ing.
THAT claim, I believe, is reprehensible.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Ireton
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 1:19 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] A wisp who went a little too far...
The really interesting pa
Just as clarification, I am not at all giving pass to this guy's
actions or anyone who intentionally or knowingly disrupts any service
of any kind.
I certainly hope though that I'm not going to be held liable if
someone comes suing me because literally their life depending on the
delivery of an e
This has more to do with malicious behavior than whether unlicensed has
protections. I have argued with others over the years that if you
intentionally do harm then you are liable even if that intentional
behavior to cause harm is with unlicensed frequencies. Looks like that
hypothesis holds tr
fred wrote:
Why in the world, I want to know, are organ availability notifications
going out via email???!!! Seriously. How fun will it be when they
start serving subpeonas and such that way - What I never got that
email??
I don't think subpoenas will get there for a while (if ever), because
t
George Rogato wrote:
According to the government, Fisher admitted he used an administrative
password to break into SBT's network on Feb. 28, 2005. Once in the
network, he plant malicious code that directed the radio tower computer
to cut off Wi-Fi service to the company's users.
Remember, be
Why in the world, I want to know, are organ availability notifications
going out via email???!!! Seriously. How fun will it be when they
start serving subpeonas and such that way - What I never got that
email??
~fred
On 12/16/06, Mike Ireton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The really interesting pa
The really interesting part of this:
The attack cut off service for one woman who was waiting for an e-mail
notifying her about the availability of an organ transplant that she
required, according to prosecutors. Because of her critical status, her
provider gave her priority status and res
I don't even know where to start.
I understand the malicious part - employee gone bad, fine. Punish him. But
2 years ? and 3 yrs after ?
This is unlicensed stuff, can we really claim business interruption !? I
would've hoped I had a defense attorney that could say "Hey, they have to
accept AL