, 2010 6:57 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
I just upgraded my units to 5.2.1. In the GUI the passthrough checkbox is
unchecked even though it's passing through. I checked the box, applied, and
it's still unchecked but passing th
ed with it after I took it down. Did a hard reset
>>> then. PoE is always on no matter what the checkbox says.
>>> Before reset, PoE did not work no matter which port power was put into.
>>>
>>> Downgraded, upgraded, just can't turn that sucker off. May
0 AM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
Two quick points, I have seen something like this due to browser.what
browser are u usingdid you try a different browser.
Also, 5.2.1 full has been released...try that
Yeah, I've seen funny browser stuff too, so I tried all three below.
Browsers: Safari 5.0.2, Firefox 3.6.10, Chrome 6.0.427.63. (all under Mac OS X)
I have Win XP and 7 so I could try IE if you think that would help. I kind of
doubt it after already trying 3.
I'll try 5.2.1. Thanks!
Greg
On S
gt; then. PoE is always on no matter what the checkbox says.
>> Before reset, PoE did not work no matter which port power was put into.
>>
>> Downgraded, upgraded, just can't turn that sucker off. Maybe I need to show
>> it a picture of my first wife...
t; Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 12:36 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
>
> I had some trouble with an NS5M running 5.2.1 RC2.
>
> Short version:
>
> I had some weirdness tonight. I was looking at netwo
tember 26, 2010 12:36 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
>
> I had some trouble with an NS5M running 5.2.1 RC2.
>
> Short version:
>
> I had some weirdness tonight. I was looking at network traffic with
> Wi
Yep. Secondary port.. Bullshit.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 12:36 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout
-Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Philip Dorr
> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 9:38 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
>
> input power in th
GARP!
I see we have a reader here...
Oldie but a goodie.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 1:53 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout
gt;
>>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Robert West
>>> wrote:
>>>> Eh? Â What ya mean???
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
>>>> [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
oun...@wispa.org]
> On Behalf Of Philip Dorr
> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:14 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
>
> It works perfectly fine if you power through the secondary port.
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at
Not according to Garp!
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Philip Dorr
wrote:
> It works perfectly fine if you power through the secondary port.
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:05 PM, RickG wrote:
> > I was skeptical of the poe passthrough sicne I first saw it and this is
> why.
> > On repeaters, it
010 at 8:39 PM, Robert West
>>> wrote:
>>>> Eh? Â What ya mean???
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>>>> Behalf Of Philip Dorr
&g
Ah! I'll give that a shot.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Philip Dorr
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 9:38 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Bu
to power
>>> the second radio
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Robert West
>>> wrote:
>>>> Eh? � What ya mean???
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: wireless-boun...@wis
What ya mean???
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>>>> Behalf Of Philip Dorr
>>>> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:14 PM
>>&g
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Philip Dorr
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
It works perfectly fine if you power through the secondary port.
On Fri, Sep
>>> Eh? Â What ya mean???
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Philip Dorr
>>> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:14 PM
>>> To: WISPA Gen
r
>> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:14 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
>>
>> It works perfectly fine if you power through the secondary port.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:05 PM, RickG wrote:
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:14 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
>>
>> It works perfectly fine if you power through the secondary port.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:05 PM, RickG wr
pa.org] On
> Behalf Of Philip Dorr
> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:14 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
>
> It works perfectly fine if you power through the secondary port.
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Ri
Eh? What ya mean???
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Philip Dorr
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
It works perfectly
Been there. But mine finally died and the hard reset is now no more.
Sucks.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:13 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary
It works perfectly fine if you power through the secondary port.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:05 PM, RickG wrote:
> I was skeptical of the poe passthrough sicne I first saw it and this is why.
> On repeaters, it would be so tempting to just run one wire but I've stuck
> with two. It will be interest
I have a NS5M (back haul) which is passing through power and data to a BulletM2
as AP and I recently had some strangeness - I changed settings in the NS5M and
power to the BulletM2 would start cycling. The BulletM2 is my access to the
NS5M so I couldn't get in that way. I also couldn't browse in
I was skeptical of the poe passthrough sicne I first saw it and this is why.
On repeaters, it would be so tempting to just run one wire but I've stuck
with two. It will be interesting to see if it gets fixed. Thanks for
sharing!
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Robert West wrote:
> Today I finall
Today I finally figured out an Issue I've been having with a NanoStation5M.
I have a customer who wanted service, was in trees but had a hot signal
out at the road. Dug a 4 foot hole, put in 2 10 foot sections of rigid
conduit and 5 bags of concrete. Ran an underground line of Cat5e, double
shi
28 matches
Mail list logo
