Excellent news!
Theresa
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Gordon Joly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 22:17 + 9/12/08, Gordon Joly wrote:
>>IWF backs down on Wiki censorship
>>
>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7774102.stm
>
> http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/IWF_reverses_censorship_of_Wikipe
At 22:17 + 9/12/08, Gordon Joly wrote:
>IWF backs down on Wiki censorship
>
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7774102.stm
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/IWF_reverses_censorship_of_Wikipedia?curid=117966
--
"Think Feynman"/
http://pobox.com/~gordo/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]///
IWF backs down on Wiki censorship
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7774102.stm
--
"Think Feynman"/
http://pobox.com/~gordo/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]///
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK
h
2008/12/8 Alison Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, December 8, 2008 18:35, jonathan cardy wrote:
>> Amazon don't seem to have the image up - I've just searched for scorpion
>> killers and got half a dozen hits, a couple with a photo of the band and
>> the rest with "no image available".
>
> Th
On Mon, December 8, 2008 18:35, jonathan cardy wrote:
> Amazon don't seem to have the image up - I've just searched for scorpion
> killers and got half a dozen hits, a couple with a photo of the band and
> the rest with "no image available".
They deleted the three 'user supplied' copies around hal
rds
Jonathan Cardy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- On Mon, 8/12/08, joseph seddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: joseph seddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] UK censorship: I'm on BBC Radio 4 Today show
> tomorrow 8:20am
> To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] UK censorship:
I'm on BBC Radio 4 Today show tomorrow 8:20am> > > You are, of course, right.>
> That doesn't change, however, that this image is not illegal to view, it's>
> You are, of course, right.
> That doesn't change, however, that this image is not illegal to view, it's
> merely in a greyer legal area of "might be illegal". Which does nothing to
> change the IWF's shameful overreach in blocking the article as well as the
> image — and in doing such a cack-hand
2008/12/8 Thomas Dalton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > As no jury has, to my knowledge, ever determined that this image meets
> that
> > test, then the image does not qualify as indecent under English law. At
> > elast until some jury decides to the contrary.
>
> No, that doesn't work. If it only becom
2008/12/8 Owen Blacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The legal definition of indecent, in this context, under English law,
> appears to be "anything which and ordinary decent man or woman would find to
> be shocking, disgusting, or revolting" (Knuller vs DPP, 1973).
That sounds about right.
> As no jury
The legal definition of indecent, in this context, under English law,
appears to be "anything which and ordinary decent man or woman would find to
be shocking, disgusting, or revolting" (Knuller vs DPP, 1973).
As no jury has, to my knowledge, ever determined that this image meets that
test, then th
> I think a better analogy would be paintings in galleries which depict under
> 18s, many of which could be considered "Images depicting erotic posing with
> no sexual activity". I am thinking of some of the paintings of Caravaggio,
> almost any depiction of Ganymede etc.
An under 18 naked in an e
2008/12/8 Thomas Dalton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 2008/12/7 David Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > It's now mainstream. IWF representative to be present. I look forward
> > to dropping in the line "Wikipedia smells of hammers." ([[Brass Eye]])
>
> I particularly liked the line "We're an educational cha
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> It would be super-fantastic if someone could confirm that you can just
> walk into a record store in the UK and buy it. There are stores here
> that have it, I'm tempted to go get a picture of myself holding... and
> start a campaign of other folks doing that.
I'm not sure
2008/12/7 David Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It's now mainstream. IWF representative to be present. I look forward
> to dropping in the line "Wikipedia smells of hammers." ([[Brass Eye]])
I particularly liked the line "We're an educational charity." - I
think it was good that you that in, I sugge
excellent - well done David, please let us know how it goes.
On Dec 7, 5:31 pm, "David Gerard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's now mainstream. IWF representative to be present. I look forward
> to dropping in the line "Wikipedia smells of hammers." ([[Brass Eye]])
>
> - d.
>
> __
16 matches
Mail list logo
