exception to this is if
On 16 March 2014 16:25, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you possibly explain how John doing the RIGHT thing would be a wheel
war.
Personally I'd kick you both off and say so, but that's just speaking
as a third-party observer.
It's not a *right* to post to a Wikimedia list.
Tony and everybody else. I have had enough. I do not want to remain a
member of a volunteer organisation where this kind of drama goes on. I
will not renew. I am an officer of two other incorporated associations
and in the past have been an officer or committee member of several
more. There is
What a total load of self-serving bullshit.
* Tony - if you bleat and whine and attack, these things happen. What is
the surprise? Such is life. Grow up.
* Scotty - really, find a bitch fight and join in. Grow up.
* Steven - poor list administration. Make a decision and tell them. Grow
up.
*
Has anyone in Australia ever been sued for calling someone else something
hurtful? If this is possible, imagine how much money politicians celebs
could make.
Terms like twit are really best avoided, but that's not for legal reasons,
AFAIK.
I found this thread by accident - I filter this list
I think banning someone is ridiculous. John Vandenberg is a very competent
administrator and former President, and has done an extremely good job. I think
we should take notice of what he says.
Tony has something to say on the list, and is entitled to be heard. I believe
him to have the
Hey all,
I have been quite active in recent months in getting photos on Flickr
relicenced, and have been quite successful in this. Aside from individual
photographers, some of the organisations which have relicenced their photos
after my request include Maersk Line, Austrian Airlines, Bahrain
Now that's a pretty damn cool release!
Just looking through the flickr stream I can see some pics that we will
have no use for (staff Halloween party, anyone?) but a *whole bunch* that
we can - individual airframes, maintenance work underway, plane interiors
(inc. the cockpit) and fittings, ground
Indeed, this is a great achievement :) I look forward to seeing how it
improves our aviation articles on Wikipedia.
Steve
On 17/03/2014 2:03 pm, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that's a pretty damn cool release!
Just looking through the flickr stream I can see some pics that we will
18 matches
Mail list logo
