> *If* the Foundation went crazy and decided to sell chocolate to make
> lots of money out of it instead of working on open content, this
> sentence does *not* tie Wikimedia CH to the Foundation's craziness.
>
>
It could be interesting. We can "share" (surely) in this situation the
same goals
Just to say: I entirely agree with Delphine's comments here and I have
also quickly done the changes in the german version (can still be
amended). I don't want to override anybody's questions but I think we
can somehow close the discussion here as Delphine assured us that we
would not need to overt
On 4/5/06, Frederic Schutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ilario Valdelli wrote:
>
> > The Bylaws should be not ambiguous. I suggest to define better the
> > word "share" in point 2.2 adding another sentence more careful.
>
> I am not against a clarification. We could indicate that the Wikimedia
> CH
Ilario Valdelli wrote:
> The Bylaws should be not ambiguous. I suggest to define better the
> word "share" in point 2.2 adding another sentence more careful.
I am not against a clarification. We could indicate that the Wikimedia
CH "shares the objectives of WMF, as they are defined at the time of
>
> The goals of Wikimedia CH are indicated at §2.1 -- these are the
> official goals, as defined by the bylaws. §2.3 is here to indicate that
> there is some kind of link with the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF), which is
> obviously required since we share their name, but it does not
> influence by
The questions of Jürg are correct. The text is changed like this:
"The Association shares the objectives of the Wikimedia Foundation,
Inc., a not-for-profit organisation based in Florida, USA."
before it was:
"The Association shall take the responsiblities of a section (Local
Chapter) of the Wik
I've modified the italian translation. In any case I'm reading the
questions made by Jürg: these are also my questions.
Ilario
On 4/5/06, Frederic Schutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Delphine Ménard wrote:
>
> > I think all is resolved. Thank you for translating the part that we
> > changed [1] i
Jürg Wolf wrote:
> * While Wikimedia CH _SHARES_ the objectives of the Wikimedia Foundation
> _FULLY_
> (not only in parts), do we have the right to discuss and form these objectives
> actively or do we have to take whatever the Foundation decides, including a
> total change of goals and as a ext
Hi
Just some questions about something, that maybe is discussed before, while
defining this section:
* While Wikimedia CH _SHARES_ the objectives of the Wikimedia Foundation _FULLY_
(not only in parts), do we have the right to discuss and form these objectives
actively or do we have to take whate
Delphine Ménard wrote:
> I think all is resolved. Thank you for translating the part that we
> changed [1] into the other languages so that it is repercuted in the
> official translations of the bylaws.
I have updated the English version of the bylaws already.
> Please inform us when this is don
On 4/3/06, Michael Bimmler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to inform you:
> There is at the moment quite some talking going on at
> http://ch.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bylaws/En about bylaws (reaction
> from ChapCom and the Legal Counsel of WMF)
I think all is resolved. Thank you for translating
11 matches
Mail list logo
